Bill Gates says teachers, doctors could be replaced by AI in 10 years — how will US workers fare?
Bill Gates isn't sugarcoating it: Artificial intelligence is coming for jobs. And not just blue-collar ones.
In a recent episode of the People by WTF podcast, the Microsoft co-founder laid out a vision of the future in which AI tools take over some of the most essential professions in America, including teaching and medicine.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
But instead of sounding the alarm, Gates insisted it's a good thing — even as millions of workers brace for change.
"We've always had a shortage of doctors, teachers, of people to work in the factories. Those shortages won't exist," Gates told host Nikhil Kamath. 'AI will come in and provide medical IQ, and there won't be a shortage."
Gates also spoke to The Tonight Show host Jimmy Fallon about the transition.
'Will we still need humans?' Fallon asked. 'Not for most things,' Gates replied.
So what are the implications for working Americans?
Gates zeroed in on two industries already under pressure: teaching and health care — markets that have historically suffered labor gaps, especially in rural areas of the U.S.
AI, Gates believes, can fill in the gaps or at least relieve some of the burden.
In schools, AI-powered tutoring tools are already being tested, offering personalized help for students in reading and math, according to Government Technology.
In health care, companies like Suki, Zephyr AI and Tennr can now generate clinical decision support, helping doctors diagnose faster and more accurately, says Business Insider.
'Years from now, AI will have changed things enough that just this pure capitalistic framework probably won't explain much, because as AIs, both as sort of white-collar type work and as blue-collar workers, the robots will get good hands and are able to do the physical things that humans do,' Gates told Kamath. 'We will have created, you know, free intelligence.'
Read more: This hedge fund legend warns US stock market will crash a stunning 80% — claims 'Armageddon' is coming. Don't believe him? He earned 4,144% during COVID. Here's 3 ways to protect yourself
It's not just teachers and doctors. Numerous industries are facing an AI invasion.
Besides some of the other industries that Gates mentions, like construction, cleaning companies and factory workers, the impact has already trickled down to customer service and IT support.
For instance, AI chatbots — with wildly inconsistent success — have already assumed much of the 'first response' nature of product support on the web.
For some, AI may simply become a co-pilot, a helper that boosts productivity. But for others, it could mean full-on job replacement. Gates doesn't deny that. What he argues is that the tradeoff might be worth it.
In Gates' ideal scenario, AI takes over routine tasks and frees people up to pursue more leisure. He envisions a world where the standard 40-hour workweek shrinks and people enjoy better work-life balance. But critics aren't buying the utopia just yet.
A recent United Nations report warned that AI could affect 40% of jobs worldwide, raising concerns about automation and job displacement.
'The benefits of AI-driven automation often favour capital over labour, which could widen inequality and reduce the competitive advantage of low-cost labour in developing economies,' the report said.
So while the industry is expected to reach $4.8 trillion, the UN says the payoff will be 'highly concentrated.'
According to UN Women, there's also the issue of bias and reliability. AI tools have been shown to replicate racial and gender disparities, particularly in hiring and health care decisions — trends that could compound, not solve, existing problems.
Gates isn't alone in predicting AI's rise. But believe it or not, he's one of the few tech leaders still mostly optimistic about it. If his vision holds, workers may need to pivot fast.
That could mean refining skills that complement AI, rather than compete with it. Things like critical thinking, emotional intelligence and creativity are talents that machine thinking may be more likely to struggle with … for now.
It's also a wake-up call for policymakers to think ahead. The transition could be bumpy, but with the right guardrails, it might just lead to a smarter economy.
At least, that's what Gates is betting on.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Aldi cuts its prices for the summer, up to 33% off 400+ items
Aldi is renewing what has become an annual summer tradition: cutting prices on hundreds of seasonal products. The Germany-based discount grocery chain said it will be reducing prices on nearly 25% of its products – more than 400 items including meat and produce – at its more than 2,400 stores. Prices will be reduced as much as 33% on the 400+ products over the summer, Aldi chief commercial officer Scott Patton told USA TODAY. Nearly one in four households shop at Aldi stores, he said, citing Circana data. Aldi's move comes as about two-thirds of Americans (67%) said they remained very concerned about food and consumer goods prices, according to a Pew Research Center survey of 3,589 adults in April. "Summer's for grilling out, camping, concerts, and quality time with friends and family – not stressing over grocery bills," he said. "That's why we decided to offer even lower prices on ALDI favorites all summer long. Our unique business model with smaller store footprints, 90% private brands and strong supplier partnerships means we can deliver real savings where other grocers can't." Starbucks: Upcoming coffee competition draws top baristas for latte art, blind tasting challenges Aldi, which plans to open 225 more stores in the U.S. this year, said its price cuts – kicking in June 5 through Labor Day – will likely save shoppers about $100 million – similar to the amount of money shoppers collectively saved with its reductions last year and more than the $60 million saved in 2023. "Last year's shopper response was overwhelming. Our customers loved it because they could stock up on summer staples without stretching their budgets," Patton said. "Aldi has always been known for quality at low prices, and when we can deliver even more savings for our shoppers, we do." Mike Snider is a reporter on USA TODAY's Trending team. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @ & @mikesnider & msnider@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
More people are joining the military. A shaky US job market could be boosting the numbers.
After years of shortfalls, military recruiting numbers are seeing a jump. Economic factors like unemployment rates and job openings impact military recruitment. Recruiting officials say the factors helping drive recruitment are complex. Military recruiting numbers are up — the Army met its annual goal of recruiting 61,000 troops months early and signs indicate Navy numbers are in good shape. But what is it exactly that is driving the jump? Recruiting officials say it's complicated. For the past several years, the Army and Navy fell thousands of new recruits short, a trend that only began to reverse at the end of last year — which the new administration has promoted as stemming from President Donald Trump's leadership and a surge of patriotism. The shift seems to turn on a shaky economy that's hiring less and the soaring costs of higher education, recruiting officials told BI. While the US labor market has relatively low unemployment, layoffs in the federal workforce, federal policy uncertainty, and 2025 recession fears have left companies hesitant to hire and employees less likely to quit. Fewer job openings and a slowing economy have historically pushed more young job seekers toward the military. That doesn't tell the whole story, though. Nearly 75% of young Americans cannot meet the health, fitness, and academic standards required to join the military, presenting a major challenge for recruiters. To confront the problem, the Army and Navy have made herculean efforts to usher not-yet-qualified young people into what are effectively pre-boot camps where they can lose weight, improve run times, and boost their test scores before officially joining. These changes instituted in recent years are paying off with a higher number of recruits in the pipeline, paving the way for the services to better meet their annual goals. But the services may also be benefiting from a shifting economic landscape in which the steep cost of higher education and fewer openings in the traditional labor market could mean that more young people are looking for alternative career paths with a promise of stability and education benefits. Instead of solely focusing on unemployment rates to understand why more and more young people may be choosing to enlist, a more accurate way to view military recruiting is through the lens of the Beveridge Curve, which compares how the unemployment rate stacks up against job vacancies, said Col. Lee Evans, Army Recruiting Command's director of market intelligence. Low unemployment and a high number of job openings indicate a growing labor market. Lately, however, lower unemployment has been met with limited job openings — meaning the economy is slowing, as shown in the chart below. Postings on the job-search platform Indeed decreased by 10% throughout 2024, and the federal nonfarm job openings rate has been trending down since 2022. Job seekers are scrambling as opportunities dry up across tech, computer science, government agencies, and more, factors that could be a boon for military recruiting. "What we've seen over the last couple years is that unemployment rates remain relatively low, right around 4%, but we've seen the job openings rate decrease," Evans said. "Many times, that provides a skills mismatch out in the labor market," he said. "And we're postured well to compete in that arena, because we have so many offerings within the Army." Evans added that in a volatile job market, young people might be more attracted to the military's career opportunities with transferable skills for later civilian life, like working as an electrician or HR specialist. Gen Z is already turning toward traditionally blue-collar technical careers. However, other jobs, including those in combat arms like artillery or infantry, can be much more difficult to transfer to the civilian sector. Brig. Gen. Christopher Amrhein, the commander of the Air Force Recruiting Service, told BI that young people are increasingly seeking jobs in air traffic control, firefighting, and cybersecurity, roles likely to lend a degree of long-term stability outside the service. Amrhein said another positive figure for recruiting is the surplus of soon-to-be recruits waiting in the military's "delayed entry program," which serves as a sort of holding pattern for future recruits to depart for boot camp at a later date. "From that standpoint, we're still garnering more and more talent in our Air Force and Space Force of an unbelievable quality," he added. Economic instability and fewer job openings aren't the only factors at play. The exorbitant cost of college has helped maintain a steady demand for college ROTC programs, Evans said. In 2023, a quarter of US adults under 40 had outstanding student loan debt. The military offers an alternative to debt for future officers: it can cover all or some of a student's tuition in exchange for four to eight years of service. Brig. Gen. Sara Dudley, the deputy commanding general of Army Recruiting Command, told BI that young people appear to be taking more time to decide what path they want to take, be it military service or something else. "It's really a couple of years after high school that they're ready to commit to making what feels like a big decision," she said. Enlisting is enticing for recent high school grads and twentysomethings, a chance to learn new skills and unlock generous education benefits with the GI Bill and tuition assistance programs. Many also carry on a family tradition of service in uniform, a longtime source of recruits that shrinks with each generation. Enlisted troops make up roughly 80% of the force. For those with or pursuing a bachelor's degree, a few years as an officer may be an increasingly attractive way for young people to build professional experience without the stress of student loans or an immediate post-grab job hunt. A similar trend occurred in 2009, following the widespread financial instability of the 2008 recession. America's slower birth rates aren't yet showing up in recruitment data, though the drop seems poised to hit the services soon. In 2007, the US saw over 4.3 million births. But the 2008 financial crisis prompted a drop that has largely persisted since. "That 2007 to 2008 timeframe, that's just now starting to get into our recruitable population," Evans said, referring to the military's eligible pool of young people. Even as military recruitment stands to gain from a costly higher education system and an unsteady job market, lower birth rates could present a new enduring challenge. "We're going to see that come into our recruitable population, and we know we're going to have to adapt to it," he said. "And we're already preparing for that." Have a tip or story to share? Reach out to these reporters at kbaker@ and allisonkelly@ or via Signal at KelseyBaker75.75 and alliekelly.10; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Sen. Rand Paul: I can't support a bill with the largest debt increase in US history
Sen. Rand Paul: I can't support a bill with the largest debt increase in US history A vote for continued deficits is a vote for continued borrowing, which is ultimately a vote to doom Americans to future tax increases and a weak economy. Show Caption Hide Caption Elon Musk slams Trump's big tax bill on X Days after leaving the White House, Elon Musk slammed President Trump's big tax bill on X. When Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017, I proudly cast my vote in favor. I supported those tax cuts then, and I support making them permanent today. I also support the newly proposed tax cuts that appear in the budget bill, such as no tax on tips. But the House-passed version of the budget bill also includes a $4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling, which should serve as a blinking warning light indicating that out-of-control spending will continue. If Congress fails to address its reckless spending, it is only a matter of time before an avalanche of calamities falls, including an inevitable future tax increase. To unleash the full dynamism of America's free enterprise system, Congress should extend the tax cuts without a multitrillion dollar increase in the debt limit. The 2017 tax cuts were not some abstract, theoretical economic exercise. They let workers, families and small businesses keep more of what they earn. Congress doubled the standard deduction, lowered individual and corporate tax rates and provided key incentives for investment. The tax cuts helped produce historically low unemployment, increase wages and strengthen small businesses. The economy responded exactly as free-market advocates have long argued: Lower taxes support an environment in which the private sector thrives, jobs are created and innovation accelerates. Americans were better off because they, not the government, determined how to spend a greater share of the money they earned. Millions of Americans could face a tax hike at the end of the year Yet despite all this success, those tax cuts are now under threat. Many of the provisions that helped fuel this economic momentum are set to expire at the end of 2025. Letting them lapse would effectively impose a tax hike on millions of Americans. Your Turn: Do you agree that Medicaid needs an overhaul? Tell us. | Opinion Forum I have consistently called for making these tax cuts permanent because I believe it's not just an economic imperative – it's a moral one. It's wrong for the government to assert that it has a primary claim on income earned by a worker or entrepreneur. That money belongs to the people who earned it. Keeping taxes low respects that basic principle of economic freedom. But we cannot ignore the looming problem of our $36 trillion (and growing) national debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts that by the end of this fiscal year, our government will spend about $2 trillion more than it has. That $2 trillion deficit is financed with borrowed money. And borrowed money is a future massive tax increase that will destroy the economic prospects of American families for generations. Americans will pay because Congress can't stop spending It gets worse. The House budget package includes a $4 trillion increase in the debt limit. Not to be outdone, the Senate proposed a $5 trillion increase in the debt ceiling. These debt limit proposals expose what no proponent of the legislation will admit: Washington has no intention of living within its means. Congress will continue to borrow, continue to spend and continue the multitrillion dollar deficits. Americans will pay dearly for Congress' inability to say no to every cause, every line item and every pinstriped lobbyist. Americans will be subject to confiscatory taxes so Uncle Sam can pay back his creditors. Americans will pay more for groceries and other necessities because inflation will have sapped the spending power of consumers. Americans will be unable to find jobs because businesses will be unable to afford new hires. In other words, today's spending threatens tomorrow's prosperity. Opinion: Trump tax bill is too expensive. GOP needs to make deep spending cuts. Throughout my career in the Senate, I have offered solutions to strengthen the American economy and benefit American families. I offered budgets that would balance the nation's books in five years, proposed the elimination of duplicative or wasteful programs and called for cutting back on the endless stream of foreign aid that sends your tax dollars to countries that often work against U.S. interests. We must extend tax cuts and rein in Washington's reckless spending I offered those solutions for the same reason I voted for the 2017 tax cuts. I believe in the power of free markets, free people and limited government. My devotion to those principles is why I cannot support a budget bill that includes the largest numerical debt limit increase in American history. A vote for continued deficits is a vote for continued borrowing, which is ultimately a vote to doom Americans to future tax increases and a weak economy. Extending the 2017 tax cuts and removing the trillions of dollars increase in the debt ceiling from the budget package would send a powerful economic signal. It would demonstrate that the United States is serious about restoring economic prosperity by unleashing the dynamism of the free enterprise system and beginning the work toward balancing our budget. The path toward a stronger and richer America is clear: We must cut taxes, rein in reckless spending and end Washington's addiction to debt. Only then can we restore economic prosperity, preserve individual freedom and ensure that the American dream remains alive for generations to come. Rand Paul is a United States senator from Kentucky and the author of "The Case Against Socialism." This column originally appeared in the Louisville Courier Journal.
