Balance of trade between nations need to reflect parity and equality
Trump had expressed hopes that higher tariffs could redress the situation and expects Malaysia to purchase a more wider range of American goods and products.
Many nations too have lopsided balance of trade with the US and this is one of the reasons for the much-feared Trump's tariffs worldwide which will begin to be implemented from Aug 1.
Numerous countries have taken advantage of the large unrestricted open US market to increase exports exponentially but buy back less in imports leading to an unfavourable balance of trade.
The US has lost out to many countries in the trade of agricultural and manufactured goods as well as services. This is the reason why the US is now the world's biggest debtor nation.
Many American multi-national have also added to the problems by opening new manufacturing centres outside the US to take advantage of lower labour costs and other incentives and exporting their products to the US for higher profits.
This has led to the famous 'rust belt', a vast number of US factories that had been shuttered down due to economic changes. This became a major socio-economic issue during the presidential elections.
The range of products and services the US depends on worldwide especially from the European Union (EU) and Asean countries has increased manyfold over the last few decade and is straining the US economy with the huge range imports which are not matched with imports by these countries.
This has been cited as one of the reasons for the much talked about decline of the US as a superpower. Trump is imposing punitive tariffs on nation he feels are restricting US imports through restrictions, regulations and import substitution.
The entry of China as a big time trading nation has upset the balance of trade internationally. China's economy of scale has led to cheaper and competitive prices and many nations have lost their erstwhile monopoly.
Previously, Malaysia trade with the US was more balanced as Malaysia used to buy a large range of manufactured products and other goods and services from the US. However, the situation has drastically changed when China began flooding its products in Malaysia. This led to Malaysia buying less from not only the US but also the EU, among others.
Malaysia often lauds its favourable trade balance as an economic achievement and advantage but does not take into account the disadvantage it causes to others. For a healthy trading relationship there should not be a very wide gulf or deficit between trading partners.
Another country with a perennially lopsided balance of trade with Malaysia is India. India has had an unfavourable balance of trade with Malaysia for decades.
India is Malaysia's largest importer of palm oil and is one of the main countries Malaysia considers to sell off any glut arising in palm oil. This enables palm oil prices to be kept high and well above production costs.
The palm oil sector has been one of the most profitable and Malaysia reaps billions of ringgit due to high prices fuelled by large scale imports by India.
In fact whenever palm oil exporters get wind of prospective large scale purchase of palm oil from India due to domestic vegetable oil shortage or demand for festivals many of these exporters and speculators jack up the prices.
The situation became so exploitative more than a decade ago when India decided to have a more stable palm oil pricing with a government to government arrangement with Indonesia.
Needless to say Malaysia-India trade ties need to become more balanced and fair to both sides. Malaysia needs to import more from India considering the presently wide range of manufactured as well as tradition products from India.
Indian investors and businesses need to reciprocate by increasing their economic activities in Malaysia and their involvement in the IT and related sectors is one way to improve the balance of trade.
The Malaysian Indian community should look into good investment opportunities in Tamil Nadu as the government is providing various incentives for export-related manufacturing for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and larger firms.
Alternatively, joint ventures between India and Malaysia need to be increased .This will also help redress the gap between imports and exports.
Governments worldwide need to ensure that the balance of trade is fair and amicable for both sides and ensure that exploitative restrictions, over-regulation and domestic discrimination as well as unfair practices do not lead to countries reacting with higher tariffs and taxes.
Trump's tariffs show how the US now unilaterally reacts to stop the disadvantages to the US economy. He has shown the way as to how to redress unfavourable trade balances with tariffs and other restrictions to save a country's economy.
Tariffs will be a feature of the future with more nations feeling they are being exploited through unfair and discriminatory trade practices. Suffice to say, the days of unrestricted open markets are officially over. ‒ July 22, 2025
V. Thomas is a Focus Malaysia viewer.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: AFP/Andrew Hanik
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
10 minutes ago
- The Star
Cross Border Insolvency Bill 2025 tabled in Dewan Rakyat for first reading
KUALA LUMPUR: The Cross Border Insolvency Bill 2025, enabling local creditors to recover debts from insolvent companies within the ASEAN region, has been tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said tabled the Bill on Monday (July 28). The proposed Bill aims to promote cooperation between courts and authorities in Malaysia and foreign states involved in cross-border insolvency cases. It also seeks to provide legal certainty for trade and investment and ensure fair administration of cross-border insolvencies, protecting creditors' interests and the debtor. The Bill aims to protect and maximise the value of the debtor's property and facilitate the rescue of financially troubled businesses. Clause 3 outlines the Bill's application when assistance is sought in Malaysia or any foreign state regarding cross-border insolvency proceedings, or when foreign creditors participate in Malaysian proceedings. However, the Bill does not apply to individual insolvency, bankruptcy, those carrying on a registered business under specific Acts, or limited liability partnerships under the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2011. Some of the notable Clauses are; > Clause 4 provides that the Bill is to be read alongside existing Malaysian insolvency laws, supplementing rather than replacing them. > Clause 6 authorises Malaysian insolvency office-holders or court-appointed individuals to act in foreign states subject to local laws, while Clause 7 gives theCourt discretion to refuse recognition or grant relief if it conflicts with Malaysian public policy. > Clause 11 states that foreign representatives appointed in foreign proceedings can apply to commence proceedings under Malaysian law if conditions are met. > Clause 12 allows foreign representatives to participate in Malaysian debtor proceedings upon the recognition of foreign proceedings while Clause 13 ensures foreign creditors have the same rights as Malaysian creditors, stating their claims shall not be ranked lower solely because they are foreign. > Clause 21 provides discretionary relief upon recognising foreign proceedings, allowing the foreign representative to manage the debtor's Malaysian property, ensuring local creditors' interests are protected and > Clause 32 ensures equitable payment in concurrent proceedings, preventing creditors from receiving more than their share compared to others in Malaysia. The Bill's tabling follows Malaysia's plan to adopt the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency.
New Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Bill for mandatory secondary education tabled
KUALA LUMPUR: The bill making secondary education compulsory was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat today. The government intends to insert a new provision – Section 32A – under the Education Act 1996, which allows the minister to publish an order in the gazette to make secondary education compulsory. The new provision penalises violation of the law with a maximum fine of RM5,000 or a maximum jail term of six months or both, unless the child is given an exemption. The bill also aims to change the scope of Section 29A to cover all Malaysian children residing in Malaysia. Currently, Section 29A of the Education Act only mandates primary education for children of Malaysian citizens residing in Malaysia. The Education (Amendment) Bill 2025 was presented for its first reading in Parliament by Deputy Education Minister Wong Kah Woh, who also said the bill's second and third readings are slated to be completed in the same session.
Malaysiakini
10 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
EU: Anchor of stability amid global trade tensions
COMMENT | In a world where trade tensions are rising and protectionism is creeping back, the European Union is doubling down on its commitment to free trade and international cooperation. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen put it plainly: 'Tariffs are taxes that only hurt businesses and consumers.' This straightforward message reflects the EU's firm belief that walls and barriers won't help anyone in the long run. The EU's robust legal framework, enforced by EU member states, the European Commission, and the Court of Justice, ensures that international trade follows clear, agreed-upon rules. These rules, grounded in the principles of the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, are not just about trade. They promote prosperity, cooperation and stability worldwide, including in the fast-growing and strategically vital Indo-Pacific region. While some countries might be tempted to retreat behind protectionist policies, the EU is keeping its doors open, especially towards Southeast Asia. This openness is based on a simple conviction: that fair, rules-based trade and investment are powerful engines for sustainable growth and development. This is exactly how peace and prosperity in the EU were built over the past decades. Now, this belief is driving a renewed effort to conclude an ambitious, comprehensive and balanced free trade agreement (FTA) with Malaysia. Partners in stability and prosperity The partnership between the EU and Malaysia, as well as with Asean, is built on trust, transparency, and a shared vision for peace, stability, and prosperity. And on mutual engagement, as evidenced by the renewed dynamics in our partnership with the visits of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim – also as Asean chair – to Brussels, Rome and Paris in the past months, as well as the visits to Kuala Lumpur by the Poland president, Denmark foreign minister, Finland trade minister and most recently the EU high representative and vice-president of the commission on the occasion of the 58th Asean Foreign Ministers Meeting. Stability and predictability are vitally important for business and the global economy. The recent relaunch of trade negotiations reflects our shared commitment to an open, rules-based international trade order – a principle Anwar has consistently advocated, and that both sides strongly uphold. The highly promising first round of EU-Malaysia trade negotiations has just concluded in Brussels, the substantive engagement from both sides signalling a fresh push to deepen economic ties. These ties are already significant: the EU is Malaysia's fourth-largest trading partner and second-largest source of foreign direct investment. For the EU, Malaysia ranks as its third-largest trading partner in Asean. But there's plenty of untapped potential, and the free trade agreement is key to unlocking it. By slashing tariffs and removing non-tariff barriers, the agreement would open up markets for goods, services, investment, and procurement flows. It would also provide clearer rules on intellectual property and digital trade - areas that are increasingly important in today's economic landscape. Freer trade also helps cushion the impact of global supply shocks by diversifying sourcing and reducing dependence on any single country or supplier. For consumers both in the EU and Malaysia, the benefits are tangible: lower prices, more choice, and greater supply security, especially in essential sectors like food, medicine, and technology. For Malaysian businesses, this means preferential and easier access to the EU's vast single market - the second-largest in the world - creating new opportunities, boosting competitiveness, and attracting high-quality investment. FTA to strengthen ties Ultimately, the FTA is more than just a commercial tool - it is a platform to shape a future-oriented, resilient relationship that reflects the shared ambitions of Malaysia and the EU for sustainable and inclusive growth. It will further strengthen the foundation of our relationship, built on trust and mutual benefit. In a time of growing trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty, the EU's commitment to open markets and international rules provides an anchor of stability. As a predictable, transparent, reliable and open partner, the EU is ready to deepen its engagements with the like-minded. The renewed EU-Malaysia free trade talks highlight how cooperation, not confrontation, can pave the way for a more prosperous future for both regions and the global economy. RAFAEL DAERR is EU ambassador to Malaysia. This op-ed is also jointly written by 16 ambassadors of EU member states in Malaysia. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
