
China and Philippines' war on the high seas: How two countries have rammed each others' ships and blockaded tiny South China Sea islands in territorial battle that threatens to spiral into WW3
But further south, there is a second conflict brewing between China and another key ally of the United States - the Philippines.
Under authoritarian President Xi Jinping, Beijing has continued to expand its reach into the South China Sea's strategically vital and resource-rich waters bordered by several Southeast Asian nations.
Each of these countries, including the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Vietnam, all lay claim to different parts of the sea and a litany of small islands, shoals and reefs adrift within it.
But China insists it should own virtually the entire sea and its strategic outposts, including swathes of territory within the 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) off the shores of all its island neighbours.
On Monday, the Philippines rejected China's claim to Sandy Cay - a group of three sandbars less than 200 kilometres off the Philippine coast - after a Chinese state-owned newspaper last week published images of coast guard officers holding up a Chinese flag there.
That prompted the Philippines' coast guard, along with a navy and maritime police team, to land on the sandbars and unfurl the Philippines flag, a move that was in turn harshly condemned and branded 'illegal' by Beijing.
But this is just the latest in a long line of disputes which are growing ever more frequent and intense.
Now, fears are mounting that a protracted spat could descend into an armed conflict between China and the US-allied Philippines - a scenario which could hasten a regional or even global fallout.
At the heart of the tensions between China and the Philippines lies a scattering of rocks, shoals, reefs and atolls across the South China Sea, most notably the Spratly Islands and Scarborough Shoal, over which both countries assert sovereignty.
The Philippines bases its claims on proximity and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), under which most of the contested features lie within its EEZ.
China, meanwhile, claims almost the entire sea via its so-called 'nine-dash line', a sweeping boundary drawn on a map in the 1940s that has no legal basis under international law.
That illegality was confirmed in 2016, when a Hague-based tribunal ruled overwhelmingly in favour of the Philippines, declaring China's claims invalid.
Dr Gregory Poling, Director of the Southeast Asia Programme at the CSIS think tank, said: 'The very existence of the Nine-Dash Line, I think, is an affront to these countries... China is imposing the idea that these waters are disputed on smaller countries, where everybody else gets 200 miles, the Chinese get 1,000 miles.'
But instead of pulling back, China has only looked to expand its presence since the ruling, militarising several natural and artificial islands - including Scarborough Shoal - and deploying coast guard ships and naval vessels to patrol the contested waters.
As a result, Chinese and Philippine military and civilian vessels have routinely come to blows in the South China Sea as of late.
These clashes, several of which have resulted in injuries to crew and damaged vessels amid ramming attacks, the use of water cannons and even lasers, are stoking tensions as the Philippines defies what it views as Beijing's policy of imperialist expansion and disregard for territorial sovereignty.
In August, a Philippine coast guard vessel, the BRP Teresa Magbanua, sustained significant damage when it was repeatedly rammed by a Chinese ship close to Sabina Shoal, about 130 kilometres west of the Philippine province of Palawan, which is part of the hotly contested Spratly Islands.
The shoal is well within the internationally recognised EEZ of the Philippines.
Commodore Jay Tarriela of the Philippine coast guard said the Magbanua dropped its anchor just off the coast of the Shoal and said it would not withdraw from the region 'despite the harassment, bullying activities and escalatory action of the Chinese coast guard'.
Video released by the Philippine coast guard appeared to clearly show the Magbanua being rammed by a Chinese coast guard ship, even as Beijing claimed the Philippine vessel had altered its path and pursued a collision course.
Close to Sabina Shoal lies the Second Thomas Shoal, where a small Philippine military detachment is stationed.
This outpost has become a litmus test of Philippine resolve and Chinese intent as Beijing's ships hassle Philippine vessels conducting supply runs to and from the shoal.
In February 2023, the Philippines accused a Chinese coast guard ship of hitting a coast guard boat with a military-grade laser.
Manila said the laser temporarily blinded some of its crew in the disputed South China Sea, calling it a 'blatant' violation of Manila's sovereign rights.
The Chinese ship also manoeuvred dangerously close, about 450 feet, to block the Philippine patrol vessel BRP Malapascua from approaching Second Thomas Shoal.
A Chinese coast guard shoots water cannons at a Philippine boat in the South China sea
Then in December of that year, another video shared by the Philippine coast guard showed Chinese ships blasting powerful water cannons at much smaller Philippine vessels off Scarborough Shoal.
Scarborough Shoal is 240 kilometres west of the Philippines' main island of Luzon and nearly 900 kilometres from the nearest major Chinese land mass of Hainan, but China in 2012 assumed control of the territory in a blatant land grab.
Chinese state television said the country's coast guard had used 'control measures in accordance with the law' against the Philippine vessels that had 'intruded' into waters around the shoal.
These incidents, in which Chinese vessels seek to intimidate or attack Philippine vessels without resorting to overt military force, have been characterised as a cornerstone of Beijing's 'grey-zone tactics' to expand its influence in the South China Sea.
'By resorting to an array of grey zone tactics, Beijing aims to progressively eat away at the status quo in the South China Sea while staying under the threshold of crisis,' said Dr Euan Graham, an expert in Indo-Pacific Defence and Strategy at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
'Through the skilful coordinated use of assets... grey zone tactics have already enabled Beijing to exert effective control over large tracts of the South China Sea... If China succeeds in dominating the South China Sea, it is likely to dominate Southeast Asia at large, as well as gaining strategic leverage over the major maritime economies of Northeast Asia,' he said in a policy paper for the Prospect Foundation.
At first glance, the fervent competition over a small collection of reefs, sandbars and uninhabited spits of land adrift in a huge sea may seem unwarranted.
But the South China Sea is one of the world's most important trade arteries through which more than $2 trillion in trade flows on an annual basis.
It is also believed to contain vast, untapped reserves of oil and natural gas, and the waters surrounding many of the shoals, atolls and reefs are crucial for fishing, an industry that supports millions of livelihoods in the Philippines alone.
Establishing a strong military presence and maritime infrastructure at key locations in the South China Sea is therefore a priority for China and its export-based, resource-hungry economy.
Control of the sea also allows Beijing to challenge the United States' role as regional security guarantor.
America has made a concerted effort to strike security alliances with members of the 'first island chain', a ring of territories running from Japan to the Philippines, to form a natural barrier against Chinese military expansion into the Pacific.
The Philippines, along with Taiwan, is a key part of this chain and the US has ramped up joint patrols and military aid to the Philippines while expanding access to Philippine bases under the 2014 Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement (EDCA).
Western-aligned allies Japan and Australia have also increased naval cooperation with the Philippines as part of the united front to deter China.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
7 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Labour's plan to recognise Palestine even if Hamas does not release hostages SLAMMED by families of captives
A statement issued by the families' lawyers said the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed in late-September DEAL SHOCK Labour's plan to recognise Palestine even if Hamas does not release hostages SLAMMED by families of captives Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HOSTAGE families blasted Labour's plan to recognise Palestine — after being told failure to release loved-ones will not stop the move. At a Foreign Office meeting, the relatives of four British-linked captives were told the UK would press ahead with state recognition even if Hamas terrorists refuse to free any of the 50 it still holds. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up A statement issued by their lawyers Adam Rose and Adam Wagner KC said the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed in late-September. But it added: 'It was made obvious to us at the meeting that, in deciding whether to go ahead with recognition, the release or otherwise of the hostages would play no part in those considerations.' They warned the UK's new position would not help 'and could even hurt' hostages. They said PM Sir Keir Starmer's plan 'appears to be to put pressure on the Israelis only to reach a deal'. It abandons efforts to press both sides, they add. Sir Keir outlined the route to recognising a Palestinian state this week. He was met with outrage by hostage families and concern from Jewish community leaders. Emily Damari, 29, who was held in Gaza and released in January, called it a 'moral failure'. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump vowed to 'get people fed' in Gaza after sending envoy Steve Witkoff to tour a US-backed aid site in Rafah. Hamas agrees to release 10 hostages as terror group issues ceasefire red lines after Trump pressured Israel to end war


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Melrose defies tariffs and supply woes to beat profit forecast
A leading aerospace business's first-half profits were above forecasts in the face of disruption caused by President Trump's tariffs and long-running aerospace supply chain issues. Operating profits at Melrose, the owner of GKN Aerospace, were £310 million for the six months ended June 30, compared with a company-compiled analysts' consensus of £299 million. Revenue rose 6 per cent to £1.7 billion, driven by a particularly strong performance from Melrose's engines division, which supplies parts to the likes of Rolls-Royce and the US-based Pratt & Whitney. The performance sent shares up more than 5 per cent on a day that markets were backed into a retreat as Trump introduced a slew of fresh tariffs. Melrose was buoyed last week by news that the US-EU trade deal had granted a tariff exemption for aircraft and aviation parts, although it said on Friday it had successfully mitigated the 'direct impact' of the current levies on its half-year bottom line. The FTSE 100 group has a significant presence in the US, which makes up nearly two thirds of its sales, and it recently opened a multimillion-pound factory in San Diego. It does, however, run an operation in Mexico, which exports to both Europe and the United States. 'We delivered a strong performance in the first half with a 29 per cent improvement in profit and cashflow significantly stronger than last year despite the backdrop of supply chain and tariff disruptions,' Peter Dilnot, chief executive, said. • One-sided trade deal suggests outsider status has benefited Britain Melrose has benefited from a twin boom in defence and aviation. Conflict in Ukraine and the Middle East has led to governments increasing military spending budgets, while travel demand has soared in the post-pandemic era, leading to record order backlogs for new aircraft. It has, however, faced hurdles from wider supply chain issues affecting the aerospace industry, which have fuelled problems at the planemakers Boeing and Airbus. Those difficulties were further compounded by the additional complexity of Trump's trade levies. Dilnot said he was confident of delivering sustained increases in profit and cashflow in the years ahead and a £600 million free cashflow target by 2029. Melrose has managed to offset some of the impact from supply chain snarl-ups thanks to increasing demand for its aftermarket services, as companies look to get more life out of older aircraft. Dilnot said that despite lower growth forecasts for global air travel, 'constrained build rates' for new aircraft coupled with record order backlogs had forced airlines to make better use of their fleets, 'fuelling' aftermarket growth. • North Sea oil is a 'treasure chest' for the UK, says Donald Trump Operating profit at Melrose's engines division grew by more than a quarter to £261 million over the half-year period, alongside a 6 per cent rise in engine flying hours. Revenue increased 11 per cent to £781 million. Its structures division reported a near-third rise in operating profit to £63 million, with a strong 10 per cent revenue growth in defence. The company supplies parts for some of the largest defence programmes in the world, including Chinook helicopters and F-35 fighter jets. Recent contract awards include the extension of a six-year tie-up with BAE Systems to provide parts for its Eurofighter Typhoon jet, and a five-year deal with the US defence giant Lockheed Martin. Melrose's board has set an interim dividend of 2.4 pence per share for 2025, up 20 per cent year-on-year. The company is currently £91 million through a £250 million, 18-month, share buyback programme. Founded in 2003 by Christopher Miller, David Roper and Simon Peckham, Melrose floated on London's Aim market the same year. After rising to the FTSE 100, its market capitalisation now sits at about £6.87 billion.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Palestinian lives lost in the pursuit of food aid in Gaza, in photos
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.