Belgian region grapples with forever chemical scandal
On an early summer afternoon about a dozen people waited to get their samples taken at a municipal building in Braine-le-Chateau, a picturesque town in the French-speaking Wallonia region.
"Initially local authorities told us that measurements were reassuring, but in reality, they didn't have any and were simply trying to keep people calm as best they could," Douglas, a 35-year-old consultant who preferred only to give his first name, told AFP.
"This kind of game has to stop," he said, adding he hoped the blood-sampling campaign launched in June would help shed light on the situation.
Anger in the region first erupted in 2023 when an investigation by local broadcaster RTBF revealed the authorities had ignored longstanding warnings about high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called forever chemicals.
It emerged that the US military, which has an airbase in the small city of Chievres, had warned the local water company in 2017 about high PFAS levels in drinking water, following an incident involving firefighting foam.
The US base advised its personnel to drink bottled water -- but locals were left in the dark for years, even after the regional government was told of the issue in 2018.
PFAS are a family of synthetic chemicals that take an extremely long time to break down.
Chronic exposure to even low levels of the chemicals has been linked to liver damage, high cholesterol, reduced immune responses, low birth weights and several kinds of cancer.
A group of more than 10,000 human-made chemicals that repel heat, water and oil, PFAS are used in nonstick pans, stain-proof carpets, and other products.
But their use is increasingly being restricted across the world due to adverse health effects.
In June an Italian court sentenced executives at a chemical plant to jail terms of up to 17 years for polluting water used by hundreds of thousands of people with the chemicals.
- 'Putting out fires' -
Water samples in Braine-le-Chateau last year revealed levels five to six times higher than a safety standard of 4 nanograms/litre (ng/L) for four PFAS recently agreed by Belgian authorities.
The exact source of the pollution has not yet been confirmed and a judicial investigation is underway.
Authorities have since ordered water distribution firms to install activated carbon filters -- a move they say has contained the issue.
Large-scale blood testing was carried out in Chievres in early 2024 -- and later extended to nearby areas.
Authorities said almost 1,300 people across about 10 municipalities had their blood samples taken to confirm exposure to the chemicals in recent weeks, as part of a fresh campaign launched in June.
The results, which could lead to new health recommendations, are expected later this year.
Wallonia's government, which took office last summer, has also decided to bring forward to 2025 new European Union rules requiring that drinking water must not exceed a total of 100 ng/L for 20 substances in the PFAS family.
"We have taken radical measures and all our distributors are now complying with this standard," Yves Coppieters, the regional minister for health and the environment, told AFP.
Nevertheless he acknowledged that "the population is very concerned", adding that without clarity on the source of the pollution, it might take decades to resolve the issue.
"Telling people not to eat their home-grown eggs and vegetables, setting standards for sewage sludge... for now I'm just putting out fires," said Coppieters, who favours a ban on all products containing PFAS.
Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden have submitted a joint proposal for the EU to ban the production, sale, and use of almost all forever chemicals.
And the European Commission has said it is looking to ban PFAS in everyday consumer products.
bur-mad/ub/ec/sbk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
UCB Forecasts Record Sales on Demand for Skin Disease Drug
UCB SA Chief Executive Officer Jean-Christophe Tellier said the success of its skin disease drug Bimzelx will allow the company to keep investing in the development pipeline. The Belgian biotechnology firm lifted its 2025 sales outlook after Bimzelx drove a 25% jump in revenue in the first half, the strongest growth for the period since 2007. The company now expects revenue to increase to at least €7 billion ($8 billion), up from €6.5 billion to €6.7 billion previously, it said in a statement Thursday. Shares rose as much as 11% to an intraday record.
Fast Company
3 hours ago
- Fast Company
What's really inside your mattress?
You probably spend more time with your mattress than any other piece of furniture. But you also probably don't know exactly what's inside it. Some companies are trying to change that. [Images: lindo12345/Getty Images, realstockvector/iStock/Getty Images Plus] BY Listen to this Article More info 0:00 / 6:49 When I recently moved and needed a new mattress, I originally considered one made from memory foam. Then I realized that I didn't know exactly what 'memory foam' was even made of. Some mattresses use fiberglass as a flame retardant. Some others include PFAS 'forever chemicals,' plasticizers, or other chemicals linked to health issues, like formaldehyde. What's inside a mattress, it turns out, takes a fair amount of research to determine. Recently, a handful of brands now make cleaner options. But building a better mattress can be complicated—and expensive. The materials you may want to avoid When fiberglass is used as a flame retardant, the material can spill out when someone removes their mattress cover or if the cover is torn. The tiny glass fibers can break and settle into dust. If you breathe it in, it can irritate your lungs. It's often present even when a mattress says that it's 'nontoxic.' In California, a new law will ban fiberglass in mattresses beginning in 2027. Still, if you buy a mattress now, there's a chance that it will have the material in it. Fiberglass was supposed to be a replacement for older chemical flame retardants that were commonly used in other furniture and caused other health problems, from endocrine disruption to neurodevelopmental toxicity. Subscribe to the Daily Company's trending stories delivered to you every day SIGN UP After regulations changed, manufacturers started phasing out most chemical flame retardants. But they still might show up in some mattresses, too. In a recent study in Canada that analyzed cheap memory foam mattresses made for children, researchers discovered flame retardants in almost every sample. In one case, a mattress contained a chemical that had been banned in Canada for more than a decade. The mattresses also contained other chemicals of concern, like plasticizers. Using the mattress can make the problem worse. 'What's happening is that the body is heating up the mattress, and the chemical comes out more when you heat it up,' says Miriam Diamond, a professor at the University of Toronto and one of the authors of the study. The study didn't look for PFAS, the 'forever chemicals' known for use in products like nonstick pans. But PFAS chemicals are also commonly used in fabric on mattresses. 'I remember when I purchased my last mattress, they said, 'We're going to sell you this breathable, water-repellent, stain-resistant mattress protector, and you need to buy it in order to get the warranty,'' says Diamond. 'And I thought, no, because those are the code words for PFAS: breathable, stain resistance.' In some cases, brands might not even know what's in the product they're selling. The researchers were surprised to find flame retardants, and speculated that some might be showing up unintentionally because the equipment used to make foam was contaminated from other uses. Foam used in car upholstery, for example, still requires flame retardants, and could sometimes end up on mattress foam by mistake. Mattresses also sometimes contain formaldehyde, a known carcinogen, in adhesives or bonding agents. Memory foam can emit other volatile organic compounds, including toluene, benzene, and acetaldehyde. If you've ever unrolled a bed-in-a-box style foam mattress, you've probably inhaled some of these chemicals. The health impacts are greatest for children and pregnant women; it's less clear how much long-term impact there might be for most adults. There's little direct research. (There's also no equivalent of the children's mattress study, yet, for mattresses made for adults.) advertisement But there's also a long list of environmental reasons to avoid foam, beginning with the fact that foam is made from petrochemicals derived from crude oil. Workers in factories that make foam can have an increased risk of cancer. At the end of a foam mattress's life, it typically isn't recycled. At a landfill, it breaks down into microplastics that can contaminate soil and water. A better mattress With all of this in mind, I looked for alternatives. Some are much pricier than others. (If you have tens of thousands of dollars to drop on a mattress, you can buy a handmade Swedish option made from horsehair, cotton, wool, and traditional springs for $34,000.) But there are several other brands now making more sustainable options, including Avocado Green, Savvy Rest, and Naturepedic. I decided to try a wool-and-latex mattress from Birch (currently $1,968), a brand that spun off from Helix, a popular decade-old mattress brand, because it had particularly good reviews for comfort. Birch sent me a sample to test. The mattress has a layer of individually wrapped coils, two different layers of latex, a layer of wool (wool is naturally fire-resistant), and a cotton cover. The design took time to develop. 'Most beds in the industry are made from polyurethane foam that have a variety of different thicknesses and densities and firmness levels where you can mix and match certain things and to kind of get to a really great bed,' says Jerry Lin, one of Helix's cofounders. 'Those options aren't as available in the natural and organic world. So honestly, it took a very long time for us to find the right mix of latex and organic wool and cotton to layer up a mattress that would be appropriate for the customer and the brand that we were serving.' The wool, for example, comes from a supplier with machinery that made the wool 'a little more bouncy,' he says, with more airflow than wool would typically have. The company similarly had to find the right suppliers for each component. The latex is certified by GOLS, the Global Organic Latex Standard, as being made from organic, raw material and meeting standards for worker health and safety. It's also certified by Greenguard Gold, a label that screens for more than 15,000 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can pollute indoor air. When I unrolled the mattress from the box, there was no chemical smell—just a faintly sweet scent that seemed to come from the wool before it faded. Over the months that I've been testing it, it's held up well; the mattress also has a 25-year warranty. It's also very comfortable when I'm lying on my back. But as a side sleeper, it isn't exactly the right fit for me. (That's not to say it might not work for other side sleepers, but it's a little more firm than I'd like, and I've been waking up with a sore shoulder.) That's the final environmental challenge: the brand is primarily online, though it's growing its partnerships with physical stores. Like many consumers, I couldn't try it out in person first. When I find a new mattress, I'll likely have to ship another very heavy package across the country. And when I donate this one, I'll have to hope that it doesn't eventually end up in a landfill. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Adele Peters is a senior writer at Fast Company who focuses on solutions to climate change and other global challenges, interviewing leaders from Al Gore and Bill Gates to emerging climate tech entrepreneurs like Mary Yap.. She contributed to the bestselling book Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century and a new book from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies called State of Housing Design 2023 More
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
France supports Belgium's push to block US destruction of contraceptives
France has confirmed it is monitoring a US plan to incinerate millions of dollars worth of unused contraceptives in Europe – a move aid groups say is ideologically driven and medically wasteful. The contraceptives – including intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants and pills – were bought under public health programmes run by the US Agency for International Development (USAID). Since January, the supplies have been sitting in a warehouse in Geel, Belgium, after the Trump administration froze and then cancelled funding for reproductive health projects. The products, which were meant for use in low- and middle-income countries, were being stored as part of USAID's supply chain, managed by its logistics contractor Chemonics. Several media outlets have reported that the material may soon be transferred and incinerated in France, though no final decision has been confirmed. A diplomatic source told RFI that France 'firmly supports the Belgian authorities' desire to find a solution to avoid the destruction of the contraceptives' and is 'following the situation closely'. The source added that France had 'no information about any transfers that have taken place'. A US State Department spokesperson told the French news agency AFP that a preliminary decision had been made to destroy certain "abortifacient contraceptives" from USAID contracts, adding that no HIV medication or condoms would be affected. The destruction is expected to cost $167,000. The stock is valued at $9.7 million. French left urges Macron not to be complicit in US plan to bin contraceptives Redistribution offers rejected Several global organisations say they offered to collect and redistribute the supplies free of charge, but were turned down by US authorities. The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) said it proposed to recover the products in Brussels, transport them to its Dutch warehouse for repackaging, and then send them to countries in need. MSI Reproductive Choices, a UK-based group, told RFI it had offered to cover all the costs involved, including rebranding. 'We would have removed the stars from the USAID logo. It would have cost the US taxpayer nothing, nor the government,' said Sarah Shaw, MSI's advocacy director. 'We were told the US government would only sell the supplies at their purchase price. This is a situation we have never seen before.' Shaw estimated the stock would have covered Senegal's contraception needs for three years. The UN's sexual and reproductive health agency, UNFPA, also offered to buy the contraceptives but was turned down. 'This suggests the problem is not legal, but ideological,' Shaw said. 'It is a clear refusal to allow these contraceptives to be given to women in need. This US administration simply does not recognise their right to contraception.' The US State Department has described the items as 'abortifacient' – a term commonly used by anti-abortion activists to describe IUDs and other hormonal contraceptives. Since January, the Trump administration has banned any US funding to NGOs that support or promote access to abortion, even indirectly. What's stopping more men in France from getting vasectomies? French firm denies involvement Media reports have identified Veolia, a French waste management firm, as a possible contractor for the incineration. But the company told RFI it only has a framework agreement with Chemonics to handle expired products. 'The stock mentioned in Belgium is not part of this agreement,' Veolia's press office said. 'We are not responsible for its management.' Activist Danièle Gaudry, from the coalition Abortion in Europe – Women Decide, told RFI the timing of any transfer from Belgium to France remains unknown. 'We still don't know the date it will happen, and we're still trying to identify the company,' she said. France's parliament approves free contraception to be extended to women up to the age of 25 Lawmakers urge action On Saturday, French Greens leader Marine Tondelier and a group of female MPs urged President Emmanuel Macron to intervene, calling the plan 'an affront to the fundamental principles of solidarity, public health and sexual and reproductive rights that France is committed to defending'. They asked him not to become 'complicit, even indirectly, in retrograde policies' and to support NGOs ready to redistribute the contraceptives. Sarah Durocher, president of the French Family Planning association, said France had a responsibility to act. 'A government that proudly enshrines the right to abortion in its constitution must also defend access to contraception beyond its borders,' she said, in a statement issued by IPPF. The Elysée has yet to comment on the case.
