Academic publishers sign AI deals as Trump cuts research funding
Even for those who are steering clear of licensing deals for now, AI is unavoidable internally. PHOTO: PEXELS
Academic publishers are rushing to sign licensing deals with artificial intelligence companies, carving out a new revenue stream as US research funding cuts dim their outlook.
Informa Plc's Taylor & Francis signed a US$10 million deal with Microsoft Corp. last year to provide the tech giant access to part of its library to train large language models, or LLMs. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc is looking to 'monetise academic content through AI deals,' it said in its latest set of results, while John Wiley & Sons Inc. announced partnerships with Amazon Web Services and Perplexity earlier this year.
The deals provide a boost to earnings for publishing giants. Informa sold US$75 million of non-recurring data access in 2024 through its partnership with Microsoft and another undisclosed partner, which helped to accelerate underlying revenue growth in the Taylor & Francis unit to 15 per cent from 3 per cent the year prior. Excluding AI deals, organic growth would have been closer to 3.5 per cent, according to Berenberg analyst William Larwood.
This could offset some of the impact from the US administration's decision to cut federal spending on academic research, Mr Larwood said in a note last month. About 11 per cent of Taylor & Francis' subscription revenues could be at risk from US funding cuts in 2026, he calculated. A 43 per cent cut to the National Institutes of Health's budget for fiscal 2026 – what US President Donald Trump is pushing for – would result in a £33 million revenue headwind for Taylor & Francis. A less drastic cut of 25 per cent would mean shortfall closer to £19 million, Mr Larwood estimated.
Even for those who are steering clear of licensing deals for now, AI is unavoidable internally. Springer Nature AG & Co KGaA, for instance, has not signed any licensing agreements so far, but is using AI to tighten workflows. 'It's not our first priority,' Chief Executive Officer Frank Vrancken Peeters said on the most recent earnings call.
'The main emphasis in terms of AI for us has been transforming the publication process, making it faster, more researcher-friendly and more reliable in terms of research integrity,' Springer Nature said in an emailed response to questions.
The recent flurry of licensing deals in the academic world is part of a broader trend of publishers both fighting against and joining forces with powerful AI companies.
The New York Times Co. recently reached a deal to license its editorial content to Amazon.com Inc. for use across its artificial intelligence platforms, after years of battles in court with OpenAI and its partner Microsoft over copyright infringement. The Atlantic and Vox Media signed similar deals, as publishers try to prevent tech companies from scraping the web to train chatbots without providing fair compensation.
'Licensing deals could be the most straightforward path to resolving copyright disputes between the developers of large language models and the owners of the content upon which those models were trained,' wrote Ms Tamlin Bason, a legal analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.
Compensation remains a key point of contention in academic publishers' AI deals. Some authors whose work was licensed out said they were not given the opportunity to opt out of the partnership and were not appropriately compensated.
Microsoft offered HarperCollins US$5,000 per title, split 50/50 with the author. There's no ballpark in terms of what writers can expect, according to Ms Mary Rasenberger, the CEO of the Authors Guild, whose position is that authors should be asked for permission and given 75 per cent to 85 per cent of the revenue from the AI deal. An author was recently paid just US$97 by Taylor & Francis to give over a book for LLM training, she told Bloomberg.
'Proceeds from these partnerships are being shared with authors and other rights holders in accordance with the licensing terms and royalty statement periods in their contracts,' a spokesperson for Taylor & Francis said.
'Academic authors don't have expectations of making that much money from their books,' Ms Rasenberger said. 'It's more that they don't want to lose control over their work.'
Beyond souring relationships with their authors, the bigger concern for publishers is becoming obsolete in a world of AI-generated content.
'It's definitely a risk, without a doubt,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst John Davies said. The key question is 'how can you give certainty to your authors and your shareholders that you've not chucked the baby out with the bath water,' he added.
Publishers' experience with selling rights to their data should be key in implementing the appropriate guardrails, Mr Davies said. Taylor & Francis has negotiated clear rules around display rights, repurposing and contiguous word count – verbatim extracts of more than a set amount of words – CEO Stephen Carter said in an earnings call last year.
Berenberg's Mr Larwood isn't too worried either, pointing to the intellectual property rights embedded in the Taylor & Francis agreements. 'This suggests that it will look to sign more contracts in the future, providing upside to estimates,' he said. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
13 hours ago
- CNA
Exclusive-OpenAI taps Google in unprecedented cloud deal despite AI rivalry, sources say
SAN FRANCISCO :OpenAI plans to add Alphabet's Google cloud service to meet its growing needs for computing capacity, three sources told Reuters, marking a surprising collaboration between two prominent competitors in the artificial intelligence sector. The deal, which has been under discussion for a few months, was finalized in May, one of the sources added. It underscores how massive computing demands to train and deploy AI models are reshaping the competitive dynamics in AI, and marks OpenAI's latest move to diversify its compute sources beyond its major supporter Microsoft, including its high-profile Stargate data center project. It is a win for Google's cloud unit, which will supply additional computing capacity to OpenAI's existing infrastructure for training and running its AI models, sources said, who requested anonymity to discuss private matters. The move also comes as OpenAI's ChatGPT poses the biggest threat to Google's dominant search business in years, with Google executives recently saying that the AI race may not be winner-take-all. OpenAI, Google and Microsoft declined to comment. Since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in late 2022, OpenAI has dealt with increasing demand for computing capacity - known in the industry as compute - for training large language models, as well as for running inference, which involves processing information so people can use these models. OpenAI said on Monday that its annualized revenue run rate surged to $10 billion as of June, positioning the company to hit its full-year target amid booming adoption of AI. Earlier this year, OpenAI partnered with SoftBank and Oracle on the $500 billion Stargate infrastructure program, and signed deals worth billions with CoreWeave for more compute. It is on track this year to finalize the design of its first in-house chip that could reduce its dependency on external hardware providers, Reuters reported in February. The partnership with Google is the latest of several maneuvers made by OpenAI to reduce its dependency on Microsoft, whose Azure cloud service had served as the ChatGPT maker's exclusive data center infrastructure provider until January. Google and OpenAI discussed an arrangement for months but were previously blocked from signing a deal due to OpenAI's lock-in with Microsoft, a source told Reuters. Microsoft and OpenAI are also in negotiations to revise the terms of their multibillion-dollar investment, including the future equity stake Microsoft will hold in OpenAI. For Google, the deal comes as the tech giant is expanding external availability of its in-house chip known as tensor processing units, or TPUs, which were historically reserved for internal use. That helped Google win customers including Big Tech player Apple as well as startups like Anthropic and Safe Superintelligence, two OpenAI competitors launched by former OpenAI leaders. Google's addition of OpenAI to its customer list shows how the tech giant has capitalized on its in-house AI technology from hardware to software to accelerate the growth of its cloud business. Google Cloud, whose $43 billion of sales comprised 12 per cent of Alphabet's 2024 revenue, has positioned itself as a neutral arbiter of computing resources in an effort to outflank Amazon and Microsoft as the cloud provider of choice for a rising legion of AI startups whose heavy infrastructure demands generate costly bills. Alphabet faces market pressure to demonstrate financial returns on its AI-related capital expenditures, which are expected to hit $75 billion this year, while maintaining its bottom line against the threat of competing AI offerings, as well as antitrust enforcement. Google's DeepMind AI unit also competes directly with OpenAI and Anthropic in a race to develop the best models and integrate those advances into consumer applications. Selling computing power reduces Google's own supply of chips while bolstering capacity-constrained rivals. The OpenAI deal will further complicate how Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai allocates the capacity between the competing interests of Google's enterprise and consumer business segments. Google already lacked sufficient capacity to meet its cloud customers' demands as of the last quarter, Chief Financial Officer Anat Ashkenazi told analysts in April. Although ChatGPT holds a large lead over Google's competing chatbot in terms of monthly users and analysts have predicted it could reduce Google's dominant search market share, Pichai has brushed aside concerns that OpenAI will usurp Google's business dominance.
Straits Times
20 hours ago
- Straits Times
Academic publishers sign AI deals as Trump cuts research funding
Even for those who are steering clear of licensing deals for now, AI is unavoidable internally. PHOTO: PEXELS Academic publishers are rushing to sign licensing deals with artificial intelligence companies, carving out a new revenue stream as US research funding cuts dim their outlook. Informa Plc's Taylor & Francis signed a US$10 million deal with Microsoft Corp. last year to provide the tech giant access to part of its library to train large language models, or LLMs. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc is looking to 'monetise academic content through AI deals,' it said in its latest set of results, while John Wiley & Sons Inc. announced partnerships with Amazon Web Services and Perplexity earlier this year. The deals provide a boost to earnings for publishing giants. Informa sold US$75 million of non-recurring data access in 2024 through its partnership with Microsoft and another undisclosed partner, which helped to accelerate underlying revenue growth in the Taylor & Francis unit to 15 per cent from 3 per cent the year prior. Excluding AI deals, organic growth would have been closer to 3.5 per cent, according to Berenberg analyst William Larwood. This could offset some of the impact from the US administration's decision to cut federal spending on academic research, Mr Larwood said in a note last month. About 11 per cent of Taylor & Francis' subscription revenues could be at risk from US funding cuts in 2026, he calculated. A 43 per cent cut to the National Institutes of Health's budget for fiscal 2026 – what US President Donald Trump is pushing for – would result in a £33 million revenue headwind for Taylor & Francis. A less drastic cut of 25 per cent would mean shortfall closer to £19 million, Mr Larwood estimated. Even for those who are steering clear of licensing deals for now, AI is unavoidable internally. Springer Nature AG & Co KGaA, for instance, has not signed any licensing agreements so far, but is using AI to tighten workflows. 'It's not our first priority,' Chief Executive Officer Frank Vrancken Peeters said on the most recent earnings call. 'The main emphasis in terms of AI for us has been transforming the publication process, making it faster, more researcher-friendly and more reliable in terms of research integrity,' Springer Nature said in an emailed response to questions. The recent flurry of licensing deals in the academic world is part of a broader trend of publishers both fighting against and joining forces with powerful AI companies. The New York Times Co. recently reached a deal to license its editorial content to Inc. for use across its artificial intelligence platforms, after years of battles in court with OpenAI and its partner Microsoft over copyright infringement. The Atlantic and Vox Media signed similar deals, as publishers try to prevent tech companies from scraping the web to train chatbots without providing fair compensation. 'Licensing deals could be the most straightforward path to resolving copyright disputes between the developers of large language models and the owners of the content upon which those models were trained,' wrote Ms Tamlin Bason, a legal analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. Compensation remains a key point of contention in academic publishers' AI deals. Some authors whose work was licensed out said they were not given the opportunity to opt out of the partnership and were not appropriately compensated. Microsoft offered HarperCollins US$5,000 per title, split 50/50 with the author. There's no ballpark in terms of what writers can expect, according to Ms Mary Rasenberger, the CEO of the Authors Guild, whose position is that authors should be asked for permission and given 75 per cent to 85 per cent of the revenue from the AI deal. An author was recently paid just US$97 by Taylor & Francis to give over a book for LLM training, she told Bloomberg. 'Proceeds from these partnerships are being shared with authors and other rights holders in accordance with the licensing terms and royalty statement periods in their contracts,' a spokesperson for Taylor & Francis said. 'Academic authors don't have expectations of making that much money from their books,' Ms Rasenberger said. 'It's more that they don't want to lose control over their work.' Beyond souring relationships with their authors, the bigger concern for publishers is becoming obsolete in a world of AI-generated content. 'It's definitely a risk, without a doubt,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst John Davies said. The key question is 'how can you give certainty to your authors and your shareholders that you've not chucked the baby out with the bath water,' he added. Publishers' experience with selling rights to their data should be key in implementing the appropriate guardrails, Mr Davies said. Taylor & Francis has negotiated clear rules around display rights, repurposing and contiguous word count – verbatim extracts of more than a set amount of words – CEO Stephen Carter said in an earnings call last year. Berenberg's Mr Larwood isn't too worried either, pointing to the intellectual property rights embedded in the Taylor & Francis agreements. 'This suggests that it will look to sign more contracts in the future, providing upside to estimates,' he said. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Microsoft unveils ROG Xbox Ally handheld video game devices
Microsoft on Sunday (Jun 8) unveiled its first Xbox-branded handheld gaming devices, touting them as a way to play its vast library of titles anywhere. Two "ROG Xbox Ally" models made in a partnership with Taiwan-based ASUS will be available by the year-end holiday season, Xbox president Sarah Bond said during an online event showcasing games heading for the platform. "The Xbox Ally is an Xbox you can hold in your hands, bringing together the power of Xbox and the freedom of Windows," Bond said. "On this Xbox, you can play games across your entire library, including all the Windows PC game stores from Xbox and to Steam, GOG (Good Old Games platform) and Ubisoft Connect." The peek at Xbox Ally came just days after the release of Nintendo's Switch 2, the handheld console that could score record early sales for the Japanese Super Mario creator. The Nintendo device, which features a bigger screen and more processing power, is an upgrade to the Switch that became a global phenomenon with hit games such as Animal Crossing. Microsoft promised to disclose pricing and release date details for Xbox Ally in the coming months. Both Xbox handhelds appeared similar to Microsoft console controllers in terms of buttons, toggles and grips but looked elongated to provide room for center screens. "When you power on your Xbox Ally, you'll boot directly into the Xbox full screen experience, a new feature optimised specifically for handheld gaming," Microsoft said in a release. "The Xbox Ally and Xbox Ally X are perfect for players looking to take an approachable gaming experience with you during travels – whether it's between airports, or between the comfiest chairs in the living room."
