AI stocks look 'eerily similar' to the dot-com craze, warns CIO overseeing $15 billion. Invest in this 'boring' corner of the market instead.
The CIO at $15 billion Richard Bernstein Advisors wrote in a June 30 post that the AI trade is starting to look rich, and that it may be time for investors to turn their attention toward a more "boring" corner of the market: dividend stocks.
"Investors seem universally focused on 'AI' which seems eerily similar to the '.com' stocks of the Technology Bubble and the 'tronics' craze of the 1960s. Meanwhile, we see lots of attractive, admittedly boring, dividend-paying themes," Bernstein wrote.
Since ChatGPT hit the market in November 2022, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 have risen 54% and 90%, respectively. Valuations, by some measures, have surged back toward record highs, rivaling levels seen during the dot-com bubble and the 1929 peak.
While Bernstein said he's not calling a top, trades eventually go the other way, and the best time to invest in something is when it's out of favor — not when a major rally has already occurred.
"At the beginning of a bull market when momentum and beta strategies are by definition most rewarded, investors' fears leads them to emphasize dividends and lower-beta equities," he wrote. "In later-cycle periods when dividends and lower beta become more attractive, investors' confidence leads them to risk-taking and momentum investing."
"We clearly are not at the beginning of a bull market and, as we've previously written, the profits cycle is starting to decelerate," he added.
That's why dividend stocks could be ripe for appreciation, Bernstein said. He especially likes utilities stocks, which are known for issuing dividends.
Dividends are payments that a company sends out to shareholders on a regular basis (usually quarterly), and they can be used by investors as income or reinvested in the stock. If reinvested, your position in the stock can compound.
When considering compounding returns, dividend stocks actually hold their own against high-flying tech stocks, Bernstein said.
"One of the easiest methods for building wealth has historically been the power of compounding dividends. Compounding dividends is boring as all get out, but it's been highly successful through time."
"In fact, compounding dividend income has been so successful, that the Dow Jones Utilities Index's returns have been roughly neck-and-neck with NASDAQ returns since NASDAQ's inception in 1971!"
Investors can gain broad exposure to dividend stocks through funds like the SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY), Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG), and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You Had Bought Gold During the 2008 Financial Crisis, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
The 2008 financial crisis had a worldwide rippling effect. The S&P 500 fell 38.5%, millions of homes went into foreclosure and U.S. households lost nearly $17 trillion in total wealth. No matter where you were at the time — but especially if you were affected by economic decline — you might not have seen that period as a time to invest. But what if you had? What if you'd purchased gold in 2008? Here's what it'd be worth today, and whether it's still a good investment in current times. Check Out: Learn More: Gold Prices Have Risen Since 2008 At the start of 2008, gold was priced at around $924 per ounce. Over the next four years, it rose to $1,788 per ounce. Like any investment, gold has had its share of fluctuation. Back in December 2015 — just shy of a decade ago — it fell to $1,060 per ounce. That's only slightly higher than its 2008 price. But as it tends to do, gold bounced back shortly thereafter. Aside from a few small dips, it's seen an overall upward trajectory. As of July 2025, it's valued at approximately $3,359 per ounce. Read Next: What Your Investment Would Be Worth Today If you'd purchased a single ounce of gold during the 2008 financial crisis, you'd have spent around $924 and it'd be worth around $3,359 today. That's a 264% increase in value over the past 17 years. But what if you'd invested more aggressively and bought, say, 10 one-ounce bars for $9,240? Using that same percentage increase, you'd have around $33,590 today. Is Gold Still Worth the Investment? You might have missed out on investing in gold when it was priced at under $1,000 an ounce. But that doesn't mean it's a bad investment now. You could use it to safeguard your other assets and build more diversity into your portfolio, especially during times of economic uncertainty and stock market volatility. It's just going to cost more than it did in 2008. 'Gold has been in an incredible bull-market cycle now for the past 25 years,' said Robert Kientz, head of operations at Kinesis Bullion. 'Gold has exceeded the returns of the major stock market indices since 2000. And while gold has been on such an incredible hot streak, it does not show signs of slowing down.' Of course, there's no guarantee that it will continue to rise in value at such an exponential rate. But Kientz said that gold may well have a solid future as an investment for the next five to 10 years. Not only do central banks still actively purchase it — they bought 244 tons in Q1 2025 — but gold prices tend to rise during times of economic uncertainty. If you're considering diversifying your portfolio, gold might be worth the investment. Just make sure it aligns with your overall strategy and goals. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs The New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing This article originally appeared on If You Had Bought Gold During the 2008 Financial Crisis, Here's How Much You'd Have Today Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P 500 Gains & Losses Today: Johnson & Johnson Stock Jumps; Universal Health Services Shares Slide
Key Takeaways The S&P 500 ticked 0.3% higher on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, as President Trump addressed concerns that a dismissal of Fed Chair Jerome Powell could be imminent. Johnson & Johnson shares pushed higher after the health care giant reported better-than-expected quarterly results. Shares of Universal Health Services fell after BofA analysts downgraded the stock, citing headwinds related to recent health care U.S. equities indexes ticked higher Wednesday as President Donald Trump refuted reports that he is planning the immediate dismissal of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and questions about his legal ability to do so. The S&P 500 added 0.3% in the midweek trading session. The Nasdaq also gained 0.3%, notching a record closing high for a third straight day. The Dow was up 0.5%. Read Investopedia's full coverage of today's trading here. Shares of Global Payments (GPN) surged 6.5%, the most of any S&P 500 stock, following reports that activist investor Elliott Management has accumulated a significant stake in the financial technology firm. Global Payments shares took a hit in April when the company agreed to acquire payment processor Worldpay in a cash-and-stock deal worth more than $24 billion. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) shares jumped 6.2%. The medical device and drug maker topped sales and profit forecasts with its second-quarter results and boosted its full-year guidance. CEO Joaquin Duato said Johnson & Johnson is positioned for growth in the second half of 2025, highlighting approvals and expected submissions across various medical areas. U.S.-based asset manager Apollo Global Management (APO) is reportedly in discussions about a potential investment in Spanish soccer club Atletico Madrid. Although Apollo's initial meetings with the club were focused on financing Atletico's 800-million-euro development project surrounding Madrid's Metropolitano Stadium, the firm is now reportedly interested in acquiring a stake in the team's majority owner. Apollo Global Management shares gained 4.8%. Shares of engineering and design software firm Ansys (ANSS) fell 4.7%, posting the benchmark index's weakest daily performance. Wednesday's downturn gave back some of the gains posted by the stock earlier in the week after regulators in China granted conditional approval for the $35 billion buyout of Ansys by fellow software provider Synopsys (SNPS). S&P Dow Jones Indices said Tuesday that Ansys stock will exit the S&P 500 later this week following the closure of the deal, to be replaced by digital advertising firm The Trade Desk (TDD). Bank of America analysts downgraded Universal Health Services (UHS) stock to "underperform" from "neutral" and lowered their price target. Shares of the hospital operator fell 3.8%. Analysts cited concerns about health care legislation, including cuts to Medicaid and Affordable Care Act, or ACA, exchanges, which they believe could pressure patient volumes and increase hospitals' exposure to bad debt. BofA indicated that UHS is highly vulnerable to changes in state directed payments. Shares of memory chipmaker Micron Technology (MU) sank 3.1% after Goldman Sachs initiated coverage of the stock with a "neutral" rating. Although Goldman analysts said Micron could benefit from an eventual rebound in the NAND flash memory market heading into 2026, they maintain a cautious stance on the overall semiconductor space, revenues for which it expects will remain relatively stable through next year. Read the original article on Investopedia
Chicago Tribune
27 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump says he's ‘highly unlikely' to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell after floating that idea in private
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he was 'highly unlikely' to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, a public statement made less than 24 hours after suggesting in a private meeting that he was leaning in favor of dismissing the head of the nation's central bank. Trump confirmed that in a White House meeting Tuesday night with about a dozen House Republicans he had discussed the 'concept' of dismissing Powell, long a target because of his refusal to lower interest rates as Trump wants. 'Almost every one of them said I should,' Trump said about the lawmakers who had come to talk to him about crypto legislation. He indicated he was leaning in that direction, according to a White House official. During that session, Trump waved a letter about firing Powell, but a person familiar with the matter said it was essentially a prop drafted by someone else and that the Republican president has not drafted such a letter. Neither source was authorized to publicly discuss the private meeting and they spoke only on condition on anonymity. Trump made his comment about being 'highly unlikely' to dismiss Powell — 'unless he has to leave for fraud' — during an Oval Office meeting with Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the crown prince of Bahrain. In recent days, White House and administration officials have accused Powell of mismanaging a $2.5 billion renovation project at the Fed, adding to months of efforts by Trump try to rid himself of the politically independent central banker. U.S. stocks were shaky as Trump spoke about Powell on Wednesday. The S&P 500's modest gain in the morning became a drop of 0.7% after initial reports that the president may fire the Fed chair. Stocks then trimmed their losses after Trump's later comment. Treasury yields also swiveled in the bond market but remained mostly calm. Those at the White House meeting were among the more far-right lawmakers, including members of the House Freedom Cause whose views are not always shared by other Republicans. In the Senate, Republicans have taken a more guarded approach. Some have backed Powell's performance at the Fed as they await an inspector general's review of the construction project. In a speech Wednesday, Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said if Powell is dismissed, 'you are going to see a pretty immediate response' 'If anybody thinks it would be a good idea for the Fed to become another agency in the government subject to the president, they're making a huge mistake,' said Tillis, who has announced that he is not running for reelection. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said this week that Powell 'has done a decent job.' 'I don't think he's been perfect,' he said, adding that there have been times they disagreed, but 'I do believe that the chairman is calling them like he sees them.' Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee had been scheduled to meet with Powell on Wednesday evening in a gathering set months ago, but it was abruptly canceled due to votes in the House, according to a committee aide granted anonymity to discuss a private meeting.
