Badly Bruised Universities Are Rushing to Cut Deals With Trump
PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station
Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind
Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole
Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds
Universities targeted by Donald Trump's crackdown on diversity programs and other policies he says show a liberal bias are essentially bleeding at the negotiating table after taking on debt, laying off hundreds of staff and slashing spending. As the fall semester approaches, they may be increasingly eager to ink accords that will stanch the flow.
Cornell and Northwestern, both of which announced steps to address major budget shortfalls this year after the federal government suspended research funds, are now close to agreements with the White House, Bloomberg News has reported.
Brown, Columbia and the University of Pennsylvania reached accords over the past month. But amid those settlements, new universities are being targeted. Most recently, the University of California at Los Angeles and Duke joined Harvard, Northwestern, Princeton and others in losing access to federal grants that are the financial lifeblood of large research institutions.
It all adds up to an unprecedented pressure campaign that's roiling the world of higher education, reverberating through faculty, student and alumni groups and clouding the outlook for the type of medical and scientific research that takes place at the colleges. The multitrillion-dollar tax law signed last month also hikes the tax on income from endowments for some of the wealthiest private schools. As the Trump administration gains leverage, colleges' bruised budgets could drive them toward making agreements quicker.
'It seems like they want to get deals done now,' said Brendan Cantwell, a professor at Michigan State University who focuses on the political economy of higher education. 'It's almost like a dam is broken. I would not be at all surprised if we saw a cascading set of agreements.'
Federal funding has been used as a cudgel by the Trump administration, which has criticized what it says is a failure by academic institutions to crack down on antisemitism during campus protests over Israel's war in Gaza. The moves also come amid a broader campaign against diversity efforts and accusations of political bias.
The fallout has already started. Northwestern said it would cut more than 400 jobs to save 5% on labor costs, with university officials calling the past few months some of the most difficult in its 174-year history. The Trump administration in April paused $790 million in research funding for the Evanston, Illinois-based school because of potential civil rights violations.
At Cornell, leaders in June warned that drastic financial austerity measures were on the table after hundreds of millions of dollars in federal research contracts were terminated or frozen.
'The spring semester was unlike anything ever seen in higher education,' they wrote in a letter to students and staff. 'We have been using institutional resources to try to plug these funding holes in the short term, but these interim measures are not sustainable.'
Late last month, the government froze $108 million in research funding to Duke University, or about 20% of its federal revenue, three Trump administration officials told Bloomberg. Duke is in talks with government officials on a settlement, according to an administration official.
Duke's press office didn't provide a comment on the funding loss or the status of government talks.
A Duke official, who asked not to be identified discussing internal deliberations, said the school is reconsidering its budget amid the funding loss, but that it hopes an end to the freeze will come soon.
Cornell and Northwestern have declined to comment on any settlement talks.
Trump Agreements
On July 23, Columbia University agreed to pay $221 million in a deal that was promptly criticized for infringing on academic freedom at the school.
Brown announced a deal on July 30, agreeing to give $50 million over 10 years to workforce development organizations in its home state of Rhode Island in exchange for the reimbursement of at least $50 million in unpaid federal grants. Shortly before reaching the deal, Brown took out a $500 million loan — a sign of how strained the school's finances had become.
Brown, the least wealthy of the Ivy League schools with an endowment of $7.2 billion, had previously warned in June of 'significant' cost-cutting measures to offset the federal funding.
The Trump administration's higher-education crackdown has exposed just how dependent some of the elite, research-focused universities are on the government. They're essentially 'major federal contractors' and stopping the stream would be catastrophic for many of them, according to Cantwell.
'Think about Booz Allen or Raytheon,' Cantwell said. 'If they said, 'All your federal funding will be frozen for 9 months,' you can imagine how those firms might react.'
The Trump administration has dealt a harsher financial blow to Harvard than any other university in its crosshairs, freezing billions of multiyear research grants and contracts.
The school estimates that the moves by the administration, as well as the endowment tax increase, will cost about $1 billion annually. Harvard's Kennedy School already cut staff.
'The unprecedented challenges we face have led to disruptive changes, painful layoffs, and ongoing uncertainty about the future,' Harvard President Alan M. Garber said in a letter to the campus.
Garber has told faculty that a settlement with the government isn't imminent and the university is considering resolving its dispute through the courts, the Harvard Crimson reported Monday.
Larry Ladd, who served as Harvard's budget director and now advises schools at the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, said he can't criticize any college for coming to a deal with the Trump administration given what's at stake for their campuses.
'Schools are likely facing pressure to use endowment and tuition revenue, which are typically used to support students, to support some of their research enterprise instead,' Ladd said. 'They don't want to do that because they want to continue to support students. There's that pressure as well.'
Lynn Pasquerella, president of the American Association of Colleges and Universities, said campus leaders are being put in an 'untenable position' and worries that federal funds will continue to be weaponized by the Trump administration, even if schools make deals.
'The concern is the more we capitulate through making these agreements, the more the administration will be empowered to continue along these lines,' she said.
--With assistance from Janet Lorin and Akayla Gardner.
AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay
How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry
Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity
What Happens to AI Startups When Their Founders Jump Ship for Big Tech
Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
US tariffs prompt Toyota profit warning
US tariffs prompted Japanese auto giant Toyota on Thursday to cut its annual net profit forecast by 14 percent. The world's largest automaker by vehicle sales now expects a net profit of 2.66 trillion yen ($18.06 billion), down from 3.1 trillion yen previously forecasted. "Due to the impact of US tariffs and other factors, actual results showed decreased operating income, and the forecast has been revised downward," the firm said in a statement. Its shares fell by as much as 2.4 percent in Tokyo afternoon trade before recovering off lows. The Trump administration in April imposed a 25 percent levy on Japanese cars imported into the United States, dealing a hefty blow to Japan and its crucial auto sector. Although Tokyo and Washington announced a trade deal in July, lowering that rate to 15 percent and providing a degree of relief for the industry, it's not yet clear when it will take effect. There is also confusion over whether the car tariff -- as well as other "reciprocal" levies -- will be capped at 15 percent, or if these would come on top of those in place before Trump's trade blitz. The auto industry had a pre-existing 2.5 percent tariff, meaning the levy currently stands at 27.5 percent. Toyota's revenues in the first quarter were up 3.5 percent, but net income plunged by 36.9 percent. - Tariffs hit forecasts - The results come after Honda said Wednesday its net profit had halved in the first quarter because of US tariffs, although it upgraded its annual profit forecast due to the deal with Washington. In the first three months of its fiscal year, which begins in April, net profit fell to 196.67 billion yen ($1.3 billion), a drop of 50.2 percent year-on-year, Honda said. Revenue dipped 1.2 percent to 5.34 trillion yen. Honda, Japan's second-biggest automaker after Toyota, has managed to withstand the pressure better than its Japanese competitors. More than 60 percent of the vehicles it sells in the United States are built there, the highest percentage of all major Japanese automakers, according to Bloomberg Intelligence auto analyst Tatsuo Yoshida. Struggling Japanese rival Nissan, whose mooted merger with Honda collapsed this year and which is slashing jobs and closing factories, in July posted a net loss of 116 billion yen ($784 million). German carmaker BMW stuck to its 2025 targets last month despite quarterly profits tumbling a third due partly to US tariffs, insisting its large American operations meant it could weather the storm. That stood in contrast to domestic rivals Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz, who cut their outlooks as they grapple with the fallout from Trump's hardball trade policies. Ford meanwhile projected a $2 billion full-year earnings hit due to the levies. bur-aph/stu/sco Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Holiday Inn owner IHG's US room revenue falls in second quarter
(Reuters) - Holiday Inn owner InterContinental Hotels Group reported a fall in U.S. revenue per available room (RevPAR) in the second quarter on Thursday, as economic uncertainties dent consumer spending in its largest market. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on trade partners and rising geopolitical tensions have rattled the travel and hospitality industry as waning consumer confidence threaten to reverse post-pandemic recovery. "While some shorter-term macro-economic uncertainties remain, many are subsiding," IHG CEO Elie Maalouf said in a statement, adding that the company remains on track to meet annual profit and earnings expectations. The hotel operator said U.S. RevPAR fell 0.9% for the three months ended June 30, compared to 3.5% growth in the first quarter. Global RevPAR growth for the first half of the year came at 1.8%, compared to 3% a year prior. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


UPI
a minute ago
- UPI
Trump's sweeping new tariffs take effect
President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, August 6, 2025, just hours before his new sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries would take effect. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo Aug. 7 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs on dozens of nations went into effect early Thursday following months of delays and threats from the American leader. "IT"S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW LOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA," Trump said on his Truth Social platform announcing the levies were now in effect. The American president has long relied on tariffs as a punishment, a negotiating tool and a measure to right what he views as negative trade imbalances that the United States has with other countries. He has described these deficits as an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States' national security and economy. Under the executive order he signed last week, most countries' imports to the United States will be subjected to a baseline 10% tariff, which went into effect at midnight Wednesday. Other governments, such as South Korea, the European Union, Britain and Japan, will have more complicated and different tariff rates as they rushed to make deals with the Trump administration ahead of last month's deadline. Brazil, for instance is facing a total 50% tariff after Trump slapped a 40% levy against it over the prosecution of his ally, former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro. He also raised tariffs to 50% on India on Wednesday over the country's continued purchase of Russian oil. Canada, the United States' closest partner, was hit with a 35% tariff, up from 25%. On Wednesday, Trump also announced he would be imposing a 100% tariff on semiconductor chips. According to the nonpartisan Yale Budget Lab think tank, U.S. consumers will face an overall average effective tariff rate of 17.3% -- the highest since 1935, during the Great Depression. The think tanks states that the average per-household income loss will be $2,400 this year. Textiles and clothing will be disproportionally affected by the tariffs, with consumers expected to face 40% higher costs for shoes and 38% higher prices for apparel. Meanwhile, the nonpartisan Tax Foundation states that Trump's tariffs could raise $2.1 trillion in revenue over the next 10 years, but will reduce total revenue raised by $1.6 trillion and reduce GDP by 0.8%. Despite what analysts say, the Trump administration has been bullish on the tariffs, saying they will generate billions for the United States. During a press conference at the White House with Apple CEO Tim Cook on Wednesday, Trump said, "I think we'll be taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs." "We have a great country. We have a country that is going to be very rich. It's a country that we're very proud of, but it's going to be very rich," Trump said. Trump initially announced the so-called reciprocal tariffs in April but then paused them for all countries but China for 90 days to allow time for the governments to hash out deals with the United States. In July, he delayed them again until Aug. 1. Then a day before the tariffs were to go into effect, he pushed their deadline a week.