Court rejects Swiss husband's attempt to evade maintenance by claiming poverty
Image: FILE
To pay maintenance to a divorcing spouse - even if it is only interim payments as per a court order pending a final divorce - is a legal obligation, the court reminded a husband based in Switzerland, who blamed a skiing accident for his non-payment.
The Western Cape High Court did not accept his excuses and ordered the man to pay R277 000 in arrear maintenance to his wife. This must be done within 15 days and if he failed, his wife was granted permission to immediately launch contempt of court proceedings against him.
The wife, who lives in Cape Town, turned to court as she wanted her husband, from whom she is not yet divorced, to honour his maintenance obligations as per a previous court order. The court, in dealing with the matter, remarked that 'we must remind ourselves" that one of the legal consequences of marriage, whether in or out of community of property, is that the spouses owe each other a reciprocal duty of maintenance according to their means.
The scale on which support must be contributed depends upon the social position, financial means and style of living chosen by the spouse.
The husband was earlier ordered to pay R31 773.70 per month, effective from September 1, 2022, towards his wife's upkeep, pending their divorce. While he did pay for a while, he simply stopped the payments.
The husband disputed that he was in wilful default in not complying with the court order. He explained that in January 2023, while skiing with his family in Grindelwald, he had an accident as he fell and hit his head. He was hospitalised the same day and was discharged the following day. Pursuant to the injury, he felt confused and disoriented and had a headache. He subsequently collapsed and was taken to the hospital.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
At the hospital, he was later informed that he had suffered a coronary stroke and that the stroke was likely to have been caused by his fall, which he experienced during the skiing trip. According to the husband, he was in a coma for three days. The respondent asserted that he could not return to work.
The Child and Adult Protection Authorities in Switzerland meanwhile appointed a legal guardian to assist the husband with managing his affairs. The Swiss Accident Insurance Organisation, however, until the end of June this year, issued him with a monthly disability income of about 80% of his previous salary. But, the husband said, he must pay his own expenses from this money.
The court questioned why he never told his curator, who managed his affairs, that he had to pay maintenance to his wife, as per a court order. The court said, as pointed out by his wife, the husband had enough money as the funds are in Swiss francs, one of the strongest currencies in the world.
The husband could have easily made payments to the applicant in rands, which is weaker than the Swiss franc, it said. But what was most concerning to the court was the fact the husband pleaded poverty, while it came to light that he was a beneficiary of a R20.3 million trust fund.
'The respondent (husband) is fully capable of accessing his portion of these funds to pay maintenance to the applicant as per the court order,' the judge said.
Cape Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Court rejects Swiss husband's attempt to evade maintenance by claiming poverty
A divorcing husband's excuses that he was involved in a skiing accident and thus cannot pay maintenance to his wife, was rejected by the court. Image: FILE To pay maintenance to a divorcing spouse - even if it is only interim payments as per a court order pending a final divorce - is a legal obligation, the court reminded a husband based in Switzerland, who blamed a skiing accident for his non-payment. The Western Cape High Court did not accept his excuses and ordered the man to pay R277 000 in arrear maintenance to his wife. This must be done within 15 days and if he failed, his wife was granted permission to immediately launch contempt of court proceedings against him. The wife, who lives in Cape Town, turned to court as she wanted her husband, from whom she is not yet divorced, to honour his maintenance obligations as per a previous court order. The court, in dealing with the matter, remarked that 'we must remind ourselves" that one of the legal consequences of marriage, whether in or out of community of property, is that the spouses owe each other a reciprocal duty of maintenance according to their means. The scale on which support must be contributed depends upon the social position, financial means and style of living chosen by the spouse. The husband was earlier ordered to pay R31 773.70 per month, effective from September 1, 2022, towards his wife's upkeep, pending their divorce. While he did pay for a while, he simply stopped the payments. The husband disputed that he was in wilful default in not complying with the court order. He explained that in January 2023, while skiing with his family in Grindelwald, he had an accident as he fell and hit his head. He was hospitalised the same day and was discharged the following day. Pursuant to the injury, he felt confused and disoriented and had a headache. He subsequently collapsed and was taken to the hospital. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ At the hospital, he was later informed that he had suffered a coronary stroke and that the stroke was likely to have been caused by his fall, which he experienced during the skiing trip. According to the husband, he was in a coma for three days. The respondent asserted that he could not return to work. The Child and Adult Protection Authorities in Switzerland meanwhile appointed a legal guardian to assist the husband with managing his affairs. The Swiss Accident Insurance Organisation, however, until the end of June this year, issued him with a monthly disability income of about 80% of his previous salary. But, the husband said, he must pay his own expenses from this money. The court questioned why he never told his curator, who managed his affairs, that he had to pay maintenance to his wife, as per a court order. The court said, as pointed out by his wife, the husband had enough money as the funds are in Swiss francs, one of the strongest currencies in the world. The husband could have easily made payments to the applicant in rands, which is weaker than the Swiss franc, it said. But what was most concerning to the court was the fact the husband pleaded poverty, while it came to light that he was a beneficiary of a R20.3 million trust fund. 'The respondent (husband) is fully capable of accessing his portion of these funds to pay maintenance to the applicant as per the court order,' the judge said. Cape Times
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Court enforces maintenance payments from husband after skiing accident excuses
A divorcing husband's excuses that he was involved in a skiing accident and thus cannot pay maintenance to his wife, was rejected by the court. Image: File To pay maintenance to a divorcing spouse - even if it is only interim payments as per a court order pending a final divorce - is a legal obligation, the court reminded a husband based in Switzerland, who blamed a skiing accident for his non-payment. The Western Cape High Court did not accept his excuses and ordered the man to pay R277,000 in arrear maintenance to his wife. This must be done within 15 days and if he failed, his wife was granted permission to immediately launch contempt of court proceedings against him. The wife, who lives in Cape Town, turned to court as she wants her husband, from whom she is not yet divorced, to honour his maintenance obligations as per a previous court order. The court, in dealing with the matter, remarked that 'we must remind ourselves" that one of the legal consequences of marriage, whether in or out of community of property, is that the spouses owe each other a reciprocal duty of maintenance according to their means. The scale on which support must be contributed depends upon the social position, financial means and style of living chosen by the spouse. The husband was earlier ordered to pay R31,773,70 per month, effective from 1 September 2022, towards his wife's upkeep, pending their divorce. While he did pay for a while, he simply stopped the payments. The husband disputed that he was in wilful default in not complying with the court order. He explained that in January 2023, while skiing with his family in Grindelwald, he had an accident as he fell and hit his head. He was hospitalised the same day and was discharged the following day. Pursuant to the injury, he felt confused and disoriented and had a headache. He subsequently collapsed and was taken to the hospital. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ At the hospital, he was later informed that he had suffered a coronary stroke and that the stroke was likely to have been caused by his fall, which he experienced during the skiing trip. According to the husband, he was in a coma for three days. The respondent asserted that he could not return to work. The Child and Adult Protection Authorities in Switzerland meanwhile appointed a legal guardian to assist the husband with managing his affairs. The Swiss Accident Insurance Organisation, however, until the end of June this year, issued him with a monthly disability income of about 80% of his previous salary. But, the husband said, he must pay his own expenses from this money. The court questioned why he never told his curator, who managed his affairs, that he had to pay maintenance to his wife, as per a court order. The court said, as pointed out by his wife, the husband had enough money as the funds are in Swiss francs, one of the strongest currencies in the world. The husband could have easily made payments to the applicant in rands, which is weaker than the Swiss franc, it said. But what was most concerning to the court was the fact the husband pleaded poverty, while it came to light that he was a beneficiary of a R20.3 million trust fund. 'The respondent (husband) is fully capable of accessing his portion of these funds to pay maintenance to the applicant as per the court order,' the judge said.
Eyewitness News
04-06-2025
- Eyewitness News
Judge slams Home Affairs for 'unintelligible, illogical babble' in gay case
'Unintelligible, illogical babble'. This is how a Western Cape High Court judge described the reasoning of a Home Affairs official who rejected an application for asylum by a citizen of Chad, who had been imprisoned in his home country for being gay. Judge Gayaat Da Silva Salie set aside the rejection of the asylum application and ordered that it be heard afresh by another Refugee Status Determination Officer (RSDO) within six months. The man, identified only as MAM in the judgment, said he fled Chad after he had been arrested and served a year in jail, convicted under the country's 'anti-homosexual' laws. He came to South Africa on a visitor's visa in May 2023 and was involved in a relationship with a South African doctor. In 2024 he applied for asylum. His last interview was in September 2024. He was then informed that his application had been rejected. In his reasons, the RSDO gave a long explanation of the political system in Chad. He then recorded: 'You were arrested and sentenced because of your sexual orientation and homosexuals are not allowed in your country. You stated that you were released by the court because you have use of a lawyer. When I assessed your information concerning homosexuals, there's a separation of powers between the executive and the judicial power in terms of homosexual laws. The government does not allow same sex relations and the courts released the offenders. Therefore your application has been rejected as unfounded.' MAM, in his submissions, said he could not appeal this decision internally because it was 'unintelligible, irrational and failed to consider the applicable law in Chad'. He said this constituted 'exceptional circumstances' which allowed him to approach a court, without exhausting his internal appeal remedies, as provided for in the Refugees Act. Judge Da Silva Salie said MAM had submitted that he fled Chad after being imprisoned solely for being a homosexual man. He said his safety and freedom remain threatened in Chad. He indicated that his family had disowned him and he faced persecution from the state and society at large. However, the respondents — the Director-General and the Minister of Home Affairs — opposed the application. They argued that the reasons were not only adequate but also clear. They also argued that the matter did not meet the threshold of 'exceptional circumstances' to approach a court for judicial scrutiny without exhausting internal remedies. Judge Da Silva Salie said the RSDO had concluded that the applicant's asylum claim was 'unfounded' relying primarily on the assertion that the judiciary in Chad is independent, and that although homosexuality is criminalised, some courts had released offenders. 'I find the argument that these reasons were clear and adequate to be rather problematic. 'They are contradictory and factually incoherent. The RSDO accepts the facts of criminalisation of homosexuality whilst simultaneously rejecting the credibility of his claim of fear of future persecution. 'This reflects a profound misunderstanding of the legal standards governing asylum, especially the well-founded fear of persecution provided for in the Refugees Act.' She noted that the RSDO had also disregarded the legal framework that governed asylum decisions and South Africa's international obligations to the rights of LGBTQI+ people. 'The theoretical independence of the judiciary cannot override the reality that consensual same-sex conduct remains criminalised in Chad and that the applicant was prosecuted and imprisoned under those laws,' she said. 'If anything, the position can only be worse for him should he return as he would be a convicted person of homosexual offences. The assertion that 'the courts released offenders' ignores that harm has already occurred. ' She said the reasons lacked any intelligible or informative content which could assist MAM in formulating an internal appeal and were 'characteristic of a sequence of illogical babble'. 'It is unintelligible,' she said. She cautioned that officials could not 'hide behind the hurdle to exhaust internal remedies', when they had provided obtuse and unfathomable reasons for application rejections. 'They are required to apply their minds and provide reasons which are clear, adequate, and provide a meaningful basis from which an applicant can comprehend, request further reasons and decide in an informed manner as to their further rights and remedies in law.' Judge Da Silva Salie set aside the rejection application and ordered that MAM be interviewed by a different officer within six months. She ordered the government respondents to pay the costs of the application. This article first appeared on GroundUp. Read the original article here.
