
Times letters: Starmer's lukewarm support for US over Iran
Write to letters@thetimes.co.uk
Sir, Your leading article ('Out of the Loop', Jun 24) states that the prime minister's lukewarm support for President Trump's campaign against Iran's nuclear weapons programme has resulted in Britain being ignored by the US. There are two problems with this. First, the US has a record of not consulting the UK, stretching back to its invasion of Grenada in 1984, if not beyond, and more recently its withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 and the UN vote on Ukraine in February. Second, when the UK has stood shoulder to shoulder with the US — you cite Iraq and Libya inter alia — this has not always turned out particularly well. What the British government needs to do is cultivate a modicum of self-respect and offer its honest opinion. There is absolutely no point in the government trying to align itself with a US president as irrational and volatile as the present incumbent.Robert WrightCheltenham
Sir, Your leading article rightly describes Britain as being marginalised by the US. I think it is actually worse than being regarded as an unreliable ally, in that the present US administration no longer trusts the UK. Who can blame it? One can only hope that the King can help to reverse this during the state visit of the US president later this year.Terence BurbidgeLittle Gransden, Cambs
Sir, Unlike your leader writer, some of us appreciate a more circumspect approach to the blowhard in the White House. More independence, less subservience and a willingness to steer clear of bear traps make for a better approach to the so-called special relationship.Kevin QuinnMusselburgh, East Lothian
Sir, Paul Jackson (letter, Jun 24) suggests that Iran should offer to give up its nuclear programme if Israel does the same. Perhaps Iran might also offer to give up its call for Israel to be wiped off the map?Dr David MarksSouthport, Merseyside
Sir, William Hague, whom I respect, writes that the prospect of Iran having a nuclear arsenal in the long term is now more likely (comment, Jun 24). I disagree. It has been obvious that Iran is uninterested in negotiating a non-proliferation agreement. Which is the lesser of two evils? Negotiations have failed — but military action may thwart a future military catastrophe. Inaction would only have given the mullahs more breathing space to pursue their pernicious aims.Peter DannenbergLondon N20
Sir, In her denunciation of Sir Keir Starmer's leadership, particularly with regard to President Trump, Melanie Phillips seems to have forgotten who the PM is dealing with ('Starmer's constant evasiveness is disturbing', Jun 24). The whole world has had to get used to a president who gives assurances to other leaders and then changes his mind. I suggest he is doing the best he can with an incredibly unpredictable leader of the free world.Charles TownleyHove, E Sussex
Sir, I don't agree with Melanie Phillips about Sir Keir Starmer. In a world of noise, hype and overconfident leaders, he is a breath of fresh air. It is possible to lead quietly and without bluster.Beryl RosenbaumPinner, Middx
Sir, The inquest into the death of Bethan James identified deficiencies in her care that, sadly, are not uncommon ('The hospital wanted rid of us. Then our daughter died', Jun 21). Missed diagnostic opportunities were compounded by the lack of continuity that blights patient care. My generation, as junior medical staff, were directly responsible to a single consultant, supervised daily by more experienced residents and regular consultant ward rounds. Working dangerously long hours that have, justifiably, been reduced, we provided continuity of care. As a house surgeon I was contracted to 108 hours per week (40 working day, 68 on-call). Today's resident doctors are limited to 48 hours. The pendulum has swung from one extreme to the other, when there must be a happier medium.
The move to time-limited contracts has been achieved by 'cross-cover' between disciplines, the transfer of duties to professions allied to medicine, and shift patterns that divorce residents from an individual consultant and from the continuing care of patients. Even with superlative record-keeping, 'handovers' can never adequately pass on the information gleaned from daily observation by the same person, 'cross-cover' can place residents in the unenviable position of caring for patients outside their experience, and the dilution of responsibility risks 'spoiling the broth'. Should safety initiatives not restore meaningful continuity of care, preventable tragedies will continue.Phillip M Alderman, FRCS EdinConsultant orthopaedic surgeon (ret'd), Ponthir, Monmouthshire
Sir, Where can the prime minister find the extra £40 billion a year that is estimated to be needed for our security ('Britain's defence spending will rise to 5% of GDP', news, Jun 24)? I propose a crackdown on fraud and error which, according to the National Audit Office, cost taxpayers between £55 billion and £81 billion in 2023-24.Robert DuffieldCheltenham
Sir, The challenge by MPs to the plan to slash disability benefits gives the disabled community much-needed (and long-overdue) hope ('Labour rebels threaten to kill off welfare reform', Jun 24). For months we have been forced to listen to a government dead-set on selling these reforms as good for employment and productivity, but I remain unconvinced. The personal independence payments (Pip), which the government wants to cut, is not an out-of-work benefit, contrary to the messaging. It helps to offset the considerable extra costs associated with being disabled.
My Pip is a lifeline; without it I risk being poorer, sicker and less able to thrive in employment. And I'm not alone: new research from Sense, the national disability charity, indicates that two in five disabled people with complex needs will struggle financially if these cuts go ahead. This will not increase productivity or get more people into employment, it will simply push more disabled people into poverty. Disabled people like me should not be bearing the brunt of government cost-cutting. MPs must stand firm and reject this bill.Steven MorrisCampaigns officer, Sense
Sir, Alix Popham is on the right track (letter, Jun 23). All major sports now go on far too long. Top rugby players play in the Premiership, autumn internationals, the Six Nations and European rugby leagues. They then go on tour with the Lions or their country. Cricket is, with the various limited overs games, almost non-stop. Football used to end in April, with the only game played in May the Cup Final. We now have leagues going on into May with unnecessary play-offs; the players then go to places like the Far East instead of a decent break. Welfare must come before profit.Henry MabbettWinscombe, Somerset
Sir, Further to the announcement by Wes Streeting of a review of NHS maternity services after the recent scandals of dysfunctional maternity care (report and Thunderer, Jun 24), the essential structure missing in the present system is accountability and decisive leadership. The service needs 24-hour consultant obstetric supervision with on-call consultants available. This should also include monitoring and supervising the midwives with direct control from a medical team. The consultants should be based in the maternity unit to avoid delay and facilitate decision-making. The present structure is simply not fit for purpose.Dr Gordon Manson-BahrRet'd GP, Tharston, Norfolk
Sir, I disagree with the premise of James Marriott's article 'Not reading or writing would be unthinkable', Jun 24). Engineers and craftsmen are far too busy making things to spend an afternoon sitting in a chair reading a book. The time will come when I can no longer lift the tools of my trade — then I will be happy to sit and read many wonderful books.Ian RutterCookham Dean, Berks
Sir, Further to your report (Jun 23) on the Reform MP Rupert Lowe instructing his gamekeeper to shoot his 17-year-old labrador, I can think of no kinder end to the life of such an old and venerable dog. One of our old terriers also lost the use of her back legs and was in agony. My husband no longer keeps a gun and we asked for the help of the huntsman of our local pack of hounds. He came immediately and she was quickly dispatched by means of a humane killer. He kindly dug a hole for her burial too. We have received such help for our old horses too, over the years. I stand with them and give them a farewell handful of feed — it's the least I can do. Death via an injection is slower of course, and slower still for a horse, which on average weigh half a ton.Marian WatersPebworth, Warks
Sir, I am in favour of Norman Foster's plan for a memorial to the late Queen (report, Jun 24). It is fitting there will be an equestrian statue facing the Mall: the Queen will be remembered at every birthday parade and state visit looking at her troops. However, it can be improved. From being a generic horse I would like the horse she rides to be Burmese, the black police horse she rode at the birthday parade for 18 years.Christopher BellewLondon W6
Sir, Your obituary of Alfred Brendel (Jun 18; letter, Jun 19) mentions that his fingers were frequently bandaged. I once had a brief opportunity of meeting him and it transpired that he always used prewar sticking plaster tape, which was very thin and apparently only available from a supplier in East Germany. He claimed that once that supply stopped so would his playing.Peter FinemanBarrow Street, Wilts
Sir, I find issue with your leading article about young people's addiction to their devices ('Eyes Up', Jun 23). You comment that young people do not use their phone to read 'a reputable newspaper'. I can often be found scrolling through The Times mobile app keeping up with the news; this is when I'm not leafing through the physical paper, often to the despair of my parents, who expect me to be studying for my GCSEs.Max Denny (aged 15)Lowestoft, Suffolk
Sir, My favourite definition of a gentleman (letters, Jun 23 & 24) is someone who is able to change gear in the diminutive Austin 7 without getting their face slapped. Although it was last produced in 1939, up to 10,000 Austin 7s still exist worldwide so it is a skill that is still required.Colin McKenzieBrighton
Sir, My grandmother and mother used to say that the true sign of a gentleman was whether his shoes were polished.Victoria HawthornLondon SW15
Write to letters@thetimes.co.uk
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
The Latest: 7 Israeli soldiers killed in Gaza as Iran-Israel ceasefire holds
Seven Israeli soldiers were killed Tuesday in the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis when their armored vehicle was struck by an explosive, an Israeli military official said Wednesday. The announcement comes a day after witnesses and hospitals in Gaza said Israeli forces and drones opened fire toward hundreds of Palestinians waiting for aid in separate incidents in southern and central Gaza early Tuesday, killing at least 44. Meanwhile, people in Iran began returning to their lives as a ceasefire with Israel, negotiated by President Donald Trump, appeared to be holding. State media described heavy traffic around the Caspian Sea area and other rural areas outside of the capital, Tehran, as people began returning to the city. The Iran-Israel conflict lasted 12 days with Israel targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites, saying it could not allow Tehran to develop atomic weapons. On Sunday, the U.S. intervened by dropping bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful. Here is the latest: 7 Israeli soldiers killed in Gaza Israel's military said Wednesday that seven soldiers had been killed the day before inside Gaza. A military official, speaking on the condition of anonymity in line with military regulations, said that the seven were killed around 5pm when an explosive struck their armored vehicle in the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis. The military said another soldier was badly wounded Tuesday from RPG fire. The incident was an unusually deadly one for Israel's troops operating inside Gaza. The military says over 860 soldiers have been killed since the war began with the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack — including more than 400 during fighting inside Gaza. —— By Julia Frankel in Jerusalem Hamas claims attack on Israeli soldiers Al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas' military wing, said on its Telegram channel Tuesday it had ambushed Israeli soldiers taking cover inside a residential building in the southern Gaza Strip. Some of the soldiers were killed and other injured after they were targeted by a Yassin 105 missile and another missile south of Khan Younis, Hamas said. Al-Qassam fighters then targeted the building with machine guns. It was not immediately clear whether the incident was related to the Israeli military's announcement that seven of its soldiers were killed Tuesday in Gaza. Iran executes more prisoners Iran executed three more prisoners Wednesday over allegedly spying for Israel, its state-run IRNA news agency reported, the latest hangings connected to its war with Israel. Iran identified the three men executed Wednesday as Azad Shojaei, Edris Aali and Iraqi national Rasoul Ahmad Rasoul. Iran is one of the world's top executioners. After the brutal 1980s Iran-Iraq war, Iran carried out the mass execution of thousands of political prisoners and others, raising concerns among activists about a similar wave coming after the war with Israel. The hangings happened in Urmia Prison in Iran's West Azerbaijan province, which is the country's most northwestern province. IRNA cited Iran's judiciary for the news, saying the men had been accused of bringing 'assassination equipment' into the country. Wednesday's executions bring the total number of hangings for espionage around the war up to six. Israeli strikes killed more than 1,000 in Iran, group says Israeli strikes on Iran have killed at least 1,054 people and wounded 4,476 others, according to figures released Wednesday by the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists. The group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, said of those killed, it identified 417 civilians and 318 security force personnel. Iran's government provided sporadic casualty information throughout the war. Its latest update on Tuesday put the death toll at 606 people killed, with 5,332 others being injured. In Israel, at least 28 people have been killed and more than 1,000 wounded in the war.


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
PM to announce ‘biggest strengthening of UK nuclear posture in a generation'
Sir Keir Starmer is set to announce a strengthening of the UK's nuclear deterrent at this week's Nato summit with the purchase of 12 new fighter jets. Billed by Downing Street as 'the biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation', the move will see the UK purchase 12 F35A jets and join Nato's airborne nuclear mission. The jets, a variant of the F35Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons, but can also be equipped with nuclear bombs. Sir Keir said: 'In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted, which is why my government is investing in our national security, ensuring our armed forces have the equipment they need and communities up and down the country reap the benefits from our defence dividend.' The decision represents a victory for the Royal Air Force, which has long pushed for a return of its nuclear capabilities since the last British air-dropped nuclear weapon was withdrawn from service after the end of the Cold War. Since then, the UK's nuclear deterrent has been carried exclusively by the Royal Navy's submarines, which the Government has also promised to invest in renewing with four new vessels. Sir Keir added: 'Supporting 100 businesses across the country and more than 20,000 jobs, these F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our Allies.' Defence Secretary John Healey said the decision followed a strategic defence review that 'confirmed we face new nuclear risks, with other states increasing, modernising and diversifying their nuclear arsenals'. The review, published earlier this month, recommended beginning discussions with the US and Nato on 'enhanced UK participation' in the alliance's nuclear mission, and raised the possibility of acquiring F35As. Nato's nuclear mission involves allied aircraft being equipped with American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe. Seven nations currently contribute so-called 'dual capability aircraft' to Nato's nuclear mission, but a the use of nuclear weapons would require the authorisation of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the US president and British prime minister. The alliance's secretary-general Mark Rutte welcomed the announcement, saying it was 'yet another robust British contribution to Nato'. Alongside the nuclear announcement, the UK is set to provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine as Sir Keir and Mr Healey push for Nato to provide Kyiv with further support. The delivery will be funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets. Sir Keir said: 'Russia, not Ukraine, should pay the price for Putin's barbaric and illegal war, so it is only right we use the proceeds from seized Russian assets to ensure Ukraine has the air defence it needs.' Wednesday is also expected to see Nato allies formally sign up to a target of spending 5% of the GDP on defence and security. The figure includes 3.5% on 'core' defence spending, with another 1.5% being spent on wider security and resilience measures such as critical infrastructure, border security and intelligence. On Tuesday, the UK committed to reaching the new 5% target from 2035, but the Prime Minister declined to say how the Government would pay for the increase from its current target of spending 2.5% of GDP on defence from 2027.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Number of Brits who see US as a global threat doubles since Donald Trump came to power
The number of Britons who see the US as a serious threat to global security has skyrocketed since Donald Trump entered the White House in January, new research shows. Even before the president bombed Iran at the weekend, almost three quarters of those asked — 72 per cent — named the US as a threat to world peace in the next decade. Researchers said the figure, which has doubled since last autumn, when it was just 36 per cent, was an 'all time high'. And it rivals China, on 69 per cent, Israel, on 73 per cent, and North Korea, on 77 per cent, although the highest was Russia on 90 per cent. In recent months, Trump has alarmed the international community on a number of occassions, including when he raised doubts about his willingness to defend European countries and when held a televised showdown with Ukrainian President Zelensky in the Oval Office. The latest British Social Attitudes (BSA) report, by the National Centre for Social Research, shows fears over the US' role in the world is split along political party lines. Labour and Green supporters are more likely — by 81 and 96 per cent — than those who back the Conservatives or Reform UK — 68 and 41 per cent — to consider the US a serious threat. The survey also shows that increased public concern over potential threats has led to a significant increase in support for defence spending. Almost one in ten — 9 per cent — believe defence should be the top priority for extra government spending, the highest figure ever recorded in the survey. Again, however, there are marked differences by party, with Conservative and Reform supporters more likely to be in favour than those who back Labour or the Greens. Gianfranco Addario, research director at the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), told The Independent the research did not go into the reasons why those who took part believe the US to be a significant threat, but said 'that would be very interesting to explore'. He added: 'The escalation of recent international conflicts is clearly reflected in the attitudes of the British population, who have never been so supportive of military spending and so concerned about serious security threats since the British Social Attitudes survey first addressed the subject in 1985. 'Perception of the US as a security threat has increased since the 2024 presidential elections and the first 100 days of the Trump administration, reaching an all-time high. 'The Labour government's approach to addressing these concerns, particularly in navigating internal party divisions while aligning with public sentiment, will be crucial in determining its success in managing the country's security and defence policies.' The British Social Attitudes survey has been conducted every year since 1983.