
Sen. Rand Paul: I can't support a bill with the largest debt increase in US history
Sen. Rand Paul: I can't support a bill with the largest debt increase in US history A vote for continued deficits is a vote for continued borrowing, which is ultimately a vote to doom Americans to future tax increases and a weak economy.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Elon Musk slams Trump's big tax bill on X
Days after leaving the White House, Elon Musk slammed President Trump's big tax bill on X.
When Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017, I proudly cast my vote in favor. I supported those tax cuts then, and I support making them permanent today. I also support the newly proposed tax cuts that appear in the budget bill, such as no tax on tips.
But the House-passed version of the budget bill also includes a $4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling, which should serve as a blinking warning light indicating that out-of-control spending will continue. If Congress fails to address its reckless spending, it is only a matter of time before an avalanche of calamities falls, including an inevitable future tax increase. To unleash the full dynamism of America's free enterprise system, Congress should extend the tax cuts without a multitrillion dollar increase in the debt limit.
The 2017 tax cuts were not some abstract, theoretical economic exercise. They let workers, families and small businesses keep more of what they earn. Congress doubled the standard deduction, lowered individual and corporate tax rates and provided key incentives for investment.
The tax cuts helped produce historically low unemployment, increase wages and strengthen small businesses. The economy responded exactly as free-market advocates have long argued: Lower taxes support an environment in which the private sector thrives, jobs are created and innovation accelerates. Americans were better off because they, not the government, determined how to spend a greater share of the money they earned.
Millions of Americans could face a tax hike at the end of the year
Yet despite all this success, those tax cuts are now under threat. Many of the provisions that helped fuel this economic momentum are set to expire at the end of 2025.
Letting them lapse would effectively impose a tax hike on millions of Americans.
Your Turn: Do you agree that Medicaid needs an overhaul? Tell us. | Opinion Forum
I have consistently called for making these tax cuts permanent because I believe it's not just an economic imperative – it's a moral one.
It's wrong for the government to assert that it has a primary claim on income earned by a worker or entrepreneur. That money belongs to the people who earned it. Keeping taxes low respects that basic principle of economic freedom.
But we cannot ignore the looming problem of our $36 trillion (and growing) national debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts that by the end of this fiscal year, our government will spend about $2 trillion more than it has.
That $2 trillion deficit is financed with borrowed money. And borrowed money is a future massive tax increase that will destroy the economic prospects of American families for generations.
Americans will pay because Congress can't stop spending
It gets worse.
The House budget package includes a $4 trillion increase in the debt limit. Not to be outdone, the Senate proposed a $5 trillion increase in the debt ceiling. These debt limit proposals expose what no proponent of the legislation will admit: Washington has no intention of living within its means. Congress will continue to borrow, continue to spend and continue the multitrillion dollar deficits.
Americans will pay dearly for Congress' inability to say no to every cause, every line item and every pinstriped lobbyist. Americans will be subject to confiscatory taxes so Uncle Sam can pay back his creditors. Americans will pay more for groceries and other necessities because inflation will have sapped the spending power of consumers. Americans will be unable to find jobs because businesses will be unable to afford new hires.
In other words, today's spending threatens tomorrow's prosperity.
Opinion: Trump tax bill is too expensive. GOP needs to make deep spending cuts.
Throughout my career in the Senate, I have offered solutions to strengthen the American economy and benefit American families. I offered budgets that would balance the nation's books in five years, proposed the elimination of duplicative or wasteful programs and called for cutting back on the endless stream of foreign aid that sends your tax dollars to countries that often work against U.S. interests.
We must extend tax cuts and rein in Washington's reckless spending
I offered those solutions for the same reason I voted for the 2017 tax cuts. I believe in the power of free markets, free people and limited government.
My devotion to those principles is why I cannot support a budget bill that includes the largest numerical debt limit increase in American history. A vote for continued deficits is a vote for continued borrowing, which is ultimately a vote to doom Americans to future tax increases and a weak economy.
Extending the 2017 tax cuts and removing the trillions of dollars increase in the debt ceiling from the budget package would send a powerful economic signal. It would demonstrate that the United States is serious about restoring economic prosperity by unleashing the dynamism of the free enterprise system and beginning the work toward balancing our budget.
The path toward a stronger and richer America is clear: We must cut taxes, rein in reckless spending and end Washington's addiction to debt. Only then can we restore economic prosperity, preserve individual freedom and ensure that the American dream remains alive for generations to come.
Rand Paul is a United States senator from Kentucky and the author of "The Case Against Socialism." This column originally appeared in the Louisville Courier Journal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

13 minutes ago
Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud
WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps
Nearly 200 House members signed onto a bipartisan letter this week to express support for Job Corps after the Department of Labor recently announced it would soon be pausing operations at centers nationwide. In the letter to Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, the lawmakers express support 'for the continuation of the Job Corps program,' while noting it remains funded through government funding legislation that passed earlier this year. 'Nearly 20,000 young people utilize Job Corps to learn skills for in-demand vocational and technical job training,' the letter said. 'Job Corps is one of the few national programs that specifically targets the 16-24-year-old population that is neither working, nor in school, and provides them with a direct pathway into employment openings in industries such as manufacturing and shipbuilding.' Job Corps, established as part of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, is a free residential education and job training program for low-income people between 16 and 24 years of age. In an announcement explaining the Labor Department's decision to suspend operations at Job Corps centers, Chavez-DeRemer said the program was found to no longer achieve 'the intended outcomes that students deserve,' citing what she described as 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' 'We remain committed to ensuring all participants are supported through this transition and connected with the resources they need to succeed as we evaluate the program's possibilities.' The department said it will begin a 'phased pause' initiating 'an orderly transition for students, staff, and local communities.' The pause will occur by June 30, the office said. The move was met with swift backlash from lawmakers, including Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), who defended the program in a statement expressing strong opposition to the department's move to pause operations. 'Serving nearly 500 students in Maine, the Loring Job Corps Center and the Penobscot Job Corps Center have become important pillars of support for some of our most disadvantaged young adults,' Collins said at the time. In the new letter sent to the secretary Thursday, the group of lawmakers said by 'filling job openings, Job Corps ensures that young people become productive members of the American workforce.' 'No other program takes homeless youth and turns them into the welders, electricians, shipbuilders, carpenters, nurses, mechanics, and vocational workers of the future,' the letter said. The letter came a day after a federal judge temporarily blocked the administration from suspending operations at Job Corps centers as critics argue the move is illegal. 'The Department of Labor is working closely with the Department of Justice to evaluate and comply with the temporary restraining order,' the agency said in a statement to The Hill on Friday. 'We remain confident that our actions are consistent with the law.' Updated: 12:51 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.