Trump can't blame Biden forever
President Trump's recent trip to the Middle East was all about making deals. He returned with promises of trillions of dollars of future purchases and investments in the United States. He also was given a gift by Qatar, a Boeing 747 luxury jetliner that he hopes to use as Air Force One, after which it will be housed at his presidential library. Of course, modifying the airplane to meet the safety and security standards of Air Force One will likely take several years, costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, making the gift rather costly.
Any time a negotiation or event works out well, Trump is quick to take credit for it. Yet when things go sour, it appears that the kneejerk reaction is to blame it on former President Biden.
President Trump has been in office since Jan. 20, 2025 — four months. This is fast approaching 10 percent of his second term next month. He has issued an unprecedented number of executive orders covering a swath of issues, including energy, immigration, climate and DEI, to name just a few. Those garnering the most attention have focused around tariffs on goods imported into the nation, with the intent to reduce the trade deficit by encouraging more domestic production. Yet whenever unfavorable news comes in, the first response has been to blame his predecessor.
This has become the theme of the administration.
For example, when Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem was asked about overspending her budget during a Senate Appropriation Committee meeting, her answer was that it was Biden's fault. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins blamed Biden for the rising agriculture trade deficit, even though the dollar value of agriculture exports from 2021-2024 were the highest ever recorded. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent blamed Biden for the recent U.S. credit rating downgrade by Moody's, even though every president since Herbert Hoover has contributed to the growing national debt.
When Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy held a press conference to announce sweeping changes in the air traffic control system, he blamed Biden for the travel delays at Newark Liberty International airport. Yet problems in the air traffic control system and its infrastructure have persisted across several administrations, as Duffy also noted, including Trump's first term, from 2017-2021.
When a new president takes office, he must accept and address the current challenges, whatever they may be. This is the case with Trump, as it was with Joe Biden in 2021 and Trump back in 2017. Such initial conditions are not a new phenomenon and are a reflection of complex societal issues that transcend administrations. They have been faced by every new president when implementing his agenda and setting up his administration.
Blaming the previous president may appease the president's most committed supporters. However, it demonstrates weakness. Whining about the 'hand that you have been dealt' does not change the cards. As Harry Truman said, 'the buck stops here.'
Given that the president has been in office for well over 100 days, the initial conditions on many issues have begun to dampen and fade. For example, the impact of the president's tariffs on the economy are quickly washing out economic policies instituted by Biden. If the tariffs turn the economy sour and push the nation into a recession, there is no one to blame but Trump.
As long as the president continues to blame Biden for anything that goes awry or what he cannot fix, he is figurately allowing Biden to live rent-free in the White House. Using an aging man who is battling prostate cancer as his whipping boy and default excuse is unbecoming of the person who holds the most powerful position in the world.
No president has all the answers to every issue they must confront and every problem they must address. That is why presidents who surround themselves with intelligent and thoughtful advisers, who can help him execute an agenda that serves the best interests of the people and the nation, are a good predictor of his success. A review of Trump's choices for his Cabinet and inner circle demonstrates his emphasis on loyalty rather than experience.
Not everyone may agree with Trump's agenda and how he is attempting to reshape America. However, blaming the former president when things go astray is, shall we say, unpresidential.
Sheldon H. Jacobson, Ph.D., is a professor in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. A data scientist, he uses his expertise in risk-based analytics to address problems in public policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Administration Has Asked Ally Serbia to Accept Deportees
President Donald Trump's administration is pushing Serbia and other Balkan nations to take in migrants deported from the US, according to people familiar with the matter. The requests to countries in the region are ongoing and part of a broader strategy to find foreign governments willing to receive migrants sent from the US, including some who originally entered under Biden-era protections, according to the people, who requested anonymity because the talks were private.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Trump Aide Spells Out How Elon Musk Could Gain Ultimate Revenge On The President
Former White House communications director Alyssa Farah Griffin explained Wednesday why she believes tech billionaire Elon Musk could now actually 'tank Donald Trump's entire legislative agenda.' Griffin, a co-host on ABC's 'The View,' warned that Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' spending bill could sway Republicans in Congress, especially those worried about the consequences to their seats if they cross the world's richest person. Musk recently slammed the bill as a 'disgusting abomination' for how it will hike the national debt. He had previously staked his reputation on slashing federal spending in his now-ended role running Trump's unofficial Department of Government Efficiency. Trump, for now, has remained silent on Musk's criticism. Griffin, who served in the Trump administration during his first term, noted how the bill has measures on energy, border security and extends Trump's tax cuts. 'If Republicans decide, 'Oooh, we don't want to get on the wrong side of Elon,' that is what Donald Trump is banking it all on,' she continued. 'And that is kind of devastating for his administration.' 'On the flip side, those Republicans, if you're in a House district, you're like, 'I'm afraid of Donald Trump,' but Elon Musk, because of the dark money system we live in, he can come in and primary you by just pouring millions and millions into your race.' All Musk needs to do, she suggested, is 'peel off a handful of Republicans' to tip the balance of power in the House. Watch here: Critics Cackle Over Mike Johnson's Awkward Confession About Elon Musk Phone Call 'You Wussed Out': David Mamet Reveals Trump's 20-Minute Call After He Committed A MAGA Sin Critics Gasp At Trump Official's 'The Thing That Matters' Declaration
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump has demolished the liberal myth. Migrants shouldn't be treated equally
Sometimes the best policies are the ones that produce the shrillest wails from the Left. Such may be the case with Trump's latest travel ban, which by rights should spark serious soul-searching in Britain. Overnight, the President announced restrictions on the citizens of 12 countries. This was a response to the recent terror attack on Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is alleged to have thrown firebombs and sprayed burning petrol at a Jewish vigil on Sunday in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Although Egypt is not on the list, Homeland Security officials said Mr Soliman was in the country illegally, having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022. So far, so Trumpian. (He took similar measures during his first term, after all, and they were repealed by Joe Biden who called them 'a stain on our national conscience'.) But then came the kicker. 'We will not let what happened in Europe happen in America,' Trump said. Ouch. If the months of Trump 2.0 have so far shifted the Overton window across the West, allowing even the likes of Sir Keir Starmer to contemplate – at least rhetorically – tackling immigration, then such a travel ban should be welcomed on these shores as well. Already, the usual suspects are accusing Trump of being 'racist'. But a glance at the range of countries on the list shows that this is not a question of race, or even religion. Rather, it is a question of homeland security, and that holds a stark lesson for Britain. A few months back, official data revealed that though foreigners comprise just 15 per cent of the population of our country, they commit 41 per cent of all crime and up to a quarter of sex crimes. In the first nine months of 2024, almost 14 per cent of grooming suspects were Pakistani, five times their share of the population. Two nationalities – Afghans and Eritreans – were more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual offence convictions than British citizens, according to the data. Overall, foreign nationals were 71 per cent more likely than Britons to be responsible for sex crime convictions. Based on convictions per 10,000 of the population, Afghans with 77 convictions topped the table with a rate of 59 per 10,000, 22.3 times that of Britons. They were followed by Eritreans, who accounted for 59 convictions at a rate of 53.6 per 10,000 of their population. In March 2025, data from the Ministry of Justice revealed that foreigners, who claim £1 billion a month in benefits, were also responsible for large proportions of violence, robbery, fraud and drug offences, between 2021 and 2023. There was no data for terrorism offences or acts of anti-Semitism. But does anybody want to hazard a guess? Which brings us to a fundamental question. Why? Why does Britain need to allow the criminals of the world to come to our shores to abuse women and girls, run criminal enterprises, foster terrorism and anti-Semitism, and claim benefits in the process? Obviously not all foreigners from these countries behave in this way. But facts aren't racist. Large numbers are pulling down our pants, spanking our buttocks and pulling them up again. In fact, the problem is not one of race but one of politics and culture. In my new book, Never Again? How the West Betrayed the Jews and Itself, which is coming out at the end of September, I look at groundbreaking research published in April by cognitive scientists Scott Barry Kaufman and Craig Neumann. They found that 'citizens in democratic countries have more benevolent traits, fewer malevolent traits, and greater well-being' than those living under autocratic regimes. Based on a study of 200,000 people from 75 countries, people living under autocracies were found to be much more likely to exhibit the 'Dark Triad' of negative personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. In democracies, by contrast, more people displayed the 'Light Triad' of humanism, faith in humanity and 'Kantianism', or treating people with dignity in their own right rather than viewing them as a means to an end. Obviously, this is not related to race. Russians are hardly black, but they hardly live in a democracy either. It is a case of cognitive development. The problem occurs when, in an age of global travel, 'Dark Triad' migrants who grew up in despotic regimes encounter gullible 'Light Triad' officials in the democracies, whose empathies are easily played upon. That is why we find British judges ruling that an Albanian convict should avoid deportation because his son had an aversion to foreign chicken nuggets, a Pakistani drug dealer could stay so he could teach his son about Islam, and a paedophile of the same nationality should not be sent home since it would be 'unduly harsh' on his own children. These real-life cases, reported by the Telegraph, provide a clear collision of the 'Dark Triad' traits in the criminals and the 'Light Triad' tendencies in the judges. It is a chemical reaction waiting to happen, and the vast majority of the population, wherever they are born, are suffering the consequences. In other words, we are being taken for fools. No foreign criminal has a God-given right to set up home in Britain just because he fancies it. This is our home, and although we are delighted to welcome strangers, that generosity should be withdrawn from those who nick our television and threaten our children – even if their own happen to like the chicken nuggets in our fridge. Trump has now thrown down the gauntlet. What is the British Government going to do to set our own house in order? Will it take an anti-Semitic outrage like the firebombing in Colorado before the Prime Minister takes action? Will he take action even then? Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
