Trump tariffs: Ireland expected to be among hardest hit
Ireland is expected to be one of the most affected countries when President Trump announces a new round of tariffs later this week.
EU goods are expected to face a tariff of about 20% when entering the United States.
Among EU countries, Ireland is the most reliant on the US as an export market.
In 2024, Irish goods exports to the US were worth €73bn (£61bn), almost a third of the country's total exports.
Tariffs are effectively taxes applied to goods imported from other countries.
Governments impose tariffs in the hope of protecting local manufacturers from international competition.
The Taoiseach (Irish Prime Minister) Micheál Martin said on Monday that increased US tariffs were "a very grave and serious threat".
Analysis co-authored by Ireland's Department of Finance and the ESRI think tank suggested the tariffs could cost Ireland more than €18bn (£15bn) in lost trade.
It also warned that a prolonged trade war between the EU and US would pose a risk to Ireland's public finances.
The level of concern in Ireland as the tariff's announcement draws closer can be gauged by the level of public interest in the issue.
Many Irish towns and cities have enjoyed the benefits of a US business presence for decades, while the workers who are employed in these big businesses travel to the plants from all over Ireland, meaning that the impact of any tariffs could reach into countless communities all over the country.
Monaghan-based manufacturer Combilift makes about a quarter of its sales in the US market where it also employs 50 people.
The company's co-founder and managing director Martin McVicar visited Chicago in March to brief his US customers.
He told them he will freeze the dollar price of all Combilift products this year to give them some certainty about import costs.
"We've given our customers certainty on what their costs will be in US dollars for products delivered to the port in the US.
"At least they can try to plan their business around that at this stage."
Mr McVicar remains bullish about the US market as he sees their products as helping customers run their businesses more efficiently.
Combilift makes forklifts which can operate in very tight spaces which allow companies to store more in their warehouses.
"We're enabling customers to expand without having to relocate and we're adamant that should outweigh the impact of a tariff," he said.
Ireland's biggest export sector is pharmaceuticals: the country is a major manufacturing hub for US companies like Pfizer and Eli Lilly.
In 2024 overall exports of medical and pharmaceutical products rose by €22.4bn (£18.8bn) or 29% to just under €100bn (£83.7bn).
These products accounted for 45% of all Irish goods exports.
Trump has repeatedly expressed his unhappiness at the scale of US pharma manufacturing in Ireland.
Last month he said: "All of a sudden Ireland has our pharmaceutical companies, this beautiful island of five million people has got the entire US pharmaceutical industry in its grasp."
Trump has also talked about imposing specific tariffs on pharma, as he has done for imports of cars.
However that is not expected to form part of this immediate round of tariffs.
Analysis: John Campbell, BBC News NI economics and business editor
Ireland has been one of the winners of globalisation - that long process which has made it easier for people, goods and money to flow around the world.
Reforms to global tax rules over the last decade have been particularly beneficial.
That has led to major international pharmaceutical and technology companies paying a large chunk of their taxes in Ireland.
So much money has flowed in that the government has been able to set up a national wealth fund.
Donald Trump's deglobalising instincts are a clear threat to that prosperity.
Dan O'Brien, chief economist of the Institute of International and European Affairs, believes the Irish economy could be exposed because of the success of the pharmaceutical sector there.
"The republic is the single biggest exporter of pharmaceuticals to the United States. With a population of just over five million that makes it a bigger exporter than even the likes of traditional powerhouses like Germany and Switzerland," he said.
Mr O'Brien added the potential impact of the tariffs on Ireland could have parallels with the country's economic crash in 2008.
"Then there was a financial crisis, it was immediate, it was like the wind blew the roof off the house," he said.
"In this case it's more like a more gradual erosion of the foundations, which obviously is very important for any structure."
Irish finance minister delivers warning over US tariffs
Irish goods exports to US surge by 34%
Trump targets Irish pharmaceutical industry for US tariffs
If the people of the country were not quite sure what the implication of the changes might be, the Irish government has left them in no doubt in recent weeks.
In a sobering analysis, the Minister for Finance, Pascal Donohoe, who is renowned for his cautious style of commentary around economic matters, outlined the possible outcome for Ireland in the worst-case scenario.
The minister, who is also president of the Eurogroup of Finance Ministers, said: "It is very possible that between 50,000 and 80,000 jobs that would have been created or kept within the economy won't be."
This sobering analysis has been accompanied by transatlantic and EU diplomatic discussions involving the Taoiseach Micheál Martin, and the Tánaiste (deputy PM) and Minister for Foreign Affairs, Simon Harris.
What are tariffs and why is Trump using them?
US tariffs 'potentially devastating' for Irish whiskey
Threat of US tariffs spells uncertainty for NI businesses
The scale of Ireland's dependency on foreign direction investment involving the US has been explained by Ireland's Industrial Development Authority (IDA).
An IDA spokesperson told BBC News NI: "IDA Ireland partners with more than 1,800 FDI client companies, 766 of which are US companies that directly employ over 210,000 people and indirectly support an additional 166,000 jobs.
"Conversely, Ireland is the sixth largest source of foreign direct investment into the US, with investment by Irish companies in 2023 worth $351bn (£272bn).
"More than 200,000 people are employed by 770 Irish companies across all 50 States."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.
President Donald Trump is vowing to spark a manufacturing boom with tariffs to protect American workers and industry. So far, it's manufacturers that have borne the brunt of the pain. The president's surprise decision to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50 percent will hit domestic manufacturing just as a new report shows the industry is already contracting. Uncertainty about where tariff rates will ultimately land — or where they'll be applied — has forced businesses to make hard decisions that could cut into both profits and hiring. And a leading trade group on Thursday called on Trump to give the companies a break on the tariffs. 'For a president who is intent on building U.S. manufacturing, the tariff strategy he's laid out is remarkably short-sighted,' said Gordon Hanson, a Harvard Kennedy School professor whose groundbreaking 2016 research work, 'The China Shock,' was among the first to sound the alarm about the threat to American industry. 'It fails to recognize what modern supply chains look like.' 'Even if you're intent on reshoring parts of manufacturing, you can't do it all,' he said. 'Steel and aluminum are part of that.' If Trump's tariffs fail to result in a manufacturing renaissance — a central focus of his presidential campaign — it could weaken the prospects of a GOP coalition that's increasingly reliant on working-class voters who supported his protectionist trade policies. But as unanticipated tariffs continue to drive up input costs for companies that need steel and aluminum for production, the warning signs emanating from manufacturers are getting louder. An index published this week by the Institute for Supply Management, which tracks manufacturing, slipped for the third straight month in May as companies made plans to scale back production. A quarterly survey conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers reported the steepest drop in optimism since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, with trade uncertainty and raw material costs cited as top concerns. Federal Reserve data this month reported weaker manufacturing output. The manufacturers' association on Thursday urged Trump to develop a 'speed pass' that would allow companies to avoid costly new duties on imported raw materials and components that are essential to U.S. producers. 'The steel and aluminum tariffs are almost custom-made to hurt American manufacturing,' said Ernie Tedeschi, a former top Biden administration economist who's now with the Yale Budget Lab. Trump and top administration officials argue that tariffs will encourage investment in domestic manufacturers, which should lead to better-paying jobs, a more resilient economy and more secure supply chains. Exports climbed in April as the president's tariffs took hold, which contributed to an eye-popping decline in the U.S. trade deficit. Indeed, the overall economy remains solid, and businesses are continuing to hire, according to Friday's jobs report for May. Despite the trade headwinds, employment in the manufacturing sector has remained steady since Trump took office. 'As the president says, if you don't make steel, you can't fight a war. He's protecting that industry and bringing it back,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Senate lawmakers this week. 'You're going to see more steel and aluminum furnaces and mills in the history of this country get built over the next three years.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump welcomed the monthly jobs report, posting on Truth Social: 'AMERICA IS HOT! SIX MONTHS AGO IT WAS COLD AS ICE! BORDER IS CLOSED, PRICES ARE DOWN. WAGES ARE UP!' Still, domestic manufacturers who rely on international supply chains for critical steel and aluminum inputs will face tough choices if they want to maintain their profits while keeping output steady. 'Higher costs are expected. Higher input prices. The question is, what do you do with those costs? How much can you pass along to the consumer? How much can you negotiate with your suppliers?' said Andrew Siciliano, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's trade and customs practice. The challenges posed by the increase in steel and aluminum tariffs are particularly acute because it's far from clear whether domestic suppliers will be able to meet the demands of domestic manufacturers. Almost half the aluminum used in the U.S. last year came from foreign sources, according to federal data, and roughly a quarter of all steel is imported. Either way, 'input costs are going to be higher,' Siciliano said. 'If they pass it on, it could affect demand. If they don't pass it on, it could affect profitability.' That isn't to say manufacturers won't benefit from tariffs in the long term. To the extent that Trump's overall tariff regime limits imports, U.S.-based industrial production could expand to address unmet demand. The Budget Lab's analysis of Trump's tariff regime — which includes the 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum — projects that manufacturing output could grow by 1.3 percent over the next five years if existing import duties are left in place. But Tedeschi cautioned that growth may exclude segments like electronic and semiconductor production — which tend to generate higher incomes for workers. Meanwhile, output in other sectors like construction or agriculture would likely contract. Julia Coronado, founder of MacroPolicy Perspectives, also said the flurry of new import duties may prompt some manufacturers to actually move their manufacturing facilities offshore rather than subject their supply chains and production processes to multiple tariffs. 'If I have to assemble a bunch of parts and inputs, why don't I just don't do that on the Canadian or Mexican side of the border and then pay the tariff on the final good?' she said. An even bigger challenge may involve finding and training workers who can staff up any facilities that reshore. Most Americans work in the service sector and, to the extent tariffs lead to reshoring, those facilities will likely rely heavily on automation, according to economists at the Bank of America Institute. Finding qualified workers in the U.S. is either too difficult or too expensive. 'Whatever manufacturing production comes back to the U.S. will require far fewer jobs than 30 or 40 years ago,' Hanson said. 'It's just the way the world has gone.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's Net Worth Takes $27 Billion Hit Amid Feud With Pres. Donald Trump
Elon Musk's exit from President Donald Trump's White House has resulted in the two towering figures feuding online, with the richest man in the world's net worth taking a significant hit due to the back-and-forth. Finance pub Forbes reports that Musk's net worth fell below $400 billion this Thursday, dropping from $414.7 billion to $388 billion, a difference of around $26.7 billion. More specifically, Musk's Tesla stock declined 14%, or $47 per share, to $285 on what Forbes calls, 'an otherwise flat day for the market.' The drop in value came almost immediately after Musk and Pres. Trump began exchanging blows on social media Thursday (June 5), with Musk claiming that Trump would've never been elected for a second term if it were not for him (Musk spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election) while Trump accused Musk of having 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' Musk also accused Trump of being listed on the Jefferey Epstein files, suggesting the current president has a direct connection to the late sex offender and financier. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk wrote on X, which he owns. '[Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He later followed up, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' The rift seemingly began after Musk exited his role as one of Trump's advisors and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Soon after, Elon called out Trump and Republicans for passing the One Big Beautiful Bill, which Musk deemed a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill' that is a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump fired back by suggesting he would terminate government contracts with Musk's businesses, which include rocket company SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. This threat is possibly what led to Musk's businesses dropping in value literally overnight. The Hill reports that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called Thursday's spat 'an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.' More from Donald Trump's Pardon For NBA YoungBoy Could Be In Jeopardy Donald Trump Announces Travel Ban And Restrictions Affecting 19 Countries Following Terrorist Attack In Colorado Elon Musk Slams Donald Trump Agenda Bill Days After White House Exit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Karoline Leavitt Snaps in Wake of Trump's Brutal Court Loss
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt went on yet another angry tirade against federal judges who rule against Donald Trump. During an appearance on Fox News Thursday night, Leavitt was asked to respond to a federal judge who blocked the removal of the wife and five children of a man charged in a firebombing attack against peaceful protesters in Boulder, Colorado. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had the family arrested despite having no evidence that they were involved in the attack. Leavitt, who regularly rails against anyone who opposes Trump, was predictably incensed. 'Well, this is just another rogue decision by a rogue judge who is trying to be—I don't know—the president of the United States? The secretary of state? The secretary of homeland security?' Leavitt said. 'Surely, these important matters of both homeland security and national security do not belong to lower district, local judges in these districts across the country.' Leavitt's insistence that federal judges, whom she attempted to dismiss as 'local,' don't have the jurisdiction to rule against Trump betrays a failure to grasp the whole 'checks and balances' part of the U.S. Constitution. Leavitt continued, once again complaining about another federal judge who had blocked the unlawful deportation of immigrants to South Sudan, and supposedly stranded some ICE agents in a 'dangerous part of the world.' (The judge did not specifically say that the agents needed to stay overseas, which means the government is choosing not to bring them back.) 'Lower district court judges do not get to dictate the foreign policy and the national security interests of the United States of America. We can't run a country if the executive is not allowed to freely exercise its powers, and that's what we're seeing take place,' Leavitt said. Unfortunately for the Trump administration, the hits to its illegal immigration agenda just keep on coming. A federal judge on Thursday blocked the arrest and removal of Yunseo Chung, a Columbia University student and green card holder who was targeted by the administration over her involvement in pro-Palestinian protests. In a brutal hearing, U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald called the government's position 'disturbing' and 'disappointing.' 'This is a new world. I'm a little taken aback,' Reice Buchwald said.