
Ignore the vitriol from the Left, the truth is that this week Trump CAN become the world's Peacemaker-in-Chief: NILE GARDINER
He alone has the power to drag Russia 's dictator Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table. And he alone has the diplomatic leverage necessary to force an end to the war in Ukraine.
There are many on the Left who will decry him for doing it, who will condemn any peace settlement simply because it is Trump who brings it about. To them, everything Trump does is abhorrent, and that includes stopping wars.
But the wider world, which has felt itself on the brink of global conflagration in the past few months, should feel profoundly grateful to the US president.
In his second term at the White House, he is proving the most effective American leader since Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War and set in train the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Trump is to meet Putin for talks in Alaska on Friday – I write from Anchorage where history is unfolding before our eyes – and if he can strong-arm the Russian dictator into halting his slow annexation of Ukraine, which has claimed an estimated 350,000 lives with more than million combatants and civilians wounded, he will deserve the world's gratitude.
European leaders warned on a call with the President yesterday that the 'territorial integrity' of Ukraine's borders must be respected. But empty rhetoric from EU capitals will achieve nothing. Moscow has no regard at all for the European Union.
Putin respects only one thing: strength. And Trump has demonstrated that repeatedly this year, both in military and economic terms.
His unilateral decision to wipe out Iran's nuclear programme with a bunker-busting bomb assault in June was a dramatic display of US power. Iran has been defanged, and the planet is safer for it. Moscow took note.
He has also shown a repeated determination to douse local conflicts. Most significantly, his intervention obliged India and Pakistan to back down from a renewed border dispute in May after military strikes between the two nuclear-armed countries.
He also stepped in to quell tensions between Serbia and Kosovo.
And in June, the foreign ministers of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo signed a peace agreement brokered by Trump to end their deadly, nearly 30-year conflict.
Another US-backed peace deal was signed this month by Armenia and Azerbaijan which involved the creation of a profitable trade link – the 'Trump corridor' – between the two nations.
Ignorant Left-wing critics mock Trump for his supposedly undisguised ambition to earn the Nobel peace prize, and his self-appointed title of 'Peacemaker-in-chief'.
His foreign policy is motivated by vanity, they claim.
I don't believe that is true. He deplores the loss of human life, as we have seen from his angry social media posts condemning Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities. But he also believes in protecting America's national security and economic interests, and his instincts tell him this is best done through peace – a peace achieved by strength.
The brazen hypocrisy of those who taunt him about the Nobel prize is ugly to witness. These are the same voices from the Left who are pleading for peace in the Middle East. Are they really so shallow that they care about human lives only when these can be saved by politicians of their own stripe?
Barack Obama was awarded a Nobel peace prize in his first year as president, when his foreign policy had achieved nothing. Seven years later, he had still done nothing to merit it.
Joe Biden managed less than nothing. It's hard to escape the conclusion that Biden's weakness emboldened Putin to attack Ukraine.
Russia did not count on the doggedness of Ukrainian resistance, nor the way that Brexit Britain under Boris Johnson would rally European opposition to Putin's so-called 'special operation'. But Putin did gauge Biden's lack of resolve correctly. The response from Washington was craven.
Nothing about America under Trump can justly be called craven. Nato too has rediscovered its backbone. For more than 30 years, as the Soviet threat receded, European countries were content to be freeloaders under US protection.
Bloated welfare state provision was funded by money saved on defence. Trump has not fully reversed that state of affairs, but he has begun to change it.
The Nato summit in June was a triumph for his deal-making, as America's allies reached a reluctant decision to invest 5 per cent of GDP in defence.
Putin knows Nato's military might far outguns anything his war-ravaged country can muster. Nato's long-range ballistic missiles, its phenomenal powers of intelligence gathering, its utter supremacy in air power and space communications, and above all its vast array of nuclear weapons, guarantee that Russia can never be victorious in a global conflict with the West.
Of course Nato is a defensive alliance but Putin dare not provoke it now. The threat of a Russian invasion of the Baltic states, for example, while still real, has receded since Trump took office in January.
What Putin fears most, though, is not only American military power but its economic might. Trump has sent shockwaves through the global financial system by imposing, lifting and reapplying tariffs. Most observers assumed he was doing this largely as leverage to achieve better trade deals.
But we are also increasingly seeing the strategic application of tariffs and economic pressure against America's adversaries.
They are the economy's equivalent of nuclear weapons, capable of bringing an enemy to his knees almost overnight. Russia is already subject to stiff sanctions. But these are not a complete financial stranglehold. Billions of roubles still flow into the country as oil and gas flow out.
India and China are its biggest customers. And despite all the West's condemnation of the Ukraine invasion, Europe also remains one of the major markets for Russian fossil fuels.
Those markets will dry up overnight if Trump chooses. He can tell China, India and Europe to cease doing business with Russia, or face unprecedented tariffs. Self-interest will force them to comply.
As Trump and Putin meet this week, the world's most powerful man and leader of the free world will be facing one of the most dangerous and evil dictators on the planet. The US president will need to prove himself a deal-maker as never before.
But if anyone can end the Ukraine war and bring peace to Europe's eastern border, it is Donald Trump.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
26 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump conveyed Putin's demand for more Ukrainian territory to Zelenskiy, source says
US president Donald Trump said on Saturday Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not", after hosting a summit where Vladimir Putin was reported to have demanded more Ukrainian land. In a subsequent briefing with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, a source familiar with the discussion cited Trump as saying the Russian leader had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv's forces ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets. Advertisement Zelenskiy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014. Trump also said he had agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies, until now with US support, have demanded. Zelenskiy said he would meet Trump in Washington on Monday, while Kyiv's European allies welcomed Trump's efforts but vowed to back Ukraine and tighten sanctions on Russia. The source said European leaders had also been invited to attend Monday's talks. Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday, the first US-Russia summit since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, lasted just three hours. Advertisement "It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted on Truth Social. His various comments on the meeting will be welcomed in Moscow, which says it wants a full settlement - not a pause - but that this will be complex because positions are "diametrically opposed". Russia's forces have been gradually advancing for months. The war - the deadliest in Europe for 80 years - has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts. Before the summit, Trump had said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on. But afterwards he said that, after Monday's talks with Zelenskiy, "if all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin". Advertisement Monday's talks will evoke memories of a meeting in the White House Oval Office in February, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance gave Zelenskiy a brutal public dressing-down. Zelenskiy said he was willing to meet Putin. But Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held positions on the war, and made no mention in public of meeting Zelenskiy. His aide Yuri Ushakov told the Russian state news agency TASS a three-way summit had not been discussed. In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, Trump signalled that he and Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had "largely agreed". Advertisement "I think we're pretty close to a deal," he said, adding: "Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'." Asked what he would advise Zelenskiy to do, Trump said: "Gotta make a deal." "Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not," he said. Zelenskiy has consistently said he cannot concede territory without changes to Ukraine's constitution, and Kyiv sees Donetsk's "fortress cities" such as Sloviansk and Kramatorsk as a bulwark against Russian advances into even more regions. Advertisement Zelenskiy has also insisted on security guarantees for Kyiv, to deter Russia from invading again in the future. He said he and Trump had discussed "positive signals from the American side" on taking part, and that Ukraine needed a lasting peace, not "just another pause" between Russian invasions. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the most interesting developments of the summit concerned security guarantees - inspired by the transatlantic NATO alliance's Article 5. "The starting point of the proposal is the definition of a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the USA, ready to take action in case it is attacked again," she said. Putin, who has hitherto opposed involving foreign ground forces, said he agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security must be "ensured". "I would like to hope that the understanding we have reached will allow us to get closer to that goal and open the way to peace in Ukraine," Putin told a briefing where neither leader took questions. "We expect that Kyiv and the European capitals ... will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress..." For Putin, the very fact of sitting down with Trump represented a victory. He had been ostracised by Western leaders since the start of the war, and just a week earlier had faced a threat of new sanctions from Trump. Trump also spoke to European leaders after returning to Washington. Several stressed the need to keep pressure on Russia. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said an end to the war was closer than ever, thanks to Trump, but added: "... until (Putin) stops his barbaric assault, we will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions." A statement from European leaders said "Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees" and that no limits should be placed on its armed forces or right to seek NATO membership - key Russian demands. Some European politicians and commentators were scathing. "Putin got his red carpet treatment with Trump, while Trump got nothing. As feared: no ceasefire, no peace," Wolfgang Ischinger, former German ambassador to Washington, posted on X. "No real progress – a clear 1-0 for Putin – no new sanctions. For the Ukrainians: nothing. For Europe: deeply disappointing." Both Russia and Ukraine carried out overnight air attacks, a daily occurrence, while fighting raged on the front line. Trump told Fox he would postpone imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but that he might have to "think about it" in two or three weeks. He ended his remarks after the summit by telling Putin: "We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon." "Next time in Moscow," a smiling Putin responded in English. Trump said he might "get a little heat on that one" but that he could "possibly see it happening".


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil markets seen bearish after Trump-Putin Alaska meeting
LONDON, Aug 16 (Reuters) - Oil markets are set for a muted price reaction when they open on Sunday after U.S. President Donald Trump's and Russian leader Vladimir Putin's meeting in Alaska, at which Trump said a fully-fledged peace deal was the aim for Ukraine rather than a ceasefire. Trump said he had agreed with Putin that negotiators should go straight to a peace settlement - not via a ceasefire, as Ukraine and European allies, until now with U.S. support, have been demanding. Trump said he would hold off imposing tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil following his talks with Putin. He has previously threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries such as China and India that buy Russian oil if no moves are made to end the Ukraine war. "This will mean Russian oil will continue to flow undisturbed and this should be bearish for oil prices," said ICIS analyst Ajay Parmar. "It is worth noting that we think the impact of this will be minimal though and prices will likely see only a small dip in the very near term as a result of this news." The oil market will wait for developments from a meeting in Washington on Monday between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. European leaders have also been invited to the meeting, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters. "Market participants will track comments from European leaders but for now Russian supply disruption risks will remain contained," said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. Brent settled at $65.85 a barrel on Friday, and U.S. West Texas Intermediate at $62.80 - both down nearly $1 before the talks in Alaska. Traders are waiting for a deal, so until that emerges, crude prices are likely to be stuck in a narrow range, said Phil Flynn, a senior analyst with Price Futures Group. "What we do know is that the threat of immediate sanctions on Russia, or secondary sanctions on other countries is put on hold for now, which would be bearish," he said. After the imposition of Western sanctions, including a seaborne oil embargo and price caps on Russian oil, Russia has redirected flows to China and India.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump-Putin latest: Vlad's peace demands revealed after summit as he tells Don he will ask for Ukrainian land
VLADIMIR Putin told Trump he wants the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions as part of their peace deal, it has been revealed. It comes just hours after the pair met in Alaska to discuss terms to end the bloody war. 7 7 7 In exchange for the Donetsk region, the Russian leader said he would halt further military advances in southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Mad Vlad also vowed to halt any new attacks if he is handed Donetsk. Moscow currently controls over 70 per cent of the highly-contested region - but capturing it entirely could allow Putin's forces to cause major disruption to supply lines on the eastern front. Speaking to top officials in Moscow a day after his talks with Trump, Putin said he and his US counterpart had discussed ways of ending the conflict in Ukraine "on a fair basis". He added the summit with Trump had been "timely" and "very useful", according to images published by the Kremlin. Sources close to Volodymyr Zelensky suggest the Ukrainian leader would not agree to the demands but that he would be open to negotiating land with Trump in his upcoming visit to Washington on Monday. The US President has previously said Russia and Ukraine both believe a full peace deal is "the best way" to end the war - rather than a short term ceasefire. Now diplomatic sources have revealed some of the initial details of the potential agreement, according to news agency AFP. The US has reportedly proposed an agreement that would see Ukraine not join Nato - but instead be offered Nato-esque protections similar to Article 5. Trump reportedly floated the plan with Zelensky and European leaders during a call after his meeting with Putin. The source said: "As one of the security guarantees for Ukraine, the American side proposed a non-NATO Article 5 type guarantee, supposedly agreed with Putin." Another insider with knowledge of the matter confirmed the NATO-like guarantees had been discussed. It is unclear what Ukraine would have to give up to secure such a deal. Kyiv has long aspired to join Nato - something fiercely opposed by Russia and cited by one of the reasons for their invasion in 2022. 7 7 7 But Trump has repeatedly ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance. Don hailed his talks with Putin as "great and very successful" as he detailed the next steps in securing peace in Ukraine. The US delegation left Alaska in Air Force One after a busy day and landed back in Washington shortly after 7am local time. Trump held a lengthy phone call with Zelensky during the flight and invited the Ukrainian President to Washington in just 48 hours time. Nato leaders were also updated on the summit in a separate call with Trump. The US President revealed on Truth Social that he informed the European side and Zelensky of Putin's main wish for a complete end to the war instead of a ceasefire.