Aussie drivers urged to invoke little-known road rule in no fault accidents: 'You're legally entitled'
But if the crash wasn't your fault, there's no reason you should be left without an equally good car while yours is undergoing any repairs. In fact, you're legally entitled to one.
"About three in four people aren't aware of their right to drive after they're not at fault in an accident,' says Nicolas Rio, general manager at Right2Drive.
"It refers actually to quite an old law — the law of demurrage," he explained, with the term being borrowed from the shipping industry and its application to road accidents has even been upheld in the High Court of Australia. "The law still holds true today... if you've been in an accident and you're not at fault, you're legally entitled to be restored to the position before the accident," Rio told Yahoo News.
However, according to the company's research nearly three quarters (74 per cent) of Australian drivers are unaware of such a legally enshrined entitlement. Right2Drive claims since its inception, it has helped some 300,000 drivers with a free car across Australia and New Zealand, with the company then chasing up the insurance provider of the driver who was at fault to cover the costs of the loan car.
The company has compiled data on the types of crashes it responds to, revealing the most common trouble spots for motorists.
"We've got a very extensive data base of incidents and crashes from our propriety system... that represent non-fatal incidents," Rio said.
One of the details from crashes in NSW, for instance, is that drivers are about three times more likely to crash in a car park (14.7 per cent) compared to a roundabout (5.6).
There is one useful tip that could help you avoid being liable — reversing into car spots. That's because reversing out into a busy car park can be a common cause of crashes, and the reversing driver will almost always be deemed to be at fault.
An Aussie insurance broker previously warned drivers they should reverse into a parking spot because backing out with limited vision could increase the chance they're liable for a fender bender.
The Insurance Council of Australia has previously confirmed to Yahoo News Australia the little-known fact, that in most cases the reversing driver is automatically deemed to be the at-fault. But Rio said there are rare cases where that rule doesn't hold.
"We definitely have instances where people have been reversing and are not at fault," he said. "If someone opens a car door into a reversing vehicle, they [the reversing car] are not at fault," he said, for example.
The NSW focused data also showed rear-end collisions are the most common type of road crash at nearly 34 per cent of accidents, while single-lane roads were the most dangerous spots, accounting for nearly a quarter of crashes, followed by multi-lane roads, car parks, traffic lights, intersections and roundabouts.
This week is National Road Safety Week with the annual initiative bringing together government bodies and road safety organisations to address the high costs of road collisions and work to reduce them.
Professor Stuart Newstead, Director of the Monash University Accident Research Centre, on Monday highlighted the boon that has come from increased safety features and technology from car manufacturers.
🚘 New camera trial to target drivers breaching road rule in 'real-time'
🔋 Big shift on Aussie roads as electric car market hits 'major milestone'
🚦 Little-known traffic light hack to hit coveted 'green wave'
"Vehicle safety improvements have played a major role in reducing road trauma over the past 50 years. Safer vehicles not only protect occupants during crashes but increasingly help prevent crashes altogether," he said.
"However, there is still significant opportunity to reduce road trauma by encouraging safer vehicle choices, especially among younger and older drivers," he added.
Earlier this year, Yahoo highlighted research that showed young drivers can be overrepresented in road fatalities, in part because they are more likely to purchase older, less safe vehicles. Budget-conscious young drivers often prioritise affordability over safety features, leading them to purchase cars with outdated braking systems, lower crash safety ratings, and worn-out components.
"A key focus during National Road Safety Week should be how we can unlock this remaining potential [of vehicle improvements] to save lives," Prof Stuart said.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Young driver's clever solution to 'frightening' Aussie road rule trend
Authorities are scrambling to invent solutions to address the major issue of Australia's rising road death toll with new markings and cameras regularly being introduced on roads. But insiders have long warned that surveillance, fines and scare tactics are not enough to deter drivers from taking risks on our roads. Now, one young Aussie is being praised for a clever idea intended to prevent both drivers and passengers from not wearing their seatbelts while driving across the nation. Although it's been over 50 years since Victoria became the first state to make seatbelt wearing compulsory, evidence suggests that many Aussies still break those rules today. A year after AI-powered mobile and seatbelt detection cameras were introduced in NSW, it was revealed 88 per cent of fines handed out to drivers were related to incorrect seatbelt use. Brisbane-based Tiffany Fouche is encouraging all Aussies to wear their seatbelts in a bid to save lives on our roads. Billboards across Queensland are now displaying her new campaign as part of the Australia-wide Re:act Road Safety Behaviour Change Program. During her research, Tiffany discovered that while many drivers and passengers do habitually put on their seat belt for long journeys, it's a different story for shorter trips and on rural roads. "People admitted to cramming extra friends in the car, or not putting on their seatbelts to pop down ot the shops," she told Yahoo News. "People in rural areas won't put their seatbelts on because they don't see the point." Others told the recent QUT graduate it's "not cool" to wear a seatbelt and they find wearing one "uncomfortable". Tiffany believes that cameras and fines alone are not enough to encourage seatbelt use, and more positive messaging needs to be spread around the community instead of "fear tactics". "Positive messaging works almost more effectively than fear tactics," she said. 🚗 New reality on Aussie roads as 75,000 drivers pay the price after cameras switched on 😳 Ominous message taped to 4WD next to remote Aussie highway 🙌 'Amazing' change on notorious stretch of highway as new camera trialled What is the new road safety campaign? Tiffany's campaign is inspired by the well-known nursery rhyme Humpty Dumpty, which depicts an egg-shaped driver and passengers in a carton-shaped car travelling at night. Alongside the slogan 'Humpty should have worn a seatbelt", her illustration shows a rear passenger flying into the air after an animal jumps in front of the car. Recent NRMA data revealed that collisions with animals in the last 12 months are the second worst in the past five years. 'I focused on passengers with my artwork because I found research from the Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety – Queensland revealed that rear seat passengers are especially at risk of leaving their seatbelt off," she said. "Rear seat passengers think they're okay, but if you were to get into an accident, you become a flying projectile," Tiffany explained, adding that it's a "very frightening" thought. Seeing her adverts across the state has been "exciting" for Tiffany, and she's already seeing positive results. "People have been really enjoying it," she said. Re:act Executive Director and Founder Andrew Hardwick said Tiffany's approach was "exceptional and made for a fantastically creative and strong campaign." "Tiffany's campaign in Queensland will run in tandem with campaigns created by students in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth," he explained. "All of them are unique and absolutely hit the brief with equal parts humour and gravity for the subject matter." Tiffinay's overall message is to remind Aussies that "everybody in the car needs to be wearing their seatbelt". Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussies erupt over new $363 per year tax hit
There are fears that electric vehicle (EV) sales could be affected if a road-user charge (RUC) is introduced to level the playing field with other cars. At the moment, EVs don't attract a tax for using Aussie roads like those in internal combustion engines (ICE). But ahead of the government's economic roundtable, there have been calls for EV drivers to pay their fair share with a brand new levy designed just for them. Electric Vehicle Council's (EVC) head of legal, policy and advocacy, Aman Gaur, told Yahoo Finance it doesn't make any sense to him why Australia would go down this path. "The simple principle around taxes is that you tax the things you don't want to see, like smoking or alcohol," he said. "Why are we taxing something that is actually trying to make Australia and the country safer from climate change? It just seems very counterintuitive." RELATED Major EV warning as true battery range for big brands like Tesla and BYD exposed ATO $2,548 tax refund cash boost for 2.6 million Aussies Hidden $3,000 per year cost of cashless revolt as record number of banknotes hoarded Why is a road-user charge being considered for EVs? Those in ICE vehicles have to pay an excise on fuel at the moment, which goes to the federal government as general revenue and can be used to fund transport infrastructure. It raises around $17 billion a year, but that revenue stream could start to go on a downward trend if more people buy EVs and don't pay a RUC. According to the Australian Automobile Association, one in 10 cars sold in the June quarter in Australia was an EV, which is a new record. The EVC said a RUC for electric cars shouldn't be introduced until that statistic hits at least three in 10 vehicles sold. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged there needed to be a shakeup in the system to account for the rise of battery-powered vehicles. 'We need money to ensure that roads are adequate, and that is a long-held belief,' he said this week. 'What we need to do is to work those issues through and to come up with a realistic plan that can be implemented. And we'll await those discussions.'How would a road-user charge work? That hasn't been hashed out yet, and will form part of the discussions at next week's productivity and economic roundtable. 'We haven't settled on a model or on timing when it comes to that change, but clearly a government of either political persuasion will need to make changes there because the excise take on petrol will come down as petrol vehicles exit the fleet," Treasurer Jim Chalmers said this week. He added "people shouldn't anticipate that there will be a change very soon". Instead of EVs having their own type of RUC, Gaur told Yahoo Finance there should be a universal road tax applied to every vehicle. This was supported by EV motoring expert Toby Hagon, who said electric car drivers needed to start paying their way, but not with their own unique levy. "I'm not sure why we would treat EVs any differently to any other car on the road; we should be taxing them all equally," he told Yahoo Finance. "Don't just single out EVs or hybrids or plug-in hybrids. Apply a road user charge across the board and get rid of fuel excess. It seems like a logical way to do it." Hagon suggested a possible RUC scenario of 3 cents per kilometre driven. The latest data found the average Aussie drives around 12,100 kilometres per year, meaning EV motorists could be paying around $363 each year under Hagon's prediction. Comparatively, the fuel excise is currently 51.6 cents per litre of petrol or diesel, and, according to Compare the Market data from last year, a typical household pays around $3,200 a year in petrol or diesel. Would people stop buying EVs if they had to pay an RUC? A poll of more than 2,500 Yahoo Finance readers found 64 per cent would avoid buying an EV if they had to pay for a road tax. But Hagon said an RUC should not influence a person's decision-making if they're looking for a new car. "The running cost of an EV is so much lower than $363 a year, so it's not going to be the determining factor of whether someone buys an EV or not," he said. When you compare that $3,200 per year cost for ICE car drivers, an EV owner is typically only paying around $701 per year for charging. Gaur said there is a much bigger potential cost than a possible $363 yearly charge to contemplate. "To the person who's thinking about their next car, think about your children, think about your own lifestyle, and what is the best way to keep Australia safe from the effects of climate change," he said. Scott Maynard, the Australian boss of Swedish EV maker Polestar, said Australia needs to make sure that whatever direction it goes in with an RUC that it makes sense for everyone. 'Driving is an essential activity, so it's important the government has a clear understanding of what it would be seeking to achieve with a road user charge," he said. "Only when we understand that question can a framework be developed, and commentary applied. 'I don't think any driver, electric or otherwise, will have an issue with a road user charge system to replace fuel excise as long as it is fair and equitable."Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Drivers warned against 'brief lapses' as mobile and seatbelt cameras dish out $423 fines
Authorities have issued a reminder to Aussies that mobile and seatbelt detection cameras are in force and catching out drivers breaking the law, with motorists copping fines for "brief lapses" while driving. The renewed message comes as the AI-powered cameras have been enforcing road rules in New South Wales for over a year, with Western Australia in a trial period of similar technology before enforcement begins later this year. Leading traffic lawyer Hayder Shkara told Yahoo News that his practice has seen an "uptick in inquiries" for his legal services since enforcement began. "Drivers are shocked at the precision of the technology and what the law actually is," Hayder, principal lawyer at Justice Family Lawyers, said. He warned that he's seeing cases catch out "more than just the obvious offenders". "Many clients are being fined for brief lapses, like adjusting a GPS or changing the music," he said. "I recall one passenger who was shocked that a seatbelt had to be worn in a particular way, saying that they had been wearing it around their body for years because it was uncomfortable having it strapped across the shoulder." Authorities across the country face an uphill battle in turning the tide on dangerous driving, with nationwide road tolls the highest they've been in 15 years. In NSW, cameras have checked 140 million cars, with 99 per cent of drivers and passengers doing the right thing. But of the approximate 75,000 caught out, 88 per cent of fines were related to incorrect seatbelt use. Last year, 34 people died on NSW roads while not wearing a seatbelt. This year, another 11 lives have been lost. According to Transport NSW, wearing a seatbelt correctly doubles the chances of surviving a crash and reduces the risk of serious injury. Last month, the Minns Government called on NSW drivers to follow the law and wear their seatbelts properly 🚗 Council's plan for new driver charge as Aussie tourist town being 'loved to death' 😳 Ominous message taped to 4WD next to remote Aussie highway reveals sad reality 🙌 'Amazing' change on notorious stretch of highway as new AI camera trialled Can I get out of a mobile or seatbelt fine? In NSW, each offence attracts a $423 fine and three demerit points, or six during double demerit periods. The fine has increased from $410 since the start of the new financial year. But according to Shkara, the high-definition quality of images makes getting out of fines a "tough battle" unless there has been a genuine error or "exceptional circumstance". "In terms of contesting, success really hinges on the specifics," he explained. "That said, we've had a few wins where the images were ambiguous. "Even a momentary lapse can lead to a fine, and with seatbelt detection now part of the mix, it's worth double-checking everything before you hit the road." How do mobile and seatbelt detection cameras work? The cameras operate by capturing images of passing cars, which are reviewed by AI software. Images that show an offence, such as a seatbelt worn incorrectly, are then verified by a person. Photos that don't show an offence are permanently deleted within an hour, NSW road safety explained. Those caught breaking the law are fined. "Whether you're the driver or the passenger, make sure you've always got your seatbelt on correctly," the authority said. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
