Trump hails new ‘Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention centre
US President Donald Trump visiting a temporary migrant detention centre - informally known as "Alligator Alcatraz" - in Ochopee, Florida, on July 1.
OCHOPEE, Florida - US President Donald Trump revelled in a new Florida migrant detention centre dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' on July 1, joking that any escapees would be taught to run away from the reptiles to avoid being eaten.
Critics of Mr Trump's harsh immigration crackdown have called the site in the Everglades swamp inhumane, but the Republican embraced the controversy as he attended its official opening.
'A lot of cops in the form of alligators – you don't have to pay them so much,' Mr Trump told reporters in Ochopee, Florida.
'I wouldn't want to run through the Everglades for long. It will keep people where they're supposed to be.'
The Florida detention centre is part of the Trump administration's tough optics for its crackdown on undocumented migrants since the 78-year-old returned to power in January.
The site on an abandoned airfield in the Everglades conservation area will cost an estimated US$450 million (S$570 million) and house 1,000 people, Florida authorities say.
Florida's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, who greeted Mr Trump on the tarmac, said 'we want to cut through bureaucracy... to get the removal of these illegals done.'
'Run away'
Mr Trump, who has cracked down on undocumented migrants since returning to power, riffed on the idea of people running away from Florida wildlife as he left the White House earlier.
'I guess that's the concept,' Mr Trump told reporters when asked if the idea behind the detention centre was that people who escaped from it would get eaten by alligators or snakes.
'This is not a nice business. Snakes are fast, but alligators... we're going to teach them how to run away from an alligator, okay?
'If they escape prison, how to run away. Don't run in a straight line. Run like this. And you know what? Your chances go up about one per cent.'
But Mr Trump later embarked on one of his dark diatribes about immigration in a news conference at the site, describing an influx of undocumented migrants under Democratic predecessor Joe Biden as 'disgusting' and falsely conflating most migrants with 'sadistic' criminal gangs.
US President Donald Trump, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem visiting the temporary migrant detention centre, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' on July 1.
PHOTO: REUTERS
The name 'Alligator Alcatraz' is a reference to Alcatraz Island, the former prison in San Franciso that Mr Trump recently said he wanted to reopen.
That plan has apparently stalled after officials said it would cost too much and be too impractical to reopen the prison surrounded by shark-infested waters.
As it seeks to look tough on migration, the Trump administration is also sending some undocumented migrants to the former 'War on Terror' prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
'Bite incidents'
Protesters against Mr Trump's immigration policies have demonstrated outside the new Florida facility in recent days.
Environmentalists have also criticised the creation of the camp in a conservation area.
The Everglades National Park is particularly known as a major habitat for alligators, with an estimated population of around 200,000.
They can reach up to 4.5m in length when fully grown.
The so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre sits on an abandoned airfield in Florida's Everglades conservation area, which is known as a major habitat for alligators.
PHOTO: AFP
Attacks by alligators on humans are relatively rare in Florida.
Across the entire state there were 453 'unprovoked bite incidents' between 1948 and 2022, 26 of which resulted in human fatalities, according to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
But authorities have played up the risk.
Mr Trump's 'Alligator Alcatraz' visit comes as he tries to push a huge tax and spending Bill through Congress this week.
The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' contains funding for Mr Trump's immigration crackdown including an increase in places in detention centres.
The deportation drive is part of a broader campaign of harsh optics on migration, including raids in Los Angeles that sparked protests against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
23 minutes ago
- CNA
Tesla sales fell 13% over last three months due to anti-Musk sentiment
NEW YORK: Sales of Tesla electric cars fell 13 per cent in the last three months as boycotts over Elon Musk's political views continue to keep buyers away, a significant development given expectations that anger with the company's billionaire CEO would have faded by now. The plunging sales add to growing signs that Musk's embrace of US President Donald Trump and far-right politicians in Europe has had a deep and enduring hit to Tesla's brand appeal. The new figures are also a possible sign that Tesla could disappoint when it announces second-quarter earnings later this month. In the first three months this year, net income fell 71%. Sales fell to 384,122 in April through June, down from 443,956 in the same period last year. During this period, Musk formally left the Trump administration as a cost-cutting czar, and hopes rose that sales would recover. On Wall Street, Tesla shares rose around 5 % on Wednesday (July 2) after the electric-vehicle company said it delivered nearly 374,000 of its Model 3 and Model Y automobiles last quarter, which was better than analysts expected, according to FactSet.
Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- Straits Times
CIA review finds flaws but does not dispute finding Russia's Putin sought to sway 2016 vote to Trump
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The CIA's review of a 2016 assessment did not overturn the judgment that Russian leader Vladimir Putin used a cyber campaign to sway the 2016 US election to Republican Donald Trump over his Democratic challenger, Mrs Hillary Clinton. WASHINGTON - A CIA review released on July 2 found flaws in the production of a US intelligence assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to sway the 2016 US presidential vote to Donald Trump, but it did not contest that conclusion. The review 'does not dispute the quality and credibility' of a highly classified CIA report that the assessment's authors relied on to reach that conclusion, it said. But the review questioned the 'high confidence' level that the CIA and FBI assigned the conclusion. It should have instead been given the 'moderate confidence' rating reached by the communications-monitoring US National Security Agency, the review said. Mr Trump, who has a history of quarreling with US intelligence analyses, has previously rejected that intelligence assessment, which was made public in an unclassified version in January 2017. After a November 2017 meeting with Mr Putin, he said that he believed the Russian leader's election meddling denials. CIA director John Ratcliffe, a former congressman who served as director of national intelligence in Mr Trump's first term, ordered the review and its 'lessons learned' section 'to promote analytic objectivity and transparency,' said a CIA statement. The CIA's Directorate of Analysis, which conducted the review, 'identified multiple procedural anomalies' in how the December 2016 classified assessment of Russian election interference was prepared. They included 'a highly compressed timeline... and excessive involvement of agency heads' and 'led to departures from standard practices in the drafting, coordination, and reviewing' of the report, it said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore and Cambodia to expand collaboration in renewable energy, carbon markets and agri-trade World Trump announces Vietnam trade deal with 20% import tariff Singapore From camping to mentorship, Singapore Scouts mark 115th anniversary of the youth movement Singapore Ong Beng Seng's court hearing rescheduled one day before he was expected to plead guilty World Sean 'Diddy' Combs convicted on prostitution counts but cleared of more serious charges Singapore Teen, 17, to be charged with allegedly trespassing on MRT tracks Singapore Granddaughter of Hin Leong founder O.K. Lim fails to keep 3 insurance policies from creditors' reach Singapore Man on trial for raping drunken woman after offering to drive her and her friend home 'These departures impeded efforts to apply rigorous tradecraft, particularly to the assessment's most contentious judgment,' it continued. The review, however, did not overturn the judgment that Mr Putin employed a disinformation and cyber campaign to sway the 2016 vote to Mr Trump over his Democratic challenger, Mrs Hillary Clinton. A 2018 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report reached the same conclusion. REUTERS
Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- Straits Times
CIA review finds flaws but does not dispute finding Putin sought to sway 2016 vote to Trump
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox WASHINGTON - A CIA review released on Wednesday found flaws in the production of a U.S. intelligence assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to sway the 2016 U.S. presidential vote to Donald Trump, but it did not contest that conclusion. The review "does not dispute the quality and credibility" of a highly classified CIA report that the assessment's authors relied on to reach that conclusion, it said. But the review questioned the "high confidence" level that the CIA and FBI assigned the conclusion. It should have instead been given the "moderate confidence" rating reached by the communications-monitoring U.S. National Security Agency, the review said. Trump, who has a history of quarreling with U.S. intelligence analyses, has previously rejected that intelligence assessment, which was made public in an unclassified version in January 2017. After a November 2017 meeting with Putin, he said that he believed the Russian leader's election meddling denials. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, a former congressman who served as director of national intelligence in Trump's first term, ordered the review and its "lessons learned" section "to promote analytic objectivity and transparency," said a CIA statement. The CIA's Directorate of Analysis, which conducted the review, "identified multiple procedural anomalies" in how the December 2016 classified assessment of Russian election interference was prepared. They included "a highly compressed timeline ... and excessive involvement of agency heads" and "led to departures from standard practices in the drafting, coordination, and reviewing" of the report, it said. "These departures impeded efforts to apply rigorous tradecraft, particularly to the assessment's most contentious judgment," it continued. The review, however, did not overturn the judgment that Putin employed a disinformation and cyber campaign to sway the 2016 vote to Trump over his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton. A 2018 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report reached the same conclusion. REUTERS
