Analysis: Why Elon Musk's third party is likely to fail
That's the only conclusion you can draw from the data about Elon Musk and his new 'America Party.'
Take a look at CNN's new poll on Musk and his political aspirations. Just 25% of all adults and 22% of voters favor a Musk-run third party to compete against Democrats and Republicans.
The vast majority of both adults (74%) and voters (77%) oppose such an endeavor.
The CNN poll isn't alone on the subject. Quinnipiac University also polled about Musk's party this week, and the results were just as devastating. Only 17% of voters would consider joining Musk and his venture to compete with the GOP and Democrats.
More than three-quarters (77%) gave a thumbs-down.
It really shouldn't be surprising that Americans are against a party named after them.
History hasn't been too kind to third parties, independents or write-ins that seek to shake up the political scene. George Washington has been the only independent to ever win a presidential election. Washington did so before political parties were a real thing in this country.
And last I checked, Musk did not lead the Continental Army across the Delaware as the top general during our country's revolution. (He is also not eligible to run for president given that he was born in South Africa.)
Alabama's George Wallace was the last third-party candidate to win a state in a presidential election. That was so long ago (1968) that we hadn't yet landed on the moon.
Musk, smartly, seems to be more interested in taking on Democrats and Republicans in congressional races than trying to run a presidential candidate.
The track record there for third parties, independents or write-ins isn't too hot to trot, either. By my count, there have been a bit more than 13,000 congressional elections since 1970. These non-major party candidates have won about 24 of them.
That's about 0.2% for those counting at home.
Sens. Angus King of Maine and Bernie Sanders of Vermont account for more than half those winners.
Such daunting math might make you wonder why anyone would spend any time pounding the keyboard to discuss Musk's potential third party.
The answer is money. Many third parties fail because they can't get their message out.
Musk's party wouldn't have that problem given that he is one of the richest men in the world. But money isn't enough.
Businessman Ross Perot had a lot of money that helped get him to get nearly 20% of the popular vote in the 1992 presidential election. Perot didn't win a state as an independent. His showing did, however, lead him to start a third party.
He started out in a much better place politically than Musk. Even so, his Reform Party saw minimal success. It reached its apex when Jesse Ventura won on its line in the 1998 Minnesota gubernatorial election.
Today, the Reform Party is remembered by few.
Back in 1993, 50% of Americans supported a Perot-formed third party in CNN polling. Fewer (37%) opposed. That's quite different from the three-quarters who are against Musk's third party now. And Perot, in 1993, actually sported net positive favorable ratings in poll after poll.
The potentially good news for Musk is that the ground is arguably as fertile for a third party now as almost any point in recent history.
Our CNN poll showed that 63% favored one to take on the Democrats and Republicans.
Musk is just the wrong guy to lead such a journey. He is, as I said at the top, one of the most unpopular political figures in the country. CNN's poll puts his favorable rating at a mere 23%. More than double that (60%) view him unfavorably.
That gives Musk a net favorable rating of -37 percentage points. Oof.
Other polls aren't nearly as unkind to the electric car builder and rocket ship maker, but they all paint the picture of a man who is far from beloved.
The sad thing about this is that Musk was once quite popular. During the 2016 campaign, Musk's net favorable rating clocked in at +29 points in a Bloomberg survey.
He had the highest net favorable rating of any person polled. Now, he's routinely the least popular person in any given poll.
Musk's drop didn't occur overnight. It's been happening through the years and has accelerated as he entered the political arena. Musk's woes went into hyperdrive during his divorce from President Donald Trump.
All in all, the more Americans see of Musk in politics, the less they like him.
Musk's unpopularity makes the normally very difficult efforts to start a third party become herculean.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate panel advances Waltz nomination for UN ambassador with Democratic support
The top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday helped advance President Trump's nominee for ambassador to the United Nations after opposition from Republican Senator Rand Paul (Ky.) delayed a vote. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), the ranking member of the committee, voted with Republicans to advance Trump's former national security advisor, Mike Waltz, after securing a commitment from the administration to distribute $75 million in lifesaving assistance. Waltz's advancement out of the committee means he can now be scheduled for a vote on the Senate floor. Shaheen said that while she disagrees with Waltz on some issues and raised concern about his role in using the Signal messaging app to discuss attack plans in Yemen, she views him as a 'moderating force' within the administration, criticizing Vice President Vance and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth as people who want to 'retreat from the world.' 'I think we're better off having someone like Mike Waltz present. That is particularly true when you consider the alternatives to Mr. Waltz as a nominee,' she said. Shaheen was making a veiled reference to some of Trump's more controversial allies carrying out diplomacy, like his envoy for special missions Richard Grenell. 'As Mr. Waltz knows, I intend to hold him accountable through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's oversight role in the months and years ahead,' the New Hampshire Democrat continued. 'And I welcome the Administration's commitment to distribute $75 million of lifesaving assistance.' The committee voted 12-10 to advance Waltz's nomination, with Paul the lone Republican senator opposing Trump's nominee. Paul criticized the former Florida lawmaker during his confirmation hearing for a 2020 vote to constrain Trump's ability to bring troops home from Afghanistan, while he was serving in Congress. 'When it comes to ending a war, you voted with [former Wyoming Republican congresswoman] Liz Cheney and the others to say that the president couldn't end the war,' the Kentucky senator said. Trump nominated Waltz as U.N. ambassador after choosing to keep his first nominee, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), in the House to preserve the slim GOP majority. Waltz's nomination also served as a small rebuke for his role in the Signal scandal — when he used the commercial messaging app to discuss war plans against the Houthis in Yemen with the president's senior officials and mistakenly invited a journalist into the conversation. And while Democrats questioned and criticized Waltz over the Signal scandal during his confirmation hearing, the former Green Beret and lawmaker was engaged on substantive topics about the U.S. role at the U.N. with an eye towards confirmation.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
DeSantis: ‘Appropriate' to pursue redistricting in Florida
Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said on Thursday it would be 'appropriate' to pursue redistricting in Florida in the mid-decade due to population shifts and what he called 'defects' in the way congressional lines have been drawn. The governor's comment came after he scored a win last week when the Florida Supreme Court ruled upheld a congressional map that blocked a challenge to the elimination of the majority-Black congressional district in the north of the state that previously was represented by former Rep. Al Lawson (D). The area that comprised the former congressional district is now divided among three Republican lawmakers. 'Just last week the Florida Supreme Court upheld the map that all of the naysayers were saying was somehow defective,' DeSantis told reporters at a press conference in Manatee County. 'I think if you look at that Florida Supreme Court analysis, there may be more defects that need to be remedied apart from what we've already done. I also think the way the population has shifted around Florida just since the Census was done in 2020, I think the state was malapportioned. So I do think it would be appropriate to do a redistricting here in the mid decade,' he said. DeSantis went on to say he believed that his state got a 'raw deal' in the Census when Florida only gained one congressional district, arguing that the state should have garnered at least two seats due to population growth. The governor said he relayed his concerns to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick after he was sworn in earlier this year. 'They said they were going to redo the count in time for 2026,' the governor said. 'They would have to do that relatively soon because you need time to draw maps and you need time to get that done.' Florida has seen an uptick in population growth following the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. A number of Democratic-held congressional seats could be impacted if redistricting were to take place, including those held in South Florida by Reps. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.), Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) and Lois Frankel (D-Fla.). Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.) in the Tampa area and Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.) outside of Orlando have also been floated as possible targets. Republicans and Democrats in the states have been engaged in a tit-for-tat of sorts over redistricting in recent weeks. Texas Republicans are moving ahead with redrawing district lines, while speculation has mounted that Republicans in other states like Florida could follow suit. Democrats from California to New Jersey in turn have ramped up calls to redraw their maps in an effort to blunt the GOP's efforts.
Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Biden's autopen poised for $10M payday
When I heard Joe Biden is getting $10 million to pen a memoir which will address his presidency, I thought the same thing you probably did: Is it a coloring book? I mean, come on. First of all, the odds are good that Grandpa Joe cannot remember what he had for breakfast today, much less the detailed doings of the White House for four long years. But also, nobody on Planet Earth thinks this man is capable of writing so much as a thank-you card. I've written a book. It's difficult, unenjoyable and requires mental stamina. To state it clearly, if Joe Biden is writing a book, then I'm the Dalai Lama. Of course, nobody is surprised when former presidents or other celebrity types get big-money book deals thrown at them, or that many employ ghostwriters. But the ghost of William Faulkner couldn't get a book's worth of sensible commentary out of Ol' Joe. This is the same former president who could barely manage a 10-minute interview with The New York Times this month. At that rate, this book would take a hundred years to finish, even if his son Hunter filled some pages with his lovely illustrations. No, it will not be Joe Biden who composes this fabulous work of fan fiction. It will likely be crafted by many of the same people who have their fingerprints all over the infamous White House autopen. This guy makes Jimmy Carter look like Cicero, and this book might be the very last chance to restore any respect and dignity at all to Scranton Joe. This inner circle that served both Joe and Jill Biden for years, from Ron Klain, to Anthony Bernal, to Susan Rice, seem to have been the real people running the country. But that's not what Biden's book will say about them. Biden's memoir will really be their day in court, especially now that many have pleaded the Fifth Amendment when asked about Biden's decline by Congress. In this way, even if Joe has no clue this book is even being written, it could still wind up an important document insofar as it will serve as the official Biden camp version of events, a sneak peek of which Hunter Biden may have given us this week. On the "Channel 5" podcast the former first son, painter, and Ukrainian gas executive, gave a profanity-laden performance that felt like an audition for a David Mamet play. Take this gem, describing the Democrats who turned on his dad: "James Carville—who hasn't run a race in 40 f--ing years—and David Axelrod, who had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama. And that was because of Barack Obama—not because of f---ing David Axelrod." Actually, if Joe's book reads anything like this, it could be a bestseller. Democrats have been cursing up a storm lately, but Hunter actually seems to be good at it, as his father was rumored to be in private. Democrats may be about to find out that hell hath no fury like a Biden scorned, and even if Joe himself thinks he's having lunch with long-dead Maggie Thatcher tomorrow, those closest to him know where all the bodies are buried. For Joseph Robinette Biden, this book deal, this cool 1$0 million, is likely the final payout of a long and very lucrative career in public service. Make of that combination what you will, but for those loyal to him, it is much more. Biden's legacy and reputation in the pantheon of American politics is as low as it can be. This guy makes Jimmy Carter look like Cicero, and this book might be the very last chance to restore any respect and dignity at all to Scranton Joe. So for whomever is writing this book, here is a piece of advice. Do the American people and Joe Biden a favor and just tell the truth. We can handle it, and even if the truth is bad, the perception of it is already very, very bad. Biden can't undo the terrible harm he did as president, the crushing inflation, the surging border or the feckless and facile foreign policy disasters. But those in charge of this book have a chance to set the record straight now. Let's pray that they take it, even though we know, they almost certainly will not.
