logo
An uncertain future for agricultural students at Black colleges after Trump cuts: ‘a clear attack'

An uncertain future for agricultural students at Black colleges after Trump cuts: ‘a clear attack'

The Guardian27-02-2025
Dr Marcus Bernard was shocked to learn last week that the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) had suspended the 1890 National Scholars program that funds undergraduate students' education in agriculture or related fields at about 20 historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs).
Bernard is dean of the college of agriculture, health and natural resources at one of those institutions, Kentucky State University. At Kentucky State, close to 40 of the scholars have enrolled since the project's inception in 1992. Nationwide, the program has supported more than 800 students, according to the USDA.
The 1890 scholarships have created a pipeline for rural and underrepresented students to pursue studies in fields such as animal science, botany, horticulture, nutrition and forestry. Upon graduation, they're placed in USDA positions around the nation.
The news of the program's suspension – explained in a single sentence that briefly sat atop the program's USDA page – sparked a flurry of inquiries at Kentucky State. Bernard said the university had been notified that incoming fall 2025 scholarship selectees would not be funded. Without the federal funds, Kentucky State couldn't pay for those students' education or continue current students' scholarships.
Bernard, anxious students and families got some small relief late Monday when the program reopened – a change noted on the website. It said that applications for the scholarship, which gives full rides to the institutions created from federal lands, would be accepted until 15 March.
However, the future of the scholarship remains unclear as much of the funding that supports the students' research and fieldwork has been halted.
The reopening of the scholarship program also does not necessarily mean it will be funded, said a USDA representative who requested anonymity. The newly reopened application period was 'probably something to appease the public from all the fires that have been lit in the last week', the official said.
The move to suspend the scholarships drew criticism from various sources, including the 1890 Foundation, the Association of 1890 Research Directors and the Association of Public Land-Grant Universities. In a statement, the representative Alma Adams of North Carolina called the suspension 'a clear attack on an invaluable program that makes higher education accessible for everybody, and provides opportunities for students to work at USDA, especially in the critical fields of food safety, agriculture, and natural resources that Americans rely on every single day. This program is a correction to a long history of racial discrimination within the land-grant system, not an example of it. I demand USDA immediately rescind this targeted and mean-spirited suspension and reinstate the 1890 Scholars Program.'
The participating universities had been founded as part of the second Morrill Act that in 1890 gave federal lands to establish historically Black colleges that specialized in agricultural and vocational education.
Alvin Lumpkin was an 1890 South Carolina State University scholar who graduated in 2012. He started as an education major but switched during his sophomore year to study family and consumer studies under the department of agriculture and environmental sciences. He then became eligible to participate in the 1890 program.
While he had various experiences as a scholar, one of his most memorable experiences was being a student firefighter. The 1890 Land Grant Institution Wildland Fire Consortium convened students from across the land-grant universities to obtain basic firefighting training skills and were placed in small towns across the south. 'It was students from Alcorn [State University], Fort Valley [State University], South Carolina [State University], and we all went down to [Florida A&M University]. And it was just a beautiful thing to have people from all different fields of study come together and train together,' said Lumpkin.
Lumpkin worked for a month with the National Forest Service in Mount Rogers national recreation area. He gained skills in water sampling and treatment; rescue efforts; and strategic field burns, an Indigenous practice of controlled, intentional fire. 'We were on four-wheelers and torched sides of the mountain to burn vegetation so that when lightning strikes, it would not cause a fire,' said Lumpkin.
For Kermit Shockley, being an 1890 scholar at Florida A&M broadened his understanding of what was possible for him. As an engineering major, he prepared trails and bridges across the Appalachian Trail during his summers. Alongside Lumpkin, he learned how to lay gravel, clear paths, administer first aid and patrol the forest to act as the first eyes for law enforcement.
Lumpkin and Shockley responded to natural disasters such as the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the largest accidental marine-based spill in history. 'It was not a 'stand back and watch' moment. It was a 'let me show you, make your mistakes, and let me teach you,'' said Shockley. With the recent mass termination of thousands of National Forest Service and National Park Service workers, 1890 scholars may be relied upon again to help fill the gaps.
Both men went into public-service careers. After graduation, Shockley went to work for the Department of Defense at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, decommissioning buildings used to enrich uranium during the second world war. Lumpkin's exposure to law enforcement as an 1890 scholar led him to become an officer with the South Carolina department of juvenile justice. He is now an assistant principal in the Sumter, South Carolina, school district.
Lumpkin stressed that the impact on the larger 1890 ecosystem will be profound. 'There's so many programs that are going to be affected by not having 1890 scholars doing research in these communities,' he said.
Other education programs have been affected by cuts. Across the 19 land-grant universities, agricultural research and urban agriculture grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and workforce training funding from the USDA's Next Generation of Agriculturalists (NextGen) program have been paused. 'All of this is going to be affected until grants have been unfrozen or until we know whether the grants will be cut completely,' said the USDA official.
Aside from the scholarship program, Kentucky State is grappling with another huge loss. Last month, the university was awarded a $1.2m research grant from the 1890 Foundation with funding through the National Forest Service to launch a comprehensive project to increase the tree canopy across Louisville to reduce the impacts of urban heat stress. The funding also prompted the university to launch a robust urban-forestry program. Last week, the university was officially notified that the grant had been terminated.
Defunding the 1890 National Scholars program stands to hurt Kentucky and the larger southern region, where most land-grant universities are located, said Bernard: 'We are in communities across the state doing programs that are helping farmers, helping our rural communities, and providing assistance to disaster victims and more.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NFL, ESPN deal is bad for sports journalism. Kaepernick doc proves it
NFL, ESPN deal is bad for sports journalism. Kaepernick doc proves it

The Herald Scotland

time4 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

NFL, ESPN deal is bad for sports journalism. Kaepernick doc proves it

When news broke that the NFL and ESPN were getting in bed together, with the league eventually owning 10% of the network, concerns immediately arose about the deal's impact on ESPN's journalistic independence. A media outlet being owned, even slightly, by an entity it covers. What could possibly go wrong! Even NFL commissioner Roger Goodell's promise to ESPN employees that the league wouldn't interfere with the network's journalism wasn't enough to satisfy concerns. Why? Because the league has shown over and over again that it can't be trusted. Its long-standing denials that the game could cause traumatic brain injuries. Its bait-and-switch on health care for retirees. Its abysmal treatment of Black players. I could go on. The only constant in the NFL, besides Jerry Jones' inability to see his shortcomings as a GM, is that the NFL is going to do what's best for the NFL. And a documentary on Colin Kaepernick would be the opposite of what's best for the NFL. OPINION: I was interviewed by Spike Lee for Colin Kaepernick doc. What happened to it? The NFL has largely moved on from the firestorm that surrounded Kaepernick's protests of racist policing of people of color. Kaepernick hasn't been on an NFL roster in eight years, and the other players who were prominent in their support of him or active in the Players Coalition are no longer in the league. The fans who claimed they'd never watch the NFL again because of the protests by Kaepernick and other players are, predictably, watching the NFL again. Donald Trump, who did as much as anyone to fan the fury over the player protests, has long since turned his attention to demonizing other protestors and people of color. A Kaepernick documentary puts it all -- the reasons for the protests, Kaepernick's collusion lawsuit, Goodell's 2020 apology to the former quarterback -- back in the spotlight, and the NFL would prefer just about anything but that. Especially given the merger with ESPN is expected to require approval from, among others, the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission. Fear that Trump would put his thumb on the scale of a major merger cowed CBS into paying an eight-figure sum to settle a winnable lawsuit the President filed against the network. Canning a documentary probably seems like a pittance by comparison, a couple of days of unflattering stories preferable to another season of manufactured outrage. "ESPN, Colin Kaepernick and Spike Lee have collectively decided to no longer proceed with this project as a result of certain creative differences," ESPN said in a statement to Reuters, which broke the news Saturday that the documentary has been shelved. OK. Sure. "The NFL played no role in this decision," NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy told USA TODAY Sports. OK. Sure. Again. Merger aside, the NFL and ESPN have been here before. And by here, I mean having a "change of heart" about the network airing something that would make the NFL look bad. Back in 2013, ESPN was collaborating with PBS' Frontline on "League of Denial," an investigation into how the NFL had handled the growing crisis of former players developing chronic traumatic encephalopathy and other trauma-related brain diseases. But on Aug. 22 of that year, PBS released a statement saying ESPN was no longer involved in the documentary. "We don't normally comment on investigative projects in progress, but we regret ESPN's decision to end a collaboration that has spanned the last 15 months and is based on the work of ESPN reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Steve Fainaru, as well as FRONTLINE's own original journalism," Frontline executives said. Unsurprisingly, the NFL denied pressuring ESPN. A day after Frontline's announcement, however, the New York Times reported that ESPN's decision came after Goodell and then-NFL Network president Steve Bornstein had expressed their displeasure with "League of Denial" during a lunch with network executives. The NFL succeeded in blackballing Kaepernick once. Why did anyone think it would be different this time around? The NFL has a vested interest in avoiding stories that could tarnish its image and put any of its multibillion-dollar revenues at risk. ESPN has a vested interest in keeping the league happy -- now more than ever. If that means journalistic independence has to take a back seat every once in a while, so be it. When there's money to be made and bills to pay, integrity is expendable. Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

Zelensky wins major concessions from Trump at peace talks after turning up in suit following THAT dressing down
Zelensky wins major concessions from Trump at peace talks after turning up in suit following THAT dressing down

Scottish Sun

time14 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Zelensky wins major concessions from Trump at peace talks after turning up in suit following THAT dressing down

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) VOLODYMYR Zelensky and Donald Trump had a love-in as he turned up in a suit for their crunch Ukraine peace talks. Six months after a White House row — where Mr Zelensky was ridiculed for wearing combat gear — they laughed and joked in the Oval Office. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 9 Zelensky and President Trump had a love-in as he turned up in a suit for their crunch Ukraine peace talks Credit: AFP 9 Trump met with Putin in Alaska last week Credit: Reuters Complimented on his smart new look, the Ukrainian president joked his outfit was 'the best I have'. He also called out the US reporter who had a pop at him last time — for wearing the same suit. At their meeting Mr Zelensky vowed he was ready to eyeball Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin to end the three-year war. That opens the door to an historic trilateral meeting between the Americans, Russians and Ukraine that insiders suggest could come within weeks or even days. READ MORE ON UKRAINE FLAG FURY Warped Russian soldiers taunt Ukraine by flying an AMERICAN flag into battle President Trump declared 'the war is going to end' as he publicly confirmed for the first time he will underwrite a peace deal. He said 'if there's peace there is going to be peace for a long time', adding: 'When it comes to security there's going to be a lot of help, we will be involved.' And in a remarkable turnaround, the President did not rule out committing US troops. Mr Trump, watched by his Vice President JD Vance, also backed a fresh meeting with Putin, after their Alaska summit last week. He said: 'I think if everything works out well today, we'll have a trilat, and I think there will be a reasonable chance of ending the war when we do that.' But he insisted European powers remained front and centre of policing a future peace. Trump and Zelensky speak in Oval Office kicking off high stakes summit as Ukrainian wears his SUIT He said European nations 'will take a lot of the burden, but we are going to help them'. And he said talks would 'take in consideration the exchange of territory' but suggested any Russian land grabs would take into account current front lines. But Mr Trump warned Ukraine could never join Nato, despite a 2024 agreement that put the nation on a path to membership being signed by the US. That put him at odds with Sir Keir Starmer who is still pushing for Ukraine to join the Western defence alliance as a full member. Asked whether 'Nato-like protection' could still be offered to deter future Russian aggression, Mr Trump said he would 'help them out with that'. He later held talks with EU, Nato and European leaders. 'NATO-LIKE PROTECTION' He told them: 'The Alaska summit reinforced my belief that while difficult, peace is within reach. 'I believe that in a very significant step President Putin agreed Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine and this is one of the key points that we need to consider, also like who will do what? 'I'm optimistic that collectively we can reach an agreement that would deter any future aggression against Ukraine.' The PM told Mr Trump: 'Your indication of security guarantees fits with what we've been doing with the 'Coalition of the Willing'. 'With you coming alongside what we've already developed, I think we could take a really important step forward today — a historic step, actually, could come out of this meeting in terms of security for Ukraine and security in Europe.' In contrast to February's dust up, Mr Zelensky arrived at the White House in a black shirt and jacket. And he was quick to thank Mr Trump after being accused of not being sufficiently grateful for aid worth billions of dollars Greeting him, the President declared of Mr Zelensky's new look: 'I can't believe it, I love it.' Mr Zelensky joked it was 'the best I have' 9 President Trump declared 'the war is going to end' Credit: Shutterstock Editorial 9 Zelensky speaks, watched by Starmer, Macron and Trump Credit: AP 9 Zelensky laughed with journalists as they made references to his suit Credit: AFP Reporter Brian Glenn then told Mr Zelensky: 'You look fabulous in that suit . . . you look good.' Mr Trump replied: 'I said the same.' He then pointed out 'he's the one who attacked you last time'. Mr Zelensky laughed and replied: 'I remember.' Glenn apologised, to which Mr Zelensky noticed he was wearing the same suit as last time and joked: 'I changed, you did not'. After coaching from British officials about handling Mr Trump, Mr Zelensky echoed Sir Keir handing over a letter from the King inviting the President to visit Britain. Mr Zelensky presented Mr Trump with a letter from his wife, written to the First Lady of the United States. He said she wished to thank Melania Trump for her plea to President Putin to stop slaughtering innocent Ukrainian children. 'GAME-CHANGING' Asked what he needs from the US, Mr Zelensky insisted 'everything' — listing troops, weapons, training and intelligence. White House aides have previously touted Nato-style assurances for Kyiv that would see allies come to its defence if Putin were to betray a peace deal. Mr Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff, who took part in the talks with Putin last week, said the Russians would allow such guarantees in a 'game-changing' concession. 9 Reporter Brian Glenn asked Zelensky about wearing a suit to the Oval Office earlier in the year Credit: Sky News 9 US President with smartly-dressed Ukraine leader Credit: AFP But Downing Street insisted it still supported Mr Zelensky's long-term ambition to join Nato. Sir Keir's spokesman said Kyiv was on a 'irreversible path' to membership and that 'Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to the EU or Nato'. Putin has previously claimed Nato expansion was an act of Western aggression and Ukrainian accession to the alliance was a red line. No10 tried to downplay splits with the US, saying the two countries were working 'hand in glove'. Further tensions were sparked when Mr Trump claimed Mr Zelensky 'can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight'. Mr Trump later said Ukraine would have to accept there was 'no getting back' Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014. Britain and other European nations insist 'international borders must not be changed by force'. Haggling over territory will centre on the Kherson, Donetsk, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions. Russia continued to attack in Ukraine yesterday in what Mr ­Zelensky called 'demonstrative and cynical' strikes to destabilise the Oval Office meeting. He railed: 'That is precisely why we are seeking assistance to put an end to the killings. That is why reliable security guarantees are required. That is why Russia should not be rewarded for its participation in this war.' 9 Mr Trump was watched by his Vice President JD Vance Credit: AFP 9 Trump greets Zelensky at the White House yesterday Credit: Reuters

USDA ends programs for solar, wind projects on farms
USDA ends programs for solar, wind projects on farms

Reuters

time15 hours ago

  • Reuters

USDA ends programs for solar, wind projects on farms

WASHINGTON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Agriculture will no longer support solar and wind projects on productive farmland, said Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins in a post on X on Monday. The move is the latest in a series of actions by the administration of President Donald Trump to stall development of wind and solar energy, which Trump says are unreliable, expensive, and dependent on Chinese supply chains. The USDA has provided over $2 billion for renewable energy projects, like solar and wind, through its Rural Energy for America Program, according to the agency website. The USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store