New York City denied request FEMA return $80M in migrant funds
Judge Jennifer Rearden, from the Manhattan bench on Wednesday, refused to issue New York City a temporary restraining order to claw back the funds because the city did not prove it would suffer irreparable harm without the money.
"We're disappointed the court did not grant the emergency relief we were seeking while the case continued, and we are evaluating next steps," a New York City Law Department spokesperson told Fox News.
The City of New York filed the lawsuit on Feb. 21 against Trump, FEMA, the Treasury Department and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), arguing the $80 million was already approved and paid out by FEMA.
"This morning, our office learned about the federal government clawing back more than $80 million in FEMA grants applied for and awarded under the last administration, but not disbursed until last week," Mayor Eric Adams, D-N.Y., said in an X post the day the lawsuit was filed.
The lawsuit said the funds were revoked on Feb. 11, after Elon Musk said the Department of Government Efficiency found a $59 million FEMA payment to New York City for luxury hotels used to house illegal migrants. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said she rescinded the funds over concerns that the Roosevelt Hotel is the "Tren de Aragua base of operations."
"I have clawed back the full payment that FEMA deep state activists unilaterally gave to NYC migrant hotels. FEMA was funding the Roosevelt Hotel that serves as a Tren de Aragua base of operations and was used to house Laken Riley's killer. Mark my words: there will not be a single penny spent that goes against the interest and safety of the American people," Noem said in a X post.
NYC Comptroller Brad Lander, a mayoral candidate vying for Adams' seat, said the Trump administration "stole" the funds.
"Let's be clear: Donald Trump and his loser lackies—Elon Musk and Kristi Noem—acted illegally when they stole $80 million from New York City's bank account. Seizing our Congressionally-authorized, FEMA-approved money was nothing more than attempted retribution against immigrants seeking asylum, many of them sent here on buses by Governor Abbott from Texas. Like all of Trump's illegal efforts to freeze and seize Congressionally-authorized funds, this action harmed taxpayers and working families and would force the City to cut services if not reversed," Lander said in a statement following the ruling on Wednesday.
The ruling came as Adams and his fellow "sanctuary city" Democratic mayors testified about their response to the migrant crisis on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.
"I'm here today to testify on how New York City can continue to reduce crime, even as a sanctuary city," Adams told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
"To be clear: A sanctuary city classification does not mean our city will ever be a safe haven for violent criminals. It also does not give New York City the authority to violate federal immigration laws. To the contrary, New York City will always comply with city, state, and federal laws, as it does now," Adams added.
Adams vowed to protect law-abiding New York City residents, regardless of immigration status, while also directing NYPD officers to comply with DHS and ICE. The mayor's comments reflect his ongoing effort to strike a balance between protecting New Yorkers and coordinating with the Trump administration's illegal immigration crackdown.
As New York City struggled to keep up with the busloads of migrants entering the city's overwhelmed shelter system, Adams was critical of former President Joe Biden's handling of the migrant crisis.
In his plight against the migrant crisis, Adams has developed a relationship with Trump – holding a private meeting with the president in West Palm Beach, Florida, and then meeting with border czar Tom Homan to discuss the migrant crisis in New York City.
Homan said he would hold Adams to his commitments, telling "Fox & Friends," "If he doesn't come through, I'll be back in New York City, and we won't be sitting on the couch. I'll be in his office, up his butt, saying, 'Where the hell is the agreement we came to?'"
Adams' office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"This Reads Like A Satirical Cartoon": People Are Mocking This Trump Voter Who Claims To "Understand" Tariffs But Doesn't Get Why Prices Are Rising
Another day, another confused Trump voter! On today's edition, we've got a MAGA supporter who supposedly understands tariffs but can't imagine why costs are rising. In a social media screenshot posted to r/LeopardsAteMyFace, this person wrote, "Trump i voted for him,now that being said I understand the tarrifs,but what good are they doing to help us? Everything is going up i thought one reason to elect him as president was for things to be cheaper I haven't seen it,Everything is going up i know the government is making more money but its us I'm worried PLEASE!" The Trump voter seemingly edited the post with an update, writing, "OK I understand now just last time he was in office it seemed like right a way fuel was cheaper. Thanks all of you!" Related: Economists widely agree that Donald Trump's tariffs will likely result in rising costs, with many companies such as Walmart and Procter & Gamble already confirming the reasons behind their recent price hikes. Sooo I'm not sure if this Trump supporter really does understand now! Naturally, people had a lot to say in the comments: "Here let me explain using cookies: You voted for a fascist because you thought he would give other people's cookies to you, but now he's taking your cookies and telling you to go fuck yourself. Hope this helps." —u/Apple-Dust Related: "These fools will never get that tariffs are just a type of tax." —u/Gadshill "It's a sales tax with extra steps." —u/GoodDog_GoodBook123 "Why is water wet? Trump said water was dry, but every time I take a shower, I get wet? Is this something the transgender Democrats are doing? Can we arrest them? Is this from the Deep State?" —u/rwblue4u "Any Trumper who tells you they 'get' or 'understand' tariffs is lying." —u/Glenn-Sturgis Related: "This reads like a satirical cartoon. 'I understand exactly how an extra tax works, but why am I suddenly paying more?? And I could've sworn prices were cheaper last time he was in power and was working with Obama's economy… explain please??'" —u/Revolutionary-Ad5695 "The bizarre disconnect we're all going to continue to see from Trump voters on the tariffs issue is so frustrating. These bozos believed that foreign governments pay our tariffs because Trump told them this. They argued with Kamala Harris supporters at the time, despite the fact that this is Econ 101. They never believe they have ANY responsibility at all. They don't believe they're expected to research the issues, learn anything new, or verify any of the information they're being given, before they adopt it as their new mantra." "The biggest frustration is the fact that they're being continually misled and never, ever learn from it. There'll be a new lie tomorrow to cover up yesterday's lie, and they'll regurgitate it perfectly, without ever feeling any embarrassment or personal responsibility." —u/Longstroke_Machine "'Last time he was in office seemed like right away fuel was cheaper.' There was a pandemic, everything was closed, and demand for fuel cratered. I'm not sure why they all have amnesia about that part while remembering the cheap gas. They sure made enough noise about it at the time." —u/WintersChild79 Related: "'I understand now.' Lord knows what Rumpelstiltskin gold was spun on that thread with those geniuses." —u/ThatsRobToYou And finally, "Yeah. We tried to explain this beforehand, but he didn't understand since he only speaks Republican." —u/Jocelyn-1973 What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Note: Some responses have been edited for length and/or clarity. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A coal-fired plant in Michigan was to close. But Trump forced it to keep running
Donald Trump has made several unusual moves to elongate the era of coal, such as giving the industry exemptions from pollution rules. But the gambit to keep one Michigan coal-fired power station running has been extraordinary – by forcing it to remain open even against the wishes of its operator. The hulking JH Campbell power plant, which since 1962 has sat a few hundred yards from the sand dunes at the edge of Lake Michigan, was just eight days away from a long-planned closure in May when Trump's Department of Energy issued an emergency order that it remain open for a further 90 days. The move, taken under emergency powers more normally used during wartime or in the wake of disaster, stunned local residents and the plant's operator, Consumers Energy. 'My family had a countdown for it closing, we couldn't wait,' said Mark Oppenhuizen, who has lived in the shadow of the plant for 30 years and suspects its pollution worsened his wife's lung disease. 'I was flabbergasted when the administration said they had stopped it shutting down,' he said. 'Why are they inserting themselves into a decision a company has made? Just because politically you don't like it? It's all so dumb.' The 23 May order, by the US energy secretary, Chris Wright, warns that the regional grid would be strained by the closure of JH Campbell with local homes and businesses at risk of 'curtailments or outages, presenting a risk to public health and safety' without it. But Miso, the grid operator for Michigan and 14 other states, has stressed it has had 'adequate resources to meet peak demand this summer' without JH Campbell and Consumers Energy had already set about making plans for life after its last remaining coal plant. 'What's remarkable is that this is the first time the energy secretary has used these powers without being asked to do so by the market operator or power plant operator,' said Timothy Fox, an energy analyst at ClearView. 'It shows the Trump administration is prepared to take muscular actions to keep its preferred power sources online.' Wright – whose department has bizarrely taken to tweeting pictures of lumps of coal with the words 'She's an icon. She's a legend' – has said the US 'has got to stop closing coal plants' to help boost electricity generation to meet demand that is escalating due to the growth of artificial intelligence. The administration has also issued a separate emergency declaration to keep open a gas plant in Pennsylvania, although it has sought to kill off wind and solar projects, which Trump has called 'ugly' and 'disgusting'. The president, who solicited and received major donations from coal, oil and gas interests during his election campaign, has signed an executive order aimed at reviving what he calls 'beautiful, clean coal' and took the remarkable step of asking fossil fuel companies to email requests to be exempt from pollution laws, again under emergency powers. So far, 71 coal plants, along with dozens of other chemical, copper smelting and other polluting facilities, have received 'pollution passes' from the Trump administration according to a tally by the Environmental Defense Fund, allowing greater emissions of airborne toxins linked to an array of health problems. Coal is, despite Trump's claims, the dirtiest of all fossil fuels and the leading source of planet-heating pollution. Trump has launched a 'political takeover of the electricity grid' to favor fossil fuels, according to Caroline Reiser, an attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'The result of this will be higher electricity bills, more pollution in our communities and a worsening climate crisis,' she added. In Michigan, the cost of keeping JH Campbell open is set to be steep. Consumers Energy initially estimated its closure would save ratepayers $600m by 2040 as it shifts to cheaper, cleaner energy sources such as solar and wind. Reversing this decision costs $1m a day in operating costs, an imposition that midwest residents will have to meet through their bills. It is understood the company privately told outside groups it fears the administration could keep adding 90-day emergency orders for the entire remainder of Trump's term. 'Consumers Energy continues to comply with the [Department of Energy] order and will do so as long as it is in effect,' a company spokesperson said. 'We are pursuing recovery of the costs of running the Campbell plant in a proceeding currently before [the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]. Timely cost recovery is essential.' Should the Trump administration go further and force all of the US fossil fuel plants set to retire by 2028 to continue operating, it will cost American ratepayers as much as $6bn a year in extra bills, a new report by a coalition of green groups has found. This would almost certainly be met by legal action – Dana Nessel, Michigan's attorney general, has already filed a lawsuit arguing the 'arbitrary and illegal order' to extend JH Campbell's lifespan will unfairly heap costs upon households in the state. Trump's efforts may bear some fruit, with US coal production expected to tick up slightly this year, although the longer-term trend for coal is one of decline amid cheaper gas and renewables. 'The administration may slow the retirement trend although they are unlikely to stop it,' said ClearView's Fox. 'The economics don't change but the administration could be a savior for these plants at least while Donald Trump is in office.' For those living next to and downwind of coal plants, there is a cost to be paid that isn't just monetary. Tiny soot particles from burned coal can bury themselves deep into the lungs, causing potentially deadly respiratory and heart problems. The closure of such plants can lift this burden dramatically – a recent study found that in the month after a coal facility was closed near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 2016, the number of childhood asthma visits to local hospitals declined by 41% and then continued to fall by about 4% each month. The study shows 'the closure of a major industrial pollution source can lead to immediate and lasting improvements in the lung health of the those who live nearby', said Wuyue Yu, research co-author and postdoctoral fellow at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. For those living in the township of Port Sheldon, a mostly bucolic setting on the shore of the vast Lake Michigan, a pollution-free future beckoned once JH Campbell had been scheduled to close, with lofty plans for new parkland, housing and a battery plant touted for the site. Now there is uncertainty. Last week, a few dozen residents and activists held a protest event next to the sprawling plant, which hummed and whirred in the summer heat, one 650ft chimney puncturing the horizon, another, smaller flue striped red and white, like a candy cane. Dozens of train cars full of coal, hastily procured after the plant's supply was used up ahead of a closure that has been scheduled for four years, backed up in the sunshine. When burned in the huge 1.5GW plant, this coal emits about 7.7m tons of carbon dioxide a year. 'Trump is just trying to keep the money coming into coal companies as long as he can, I suppose,' said David Hoekema, who has lived a couple of miles from the plant since 2006 and has had to clean coal dust from his windows. Trump easily won this county, called Ottawa, in last year's election, but Hoekema said even his staunchest conservative neighbors don't want the coal plant. 'I've not met anyone along the lake shore who says, 'Oh yeah, let's keep this open' – even the conservative Republicans are concerned about their health,' he said. 'Republican ideology says local control is best but the Trump administration is saying, 'We don't care what the hell states do, we will impose our order on them.' I know there's a lot of competition, but this would have to be one of their craziest decisions.' The Department of Energy did not respond to questions about its plan for JH Campbell once the emergency order ends on Thursday. The battle over the coal plant's future has taken place to a backdrop of a scorching summer in Michigan, one of its hottest on record, with algal blooms sprouting in its lakes, both symptoms of an unfolding climate crisis. 'The talk in neighborhoods has been how hot it's been this summer – my kid was prepared to be outside every day and it's been so hot so often it's been irresponsible to do that,' said Stephen Wooden, a Democratic state lawmaker who added that Michigan residents are also 'pissed off' about increasing power bills. 'We're seeing the impacts of climate change daily, it is impacting our state,' Wooden said. 'And this is being caused by the continuation of outdated, expensive fossil fuels that Donald Trump wants to prop up.' Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
US and EU frame the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidify some commitments
WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States and the European Union on Thursday issued a joint statement that frames the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidifies some trade commitments. 'This Framework Agreement will put our trade and investment relationship — one of the largest in the world — on a solid footing and will reinvigorate our economies' reindustrialization,' the document reads. Together, the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. Key points in the letter include a 15% U.S. tariff rate on most European goods, with specifics on auto tariffs tied to EU legislative actions. In addition, the EU agrees to eliminate tariffs on industrial goods and many agricultural products, while the U.S. will reduce tariffs accordingly. The agreement also covers $750 billion in energy purchases and $600 billion in EU investments by 2028. The agreement also addresses non-tariff barriers, digital trade and environmental regulations. In July, President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met briefly at Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland and announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. Before the Republican U.S. president returned to office for his second term, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with about $2 trillion, around 1.7 trillion euros, in annual trade.
