logo
Trump threatens 25% tax on goods imported from Japan and South Korea

Trump threatens 25% tax on goods imported from Japan and South Korea

Leader Live2 days ago
Mr Trump provided notice of the tariffs to begin on August 1 by posting letters on Truth Social that were addressed to the leaders of both countries.
The letters warned both countries not to retaliate by increasing their own import taxes, or else the Trump administration would further increase tariffs.
'If for any reason you decide to raise your tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' Mr Trump wrote in the letters to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung.
The letters were not the final word from Mr Trump on tariffs, so much as another episode in a global economic drama in which the US president has placed himself at the centre.
He has declared an economic emergency to unilaterally impose the taxes, suggesting they are remedies for past trade deficits even though many US consumers have come to value car, electronics and other goods from Japan and South Korea.
But it is unclear what he gains strategically against China — another stated reason for the tariffs — by challenging two crucial partners in Asia who could counter China's economic heft.
'These tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country,' Mr Trump wrote in both letters.
Because the new tariff rates go into effect in roughly three weeks, Mr Trump is setting up a period of possibly tempestuous talks among the US and its trade partners to reach new frameworks.
Mr Trump initially sparked hysteria in the financial markets by announcing tariff rates on dozens of countries, including 24% on Japan and 25% on South Korea. In order to calm the markets, Mr Trump unveiled a 90-day negotiating period during which goods from most countries were taxed at a baseline 10%.
The 90-day negotiating period technically ends before Wednesday, even as multiple administration officials and Mr Trump himself suggested the three-week period before implementation is akin to overtime for additional talks.
He is relying on tariff revenues to help offset the tax cuts he signed into law on July 4, a move that could shift a greater share of the federal tax burden on to the middle class and poor as importers would pass along much of the cost of the tariffs.
His trade framework with Vietnam is clearly designed to box out China from routing its America-bound goods through that country, while the quotas in the United Kingdom framework would spare that nation from the higher tariff rates being charged on steel, aluminium and autos.
The United States ran a 69.4 billion dollar trade imbalance in goods with Japan in 2024 and a 66 billion imbalance with South Korea, according to the Census Bureau.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza permanent ceasefire 'questionable' - but possible 'within weeks, not a day', says senior Israeli official
Gaza permanent ceasefire 'questionable' - but possible 'within weeks, not a day', says senior Israeli official

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Gaza permanent ceasefire 'questionable' - but possible 'within weeks, not a day', says senior Israeli official

A senior Israeli official has issued a less-than-optimistic assessment of the permanency of any ceasefire in Gaza. Speaking in Washington on condition of anonymity, the senior official said that a 60-day ceasefire"might" be possible within "a week, two weeks - not a day". But on the chances of the ceasefire lasting beyond 60 days, the official said: "We will begin negotiations on a permanent settlement. "But we achieve it? It's questionable, but Hamas will not be there." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to conclude a four-day visit to Washington later today. There had been hope that a ceasefire could be announced during the trip. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that it's close. 0:44 Speaking at a briefing for a number of reporters, the Israeli official would not be drawn on any of the details of the negotiations over concerns that public disclosure could jeopardise their chances of success. The major sticking point in the talks between Hamas and Israel is the status of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) inside Gaza during the 60-day ceasefire and beyond, should it last longer. The latest Israeli proposal, passed to Hamas last week, included a map showing the proposed IDF presence inside Gaza during the ceasefire. This was rejected by Hamas and by Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, who reportedly told the Israelis that the redeployment map "looks like a Smotrich plan", a reference to the extreme-right Israeli finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich. The official repeated Israel's central stated war aims of getting the hostages back and eliminating Hamas. But in a hint of how hard it will be to reconcile the differences, the official was clear that no permanent ceasefire would be possible without the complete removal of Hamas. "We will offer them a permanent ceasefire," he told Sky News. "If they agree. Fine. It's over. "They lay down their arms, and we proceed [with the ceasefire]. If they don't, we'll proceed [with the war]." On the status of the Israeli military inside Gaza, the official said: "We would want IDF in every square meter of Gaza, and then hand it over to someone..." He added: "[We] don't want to govern Gaza... don't want to govern, but the first thing is, you have to defeat Hamas..." The official said the Israeli government had "no territorial designs for Gaza". "But [we] don't want Hamas there," he continued. "You have to finish the job... victory over Hamas. You cannot have victory if you don't clear out all the fighting forces. "You have to go into every square inch unless you are not serious about victory. I am. We are going to defeat them. Those who do not disarm will die. Those who disarm will have a life." On the future of Gaza, the official ruled out the possibility of a two-state solution "for the foreseeable future". "They are not going to have a state in the foreseeable future as long as they cling to that idea of destroying our state. It doesn't make a difference if they are the Palestinian Authority or Hamas, it's just a difference of tactics." On the most controversial aspect of the Gaza conflict - the movement of the population - the official predicted that 60% of Palestinians would "choose to leave". But he claimed that Israel would allow them to return once Hamas had been eliminated, adding: "It's not forcible eviction, it's not permanent eviction." Critics of Israel's war in Gaza say that any removal of Palestinians from Gaza, even if given the appearance of being "voluntary," is in fact anything but, because the strip has been so comprehensively flattened. Reacting to Israeli Defence Minister Katz's recent statement revealing a plan to move Palestinians into a "humanitarian city" in southern Gaza, and not let them out of that area, the official wouldn't be drawn, except to say: "As a permanent arrangement? Of course not."

People in the US: are you delaying major life decisions under Trump's presidency?
People in the US: are you delaying major life decisions under Trump's presidency?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

People in the US: are you delaying major life decisions under Trump's presidency?

As Donald Trump approaches six months in office as president, his administration's agenda has shaken every corner of US life. According to research from Harris Poll, Americans are reconsidering major life events including marriage, having children and buying a home amid economic anxiety under the Trump administration. Six in 10 Americans said the economy had affected at least one of their major life goals, citing either lack of affordability or anxiety around the current economy. We want to hear from you. Have you been delaying major life decisions amid economic and political anxieties? When did things begin to feel destabilized? What effect in particular has delaying life decisions had on your household? You can tell us if you are delaying any major life decisions and your reasons why by filling in the form below. Please be as specific as possible. Please include as much detail as possible. Please be as specific as possible. Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.

Trump announces 50% tariff on Brazil, citing a ‘witch-hunt' against Bolsonaro
Trump announces 50% tariff on Brazil, citing a ‘witch-hunt' against Bolsonaro

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump announces 50% tariff on Brazil, citing a ‘witch-hunt' against Bolsonaro

Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that his administration will hit Brazil with a 50% tariff on products sent to the US, tying the move to what he called the 'witch-hunt' trial against its former president, Jair Bolsonaro. Posting letters on Truth Social, the US president had earlier in the day targeted seven other countries – the Philippines, Brunei, Moldova, Algeria, Libya, Iraq and Sri Lanka – for stiff US tariffs on foreign exports starting on 1 August. On Wednesday afternoon, Trump avoided his standard form letter with Brazil, and criticized the trial Bolsonaro is facing over trying to overturn his 2022 election loss. Trump has described Bolsonaro as a friend and hosted the former Brazilian president at his Mar-a-Lago resort when both were in power in 2020. 'This Trial should not be taking place,' Trump wrote in the letter posted on Truth Social on Wednesday. 'It is a witch hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!' He said the 50% tariffs on Brazil would be 'separate from all sectoral tariffs'. After the news, Brazil's real currency added to earlier losses to fall more than 2% against the dollar. Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, rejected Trump's demand that legal proceedings against Bolsonaro be dropped and his claim that a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports was necessary to close a trade deficit that does not, in fact, exist. In a statement posted on social media and his government's website, the Brazilian president responded, point by point, to the claims made by Trump in a letter addressed to him earlier on Wednesday. 'Brazil is a sovereign nation with independent institutions and will not accept any form of tutelage,' Lula began. He then pointed out that the charges against Bolsonaro, for allegedly plotting to remain in power after losing his bid for re-election, 'fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of Brazil's Judicial Branch and, as such, are not subject to any interference or threats that could compromise the independence of national institutions'. Trump also objected to Brazil's supreme court fining of social media companies such as Twitter/X, saying the temporary blocking last year amounted to 'SECRET and UNLAWFUL Censorship Orders'. Trump said he is launching an investigation as a result under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which applies to companies with trade practices that are deemed unfair to US companies. Lula also rejected Trump's claim that Brazil's efforts to regulate the operations of US social media platforms on its territory in accordance with its own laws are not, as Trump had claimed, a form of censorship. 'Brazilian society rejects hateful content, racism, child pornography, scams, fraud, and speeches against human rights and democratic freedom' Lula wrote. 'In Brazil, freedom of expression must not be confused with aggression or violent practices. All companies—whether domestic or foreign—must comply with Brazilian law in order to operate within our territory.' The US president had been scheduled to hike tariffs on dozens of countries on Wednesday. Earlier this week he announced a fresh three-week delay, to 1 August, but started announcing new rates that countries would face unless they strike a deal with the White House. After announcing plans on Monday for US tariffs of up to 40% on goods imported from 14 countries, including Bangladesh, Japan and South Korea, Trump wrote to the leaders of more countries on Wednesday, and published each letter. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion He claimed exporters in Algeria, Iraq, Libya and Sri Lanka would face a US tariff of 30%, while exporters in Brunei, Moldova and the Philippines would face a 25% tariff. 'These Tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your Country,' Trump wrote. A string of delays and rate changes have frustrated businesses in the US and around the world. On Tuesday, Trump vowed to introduce US tariffs of up to 200% on foreign drugs and 50% on copper, propelling US prices of the latter to record highs. But appearing alongside the leaders of Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal at the White House on Wednesday, the president indicated that the five African nations were unlikely to face US tariffs as they intended to lower their own tariffs on US exports. The US president's latest threats have heightened fears that his erratic trade strategy risks exacerbating inflation across the US, having repeatedly pledged on the campaign trail to bring down prices rapidly. Trump appears aware of this apprehension. 'I brought down costs more than any President in recorded history,' he wrote on social media late on Tuesday. 'The Crooked Democrats are using the opposite narrative, even though they know it is a total LIE.' Analysis by Oxford Economics indicated that the US effective tariff rate on imports from overseas would rise to about 20% after the latest tariff letters. 'That is up from 17% but less than our recession threshold of 25%-28%,' said Michael Pearce, its deputy US economist at Oxford Economics. 'Our assumption is that most countries will secure a deal or extension to avoid tariff increases,' said Pearce. 'However, the risks are skewed toward higher rates.' While Trump and his allies have sought to pressure the Federal Reserve into cutting interest rates, the central bank's top officials – led by its chair, Jerome Powell – have so far refused, as they wait to see the impact of his tariffs on the economy. Minutes taken from the Fed's latest rate-setting meeting, released on Wednesday, disclosed that only 'a couple' of its officials said they felt interest rates could fall as soon as its next meeting, later this month. 'Most participants' at the Fed meeting – at which rates were kept on hold last month – anticipated rate cuts later this year, according to the minutes, with any price shock caused by Trump's tariffs expected to be 'temporary or modest'. Robert Mackey contributed reporting

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store