Kia joins Tesla's Supercharger network after months-long delay
This story was originally published on Automotive Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Automotive Dive newsletter.
Kia electric vehicles can officially charge on Tesla's Supercharger network, according to an April 24 press release.
Kia EV6, EV9 and Niro owners can now use an additional 21,500 vehicle charging stations, increasing charging station availability for Kia EV drivers by more than 80% and totaling access to more than 40,000 fast chargers, the company said.
Kia was originally set to join Tesla's Supercharger network in January but was delayed due to unspecified 'technical issues.'
'Expanding the network of available DC fast chargers to our EV customers is an important component to maintaining the brand's leadership in electrified mobility,' Seungkyu (Sean) Yoon, president and CEO of Kia North America and Kia America, said in a statement. 'Now, with access to the Tesla Supercharger network of DC fast chargers, our EV owners can feel even more confident in their decision to purchase or lease a fully electric Kia vehicle.'
Kia joins a long list of automakers granted access to Tesla's fast-charging stations. Other EVs that can use the Supercharger network include those made by Ford, General Motors, Hyundai, Lucid, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Polestar, Rivian and Volvo. Honda will join the Supercharger network in June.
Most automakers offer adapters that their customers can purchase in order to use Tesla's North American Charging Standard ports, but Kia said its 2025 EV6 and 2026 EV9 both feature NACS charging ports. Owners of current EV6, EV9 and Niro models can purchase adapters at Kia dealers, the company said, though any Kia drivers who purchased or leased their 2024 or 2025 EV9 or 2024 EV6 vehicles after Sept. 4, 2024 are eligible to receive free adapters.
By the end of the year, nearly all automakers will have access to the Supercharger network.
Recommended Reading
Honda gains access to Tesla Supercharger network
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Elon Musk discovers Trump doesn't stay bought
I have been watching, with some grim amusement, Elon Musk discovering the limits of being just another political donor. While he was at DOGE, he literally could control the Treasury and DOD — he effectively had the IT reins of the entire country, and could simply gut things he hated at will. There was a price for that: it destroyed what was left of his reputation. But it was real, true power — being able to stop payments at will makes you more powerful than the president. So much for that. These days, Musk is reduced to begging his followers on X to call their senators and congressmen [sic, obviously] to vote down the Big Beautiful Bill. His nominal reason is that Donald Trump's budget plan will increase the deficit, but reports indicate that Musk is annoyed an EV credit is getting cut. That makes it harder to sell Teslas in an environment where it's already hard to sell Teslas. Also, Musk may be annoyed that he didn't get to stay past his statutory limit as an unpaid advisor and that the FAA isn't using Starlink, according to Axios. Even less powerful enemies can lead to political problems, which is why Musk doesn't get his pet boy in NASA The cracks have been showing in the MAGA-tech alliance for some time now. When Scott Bessent got Musk's IRS pick ejected in April, that was notable. (Bessent's deputy now runs the IRS.) Musk wasn't politically savvy enough to get Bessent on his side before installing his pick; an end-run like that is insulting and Musk had been making enemies. Take, for instance, Marco Rubio, who was furious when Musk destroyed USAID — that was Rubio's department and getting rid of it cut his power. Sean Duffy, the reality TV star who is for some reason running the Department of Transportation, had to intervene to stop DOGE from firing air traffic controllers while the lack of air traffic controllers remains a hot-button issue. These men should not have been especially difficult to finesse, but then Musk is known for his bull-in-a-china-shop approach. It is rare that a person in a position of power — a cabinet seat, say — willingly gives up even an inch of leverage. Making enemies of Bessent, Rubio, and Duffy was a strategic error. Even less powerful enemies can lead to political problems, which is why Musk doesn't get his pet boy in NASA now. Jared Isaacman was due to receive his final confirmation vote in the Senate when Trump abruptly withdrew his nomination for head of the aerospace agency. That was reportedly because Musk had beef with Sergio Gor, the head of the White House Presidential Personnel Office — basically the lead recruiter for government jobs. The moment Musk was no longer in the actual White House, Gor dropped the blade. Silicon Valley is still entwined with the government — Musk's cronies, including the guy who calls himself Big Balls, now have permanent jobs. Associates of Peter Thiel, Palmer Luckey, and David Sacks all have jobs in the administration; the vice president owes his entire political career to his sugar daddy Thiel. But when David Sacks gets on X to argue with Marjorie Taylor Greene about the AI provision in the budget bill, that suggests a shocking lack of leverage. Sacks was a major Republican fundraiser and is a literal advisor to the president; shouldn't he be able to pick up a phone and get what he wants? Instead, his podcast All-In is getting the exclusive bitch session from Isaacman, the NASA administrator who wasn't. Great for content, I guess, but not real power. I'm a little surprised Musk isn't threatening to primary people over the bill. Maybe that's happening in private, I don't know. But it could also reflect that Musk's money is, at times, a political liability. When Musk dropped $20 million on his preferred Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate, that candidate got blown out of the water. Musk's increasingly toxic reputation may make his money less welcome. Still, Trump isn't publicly chastising Musk, which is unusual. Maybe that's because he's waiting on a $100 million check to his political action committee, per The Wall Street Journal. Or maybe it's because Musk is particularly close to Katie and Stephen Miller, two major Trump administration power players. The basic truth of Donald Trump's entire career, starting in real estate, is that he will fuck over anyone who does a deal with him as soon as it benefits him to do so. (Just ask Michael Cohen!) You can buy him, but he won't stay bought. You have to keep an eye on him, keep managing him, as Stephen Miller knows well. Musk left the White House to tend to his own reputation, leaving his enemies behind to whisper in the president's ear. Sure, he's still got people in the administration, but it's hard to effectively rule from the shadows when you've created a shocking amount of tension with the actual presidential staff. Musk set his own companies on fire, and this is what he's gotten in return. What did you get for your money, honey? How do you get your kicks?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Losing Patience With Musk's Outbursts Over Megabill
WASHINGTON—President Trump is losing patience with Elon Musk after the billionaire attacked Republicans' sprawling tax-and-spending bill. Musk is irked about Trump's decision to withdraw the nomination of a key ally to lead the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. A senior White House official said Trump wasn't happy about Musk's decision to lambaste his signature legislation, describing the president as confused as to why the Tesla chief executive decided to ratchet up his criticism after working so closely with the president for four months.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Musk, Trump fallout is bad news for Tesla and EVs
Elon Musk 's suddenly icy relationship with Republicans portends poorly for Tesla and EVs in general. Why it matters: Musk's alliance with President Trump was once seen as a boon to Tesla's prospects — but his public criticism of the GOP's "big, beautiful bill" suggests the warm-and-fuzzy relationship between the GOP and Tesla is coming to an end. The big picture: Tesla investors have been hoping for favorable policies from Washington, including for EVs and self-driving cars. But if Musk falls out of favor on Capitol Hill, congressional Republicans will have little political reason to hold back on their war on EVs. In fact, the "big, beautiful bill" already contains language that would effectively end EV incentives for Tesla buyers, though Musk has previously said that he supports an end to those credits. Threat level: While Tesla has experienced a decline in sales as progressive opponents protested Musk's support for Trump, the company was enjoying an increasingly positive reputation among more conservative consumers. Trump himself even promoted Teslas by promising to buy one in support of Musk earlier this year. By the numbers: It's bad timing for EVs, which are already facing reputational issues. Only 16% of U.S. adults said it's likely or very likely that their next vehicle will be an EV, according to a AAA survey released Tuesday. That's the lowest point since 2019. Reality check: If Musk becomes less associated with one particular party, that could be a positive in the long run. "We think a move back towards the middle would be a good thing for sentiment towards the stock," CFRA Research analyst Garrett Nelson tells Axios in an email.
