logo
Farmers for Action withdraws from NAP discussions

Farmers for Action withdraws from NAP discussions

Agriland19 hours ago

Farmers for Action (FFA) has withdrawn from all official discussions relating to a new Nutrients Action Programme (NAP) for Northern Ireland.
A delegation from the organisation walked out of an official NAP stakeholder meeting at which Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) officials were in attendance earlier this week.
FFA spokesperson, William Taylor said: 'The current NAP review process is not fit for purpose. We have made it clear to DAERA officials that we will not engage with the process until such times as fundamental changes in its structure are implemented.'
Significantly, FFA has requested a meeting with Minister for Agriculture, Environment, and Rural Affairs Andrew Muir, to discuss the ways in which a new NAP can best be developed for Northern Ireland.
Taylor said: 'We have yet to receive an official response on this matter.'
NAP public consultation
Meanwhile, FFA is indicating that it may still participate in the NAP public consultation.
'But this would only be on the basis of the farm minister fundamentally changing its structure,' stressed the FFA representative.
'First off, his department must adequately support all farming businesses regarding the final NAP measures that are implemented.
'In practical terms, this means introducing FFA's proposed Farm Welfare Bill. This has been designed to guarantee farmers sustainable prices on an ongoing basis allied with the capability of further investing in their business.'
FFA is also calling for the Department of Agriculture, Environment, and Rural Affairs (DAERA) to ensure that sufficient advisors are made available to work with farm businesses on an individual basis when it comes to the calculation of phosphate and nitrate loading levels across production agriculture.
Taylor commented: 'The principle of DAERA being used as an enforcement agency in the first instance is fundamentally flawed.
'It is the job of department officials to work with farmers, advising them how to reach whatever NAP targets are agreed in a co-ordinated manner.
'These are matters which can only be addressed in the long term: there is no short-term fix. And this fundamental fact must be realised by DAERA.'
And finally, FFA wants the policies implemented where the use of organic manures are concerned to be totally overhauled.
Taylor said: 'In the first instance, there are large tracts of agricultural land across Northern Ireland that would actually benefit from an application of slurry.
'And this fundamental fact must be recognised by Minister Muir.'
FFA also wants to see the export of the surplus manures produced in Northern Ireland to Brazil and other Mercosur countries.
This is based on the rationale that grain and animal feed stuffs imported from South America are contributing to Northern Ireland's water quality challenge in the first place.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Farmers for Action withdraws from NAP discussions
Farmers for Action withdraws from NAP discussions

Agriland

time19 hours ago

  • Agriland

Farmers for Action withdraws from NAP discussions

Farmers for Action (FFA) has withdrawn from all official discussions relating to a new Nutrients Action Programme (NAP) for Northern Ireland. A delegation from the organisation walked out of an official NAP stakeholder meeting at which Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) officials were in attendance earlier this week. FFA spokesperson, William Taylor said: 'The current NAP review process is not fit for purpose. We have made it clear to DAERA officials that we will not engage with the process until such times as fundamental changes in its structure are implemented.' Significantly, FFA has requested a meeting with Minister for Agriculture, Environment, and Rural Affairs Andrew Muir, to discuss the ways in which a new NAP can best be developed for Northern Ireland. Taylor said: 'We have yet to receive an official response on this matter.' NAP public consultation Meanwhile, FFA is indicating that it may still participate in the NAP public consultation. 'But this would only be on the basis of the farm minister fundamentally changing its structure,' stressed the FFA representative. 'First off, his department must adequately support all farming businesses regarding the final NAP measures that are implemented. 'In practical terms, this means introducing FFA's proposed Farm Welfare Bill. This has been designed to guarantee farmers sustainable prices on an ongoing basis allied with the capability of further investing in their business.' FFA is also calling for the Department of Agriculture, Environment, and Rural Affairs (DAERA) to ensure that sufficient advisors are made available to work with farm businesses on an individual basis when it comes to the calculation of phosphate and nitrate loading levels across production agriculture. Taylor commented: 'The principle of DAERA being used as an enforcement agency in the first instance is fundamentally flawed. 'It is the job of department officials to work with farmers, advising them how to reach whatever NAP targets are agreed in a co-ordinated manner. 'These are matters which can only be addressed in the long term: there is no short-term fix. And this fundamental fact must be realised by DAERA.' And finally, FFA wants the policies implemented where the use of organic manures are concerned to be totally overhauled. Taylor said: 'In the first instance, there are large tracts of agricultural land across Northern Ireland that would actually benefit from an application of slurry. 'And this fundamental fact must be recognised by Minister Muir.' FFA also wants to see the export of the surplus manures produced in Northern Ireland to Brazil and other Mercosur countries. This is based on the rationale that grain and animal feed stuffs imported from South America are contributing to Northern Ireland's water quality challenge in the first place.

Almost 200 attend webinar launch of NI NAP impact calculator
Almost 200 attend webinar launch of NI NAP impact calculator

Agriland

timea day ago

  • Agriland

Almost 200 attend webinar launch of NI NAP impact calculator

Almost 200 farmers and other stakeholders from the agri-food industry attended an AgriSearch webinar this week to launch AgriSearch's NAP (Nutrient Action Programme) farm impact calculator. Opening the webinar, AgriSearch vice-chair Ian McCluggage outlined the considerable amount of work that AgriSearch had done in a relatively short timeframe to respond to the NAP consultation. This included presentations at an AgriSearch event at Balmoral Show. The vice-chair thanked Dr. Sinclair Mayne for the considerable amount of work he had put into helping AgriSearch respond to the consultation including an in-depth critique of the science behind the proposals. AgriSearch was coordinating its actions with key industry stakeholders. NAP farm impact calculator The NAP farm impact calculator has been developed by AgriSearch to help farmers assess the impact of the measures proposed for the 2026-2029 Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) NAP. The calculator is now available to download from the AgriSearch website. During the webinar AgriSearch strategy manager, Jason Rankin outlined the calculations that the tool performs and gave a practical, step-by-step guide on how to download and use the calculator and interpret the results. This includes a calculation of the organic nitrogen loading (using the updated figures for dairy cows) which will determine if a farmer falls into the 'intensive' category or will require a derogation. The calculator also determines the farm's proposed allowance for chemical N fertiliser and indicates if this is above or below the farm's current usage. Finally, the calculator works out the farm's phosphorus balance and indicates how many extra hectares or the extent of the stocking rate cut needed to achieve both the 10kg P/ha and 8kg P/ha limit. Rankin then went through a number of dairy farm case studies illustrating how different types of farm might be impacted by the NAP proposals. AgriSearch's agriculture manager John Morrow went through two examples of beef and sheep farming systems, which was followed by a questions and answer session. Closing the webinar Ian McCluggage said that AgriSearch would be working with industry partners to gather a number of farm case studies from across the ruminant livestock sector. These will be used as part of a wider economic impact assessment. He encouraged farmers to participate if approached and emphasised that all such case studies would be kept anonymous.

French and Brazilian leaders disagree on Mercosur after meeting
French and Brazilian leaders disagree on Mercosur after meeting

Agriland

timea day ago

  • Agriland

French and Brazilian leaders disagree on Mercosur after meeting

The presidents of Brazil and France spoke of their differences on the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement yesterday, during a visit of the Brazilian leader to the European Country. According to reporting by Reuters, French president Emmanuel Macron and Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva differed with each other on the issue, with Lula calling for Macron to 'open his heart' to the deal, and Macron pushing back, highlighting the negative impact to French and European farmers. Lula is set to shortly take up the rotating presidency of the Mercosur bloc – which also includes Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay – and indicated that he intends to use his six-month tenure to push the agreement over the final hurdles. 'I will not leave the Mercosur presidency without having concluded the trade deal,' he said. He also called on Macron to tell his fellow European leaders that Brazil was committed to fighting deforestation. According to the Reuters report, Macron said he was in favour of free and equitable trade, but that the deal, in its current form, would harm farmers as they would have to compete against South American farmers who are not subject to the same environmental regulations as European farmers. The French president said that the inclusion of so-called 'mirror clauses' may improve the deal. Reuters also reported that French farming organisations met with politicians this week and urged Macron to work with other EU countries to form a 'blocking minority' in the Council of the EU against the deal, (a blocking minority is four EU member states). Mercosur France and Ireland have been the two EU countries most steadfast against the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement, with Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris recently telling the Dáil that he is unconvinced that Ireland's concerns about the trade agreement have been 'adequately addressed'. According to Minister Harris, both he and his officials continue to engage at EU level at every opportunity, with both the European Commission directly and with counterparts in EU member states, including France, to 'voice our concerns with the agreement'. Harris said both he and his officials have sought to 'interrogate the outcome of negotiations to assess if our concerns have been adequately addressed'. However, he said: 'I am not convinced they have been.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store