Explosion at Los Angeles police training centre kills three officers
The explosion took place shortly after 7:30am local time (14:30 GMT) on Friday at the Biscailuz Training Facility in East Los Angeles.
'Tragically, there were three Department member fatalities. Sheriff's homicide detectives are on scene,' the department said on social media.
The department described the explosion as a 'critical workplace incident'. The blast closed roads in the surrounding area, though the sheriff's department reassured locals that there was no threat to the wider community.
Sheriff Robert Luna held a midday news conference not far from the blast site, where he declined to identify the three victims. He did, however, say that one had served 19 years with the force, another 22 years, and a third 33 years.
'This is unfortunately the largest loss of life for us as the LA County Sheriff's Department since 1857. Between all three sworn members, they had served our community proudly for 74 years,' Luna said.
The sheriff also said the three victims were part of a special enforcement bureau tasked with arson and explosives enforcement.
On social media earlier in the day, United States Attorney General Pam Bondi indicated that members of the local bureau of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) were on the ground to probe what happened.
'I just spoke to [US Attorney Bill Essayli] about what appears to be a horrific incident that killed at least three at a law enforcement training facility in Los Angeles,' Bondi wrote on social media. 'Please pray for the families of the sheriff's deputies killed.'
At his midday news conference, Sheriff Luna said that details about the explosion were forthcoming as the investigation was only in its initial stages.
'At this time, we do not know the cause of the explosion,' Luna said. 'There is no threat to this community. This is an isolated incident.'
Luna added that he is prioritising notifying the relatives of the victims before releasing further information to the public.
He has met two of the three families so far, he said. 'As you can imagine, those were extremely challenging conversations.'
The sheriff also thanked the bomb squad of the Los Angeles Police Department for helping to secure the blast site.
'They immediately came out to assist after this explosion occurred to render the devices safe,' he said. 'And just so all of you know, they were just rendered safe within the last minutes, right before we walked out here, so it was still an active scene. It wasn't stable and definitely a very active crime scene.'
He explained that investigators can only go on-site now that there is no further risk of explosions.
'There's a lot more that we don't know than what we do know,' he added.
Luna, however, was quick to defend the professionalism of the special enforcement bureau, calling its members 'the best of the best'.
'The individuals who work our arsons explosives detail, they have years of training,' Luna said. 'Usually, the average calls that they go to in dealing with some very dangerous situations or items average about 11,000 per year. So these aren't people who don't do this very often. They are fantastic experts. And unfortunately, I lost three of them today.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
22 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Can Barack Obama be prosecuted over ‘Russian interference' intelligence?
US National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard launched a new attack on former President Barack Obama this week, alleging that he conspired to undermine Trump's 2016 presidential victory by using false intelligence purporting to show Russian interference in Trump's favour. On Wednesday, Gabbard told a White House news briefing that she had declassified evidence of a conspiracy between Obama and senior officials in his administration. Gabbard said she had referred Obama to the Department of Justice for potential criminal prosecution. However, declassified documents released by Gabbard this week, including a September 2020 report led by House Republicans on the intelligence committee, do not appear to implicate Obama in any apparent way, experts say. 'There is no evidence of criminal acts on Obama's part or anyone in his administration,' Barbara Ann Perry, who analyses US presidents at the Virginia-based Miller Center, told Al Jazeera. Several investigations by Congress and the intelligence community have previously found that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election. The document release and investigation come as the White House faces growing pressure from within Trump's MAGA base to release classified information about the high-profile sex offender and one-time Trump ally, Jeffrey Epstein. 'There is a direct correlation between diversion from the Epstein files, which Trump and his MAGA followers have demanded to see for years,' Perry said. Here's what we know about the allegations Gabbard is making: What has Gabbard accused Obama of? Gabbard has declassified a 44-page report prepared by the House of Representatives intelligence committee in September 2020 that she claims proves that Obama and senior officials in his administration engineered a 'treasonous conspiracy' to suggest that Russia had influenced the 2016 presidential election in favour of Trump. The report, which was led by House Republicans, reviewed how US intelligence had concluded that Moscow interfered in the elections in a January 2017 Intelligence Community assessment that was published two months after the elections. 'There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false,' Gabbard said at the briefing, adding that the idea that Russia interfered in the election to promote Trump was a 'contrived narrative'. Obama's administration 'manufactured findings from shoddy sources … In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people, who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016', she said. Gabbard added that she had referred the former president to the Justice Department for a possible criminal prosecution. Previously, on July 18, Gabbard released a separate batch of declassified information containing a trove of documents, including emails (PDF) from Obama administration officials in the months leading up to the elections. In it, they concluded that 'there is no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means.' Gabbard said in a statement that the Obama administration went ahead with investigating Russian interference after Trump won the 2016 elections, despite that initial conclusion and despite intelligence agencies like the CIA stating in advance of the vote that Russia could not affect the vote count. Those efforts were made to 'subvert the will of the American people' and amounted to a 'years-long coup' against Trump, she said. President Trump, on Tuesday, accused Obama and top officials of his administration of treason. 'It's time to go after people,' he said. Are Tulsi's claims correct? Analysts say the report that Gabbard released on Wednesday, as well as the documents declassified last week, do not appear to provide evidence that Russia did not interfere in the elections to favour Trump, or that Obama ordered the investigation to reach a pre-determined conclusion. Responding to Gabbard's claims that the Obama White House ordered an investigation into the matter despite US intelligence agencies repeatedly assessing that foreign adversaries could not launch cyber attacks on the elections, Perry of the Miller Center said there was a valid reason for Obama's delayed order. 'There was suspicion on the part of the White House that Russia was interfering with the election, but the Obama administration did not take direct action to prove its suspicion until after the election for fear of being accused by Trump of interfering in it on Clinton's behalf,' Perry said. At the time, during the 2016 election campaign, Trump had repeatedly predicted at rallies that he might lose the vote because Democrats wanted to 'steal the election'. That atmosphere may have discouraged the Obama administration from doing anything until after the vote, Perry added. In addition, the documents Gabbard released from Obama officials do not appear to contradict the established conclusions of Russian interference, analysts say. Obama officials did not allege that vote counts had been manipulated, but rather that Russian hackers had launched covert digital operations aimed at sowing discord in the US during the vote, including by leaking emails of top Democrats, such as Clinton, and trying to influence opinion on social media using 'bots'. The Senate Intelligence Committee report that Gabbard released, in which she hoped to undermine the Obama-era investigations into Russian interference, affirmed that position, although it blamed Obama administration officials for concluding that Russia interfered specifically to favour Trump. Election interference encompasses a wide range of illegitimate means to change election outcomes, including vote rigging, vote buying or covert manipulation of voters. Will there be a criminal investigation now? On Wednesday, the Justice Department, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, announced the creation of a 'strike force' that will assess Gabbard's claims and consider potential next legal steps. In a statement, Bondi said the Justice Department would 'investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice'. She did not give details about what the next steps might be. Obama, as a former US president, enjoys civil and criminal immunity for actions undertaken during his time as president, which are regarded as 'official'. This could represent a stumbling block for any prosecutions, analysts say. Indeed, in a landmark decision siding with Trump in July 2024, the Supreme Court confirmed that presidents have absolute immunity when they carry out 'official acts'. Trump, at the time, was being prosecuted for actions during his first presidency, which, prosecutors said, amounted to an attempt to influence the 2020 election results. Perry of the Miller Center said Obama's order for an investigation constituted an 'official act'. The Justice Department could attempt to argue that investigating Moscow's interference in the US elections was not a core presidential duty, but that would likely be a weak assertion, she said. What did the intelligence showing Russian interference say? Several intelligence reports concluded that Russia did try to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including investigations by two Justice Department special counsels, a Republican-led House committee on intelligence, which was recently released, and the Senate intelligence committee. The matter is one of the most extensively scrutinised in US election history. Russia, for its part, has denied the allegations. Trump and his allies frequently refer to the investigations as a 'hoax' because they also attempted to examine links between Trump, his associates, and Russian operatives. In January 2017, two months after the election, US intelligence agencies initially concluded that Russia had been responsible for cyberattacks on the email accounts of top Democrats, and for sowing discord on social media, using bots and trolls. The CIA said that the Kremlin orchestrated and codenamed the operation Project Lakhta. FBI investigations also focused on individual Trump officials, such as George Papadoulous, who was indicted for providing false statements to the FBI regarding his relations with Russians. Papadoulous was found to have known about the Russian operation, but there was no evidence that he had shared that information with the Trump campaign. During Trump's first presidency, the Justice Department probed the conduct of the intelligence agencies regarding the investigations and found that there had been no 'political bias' involved. The most followed report was released by special counsel Robert Mueller in 2019. It concluded that the 'Russian government interfered in the 2016 election in a sweeping and systematic fashion' through social media campaigns that favoured Trump, because Moscow assessed that it would benefit from a Trump presidency. The operations sought to damage Clinton's image by hacking into email accounts of members of the Clinton campaign and leaking them to the public, the report stated. There was no criminal indictment, however, because Mueller concluded that there was no evidence that Trump's campaign coordinated with Russian agents. An earlier (PDF) report by the House of Representatives' intelligence committee in April 2018 determined that there was no collusion between Trump's campaign and Russian agents. Importantly, it did not contradict the facts of Russian interference, however, stating that an extensive operation using social media and state-owned media house, RT, had been deployed. One report, known as 'the Steele Dossier', compiled by counterintelligence specialist Christopher Steele, did allege close links between Trump and Russian operatives. That has since been debunked because of weak sourcing. Where else has Russia been accused of interfering in elections? French elections in 2017: Russian hackers targeted the campaign staff of then-independent candidate Emmanuel Macron during the country's April 2017 elections, according to government officials. Macron was running against Marine Le Pen, who had promised to take France out of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), and who was openly critical of sanctions against Russia. However, French cyber authorities said they had successfully fought off the attacks. UK's Brexit referendum in 2016: There is no conclusive evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum. While there were rumours of possible interference using bots and trolls on social media, the UK government 'turned a blind eye' to the allegations, according to a 2020 report by the UK Parliament's intelligence committee. The report also concluded that there was 'credible open-source' evidence that Russia had interfered in the 2014 Scottish referendum for independence and that Russia regularly tried to interfere in UK politics.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
US Justice Department to discuss Epstein with Ghislaine Maxwell
Officials from the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) are set to interview sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell in Florida, as pressure continues to mount on the administration of US President Donald Trump over the handling of the files of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Former British socialite Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking minors on behalf of Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial in his own paedophile trafficking case. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche – Trump's former personal lawyer for his hush money trial and two federal criminal cases – was to interview Maxwell on Thursday at a federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, multiple US media outlets reported. In a social media post on Tuesday, Blanche said that Trump 'has told us to release all credible evidence' and that if Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ 'will hear what she has to say.' A DOJ spokesman did not immediately return a message from The Associated Press seeking comment on Thursday. The person who confirmed the meeting to The Associated Press insisted on anonymity to describe a closed-door encounter. Maxwell, the daughter of the late British press baron Robert Maxwell, is the only former Epstein associate who was convicted in connection with his activities, which conspiracy theorists allege included trafficking young models for VIPs. Joyce Vance, an ex-federal prosecutor who now teaches law at the University of Alabama, said any ''new' testimony [Maxwell] offers is inherently unreliable unless backed by evidence.' 'Trump could give Ghislaine Maxwell a pardon on his last day in office, in exchange for favourable testimony now,' Vance said in a post on X. 'She knows he's her only chance for release.' 'Client list' The meeting with Maxwell marks another attempt by the Trump administration to defuse anger among the Republican president's own supporters over what they have long seen as a cover-up of sex crimes by Epstein, a wealthy financier with high-level connections. On July 7, the DOJ and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) issued a memo saying that a review of Epstein's case yielded no new evidence, including no 'client list'. But that finding caused an uproar among Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, which noted that US Attorney General Pam Bondi herself had referred to a client list 'sitting on my desk right now' earlier this year. Members of Trump's base have long embraced conspiracy theories about rings of sex offenders in the highest levels of government, and some have questioned the circumstances surrounding Epstein's death, speculating that it was an orchestrated cover-up. On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Maxwell to appear before Congress next month, noting in a statement that 'the facts and circumstances surrounding both your and Mr Epstein's cases have received immense public interest and scrutiny'. The committee's Republican chair, US Representative James Comer, noted in his statement that while the DOJ was moving forward with its interview, 'It is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of you and Mr Epstein.' Democrats have also pushed for the release of the Epstein files, and on Wednesday, a Republican-led panel pushed forward a Democrat-led subcommittee subpoena demanding that the DOJ release the Epstein files. In an interview with political commentator Brian Tyler Cohen, US Representative Jasmine Crockett, a Democrat, said she would trust Congress to interview Maxwell more than the DOJ, noting the potential for 'them sanitising the information that we get, or potentially engaging in some type of threats, or potentially offering a pardon if certain things were said or not said'.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Several killed and dozens injured in northern Syria explosion
Several killed and dozens injured in northern Syria explosion NewsFeed At least 6 people have been killed and over 100 injured in an explosion in northern Syria's Idlib province. Reports suggest it happened at an ammunition depot and officials said rescue efforts were hindered by 'recurring explosions.' Video Duration 01 minutes 25 seconds 01:25 Video Duration 01 minutes 48 seconds 01:48 Video Duration 01 minutes 10 seconds 01:10 Video Duration 00 minutes 42 seconds 00:42 Video Duration 01 minutes 30 seconds 01:30 Video Duration 01 minutes 31 seconds 01:31 Video Duration 00 minutes 41 seconds 00:41
