logo
Cambridge sewage plant move halted after funding withdrawn

Cambridge sewage plant move halted after funding withdrawn

BBC News3 days ago
A sewage treatment works will not be moved to green belt land near a village after government funding for the relocation and development was withdrawn.Anglian Water was given permission to replace its current Cambridge facility, near Milton, with a new plant on land known as Honey Hill, close to Horningsea.However, Cambridge City Council said the government had now confirmed "funding will not be made available to support the delivery of Anglian Water's Waste Water Treatment Plant relocation".Anglian Water said the decision was "disappointing", but added: "Our teams are reviewing all options to increase capacity to support growth at our existing treatment works in Cambridge."
The Development Consent Order (DCO) to relocate the Waste Water Treatment Plant was approved by the government in April 2025.The treatment works were being moved to make way for new homes in the north-east of Cambridge.The council said the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government (MHCLG) made its decision to withdraw funding from the Housing Infrastructure Fund after costs of the relocation increased "significantly as a result of rising costs of materials and labour and disruption to global supply chains, an increase that MHCLG said was unaffordable".
The council added: "As a result of this decision, Cambridge City Council and Anglian Water's proposals for the new 'Hartree' development on the current site, which would form the heart of a proposed new district in North East Cambridge, will not be able to be delivered."David Barnetson, programme director at Anglian Water, said: "Whilst it's disappointing that the project won't now go ahead, we're committed to supporting Cambridge and the wider area through its rapid projected growth, whilst continuing to protect customers and the environment. "Our teams are reviewing all options to increase capacity to support growth at our existing treatment works in Cambridge."The government has been contacted for comment.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike
Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike

Telegraph

time18 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike

A potential 5.5 per cent rise in England's train fares next year has been described by public transport groups as 'outrageous'. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6 per cent hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5 per cent, which means fares could jump by 5.5 per cent. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, said 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He added: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71 per cent of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation. About 45 per cent of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'

North-east economic system 'is dying' and communities must not be left behind
North-east economic system 'is dying' and communities must not be left behind

Press and Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Press and Journal

North-east economic system 'is dying' and communities must not be left behind

The north-east energy industry is 'dying' and must be completely reimagined with community owned resources, according to the region's Green MSP. Maggie Chapman described the challenge of untangling Aberdeen and the wider north-east's oil and gas heritage shortly before industry figures descend on the city for a major conference. Her comments came in her first full interview since she was bumped down the Green party list for election to Holyrood – meaning she is likely to be out of parliament next May. She was asked to reflect on what Greens can say to a region where fossil fuel has driven the economy and created so many well-paid jobs over decades. 'There's a challenge that we, as a society, have in disentangling ourselves from a fossil fuel economy that has been the way that we've existed since the Industrial Revolution,' she said. 'We have a huge task to disentangle ourselves from that. It's not easy.' Ms Chapman, a former Aberdeen University rector, says coal, oil and gas led to an industry which now needs changed. 'We need to get that transition right,' she added. 'And when everything in the north-east, whether we're talking about Aberdeen and the Shire, or we're talking about, the industry around Dundee and Docks and everything that's here, everything's been set up for a system that is dying. 'You know, the fossil fuel economy is on its way out.' A new system, based on clean, community owned and controlled resources, now needs speed up. 'We desperately need to do that in a way that doesn't leave any community in the north-east behind,' she said. 'If we continue to let what happened to the coal miners happen to all fossil fuel workers, then, we've not done our jobs. And I don't mean our jobs as politicians, I mean our job as a society.' The comments come at a time of upheaval in the North Sea and debate about how to support oil extraction while moving to renewables. There is also serious concern about the pace of change for jobs, and the impact of green infrastructure on the landscape, from pylons to wind turbines. The energy industry will gather at the P&J Live conference centre over September 2-5 where the evolution of the North Sea takes centre stage. Organisers of the Offshore Energy Expo and Conference promise to 'set our sights on the next frontier: mapping the journey to a sustainable, better energy future'.

Guy Ritchie's Compton Abbas Airfield footpath diverted
Guy Ritchie's Compton Abbas Airfield footpath diverted

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Guy Ritchie's Compton Abbas Airfield footpath diverted

A public footpath which directly crosses a runway in an airfield owned by film-maker Guy Ritchie has been diverted.A new path around the edge of Compton Abbas Airfield in Dorset, was officially certified as a legal route on is about 500m (1,640ft) longer than the previous path and was requested in March by Ashcombe Estates, trading as the changes coincided with the moving of the test area for aircrafts, which is now further away from any public path. The airfield said "the flying community has been very supportive" of the Abbas Parish Council initially objected to the plans, saying the path had likely been in existence since 1888 without problems or accidents, but it withdrew the Council said: "The decision at the Strategic and Technical Planning Committee was to refer the confirmation of the Order to the Secretary of State, this was because we had an objection. "However, after the meeting, the objection was formally withdrawn and therefore Dorset Council was able to confirm the Order itself." You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store