Big Shots, Ullu, ALTT, Desiflix, Mojflix and 20 other OTT apps banned: What government's 'ban order' says
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The report quotes an unnamed source who said 'There was hardly any storyline, theme or message in a social context'.
According to the agency report, the action was taken in consultation with MHA, MWCD, MeitY, Department of Legal Affairs, industry bodies FICCI and CII, along with experts in women's and child rights. The report says that the
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
(MIB) has directed Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to disable public access for publishing obscene, vulgar and pornographic content.
In its official notification, the ministry emphasised that the intermediaries are responsible for removing or disabling access to unlawful information under the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.
What Section 67 and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 says
The Section 67 and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 deal with the publication and transmission of obscene and sexually implicit content in electronic form.
The key difference is that Section 67 applies to general obscenity, while Section 67A deals with more graphic, sexually explicit material. The punishments under Section 67A are more severe due to the nature of the content.
Section 67 of the IT Act punishes the online publication or transmission of obscene or vulgar material that could deprave or corrupt readers, with imprisonment of up to three years and a fine of up to Rs 5 lakh for the first offence, and up to five years in jail and Rs 10 lakh fine for repeat offences.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Section 67A, on the other hand, deals specifically with material that contains sexually explicit acts or conduct, with stricter penalties—up to five years in jail and Rs 10 lakh fine for the first offence, and up to seven years imprisonment and Rs 10 lakh fine for subsequent offences.
OTT apps banned by government
As per ANI report, 26 websites and 14 apps have been banned by the government. Names in the list of banned OTT platforms include
ALTT
ULLU
Big Shots App
Desiflix
Boomex
Navarasa Lite
Gulab App
Kangan App
Bull App
Jalva App
Wow Entertainment
Look Entertainment
Hitprime
Feneo
ShowX
Sol Talkies
Adda TV
HotX VIP
Hulchul App
MoodX
NeonX VIP
Fugi
Mojflix
Triflicks
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Deesa fire tragedy: Kin move SC, seek Rs 2 crore compensation per victim, probe outside Gujarat
The family members of the April 1 Deesa fire tragedy — during which at least 21 workers, including seven children, were killed and six others were injured after a blast, involving a massive blaze, destroyed a firecracker warehouse — have moved the Supreme Court seeking a compensation of Rs 2 crore per victim and also directions to transfer the case probe to police officers from outside Gujarat. While moving the top court, the victims' kin mentioned the infringement of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees 'protection of life and personal liberty'. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the respondents, including the Chief Secretary of Gujarat, returnable on September 26. The Supreme Court Division Bench of Justice Surya Kant, Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh issued the notice to the respondents on July 31, after admitting the petition filed by Chandar Singh Nayak, from Madhya Pradesh's Devas village, who works as a labourer in Ahmedabad, and has lost six family members in the tragedy. The State of Gujarat, through the Chief Secretary as well as the Home Secretary as well as the Regional Fire Officer of Gandhinagar, District Collector of Banaskantha and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Deesa are respondents to Nayak's petition before the SC. On April 1, when a fire broke out in the illegal firecracker manufacturing facility, comprising six warehouses in Deesa, Nayak lost his daughter, son-in-law, siblings of son-in-law, and mother-in-law of his deceased daughter in the incident. In his petition, filed through Advocate Utkarsh Dave, Nayak has informed the court that the firecracker warehouse ran without proper licensing, sale permissions, fire safety equipment and regulatory insights. 'A majority of the deceased migrant workers, who were brought by the warehouse owners from the neighbouring state of Madhya Pradesh, worked in the firecracker factory without any formal contract, with no or minimal safety measures and equipment,' the petition states, enlisting four similar incidents that have occurred in Gujarat since 2023, including the April 20, 2023 blaze in a firecracker factory in Aravalli, in which four labourers were killed as well as a fire in Bapunagar godown storing firecrackers without permission in Ahmedabad on May 10, 2023, that caused injuries to some persons. The petition also lists the death of two persons in a blast in a firecracker factory in Ahmedabad's Vanch on April 21, 2024 that killed two as well as the May 25, 2024 Rajkot TRP gaming zone fire. 'Several persons lost their lives and many others suffered serious injuries to their person and property in these incidents due to the repeated failure of the State authorities who failed to keep a check on these illegal activities and, therefore, are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the kin of the victims and injured persons… In such cases, the state must see that the victims do not remain in the constant state of suffering and despair…' the petition states. Seeking a higher compensation of Rs 2 crore each for the families of the deceased victims and Rs 50 lakh to the injured victims, the petition states, 'It is submitted that the Central Government and the State Governments of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh announced paltry compensation amounts of Rs 2 lakh, Rs 4 lakh, and Rs 2 lakh respectively to the next of kin of the deceased persons and Rs 50,000/- each for the injured by overlooking the fact that a majority of the victims were the sole bread earners of their respective families…' The petition seeks 'directions' for the state government to 'immediately locate and carry out an inspection of all the firecracker manufacturing units in the State of Gujarat in respect of compliance with applicable fire safety norms' under prevailing laws.' Advocate Dave said that the petition seeks investigation into the role of the state officials, who have 'shown extreme administrative lethargy and even complicity despite judicial interventions'. Dave said, 'Gujarat has seen several tragedies in the past that have caused loss of lives due to negligence of authorities and repeated failure of the officials working in state government. Our petition is seeking that the amount of compensation should be enhanced, which can bring a life of dignity to the kin of the victims, if not closure in the matter… In the specific case of Deesa, we have sought that the investigation should be conducted by officers from outside the state of Gujarat so that the state government officers responsible for the tragedy are not given scope to escape the law. A total of 21 people had lost their lives in the tragedy. The warehouse owners were illegally manufacturing fireworks in the said premises. An FIR was lodged in the case in Deesa Rural police station.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
20-year-old Noida man gets Rs 10,01,35,60,00,00,00,00,00,01,00,23,56,00,00,00,00,299 in dead mother's Kotak savings account. Here's how much that is
A 20-year-old man in Noida discovered an unfathomable ₹1 septillion trillion in his Kotak Mahindra Bank account, prompting an Income Tax Department investigation. The account, belonging to Deepak, was frozen after the suspicious deposit was flagged. Authorities are probing whether it was a technical error, glitch, or money laundering attempt. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a strange turn of events, a 20-year-old man from Noida , Uttar Pradesh, was stunned to find an astronomical sum—over ₹1 septillion trillion—credited to his Kotak Mahindra Bank savings total amount in question is in 37 digits - Rs 10,01,35,60,00,00,00,00,00,01,00,23,56,00,00,00,00,299.A journalist, Sachin Gupta, tweeted this earlier today. According to the tweet, the 20-year-old Deepak got this amount though he said it is about 1 billion 13 lakh 56 thousand crore rupees."My math is a bit weak. The rest of you can do the multiplication and division. Currently, the Income Tax Department is investigating. The bank account has been frozen," read the per a report of News24, the 20-year-old was operating the account which originally belonged to his mother, Gayatri Devi, who passed away two months ago. On the night of August 3, Deepak received a notification showing a credit of ₹1.13 lakh crore (₹1,13,56,000 crore). Confused and alarmed, he shared the message with his friends, asking them to count the next morning, Deepak went to the bank to verify the transaction. Bank officials confirmed the mind-boggling balance but informed him that the account had been frozen due to the suspiciously large deposit. The matter was immediately flagged to the Income Tax Department, which has now launched a formal the news spread rapidly, Deepak was bombarded with calls from relatives, friends, and neighbors. Unable to handle the sudden attention, he switched off his are now investigating whether the transaction was a technical error, a banking glitch , or a possible case of money laundering. Officials say the true source of the funds will be known only after a thorough investigation.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Vizag doctor arrested from RGI Airport
Hyderabad: A Visakhapatnam-based doctor was arrested by Gopalapuram police from Hyderabad's RGI Airport on Monday for her alleged involvement in the trafficking-cum-illegal surrogacy racket being probed by local police. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Dr Vidyulatha was picked up after her name came up during investigation and was named as an accused in one of the four fresh FIRs registered by Gopalapuram police. One of the complainants alleged that the doctor colluded with others at Srushti Fertility Clinic and defrauded them. She claimed that Dr Vidyullata and an anaesthetist Kalyani lied to her about the baby girl being born through surrogacy using her and her husband's biological samples. "Later when we went for a DNA test, we realised the claim was false," the complainant claimed. Based on her complaint, Gopalapuram police named Dr Vidyulatha as an accused and nabbed her. "She had come to Hyderabad for some property transaction. We tracked her down and caught her from the RGI Airport while she was planning to return to Visakhapatnam," said a police official. Dr Vidyulatha is currently being interrogated by Gopalapuram police. Dr Vidyulatha along with four others including Dr Namratha and Kalyani were charged under BNS & Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
