Tom Aspinall reacts to Ciryl Gane fight as first undisputed title defence is confirmed
Tuesday (22 July) brought the announcement that Aspinall will make his first undisputed-title defence in the main event of UFC 321, finally taking on European rival Gane.
The pair have been linked numerous times in recent years, with Gane and the Briton occupying top rankings in the division. Gane, 35, won the interim belt in 2021 but failed to unify the titles with then-champion Francis Ngannou in January 2022, while Aspinall claimed the interim strap in November 2023 and never got the chance to face fellow title-holder Jon Jones.
Jones's recent retirement saw Aspinall, 32, elevated to undisputed champion, almost a year after he took the rare decision to defend the interim belt – which he retained against Curtis Blaydes in Manchester. Now, the Wigan fighter prepares to defend the undisputed title for the first time, in Abu Dhabi on 25 October.
'Finally we're back, after over a year hiatus,' Aspinall said in an Instagram video on Wednesday (23 July). 'Me and Ciryl finally signed on the dotted line.
'This is the fourth time we've been matched up together. He turned the fight early on, before we were both in the rankings.
'After that, he fought Spivac [in 2023]. I said in a post-fight interview after I beat [Marcin] Tybura: 'I'm going to go to Paris, I'm going to be sat front row for Ciryl Gane against Serghei Spivac, I'm gonna beat the winner, and then I'm gonna beat Jon Jones.' I went to Paris, Ciryl unfortunately turned down the fight on a second occasion.
'The third occasion, I fought Curtis Blaydes. The original opponent was Ciryl Gane. Unfortunately, Ciryl was busy that date. Ciryl was filming his Netflix series. I can't remember what it's called, but I'm sure you can check it out now on Netflix.
'And now we are matched up for 25 October, Abu Dhabi. Me and Ciryl, the fourth attempt is here, and this is Ciryl's third title shot. So, we are going to try and get rid of Ciryl Gane from the title picture for good.'
Aspinall's last fight was his first-round knockout of Blaydes in July 2024, as he avenged an injury-induced loss to the American from 2022. Meanwhile, Gane's last outing was a controversial fight with Alexander Volkov in December, when the Frenchman outpointed the Russian for the second time, though many fans and pundits disagreed with the scoring.
Gane's previous two undisputed-title fights were his points loss to Ngannou, and his first-round submission loss to Jones in 2023. The latter result saw Jones, the consensus greatest light-heavyweight ever, win the vacant heavyweight title.
Jones was then due to defend the belt against divisional great Stipe Miocic in November 2023, but he suffered an injury that delayed the bout by 12 months. On the night they were first due to fight, Aspinall instead faced Sergei Pavlovich, knocking him out in round one to become interim champion.
Aspinall then retained the interim strap against Blaydes before Jones, 38, stopped Miocic, 42, last November. Jones never committed to fighting Aspinall in a unification bout, and ultimately the American retired last month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Former Porto captain Costa dies aged 53
Former Porto captain Jorge Costa has died aged 53 after having a cardiac arrest at the club's training centre, the Portuguese side has defender led Porto to Champions League glory under manager Jose Mourinho in 2004 and won 50 caps for spent a season on loan at Charlton in the Premier League in 2001-02 and retired from playing in centre-back moved into management and held positions at 16 clubs before taking up the role of Porto's director of professional football last season."Throughout his life, both on and off the pitch, Jorge Costa embodied the values that define FC Porto: dedication, leadership, passion and an unshakeable spirit of conquest," the club said. "He left his mark on generations of fans." Costa graduated from Porto's academy and went on to make 324 appearances for the won 24 trophies before leaving in 2005, including the Champions League, Uefa Cup and eight Primeira Liga 2000, Costa won the Portuguese Golden Ball - an award handed out to the league's best managerial career took him across the globe with stints in Portugal, Romania, Cyprus, Tunisia, India and Gabon.
The Sun
2 minutes ago
- The Sun
Dillian Whyte's net worth and how much he is getting paid for Moses Itauma fight
DILLIAN WHYTE has had an impressive career as a boxer since turning professional back in 2011. The Body Snatcher has been in some big money-making fights and has racked up huge wins along the way. 1 And Whyte will receive another huge payday as he takes on WBO Intercontinental champion, Moses Itauma. What is Dillian Whyte's net worth? Whyte has been in some massive fights in his career, including one which he lost against heavyweight superstar Anthony Joshua back in 2015. But the 32-year-old has wins over Derek Chisora (x2), Oscar Rivas, Robert Helenius, Joseph Parker and Marius Wach. Across his career, Whyte has made millions in earnings. And according to Celebrity Net Worth, his net worth in 2022 stood at £7million - but it would have increased since then due to huge fights and brand deals. Following his loss to AJ, Whyte notched over 10 wins in a row and turned himself into a pay-per-view attraction in the UK. His entertaining fighting style has afforded him the luxury of commanding big purses, such as the £4million pay-day he made to fight Povetkin in August 2020. Whyte, however, could have made even more money had fans been present at the clash, but they weren't allowed due to the coronavirus pandemic. Since then, Dillian has been involved in other major fights, such as his 2022 battle against Tyson Fury. He earned £5.5m for the fight, which is a career-high pay day for the Brixton man. But missed out on £8.6m as the Body Snatcher lost in the sixth round. What is Dillian Whyte's purse for the Moses Itauma fight? According to sources online, Dillian Whyte is guaranteed $2.5million (£1.8million), and Moses Itauma is guaranteed $1million (£753k). Depending on pay-per-view numbers, Whyte could earn another $1m (£753k), and Itauma could earn another $500k (£376k). This would take the total for Whyte to $3.5million (£2.6million), and Itauma to $1.5million (£1.1million).
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Legal case a 'seismic confrontation' between players and Fifa
"A seismic legal confrontation between players and Fifa."The view of former Fulham midfielder-turned-lawyer Udo Onwere when asked to assess the significance of the compensation claim launched against Fifa this week on behalf of current and former professional footballers over transfer Monday, Dutch foundation Justice for Players (JFP) said it had started a class action lawsuit against the sport's world governing body, along with the football associations of France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and argues that 100,000 footballers playing in Europe since 2002 could have lost income as a result of "unlawful" Fifa regulations, and that "preliminary analysis" shows that damages could amount to several billion case is the result of last year's ruling by the highest European court that Fifa regulations over some football transfers broke EU October, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) found in favour of former Chelsea and Arsenal midfielder Lassana Diarra after he argued some of the rules restricted his freedom of movement and breached competition law, and sued Fifa."This class action could rewrite the rules governing player mobility across the global football industry" says Onwere, who is now a partner at law firm Bray and Krais."What distinguishes this case from previous skirmishes with the governing body is its sheer scale and complexity... The outcome of this litigation could usher in a new era of transfer regulations and governance - one where contractual stability is balanced with player autonomy."It could prove to be as transformational as the landmark 1995 Bosman ruling."Such a comparison is notable, because JFP is being advised by Diarra's Belgian lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, who also won the landmark 1995 case at the CJEU on behalf of ex-player Jean-Marc ruling dramatically changed the sport, meaning footballers could choose to run down their contracts and move clubs on a free transfer, with teams no longer able to demand compensation for out-of-contract years on, some now believe this latest case could result in players being able to terminate their own contracts, without paying compensation, before those deals come to an Sport has been told that Fifa has until the start of September to respond to the threat of legal action. Background Last year, the CJEU said that, by refusing to provide Diarra with an international transfer certificate (ITC) for a proposed move to Belgian club Charleroi in 2015 after he was found to have breached his contract with Lokomotiv Moscow (for which he was ordered to pay £8.4m to the Russian club and suspended), Fifa showed that its rules "impede the free movement of professional footballers wishing to develop their activity by going to work for a new club".Diarra's lawyers contested the Fifa rule which makes a club wishing to sign a player jointly liable for compensation to a player's old club, and at risk of sporting sanctions, in cases where the player's previous contract was terminated without just also challenged a rule which allows the national association of a player's former club to withhold an ITC where there was a dispute, which they said also hindered the court ruled that Fifa should not be able to use the ITC system to prevent players who have breached a contract from moving and working where they the time Fifa said it had been "continuously improving" the transfer system "for the benefit of players, clubs, leagues and member associations, to ensure that players can train, be developed and have stability, while safeguarding the integrity of competitions by implementing a robust regulatory framework for the international transfer system".It then adapted its transfer regulations on an interim basis, but accepted they could be open to challenge. JFP claims that affected professional footballers have earned approximately 8% less over the course of their career as a result of Fifa's rules, and its litigation could mean players can terminate their own contracts. 'A huge hit' Lucia Melcherts, the chair of JFP, said: "All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful Fifa regulations. In any other profession, people are allowed to change jobs voluntarily. The same should be true in football, particularly as the average career span of a professional footballer according to a FIFPro study is only eight years long.""FIFA will find it difficult to put forward a robust defence to these claims in the face of a clear decision by the CJEU in the Diarra case that there was anti-competitive behaviour over several years", says Daniel Gore, an arbitration lawyer at Withers."The anticipated floodgate of claims has commenced, and Fifa's finances could take a huge hit at a time they are flying high after the expanded Club World Cup this year and World Cup in 2026."In a statement, the European division of global players' union Fifpro, which backed Diarra's case, said the action "represents the anticipated practical response" to the CJEU ruling, "effectively centralising advocacy for affected players' interests that have broad implications for the football industry".It said it would "thoroughly assess" the foundation's move, adding it "will always support fair compensation for affected players whose rights were breached, while driving meaningful reform towards inclusive governance structures in international football."This approach aims to shield past, current and future generations of players from unilateral and arbitrary decision-making processes that undermine or harm fundamental workers' rights and fair competition."Fifa has been approached for comment.
