
Paul Ryan: Supreme Court likely to restrict Trump's emergency tariff authority
He said Wednesday that Trump's emergency tariff authority, which is the legal basis for Trump's country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs that are set to go into effect on Thursday, is likely to be struck down by the Supreme Court.
An appeals court is currently reviewing that authority, which Trump invoked through the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), becoming the first president in history to use the law for tariffs.
'It's more than likely that the Supreme Court knocks out IEEPA, the law that's being used for these tariffs, which doesn't have the word 'tariff' in it. Then the president is going to have to go to other laws to justify tariffs – 232, 201, 301. There's a bunch of laws, and those are harder laws to operate with,' he told CNBC.
Financial markets, which took a dive earlier in the year as a result of the tariffs and then bounced back to record highs, are assuming that the general shape of the new tariff regime is in place, but that assumption could be wrong, Ryan warned.
'[The market thinks that tariffs] are going to settle into some easy, predictable place, and I just don't think that's going to happen,' he said.
The former Speaker also warned about policy factors that have nothing to do with trade making it into the tariffs, saying some of them were based simply on Trump's 'whims.'
'They threw a tariff on Brazil at 50 percent, and we have a trade surplus with Brazil. There's no, sort of, rationale for this other than the president wanting to raise tariffs based up on his whims, his opinions,' Ryan said.
Federal judges on the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals raised their eyebrows at the president's use of IEEPA last week.
'It's just hard for me to see that Congress intended to give the president in IEEPA the wholesale authority to throw out the tariff schedule that Congress has adopted after years of careful work and revise every one of these tariff rates,' Judge Timothy Dyk said.
The economic effects of Trump's policies are starting to show up in the economic data.
Prices have risen as companies have likely started to pass along cost increases from tariffs. The personal consumption expenditures price index rose to a 2.6 percent annual increase in July, and the consumer price index advanced to a 2.7 percent increase.
The labor market has also started to slow down, adding just 106,000 jobs to the economy since May. A modest 73,000 jobs were added in July, the Labor Department reported on Friday.
While businesses have been expressing concerns about uncertainty coming from the tariffs, it's not clear yet whether that's what has prompted the slowdown in hiring. It could also be from a lower supply of available workers – a potential result of Trump's immigration crackdown.
If it's the business climate that's weighing on the jobs market, economists say that will show up in future employment readings as a rise in the unemployment rate and lower wage growth. Those are indications of 'slack.'
If it's fewer available workers due to restricted immigration, the effects on the unemployment rate and wages would be the opposite. In that case, 'the reduction in the supply of workers decreases the slack in the labor market because it lowers the level of maximum (or potential) employment,' former Fed economist Claudia Sahm wrote in a Tuesday commentary.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariffs and the tax bill are splitting the stock market. Here's the playbook for investors, according to Morgan Stanley.
Trump's policies are splitting the stock market, Morgan Stanley says. The bank said it believes Trump's tariffs and tax bill are splitting parts of the market in half. It says there are a handful of things for investors to look for when deciding where to put their money. President Donald Trump's policies are splitting the market into distinct camps, Morgan Stanley says. Lisa Shalett, the chief investment officer of the bank's wealth management arm, pointed to the effects of Trump's tax bill and his sweeping tariffs in a recent podcast. "Now, as the impacts of the tax reform bill and global tariff implementation begin to roll through the economy, we sense that yet another series of great divides are opening up," Shalett said. Here are the splits that are emerging: 1. Consumer-facing businesses vs. B2B businesses Businesses that sell directly to consumers are more impacted by any potential weakening fo household balance sheets, a risk that business-to-business firms are less worried about. Market pros believe that tariffs could weaken consumers' spending power, as companie can pass along the cost of import duties by raising prices. Shalett added that those pressures are coming at an already critical time for consumers, pointing out that more Americans are falling behind on credit card and auto loan payments. The job market is also flashing signs of weakness, with payrolls in May and June seeing a large downward revision, while job growth for the month of July was below expectations. A weaker labor market often leads to a pullback in consumer spending. 2. Multinational exporters vs. importers Multinational exporters outside of the consumer space are facing "fewer external barriers" to sending products abroad, Shalett said, suggesting they were more shielded from the trade war. Those firms are also benefitting from a weaker US dollar, which is making their products more attractive to foreign customers, Shalett added. Multinational firms are also typically more capital- and research & development-intensive, she said. That also positions them to benefit more from the tax benefits outlined in the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which creates favorable tax treatment for domestic R&D costs. "So, with this new structural division emerging, global stock selection is more important now than ever," Shalett said. Here are some characteristics of the companies investors should be leaning toward, in Shalett's view: Multinational non-consumer exporters. Tailwinds for these companies should continue, Shalett said. Select tech, financials, industrials, energy, and healthcare stocks. Stocks in these areas could benefit from some of the policies included in Trump's tax bill, which could lead to upside surprises in earnings and cash flow. Stocks that aren't "overhyped." International stocks, commodities, and energy infrastructure. Companies in these areas could help an investor diversify their portfolio, she added. Sentiment has shifted slightly more bearish in the last week, with Trump doubling down on tariff threats and markets digesting weaker-than-expected economic data. Goldman Sachs, Evercore ISI, Stifel, Pimco, and HSBC are among the firms that have recently flagged the risk of a stock correction or advised investors to rethink their portfolio allocations. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Rep. Mocks Party's Hypocrisy Over Texas Gerrymandering Chaos
In a brutal tweet post on Wednesday, one Republican member of Congress has called out his own party's hypocrisy in blasting Texas Democrats for leaving their state. Dozens of Democrats left Texason Monday to deny Texas Republicans a quorum to vote on a newly gerrymandered map that would add five Republican-leaning seats to the House of Representatives. But where a lot of Republicans saw opportunity, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) saw hypocrisy — especially since House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) suddenly canceled House votes last month and sent lawmakers home early for five weeks to avoid a vote on releasing files connected to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a former friend of President Donald Trump. Despite Johnson's very public efforts to sweep the scandal under the rug, Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) have introduced a bipartisan resolution calling for the release of files. After Republicans criticized Texas Democrats who left their state to prevent the passage of a gerrymandered map, Massie apparently wondered why they were OK with lawmakers ditching Washington, D.C., to avoid a vote on a topic Trump has tried to downplay. Massie made his thoughts known on social media with a tweet that compared 'Democrats leaving Texas to protect their district' to 'Republicans leaving D.C. to protect the Epstein files,' with Johnson's head superimposed over the image of a driver in a car meant to represent Republicans. Some people saw Massie's post as a sign that he was just a D-D-Democrat in Republican clothes. But Massie pointed out just how conservative he is in his response. Related... Texas Democrats Evacuate After Bomb Threat At Chicago Hotel Mike Johnson Shuts Down House Early To Block Vote On Jeffrey Epstein Files Rising Dem Star Talks Texas Gerrymandering Chaos: 'You Don't Beat A Bully By Playing Dead' Obama Slams Texas GOP's Gerrymandering Plot As 'Power Grab'


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rubio suggests Russia, Ukraine not ready for Trump meeting
Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested Wednesday that Russia and Ukraine are not ready for a meeting with President Trump as the war between the two countries rages on. 'I think what we have is a better understanding of the conditions under which Russia would be prepared to end the war,' Rubio told Fox Business Network's Larry Kudlow on his show. 'We now have to compare that to what the Ukrainians and our European allies, but the Ukrainians primarily, of course, are willing to accept and what you try to see is, how far can you get these two positions closer? How can you get these two positions closer to each other?' 'If we can get what the Ukrainians will accept and what the Russians will accept close enough, then I think there's the opportunity for the president to have a meeting that includes both Putin and Zelensky to try to close this thing out,' he added. 'So, we've got to get closer in that regard.' Trump has recently weighed a meeting in upcoming weeks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky amid an effort to end the war between the two countries. The president brought up the idea of meeting with the two leaders in a Wednesday call with European leaders, a source confirmed to The Hill. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said Russia had shown interest in a Trump meeting. 'As President Trump said earlier today on TRUTH Social, great progress was made during Special Envoy Witkoff's meeting with President Putin,' Leavitt said in a statement. 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky. President Trump wants this brutal war to end,' she added.