Morgan Stanley shares fall despite earnings beat, as investment banking revenue shrinks
Stock markets swung sharply during the quarter after U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs against major economies. This spurred volatility and trading volume, as investors repositioned their portfolios and hedged risks. But markets recovered late in the quarter and improved the outlook for business.
Morgan Stanley shares opened down 3%, but accelerated the decline to almost 4% after a report about Trump potentially taking action to fire Fed chairman Jerome Powell.
"The second quarter unfolded with two distinct halves. The first half began with uncertainty and market volatility associated with the U.S. trade policy, and the second half ended with increasing engagement and a steady rebound in capital markets," CEO Ted Pick told analysts on a conference call.
Traders brought in a big windfall and institutional securities, which houses Morgan Stanley's Wall Street operations, posted revenue of $7.6 billion, compared with $7 billion a year ago.
Investment banking at Morgan Stanley did not recover as quickly as it did for rivals such as Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase. The other lenders also reported trading windfalls in the second quarter.
Morgan Stanley's revenue fell 5%, and fewer completed M&A transactions weighed on its advisory revenue. But executives were more optimistic about the outlook for M&A and IPOs.
"We are optimistic about the capital markets rebound," Chief Financial Officer Sharon Yeshaya told Reuters in an interview. "Companies are looking past tariffs for strategic movements and growth," she said, adding that discussions about mergers and divestitures are active again.
Morgan Stanley's equity underwriting surged 42% to $500 million, driven by higher follow-on and convertible deals as well as IPOs. It was the lead underwriter of fintech giant Chime's June IPO and also led IPOs for Hinge Health, and marketing tech firm MNTN in May. Other prominent deals in the quarter were financing for Elon Musk's xAI and advisory on the sale of Silvus Technologies to Motorola.
Overall, the bank beat forecasts with a net income of $3.5 billion, or $2.13 per share in the quarter, above the estimates compiled by LSEG of an average $1.96 per share.
After reducing headcount by 2,000 employees in the first quarter, Morgan Stanley is not discussing more job cuts.
CLIENT ASSETS REACH $8 TRILLION
Total client assets across wealth and investment management reached $8.2 trillion, approaching a longstanding goal of $10 trillion in assets managed set by former CEO James Gorman.
Attracting net new assets is critical for wealth and investment management, as it drives fee-based revenue and supports long-term growth in assets under management.
Wealth management revenue increased to $7.8 billion in the second quarter from $6.8 billion a year earlier, by adding new assets and collecting more fees.
M&A FOCUS
Analysts quizzed the CEO about possible acquisitions that Morgan Stanley could do, particularly as a potential reduction in capital requirements frees up money to pursue deals.
"There are inorganic opportunities that come by along the transom and we are looking at them, of course, but the bar is super high," Pick said.
Deals could involve "tuck-ins," or acquisitions of small companies that add to the bank's core strategy.
Pick took the helm in January 2024 succeeding Gorman, who bought brokerage E-Trade and asset manager Eaton Vance, transforming Morgan Stanley's business model and turning profits more predictably.
The bank also said it is considering potential uses of stablecoins for its clients, but it was too early to tell how the business would take shape, Yeshaya told analysts. (Reporting by Manya Saini in Bengaluru and Tatiana Bautzer in New York; Editing by Lananh Nguyen, Sriraj Kalluvila, Mark Porter and Daniel Wallis)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Markets' trade deal euphoria ignores tariff reality: McGeever
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) ORLANDO, Florida - The optimism sweeping world stock markets following news of emerging and expected U.S. trade deals is undeniable and understandable. But it is also puzzling. The S&P 500, Britain's FTSE 100 and the MSCI All Country index have powered to new highs this week, and other global benchmarks are not far behind. Analysts at Goldman Sachs and other big banks have recently been raising their year-end S&P 500 forecasts by as much as 10%. The catalyst is clear: baseline tariffs on imported goods into the U.S. will be much lower than the duties President Donald Trump had threatened previously. It emerged this week that the levy on Japanese goods will be 15%, not 25%, and indications are that a deal with the European Union will land on 15% too. That's half the rate Trump had threatened to impose. Suddenly, the picture is nowhere near as bleak is it looked a few months ago. Economists reckon that the final aggregate U.S. tariff rate will settle around 15-20% once deals with Brussels and Beijing are reached, a level markets are betting won't tip the economy into recession. This suggests that Trump's seemingly chaotic strategy – threaten mutually assured economic destruction, extract concessions and then pull back to limit the market damage – is paying off. But will it? SOMEONE MUST PAY Despite the market euphoria, the fact remains that on December 31 last year, the average aggregate U.S. tariff on imported goods was around 2.5%. So even if that ends up in the anticipated 15-20% range, it will still be at least six times what it was only a few months ago, and comfortably the highest it has been since the 1930s. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimates that tariff revenues this year could reach $300 billion, which is the equivalent to around 1% of GDP. Extrapolating last year's goods imports of $3.3 trillion to next year, a 15% levy could raise close to $500 billion, or just over 1.5% of GDP. So who will pick up that tab? Is it the U.S. consumer, importers or the overseas exporters? Or a mixture of all three? The likelihood is it will mostly be split between U.S. consumers and companies, squeezing household spending and corporate profits. Either way, it's hard to see how this would not be detrimental to growth. We may not know for some time, as it will take months for the affected goods to come onshore and get onto U.S. shelves and for the tariff revenues to be collected. "We've got a ways to go before we can really say the U.S. economy is feeling the full effect of the tariff policies being announced," Bob Elliott, a former Bridgewater executive and founder of Unlimited, told CNBC on Wednesday. But in the meantime, equity investors appear to be ignoring all of this. SIGNS OF FROTH The market's short-term momentum is clear. The S&P 500 has closed above its 200-day moving average for 62 days in a row, the longest streak since 1997, according to Carson Group's Ryan Detrick. And the 'meme stock' craze is back too, another sign that risk appetite may be decoupling from fundamentals. Indeed, markets are priced for something approaching perfection. The consensus S&P 500 earnings growth for next year is 14%, according to LSEG I/B/E/S, barely changed from 14.5% on April 1, just before Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff salvo. Even the 2025 consensus of around 9% isn't that much lower than 10.5% on April 1. A Reuters poll late last year showed a 2025 year-end consensus estimate for the S&P 500 of 6,500. The index is nearly there already, and is trading at roughly the same multiple as it was on December 31, a 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio of 22. Can these lofty expectations be supported by an economy whose growth rate next year is expected to be 2% or less? Possibly. But it will be a challenge for most firms, with the exception of the 'Magnificent Seven' tech giants whose size might better shield them from tariffs or slowing growth. Ultimately, this is all a huge experiment pitting protectionist trade policy and Depression-era tariffs against the economic orthodoxy of the past 40 years. And it's yet another example of equity investors' ability to find the silver lining in almost anything. As Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management, says: "'It could have been worse' is not a good foundation for a market rally". (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters) (By Jamie McGeever. Editing by Mark Potter)
The National
15 hours ago
- The National
Trump to tour Federal Reserve as war on Chair Powell escalates
US President Donald Trump was set to tour the site of the Federal Reserve's headquarters on Thursday, a significant escalation in his relentless pressure campaign on Fed Chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates. The White House has framed the visit to tour the renovation of two Fed buildings, whose costs have swelled from an initial $1.9 billion to roughly $2.5 billion. Some believe the Trump administration is attacking the renovation costs as a pretext to fire Mr Powell. Presidential visits to the Federal Reserve are rare, with the commander-in-chief generally taking precautions to preserve the central bank's autonomy. The last president to visit the Fed was George W Bush in 2006 when he swore in Ben Bernanke as chair. Other Trump aides are expected to tour the Fed's renovations with him. It was not clear if Mr Trump will meet Mr Powell. 'The Federal Reserve is working with the White House to accommodate their visit,' a Federal Reserve spokesperson told The National. Mr Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with the Fed's extended rate-cut pause. The US central bank has held its interest target rate range steady at 4.25 to 4.50 per cent this year due to uncertainty surrounding tariffs. Recent data have shown that the effects of tariffs are beginning to creep into the US economy. The Labour Department reported last week that inflation had ticked up in June. Underlying data showed that prices in everyday items such as household appliances, toys and apparel are being passed down to consumers. Some economists, however, argue that the Fed should begin cutting rates soon to help protect the labour market. Unlike most central banks, the Fed holds a dual mandate of price stability and full employment. The visit also comes less than a week until the Fed's next meeting, where it is again expected to hold rates steady. But Mr Trump has repeatedly called for the Fed to lower interest rates by as much as 3 percentage points to around 1.25 per cent. He has said doing so could help service the US debt, a concept known as fiscal dominance. Projections released by the Fed in June signalled that the central bank expects to cut rates twice this year, although it is unclear when. Traders currently expect the Fed to resume rate cuts in September, according to CME Group data. Mr Powell has repeatedly said Mr Trump does not have the legal authority to fire him. And such a move would likely lead to a financial crisis as markets would question the independence of future rate moves by the central bank. Mr Powell has also said he will not resign before his term as Fed Chair expires in May 2026. The bond market was mostly subdued ahead of Mr Trump's visit, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury up 1 basis point at 4.398 per cent.
The National
16 hours ago
- The National
Gaza suffering is 'unbearable', says EU commissioner
International pressure on Israel to alleviate 'unbearable' suffering in Gaza is set to increase at an upcoming conference in New York in support of a Palestinian state, the EU commissioner for the Mediterranean Dubravka Suica has told The National. The UN has warned of mass starvation in Gaza engineered by Israel, but Benjamin Netanyahu's government rejects the accusation and blames Hamas. In the meantime the number of deaths from starvation rises steadily. 'The situation there is unbearable,' Ms Suica said. 'This is exactly the reason there is a conference. It won't solve that but it can help, because France and Saudi Arabia are organising it. Many foreign ministers will follow, and I will join on behalf of the European Commission.' A two-state solution such as that backed by the bloc and its Arab partners appears to many more elusive than ever. Israel's parliament this week called for the annexation of all Jewish settlements in the West Bank – in effect blocking the possibility of a future Palestinian state. Ms Suica, a Croatian politician who is scheduled to represent the EU at this month's conference, plays a central role in shaping the EU's economic diplomacy in the Middle East. The budget she oversees was doubled last week to €42.5 billion in the EU Commission's latest seven-year budget proposal. In October, Ms Suica will present a 'new pact for the Mediterranean', which is expected to include concrete partnerships with the region, starting with the first joint energy conference with GCC countries in Brussels on December 15. The idea is to show the region that the EU is not neglecting relations with the Arab world despite being also focusing on what is viewed as Russia's existential threat in Ukraine. Though not part of the Mediterranean region, Gulf countries are to be integrated in the new pact as privileged partners. 'We badly need them to get with us, because their interest is to have peace, security and prosperity in the region,' Ms Suica said. We want to be a player, not only a payer EU Commissioner for the Mediterranean Dubravka Suica Ms Suica, who is in charge the EU's funding to the Palestinian Authority, said that the EU would invite partners in New York to join a newly launched donor platform. It also aims to co-ordinate international efforts for the reconstruction of postwar Gaza once a permanent ceasefire is achieved. EU pressure Brussels views the Palestinian Authority (PA), which has been considerably weakened by Israel, as the only alternative to Hamas in governing Gaza. As its primary financial supporter, the EU increased its funding to the PA this year to €620 million in grants, up from €400 million in grants and loans in 2024. The bloc also recently released €52 million in funding for UNRWA, though Ms Suica signalled hopes that, over time, the PA will assume responsibility for essential services. 'Once they take over services, like health and education, they will be powerful enough to show that they can be a counterpart to Israel,' she said. 'This is what we want to achieve.' Gulf countries as well as OECD states, including the UK, Australia and Japan, would be considered strong partners to the new donor platform. There is a widespread view that the US mediates conflicts in the region while the EU finances reconstruction – but Ms Suica wants that to change, pointing to the Middle East's geographical proximity to Europe. Her motto is: 'We want to be a player, not only a payer.' While the New York conference is not expected to yield immediate decisions, it aims to offer a renewed political horizon for resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict. Participants are set to express their concern over the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Yet both Israel and the US will be absent, and France's stated intention to issue its own recognition of Palestine at a follow-up leaders' meeting in September has angered Israel. Despite Israel's reputation suffering a blow during the Gaza war, EU unity on the conflict remains fragile – a fact recognised by Ms Suica. 'Let's see whether this conference in New York will help, because it will be worldwide, and I am sure that they [Israelis] also don't want to have such an image in the world,' she said. EU countries failed last week to adopt of any of the 10 measures put forward by the bloc's foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, after her services found that Israel had breached a human rights clause enshrined in its relations with the bloc. Her proposals included suspending trade preferences and scientific partnerships. All options One measure that did gain consensus was a deal to increase humanitarian aid to Gaza. Yet EU ambassadors in Brussels were reported to have been widely dissatisfied with its roll-out and impact at their first update this week. Ms Kallas on Tuesday warned that 'all options remain on the table if Israel doesn't deliver on its pledges'. Her office did not answer a question from The National asking whether she would participate in the upcoming conference in New York. Israel has killed close to 60,000 Gazans in 21 months of war, after around 1,200 died in Hamas-led attacks in Israel. Ms Suica reiterated the EU's insistence on Israel keeping border crossings open to ensure the flow of humanitarian assistance. 'They opened some crossings, but still, we are monitoring closely what's going on. We need more,' she said. Regional efforts In addition to her work on Palestine, Ms Suica has been actively engaging with Middle Eastern partners to forge long-term region-to-region co-operation. This includes a strategic partnership signed with Jordan in January and discussions on green energy initiatives with Morocco, such as maritime port decarbonisation. She described the frequent accusation that such partnerships are focused solely on keeping migrants out of Europe as false. 'We don't impose anything. We don't have a template,' Ms Suica said. There has also been a measure of behind-the-scenes diplomatic efforts, with the Israeli, Palestinian and Syrian foreign ministers sitting at the same table at a meeting in Brussels last week. In June, Ms Suica announced a €175 million aid package for Syria. She recalls being told during meetings with Syria's Finance Ministry and central bank governor that while the country was happy to see the EU return after the fall of the Assad regime, there was fear of European interference. 'We don't want to interfere, but we want to accompany you. We want to assist you,' she answered. On Palestine, the philosophy is the same, she said, pointing to its financial support for the PA. 'I cannot predict what will happen, but we are doing our best to achieve a two-state solution,' Ms Suica said.
