"Direct threat to democracy," US Secy of State condemns assassination attempt on Colombia's presidential contender
Rubio directed Colombian President Gustavo Petro to protect the country from leftist "inflamatory rhetoric".
In a post on X, Rubio stated, "The United States condemns in the strongest possible terms the attempted assassination of Senator Miguel Uribe. This is a direct threat to democracy and the result of the violent leftist rhetoric coming from the highest levels of the Colombian government. Having seen firsthand Colombia's progress over the past few decades to consolidate security and democracy, it can't afford to go back to dark days of political violence. President Petro needs to dial back the inflammatory rhetoric and protect Colombian officials. We stand in prayer with Miguel's family, loved ones, and his supporters. Those responsible for this attack must face justice."
https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1931529095222894940
Colombian Senator Uribe, in the running to join next year's presidential race, was shot at an event in Bogota, according to national police, CNN reported.
The 39-year-old, from the conservative Centro Democratico - or Democratic Center - one of the biggest opposition parties in the South American nation, had expressed his intention to run in next year's election, as per CNN.
"Armed individuals shot him in the back while he was participating in a campaign event at around 5:00 pm," the party said in a statement.
Bogota Mayor Carlos Galan said Uribe was receiving emergency care after being attacked in the capital's Fontibon district, and the suspected attacker had been arrested.
The attack drew condemnation from the Colombian government and Centro Democratico, as well as former presidents and other regional leaders.
Colombian President Gustavo Petro expressed his solidarity with the senator's family in a post on X, saying: "I don't know how to ease your pain. It is the pain of a mother lost, and of a wounded homeland."
https://x.com/petrogustavo/status/1931500641194479719
The Colombian foreign ministry called the attack "a direct affront to democracy, respect for differences, and the free exercise of politics in our country." It called on the authorities to "to fully clarify this serious incident."
https://x.com/CancilleriaCol/status/1931522191109337166
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
9 hours ago
- Times of Oman
"Won't call Trump to negotiate," Brazil President Lula Da Silva
Brasilia: Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that he will not call US President Donald Trump to negotiate with him. Silva said that Trump is not interested in negotiation. "I'm not going to call Trump to negotiate anything, because he doesn't want to talk. But rest assured, I will call Trump to invite him to come to the COP, because I want to know what he thinks about the climate issue. I'll have the courtesy to call him. I'll call him, Xi Jinping, I'll call Prime Minister Modi, I'll call. I just won't call Putin, because Putin can't travel right now. But I will call many Presidents," he said. The statement comes as Trump said that he would impose a 50 per cent tariff on Brazilian goods. Trump on July 30 signed executive actions on Wednesday imposing a 50% tariff on Brazil, a 50% tariff on certain copper products and suspending a tax perk for all countries that allowed cheap packages to fly into the US duty-free, as per CNN. Earlier in the month of July, Trump in a letter threatened the hefty tariff if Brazil did not end its trial against right-wing former president, Jair Bolsonaro. He accused the Brazilian government of "serious human rights abuses that have undermined the rule of law in Brazil," as per CNN. The new tariff on Brazil appeared to be spurred by non-economic matters, as per CNN. Bolsonaro bragged about his closeness with Trump. He is facing trial for allegedly attempting to stage a coup against Lula. Trump has publicly objected to that proceeding, and his order alleged Bolsonaro's prosecution was "politically motivated." "The Order finds that the Government of Brazil's politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and thousands of his supporters are serious human rights abuses that have undermined the rule of law in Brazil," the order read, as quoted by CNN.
Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
Fact check: Are X's community notes fueling misinformation?
New York: On July 9, the US government sanctioned United Nations Human Rights Council special rapporteur Francesca Albanese for what the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said was a "campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States." Albanese has consistently denounced Israel's actions in Gaza since its offensive against the Palestinian group Hamas began in October 2023, as well as the Trump administration's efforts to suppress dissenting voices critical of Israel. The announcement was rejected by the UN, which called for a reversal of the sanctions, and it also prompted a debate online, where Albanese's name began to trend on X (formerly Twitter). Posts poured in both defending and criticizing her work, accompanied in several cases by "Community Notes," X's signature tool to fight misinformation. The notes, which are essentially brief clarifications or extra context attached to posts, can be submitted by anyone. X claims it uses what it calls a "bridging algorithm" to prevent bias, lending more weight to upvotes from users with historically different viewpoints and thus theoretically reducing the chance that a single group can dominate the narrative. But that doesn't make them immune from error. In the case of Albanese, for instance, one community note claimed that "Francesca Albanese is not a lawyer," amplifying arguments by her critics about her qualifications and "ethical conduct." While Albanese did admit in an interview with Vanity Fair that she didn't take the bar exam, which would have qualified her as a practising attorney, she did study law. Her official profile on the website of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) describes her as an "international lawyer" who has authored publications on International Law. What this example shows is that while community notes can be a valuable tool to reduce the spread of disinformation, they are not always accurate and often fail to paint the whole picture. Notes are meant to be a system where users collaboratively add context and verify facts. Research from Cornell University has shown that notes on inaccurate posts on X help to reduce reposts and increase the likelihood that the original author deletes the post. However, according to an analysis of X data by NBC News, the number of community notes being published are declining in number, and DW Fact check spotted several examples of the tool misleading users instead of helping them spot falsehoods. Misleading community notes slipping through In July 2025, a post by Sky News quoting the United Kingdom's Metropolitan Police chief went viral, accumulating over 4.7 million views. The post linked to a Sky News article based on an interview with the police chief, which highlighted structural inequality, noting it was "shameful" that black boys in London were statistically more likely to die young than white boys. The community note was then added; however, it was reframed, stating: "The headline lacks the essential context that despite making up only 13% of London's total population, Black Londoners account for 45% of London's knife murder victims, 61% of knife murder perpetrators, and 53% of knife crime perpetrators." While factually correct, the note introduced unrelated crime statistics from 2022 — subtly shifting the focus from systemic inequality to framing black boys as perpetrators of crime. Instead of clarifying the issue, the note distorted the original message, misleading users who hadn't actually clicked on the link in the post. Community notes and elections Another problem was spotted by experts during the 2024 US Presidential elections. Researchers Alexios Mantzarlis and Alex Mahadevan from the Florida-based Poynter Institute analysed community notes posted on Election Day. Their goal was to assess whether community notes were helping counter election misinformation or not. Their findings raised concerns. Out of all fact-checkable posts analyzed, only 29% carried a community note rated as "helpful." In X's system, a note is rated "helpful" when it is upvoted by a diverse group of contributors and prioritised for public display. But of these "helpful" notes, only 67% actually addressed content that was fact-checkable. In other words, nearly a third of the notes that appeared as helpful were attached to posts that didn't contain factual claims at all. The researchers saw this as a problem of low precision and recall: too few misleading posts were getting corrected, and even when notes appeared, many weren't targeting actual misinformation. As Poynter noted, "This is not the kind of precision and recall figures that typically get a product shipped at a Big Tech platform." Meanwhile, Germany's Alexander von Humboldt Institut für Internet und Gesellschaft, a research institute based in Berlin analyzed nearly 9,000 community notes in the run-up to the country's federal elections in February this year, and found that "community notes follow political patterns." The institute said, "Users who write notes are not free of political views. Their assessments and comments may therefore be influenced by their own interests or ideological biases." Poynter's Mahadevan explained in an interview with DW's fact-checking team how people may be gaming the system: when someone new joins Community Notes, X assumes they're unbiased because they haven't rated many notes yet.
Times of Oman
4 days ago
- Times of Oman
Bangladesh needs fundamental reforms, says NCP Joint Convener Tajnuva Jabeen ahead of uprising anniversary
Dhaka: In Bangladesh, the National Citizen Party (NCP), a new political party formed four months ago, mainly led by students, has been vocal in demanding fundamental reforms ahead of the uprising anniversary. "We want the fundamental reforms. The constitutional institutions should be out of the control of the executives. In the last autocratic regime, what happened was that the Prime Minister was highly powerful. Everything was under her control. The Prime Minister was like a king. It should not be like this. We want democratic transformation. The Executive, Judiciary, and the Parliament - three pillars - should be independent," Tajnuva Jabeen, Joint Convener of NCP, told ANI in an interview. The NCP was formed on the initiative of the students who led the movement, known as the July uprising or July revolution, to oust Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on August 5 last year. She fled the country, and an interim government was formed under the leadership of Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel laureate. Bangladesh is on high alert ahead of the anniversary of the uprising. Law enforcement agencies, including the police, are setting up checkpoints on the streets and conducting searches. Bangladesh's Independence leader, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, was assassinated along with most of his family members on August 15, 1975. Despite the ban on the activities of the Bangladesh Awami League, the party is observing August as a month of mourning. "We want the PR (proportionate representation) system in the upper house. We want direct vote in the women participation in the reserved seat. There are a lot of proposals. All the political parties agreed. We specially stressed the appointment of the head of the constitutional body. It should be appointed by a specialised body," she added. The NCP leader said Bangladesh has started its transformation, but the process is slow. "It's been one year since the July uprising got free from autocratic fascist Sheikh Hasina. Autocracy was established for more than one and a half decades, almost 55 years. So, all the law enforcement, all the bureaucracy, all the administration was under the fascist regime. It was a long history of a fascist regime. We cannot expect an overnight transformation from autocracy to democracy. But now we can talk about everything, we can ask our interim government about what they are doing. We are debating the reform proposals and arguing for democratic transformation. Everybody is participating in the dialogue and seminars. In the last 15 years, we could not even talk. There was no chance to talk against the government. There were laws to stop our voice. There were enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings. There was looting of all the banks. There was an empire of autocracy. But in the last one year, it stopped, and we have started transforming to democracy. I think the transformation process is slow. It was not as we expected one year before. But the progress is there," Jabeen said. She said her party will be different from the existing political parties in Bangladesh, ensuring democratic practices within the party, instead of dynasty politics. "Our party is only four months old. First of all, I can say that what happened in the last 15 years, the two main political parties were represented by two families. Cabinet, administrations, and family members were everywhere. The country was run by the two political families. After 50 years, all the student leaders of the July uprising, civil society members, and various professionals came together and formed a new political party with a variety of people from different backgrounds. So, it is completely different from the existing old political parties. The women's participation in the party is very high in comparison to the old political parties. Our party is only four months old. In comparison to big established political parties, there is a bunch of talented female members in our party," she said. "The chief of our party will be elected only for two terms, with three years in each term. He or she must be elected from the direct vote of the grassroots level to the central level. Internal democracy will be maintained. For transparency, we can ask our leader why this is happening. So, internal democracy is strictly maintained," she added. Jabeen said NCP funding would be transparent: "Our party established a financial website with funding and expenditure details. We will publish the expenditure of the party on the financial website so everybody can see how we run the party. Internal democracy within our party is well maintained." Replying to a question about the mob culture, the NCP leader said, "It is a complete failure of the government. In the last one year, one single failure of the government is the failure to maintain the law and order situation. During the July uprising, police and other law-enforcing agencies participated in the mass killing. So, it should be the priority of this interim government to re-establish the forces like police, RAB, DB and all the forces related to security. But the government could not do this. So, it is the unfortunate failure of this interim government. So, this mob culture or whatever you say - the false cases accusing people - these are not the right things." NCP is hopeful about holding the national election by the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel laureate, early next year. "We are hopeful. The probable date for the election is either in February or April. The press secretary to the interim government's Chief Adviser said the election would not be postponed even by one day. In the national consensus council, all the political parties discussed all the reform proposals. They negotiated and came to a consensus. We are hopeful to get a July Charter, and after that, we are expected to get a date for the national election," Jabeen said. The NCP leader expressed serious concerns over the law and order situation in Bangladesh, including the safety and security of minority communities. "We are not only concerned about the safety and security of the minority community; we are concerned about the safety and security of all the citizens. Unfortunately, after the July uprising, in the last one year, there were many false propaganda claims that there was the highest number of attacks on minorities; but all were not true. Whenever there is an attack on minorities, all the political parties, the government, and all the citizens of Bangladesh were very concerned. They talked about this and the government also took necessary steps. Our party is highly vocal regarding the security and rights of minorities." NCP wants good relations with all neighbours, including India, with mutual respect. "We always look for not only India but we want friendship with all the neighbouring countries. We are dependent on each other. We share the borders. We cannot ignore geographical arrangements between our neighbouring countries. But we expect the relationship will be built on the basis of mutual respect. We are very concerned about the border killings. We are concerned about the illegal push-in. We expect India will recognise these issues. After the uprising, India closed the visa for the general public. There was no specific reason behind this. We expect we will help each other. No country should dominate another." The NCP leader is optimistic about the change in political culture in Bangladesh. "We are talking about a new political arrangement. We urge the general people to keep faith in us. It will take time. I know there are some incidents that hurt people. But this is not the end. It was a rotten political system. In the last 15 years, it has been polluted even more. We need time to clarify ourselves. We will clarify our manifesto. We will come up with hope and expectations." "We have to get our party registration first. We just finished our July march and are looking for the July announcement and July Charter. We will also look at how the July Charter will be implemented. We want a referendum to implement the July Charter. We want the July Charter to be signed by all the political parties. It should be implemented before the election. On the basis of the July Charter, we want a legal framework. After that, we hope for an election. Our priority is the July Charter and July announcement, then our party registration, then we will go for the election, whether with an alliance or solo."
