Behind Trump's long campaign to target Chinese student visas
President Donald Trump's aides and allies have been laying the groundwork for his aggressive crackdown on Chinese student visas for years.
Trump vowed on the campaign trail in 2023 to ban 'Christian-hating communists, Marxists and socialists' from the country, expanding on efforts from his first administration to shut down China-funded Confucius Institutes on U.S. college campuses and prosecute Chinese scientific researchers and professors at American universities. MAGA allies on the Hill have introduced legislation to this effect in recent years. And during his first term, Trump officials even discussed the early iterations of the very policy Secretary of State Marco Rubio unveiled late Wednesday.
The plan to revoke the student visas is another example of a White House able to build on the policy foundation laid during Trump's first term — turbocharged by planning that took place in the president's four years away from Washington.
While work on student visas had been underway, the president and his aides considered that the timing of the clampdown may complicate a fragile trade truce with China. But the administration forged ahead anyway, said a White House official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about policy discussions.
'The president laid it out there in the campaign… when he says he's going to do something in the campaign, he actually tries to do it,' said Ken Cuccinelli, who served as Trump's deputy of Homeland Security during the first term.
'The reason people like me raised it in the first term is the reason you're hearing from Rubio — there are very real security reasons to not help the Chinese advance their position in technical fields, and certainly not anyone more closely associated with [the Chinese Communist Party].'
The policy released this week circulated among administration officials for months after Trump signed a day one executive order directing the secretary of State to review vetting and screening for immigrants coming to the U.S., including for visa holders. The administration is stacked with aides who have long been laser focused on cracking down on China's influence in U.S. institutions, including senior policy adviser Stephen Miller and Rubio. Both played key roles in finalizing this week's policy announcement across the White House and departments of Homeland Security and State, according to the White House official.
'It was only a matter of time,' the official said. 'It's something that's been so widely discussed for so long.'
Approximately 277,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. last year, and it remains unclear how many will lose their ability to remain in the country. Rubio vowed to 'aggressively revoke' the visas and said the focus would be on people with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or those studying sensitive subjects.
'The Secretary made this decision in the administration's ongoing effort to protect our homeland from espionage and other hostile actions,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.
The administration's action has further fueled tensions between China and the U.S., with Beijing condemning the policy as 'unreasonable' and one that 'damaged the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese students and disrupted the normal cultural exchanges between the two countries.' Last month, Trump placed a 145 percent tariff on Chinese goods but those were reduced to 30 percent when U.S. and Chinese officials reached a temporary agreement. China also reduced its tariffs on American goods to 10 percent from 125 percent.
The trade detente was already in jeopardy as the countries continue to engage in a growing supply chain standoff, with the U.S. this week curbing sales to China of critical U.S. technologies, including software used to make semiconductors. The latest move could further threaten the strained relationship.
The administration's student visa crackdown follows House passage of legislation to deny DHS funding to U.S. colleges and universities with Confucius Institutes or ties to Beijing's security apparatus. And Trump more broadly has targeted international students across the nation's higher education system, pausing interviews for new student visa applicants this week as it weighs expanding social media screening throughout the vetting process.
'They may be using a machete instead of a scalpel at this point,' said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that looks to restrict immigration. 'This is just an agenda item that's been pretty high on the list because of the security importance of it.'
The president's aides and allies view the visa revocations as the initial step in clamping down on Chinese influence in the U.S., with the White House official suggesting it could lead to a wider exclusion of international students from the country. Some allies are hopeful that the administration will next target funding for universities working with Chinese grad students, similar to what the House bill did.
'We have to take things one step at a time,' the White House official said. 'When you're trying to do something big, it's best to start small.'
Trump previewed this week's policy move almost two years ago at the Faith and Freedom Coalition conference in Washington, vowing to use Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 'deny entry to all communists and Marxists.' U.S. immigration law already bars members of the Communist Party from becoming naturalized citizens or green card holders, but these rules don't apply to people in the U.S. on student or tourist visas.
'Those who come to enjoy our country must love our country,' Trump said. 'We're going to keep foreign, Christian-hating communists, Marxists and socialists out of America.'
But Trump allies have been planting the seeds for much longer. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) in 2020 introduced legislation that sought to limit Chinese nationals from obtaining visas for STEM-related studies. The issue has continued to circulate in GOP circles.
Cotton applauded the administration's decision in a statement, saying 'China's use of students to spy on political dissidents and American researchers is a well-documented national security threat.'
Rubio, who introduced another bill alongside Cotton targeting visas for Chinese nationals in 2021, has long invested in the issue. While representing Florida in the U.S. Senate, he pressured local colleges to shut down their Confucius Institutes. He was vocal in his opposition to China, contending in 2022 it 'is the most formidable near-peer adversary our nation has ever faced.'
Andrew Atterbury contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Truly Can't Believe The Location This Republican Senator Chose To Film Her "Apology"
I'm sure you've heard of Iowa Senator Joni Ernst's "we all are going to die" thing. She held a townhall on Thursday, and a clip of her comments about SNAP and Medicaid cuts went viral: At her town hall, when the crowd says people will die due to Medicaid and SNAP cuts, Joni Ernst responds "well we all are going to die." #iasen — danny (@dabbs346) May 30, 2025 ABC/dabbs346/Twitter: @dabbs346 Someone from the crowd shouted, "People are going to die," and Joni responded, "Well, we all are going to die." FWIW, The Hill reported she went on to say that Republicans would protect Medicaid for "the most vulnerable." She also said, "SNAP overpayments that the states have been making will need to stop," and "When you are arguing about illegals that are receiving Medicaid benefits, 1.4 million, they're not eligible, so they will be coming off." ANYWAY, this whole thing kind of blew up. People are calling this "one of the worst politician quotes" they've ever heard. And people are joking: "New GOP slogan: 'We're all gonna die!'" Related: 18 Major Global Events That American Media Is Ignoring Right Now, And Why They Actually Matter To Us Sooo, we're on round two from that. Senator Ernst decided to issue an "apology" that isn't really an apology at all. Against all odds, Joni Ernst has made it worse — Keith Edwards (@keithedwards) May 31, 2025 joniernst/Twitter: @keithedwards "Hello everyone, I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall," she said. "See, I was in the process of answering a question that was asked by an audience member when a woman who was extremely distraught screamed out from the back of the auditorium, 'People are going to die.' And I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth." "So, I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well. But for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my Lord and savior Jesus Christ." Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It Yeaaah, people are unpacking this one. "I'm at a loss for words..." one person said. Another person encouraged her to keep digging in, "Keep posting through it Joni you're almost there." And this person joked, "Leave the tooth fairy out of this, you monster." But the #1 thing people can't believe is the location where she recorded it. It appears that she's walking through a cemetery. "I'm sorry... is she walking through a cemetery as she makes this?" one person asked. Another person said, "No way that Joni Ernst apology video can be real is she in a cemetery." And this person gave her a new nickname: "Senator Grim Reaper." Thoughts? Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Miss USA's 2024 "National Costume" Has Been Revealed, And It's Obviously An Interesting Choice Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Johnson says 4.8 million Americans won't lose Medicaid access ‘unless they choose to do so'
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) doubled down on his claim that there won't be Medicaid cuts in President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' despite projections that millions of low-income individuals would lose health insurance as a result of the bill. Johnson, during an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' pushed back on independent projections that the bill would lead to 4.8 million who would lose coverage because of work requirements, saying they won't lose it 'unless they choose to do so.' 'Those 4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so,' he told host Kristen Welker. 'You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied — these young men, for example, okay — to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week, and that's too cumbersome for them? I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it.' He added that the people who are complaining about losing their coverage are doing so 'because they can't fulfill the paperwork,' noting that the policy follows 'common sense.' 'When people work, when able-bodied young men work, it's good for them, for their dignity, their purpose, and it's good for the community,' he said. 'If you can't find a job, then volunteer in your community for 20 hours, and you will meet the requirement.' The proposed Medicaid and health care reforms would require states to impose work requirements on childless adults aged 19-64 to be eligible for Medicaid. It also aims to shorten the open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act, among other changes. The reforms are key components of the bill, which the House Energy and Commerce Committee crafted after being tasked with finding more than $800 billion in savings over a decade. Those portions of the GOP proposal would save $625 billion over 10 years, according to the CBO. Johnson said that the bill 'strengthens' Medicaid and said what they are doing is 'an important and frankly heroic thing.' 'It's intended for young, you know, single, pregnant women and the disabled and the elderly,' he said. 'But what's happening right now is you have a lot of people, for example, young men, able bodied workers, who are on Medicaid. They're not working when they can.' His comments are just the latest assertion from Johnson that the bill won't threaten Medicaid coverage for people who need it. However, the bill is hitting some roadblocks for Republican lawmakers, who are finding themselves enveloped in criticism at their town halls.

Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
What's Good for Politicians Is Good for General Motors
General Motors CEO Mary Barra earned $29.5 million last year, and it's hard to argue that she isn't earning her keep. The automaker sold more cars in the U.S. than any other company last year, and its profits have doubled in her 11 years as CEO. Credit her ability to please her most important customers—politicians. Their command is her wish. While doubling down on manufacturing profitable gas guzzlers, Ms. Barra promoted electric vehicles to ingratiate herself to Democrats who want to eliminate the products that churn out profits for her company. She again proved her flexible principles last week by praising President Trump's auto tariffs, which the company estimates will dent its profits by $5 billion this year. 'I think tariffs is one tool that the administration can use to level the playing field,' she said. What she omitted is that the playing field has been tilted in GM's favor for decades by a 25% tariff on pickup trucks, which gives domestic automakers an effective monopoly. Also: Mr. Trump's new 25% tariffs on all cars and parts not made in the U.S. will hurt GM, but they will wallop its foreign competitors even more. In 2018 Ms. Barra got a crash course in politicking when she announced a corporate restructuring that involved closing four U.S. plants that produced low-selling sedans. Her goal was to make GM leaner and more profitable. In this she succeeded, but she blundered by not throwing a bone to Mr. Trump, who thinks CEOs answer to him.