logo
Are you on the state pension cliff edge and is the triple lock safe? Experts reveal what YOU need to do

Are you on the state pension cliff edge and is the triple lock safe? Experts reveal what YOU need to do

Scottish Sun25-07-2025
We explain what a huge state pension review could mean for you
PENSION TENSION Are you on the state pension cliff edge and is the triple lock safe? Experts reveal what YOU need to do
MILLIONS of Brits could work for longer after the government announced a review of the state pension age this week.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says a review is needed to keep the state pension system 'sustainable and affordable'.
5
A huge review into the state pension is going ahead as concerns grow over the affordability of the system
Credit: Getty
5
The current State Pension costs the Treasury around £125 billion a year
Credit: Getty
The current State Pension costs the Treasury around £125 billion a year – and it's only going to go up as we all live longer.
The triple lock promise, which guarantees that the state pension increases in line with inflation, wages or 2.5%, is expected to hit £15.5billion a year by 2030.
Blathnaid Corless and Ruth Jackson-Kirby explains what is happening and what YOU should do now.
What is happening?
The state pension age - when you can start claiming - is currently 66. It is rising to 67 by 2028 and 68 by 2046.
A new review means the rise could be accelerated and the state pension age could even rise to 69 or 70.
The government reviews the state pension age every six years and the next review was due in 2029 - but will now come in 2027.
Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, said: "An increase to the state pension age from 66 to 67 is already slated to happen between 2026 and 2028.
"But it's less clear what will happen after that.
"There is also an increase to age 68 pencilled in for 2046, but a faster increase is definitely on the cards.
"The first two reviews of the state pension age advocated bringing this forward, but successive governments have treated the issue like a hot potato."
The government has also asked the Pensions Commission to tackle a savings crisis faced by retirees, including how much is saved via minimum auto-enrollment contributions and how to help self-employed people.
Hargreaves Lansdown head of retirement Helen Morrissey, said: 'The concern is that many people are not saving enough and risk not having enough in retirement.'
When will I get the state pension?
The big question is whether the move to a state pension age of 68 will be brought forward.
Any changes could mean people in their mid-50s being left facing a gap between when they planned to retire and when they can start claiming their state pension.
For anyone under 55, it means that you will have to factor in working longer into your retirement plan.
5
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says a review is needed to keep the state pension system 'sustainable and affordable'
Credit: AFP
Former pensions minister and LCP partner Steve Webb said: 'The most likely change in the short to medium term is getting to 68 sooner, as this has been recommended by two previous reviews of state pension age.'
A previous review, called the Cridland Review, recommended that the rise to 68 should be brought forward.
Whatever happens the government must give at least 10 years notice of any increase to the state pension age.
If the state pension age rises to 68 earlier than planned, people born in the early 1970s could lose out on £17,340, based on the state pension rising 2.5 per cent each year, according to AJ Bell.
You can see when you will get the state pension as planned by using our Sun Club tool at thesun.co.uk/money/state-pension.
5
Anyone under 48 years old will almost certainly have a state pension age of 68
'We're relying on the pension... and now it's going to be pushed back and back'
NICOLA Jones, 58, gave up her job as a mental health worker last year to become a full-time carer for her partner Tracy, 54, who has MS.
The couple say they're very worried about potential changes to the state pension age, which they're hoping will ease the financial strain of living solely off benefits including Universal Credit and Carer's Allowance, which give them a joint monthly income of £1118.67.
While Nicola will not be affected by the predicted changes, Tracy probably will.
'We're on the bread line as it is because I'm a full time carer and we have no savings. We keep hearing that people should be saving towards their pension, but we can't do that,' Nicola said.
'We're really struggling as it is, and we would rely on the pension coming in and just easing our life really and just making it less stressful, and now it's going to get pushed back and back - I mean, I've heard it could be going up to 70.'
Is the triple lock safe?
Raising the state pension age isn't the only way the government could cut its retirement bill - it could look at the triple lock.
It has been a brilliant support to pensioners against inflation but at a huge cost to government finances.
The government has ruled out axing the triple lock guarantee before the end of the current Parliament, which will be in July 2029 at the latest.
Ms Morrisey said: 'Over the longer term we may well see the triple lock evolve - one option could be for it to move towards being a double lock instead.'
Calum Cooper, head of Pensions Policy Innovation at Hymans Robertson, said: 'We estimate it should be replaced in the 2030s – it's a question of when, not if.'
Another option could be looking at making it means tested - but this is unlikely, suggests Steve Webb.
But he adds: 'Other changes could include increasing the number of years of contributions needed for a full pension'. At present you need 35 years to get the full state pension.
5
Is your pension about to be taxed?
Another problem facing future pensioners is tax.
You can earn up to £12,570 before you have to start paying income tax. That's your Personal Allowance.
The full state pension is £11,973 a year – just £597 below that threshold.
With the Personal Allowance frozen until at least 2028 millions of pensioners are heading towards paying tax on a state benefit.
It's a looming political disaster that any government will want to avoid.
What should you do now?
The planned shake-up to rules shows that 'relying on the state pension alone for your retirement income is risky', says Rachel Vahey.
'If you're forced to wait a year or two to claim it, you'll either need to work longer or find tens of thousands of pounds extra from your pension and private savings to plug the gap,' she adds.
If you're approaching retirement and concerned about your savings, she suggests downsizing your home to free up cash, or moving into another job, possibly part-time.
'The best way to give yourself freedom to retire on your own terms is to build up your private pension pot,' she says.
Even if you're not yet approaching retirement, you should keep an eye on your pension savings so you know what you're on track to receive and can work out if you need to increase your contributions, Ms Morrisey added.
'Taking small steps like increasing your contribution to your private pension every time you get a pay increase or new role can make a big difference to what you end up with in retirement.'
You should also make sure you haven't lost track of any old pensions from previous jobs, as you could be missing out on thousands of pounds.
If you have lost track of a pension, you can use the government's pension tracing service to track it down, either by phone or at www.gov.uk/find-pension-contact-details.
You can also use Gretel, a free online service that takes minutes to sign up.
'Once you've got a true idea of how much you have saved then you can make a plan to move towards the kind of retirement you want,' Ms Morrisey adds.
For a single person looking for a 'moderate retirement' later in life, which would allow you to have a two-week holiday in Europe, a long weekend break in the UK, some eating out, as well as the ability to run a small car, you'll need to have a single annual income of £26,129, according to Hargreaves Lansdown.
The State Pension isn't going to disappear or change overnight but pressure is building, and the current benefit is unsustainable.
'There's no doubt that making sure you have a good private pension is the best protection against future changes which make the state pension less generous,' concludes Webb.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as ‘nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo
Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as ‘nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as ‘nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo

Find out where Heinz's new creation is available SMOOTHIE CRIMINAL Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as 'nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE launch of a ketchup smoothie has been given an almost criminal reception from sceptical food fans. Heinz linked up with US firm Smoothie King for the concoction — which blends its tomato ketchup with acai sorbet, apple juice, strawberries, and raspberries. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Heinz and Smoothie King have released the first ever Tomato Ketchup Smoothie Credit: AP 3 The launch has been given an almost criminal reception from sceptical food fans Credit: AP But the creation, available in Smoothie King stores in the US has been labelled 'disgusting' and 'nasty' on social media. In June, Heinz unveiled a new ketchup which some customers claimed was "better than the original". The "game-changing" condiment has 35 per cent more tomatoes, a "DRASTICALLY" different colour, and even boasts several health benefits. Heinz's Tomato Ketchup Zero sent sauce fans into an online frenzy - with many claiming the new sauce has a better taste. The new Zero ketchup no added sugar and salt, unlike its original counterpart. According to the beloved sauce brand, 9 in 10 customers said "it delivers the great quality you'd expect from Heinz", and tastes better than "other 'Zero' products". Bewildered shoppers poured out on social media, with many shocked at the new launch. One user said: "IS THAT ZERO CAL KETCHUP?" Another chimed in: "IS THAT KETCHUP ZERO I'VE NEVER SEEN ONE WHAT IS THAT?" While a third user said: "It's DRASTICALLY different in colour than ketchup I have what the hell." Heinz also said that the release meets consumer trends, as "50,000 Brits say their top food priority is healthier choices with less sugar and salt". 'Revolting' shoppers scream as Heinz launches 'repulsive' new sauce inspired by smash hit movie

Middle-income workers shoulder biggest tax burden increase
Middle-income workers shoulder biggest tax burden increase

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Middle-income workers shoulder biggest tax burden increase

Middle-class workers are shouldering the biggest increase in the tax burden thanks to a stealth raid on thresholds, analysis suggests. The share of income tax paid by those who earn between £43,000 and £61,900 rose from 15.1pc to 17pc between 2021-22 and 2025-26, according to the TaxPayers' Alliance. During the same five-year period, the share of income tax paid by the top 1pc, those earning more than £201,000 a year, fell from 30.7pc to 26.6pc, the pressure group found. It comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a £50bn black hole in the public finances and declining tax revenue as high-net-worth individuals look to move abroad. Analysis by the Financial Times this month revealed there had been a 40pc rise in directors moving abroad since Labour's autumn Budget. The Taxpayers' Alliance report found the proportion of total income tax receipts increased for every group except for the top 1pc of earners, thanks to a series of stealth taxes first introduced by the Conservatives. Income tax thresholds, including the £12,570 tax-free 'personal allowance', were frozen at the 2021 budget by then chancellor Rishi Sunak until 2025-26. A year later, his successor, Jeremy Hunt, extended the freeze until 2027-28. Despite promising not to raise taxes on working people, Sir Keir Starmer has not ruled out extending the freeze further to 2029-30. Keeping thresholds frozen means earners lose a larger share of their incomes to tax, as inflation pushes up wages in a process known as fiscal drag. The stealth raid means almost 2.9 million more people will pay the basic rate of income tax in 2025-26 than in 2021-22, while over 2.6 million more will pay the higher rate. Including other rates, almost 6 million more people are forecast to be paying income tax than in 2021-22. John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'This is the sad but inevitable result of successive governments' assortment of anti-affluence tax policies, which penalise aspiration and success. 'The UK is now trapped in a doom loop with the Chancellor desperately scrabbling around for more cash to fill the fiscal black hole and increasingly finding her only option is to come after the middle classes. 'Rachel Reeves needs to now show some humility and reverse the policies that have done so much to drive away high earners.' The respected National Institute of Economic and Social Research on Tuesday warned slowing economic growth, a weak jobs market and Labour's failure to commit to welfare reform meant Ms Reeves was on course to miss her borrowing targets by £41.2bn. When combined with the £9.9bn of headroom the Chancellor has committed to keeping, it means she is facing a £51.1bn deficit in the autumn that will either have to be solved by raising taxes or cutting spending. The study also underlined the importance for the Treasury's balance sheet to keep the highest earners in Britain. Despite the proportion of tax paid by the top 1pc of earners falling, the group still accounts for more than a quarter of all income tax receipts. Analysis of Companies House by the Financial Times found that 3,790 company directors had left Britain between October and July compared with 2,712 in the same period a year earlier. Significant names have included Richard Gnodde, Goldman Sachs ' most senior banker outside the US, Nassef Sawiris, the Aston Villa co-owner, and British property tycoon brothers Ian and Richard Livingstone. It comes after Labour launched a wide-ranging tax raid after coming to power last year. This included abolishing the non-dom status and tightening inheritance tax rules. Laura Suter, of AJ Bell, said: 'Government tax policy in the past few years has had the dual outcome of pushing some of the wealthiest to leave the UK and also landing more taxpayers with higher tax bills at the same time. 'Together, this means that an increasing proportion of the total tax bill of the country is paid by middle earners, rather than the super-rich. 'Looking ahead, any potential tax-raising measures that Rachel Reeves makes in her next Budget could exacerbate this dynamic further.' Trevor Williams, a former chief economist at Lloyds Bank, previously warned Britain was facing a millionaires' exodus. Mr Williams said: 'Since 2014, the number of resident millionaires in the UK dropped by 9pc compared with the world's 10 wealthiest countries' global average growth of more than 40pc. 'Over the same period, the US saw a 78pc increase in millionaires – the fastest wealth growth [among these countries].' The Treasury insisted that under its Plan for Change it would keep more money in people's pockets. A spokesman said: 'This government inherited the previous government's policy of frozen tax thresholds. At the Budget and the Spring Statement, the Chancellor announced that we would not extend that freeze. 'We are also protecting payslips for working people by keeping our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT. That's the Plan for Change – protecting people's incomes and putting money into people's pockets.'

Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as ‘nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo
Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as ‘nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as ‘nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo

THE launch of a ketchup smoothie has been given an almost criminal reception from sceptical food fans. Heinz linked up with US firm Smoothie King for the concoction — which blends its tomato ketchup with acai sorbet, apple juice, strawberries, and raspberries. 3 3 But the creation, available in Smoothie King stores in the US has been labelled 'disgusting' and 'nasty' on social media. In June, Heinz unveiled a new ketchup which some customers claimed was "better than the original". The "game-changing" condiment has 35 per cent more tomatoes, a "DRASTICALLY" different colour, and even boasts several health benefits. Heinz's Tomato Ketchup Zero sent sauce fans into an online frenzy - with many claiming the new sauce has a better taste. The new Zero ketchup no added sugar and salt, unlike its original counterpart. According to the beloved sauce brand, 9 in 10 customers said "it delivers the great quality you'd expect from Heinz", and tastes better than "other 'Zero' products". Bewildered shoppers poured out on social media, with many shocked at the new launch. Another chimed in: "IS THAT KETCHUP ZERO I'VE NEVER SEEN ONE WHAT IS THAT?" While a third user said: "It's DRASTICALLY different in colour than ketchup I have what the hell." Heinz also said that the release meets consumer trends, as "50,000 Brits say their top food priority is healthier choices with less sugar and salt". 'Revolting' shoppers scream as Heinz launches 'repulsive' new sauce inspired by smash hit movie 3

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store