World Bank projects 2.7 percent growth for Pakistan in FY2025
The World Bank, in its latest report titled 'Reimagining a Digital Pakistan,' said the real GDP growth is expected to benefit from a rebound in private consumption and investment, driven by easing inflation, lower interest rates and improving business confidence.
This improvement in Pakistan's economy is supported by declining inflation, which fell to 1.5 percent in February, prompting the central bank to reduce its policy rate to 12 percent after a series of cuts totaling 1,000 basis points since June 2024.
Despite these positive indicators, the country faces significant external financing challenges, including over $22 billion in external debt repayments, highlighting the need for continued structural reforms and fiscal consolidation.
'Pakistan's economy continues to stabilize and is expected to grow by 2.7 percent in the current fiscal year ending June 2025, up from 2.5 percent in the previous year,' the World Bank said.
It added that agricultural growth remained modest due to unfavorable weather conditions and pest outbreaks while industrial activity weakened due to rising input costs, increased taxation and cuts in government expenditure.
The report said growth in Pakistan's services sector remained 'muted' due to spillover effects from weak agricultural and industrial activity, which will make it challenging for the government to create jobs and reduce poverty.
'Pakistan's key challenge is to transform recent gains from stabilization into economic growth that is sustainable and adequate for poverty reduction,' World Bank Country Director for Pakistan, Najy Benhassine, said.
'High-impact reforms to prioritize an efficient and progressive tax system, support a market-determined exchange rate, reduce import tariffs to boost exports, improve the business environment and streamline the public sector would signal strong reform commitment, build confidence, and attract investment.'
The report said real GDP growth was expected to rise to 3.1 percent in FY26 and 3.4 percent in FY27 due to the predicted ongoing macroeconomic stabilization and the implementation of key economic reforms.
'The April 2025 edition, Taxing Times, projects regional growth to slow to 5.8 percent in 2025 — 0.4 percentage points below October projections — before ticking up to 6.1 percent in 2026,' the World Bank said. 'This outlook is subject to heightened risks, including from a highly uncertain global landscape, combined with domestic vulnerabilities including constrained fiscal space.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
7 days ago
- Arab News
Court of Arbitration's latest award on Indus Waters Treaty vindicates Pakistan's stance — FO
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Monday said the latest award on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), rendered by Court of Arbitration, is in line with Pakistan's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the treaty, which India has threatened to put in abeyance. India announced in April it was putting the 1960 World Bank-mediated treaty, which ensures water for 80 percent of Pakistani farms, in abeyance a day after an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan, an allegation Islamabad denies. Pakistan has previously said the treaty has no provision for one side to unilaterally pull back and that any blocking of river water flowing to Pakistan will be considered 'an act of war.' The IWT grants Pakistan rights to the Indus basin's western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab — for irrigation, drinking, and non-consumptive uses like hydropower, while India controls the eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — for unrestricted use but must not significantly alter their flow. India can use the western rivers for limited purposes such as power generation and irrigation, without storing or diverting large volumes, according to the agreement. In a statement issued on Monday, Pakistan's foreign office said it welcomed the award rendered by the Court of Arbitration on Aug. 8 on issues of general interpretation of the IWT, explaining the designed criteria for the new run-of-river hydropower projects to be constructed by India on the western rivers of Chenab, Jhelum and Indus. New Delhi has not yet commented on the development. 'In a significant finding, the Court has declared that India shall 'let flow' the waters of the western rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. In that connection, the specified exceptions for generation of hydro-electric plants must conform strictly to the requirements laid down in the Treaty, rather than to what India might consider an 'ideal' or 'best practices' approach,' the foreign office statement read. 'The Court's findings on low-level outlets, gated spillways, intakes for the turbines, and free-board are in line with Pakistan's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Treaty. The Award also limits India from maximizing the pondage volume.' The South Asian neighbors have been arguing over hydroelectric projects on the shared Indus river and its tributaries for decades, with Pakistan complaining that India's planned hydropower dams will cut its flows. Notably, the Court observed that the awards of a Court of Arbitration are 'final and binding on the parties (India and Pakistan),' and have a controlling legal effect on subsequent Courts of Arbitration and neutral experts, according to the Pakistani foreign office. Recognizing Pakistan's vulnerability as the downstream riparian, the Court has further observed that the object and purpose of the Indus Waters Treaty, as it relates to the western rivers, is to de-limit the two states' respective rights and obligations, in conjunction with mutual cooperation and effective dispute resolutions procedures. 'The award carries special significance in the wake of India's recent announcement to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, and its earlier decision to boycott the proceedings of the Court of Arbitration. It is an endorsement of Pakistan's historical stance on the afore-stated issues,' the foreign office said. 'Pakistan remains committed to full implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty. It also expects India to immediately resume the normal functioning of the Treaty, and faithfully implement the award announced by the Court of Arbitration.'
Asharq Al-Awsat
10-08-2025
- Asharq Al-Awsat
World Bank's IFC Approves Oman Polysilicon Project Loan
The World Bank's International Finance Corporation on Friday approved a loan and investment worth up to $250 million in a polysilicon manufacturing project in Oman for solar power applications, over the objections of the IFC's US executive director, the US Treasury Department said. Three other executive directors on the IFC board abstained from the vote on the United Solar Polysilicon project, including those representing Germany, the Netherlands and Nordic countries, two sources familiar with the vote said, according to Reuters. United Solar plans to build a $1.6 billion plant to produce 100,000 metric tons of polysilicon a year in Oman's Sohar Port Freezone. The company has some links to China, partly through its chairman and founder, Zhang Longgen, a US citizen who was previously CEO of Chinese polysilicon maker Daqo New Energy Corp. A key United Solar shareholder, Chinese private equity investor IDG Capital, spent much of last year on a US Defense Department list of companies with links to China's military before its removal in December. Other shareholders include Zhang and Oman's sovereign wealth fund. IFC intends to provide a loan of up to $200 million and a preferred equity investment of $50 million, according to its disclosure sheet on the project. At full capacity, the United Solar plant in Oman would produce enough polysilicon annually to supply solar panels producing 40 gigawatts of power. China dominates the global production of polysilicon, a key ingredient in solar panels, and in its higher-purity form, a raw material for semiconductor production. The sector is already suffering from massive excess capacity. Reuters reported last week that Chinese polysilicon producers are in talks to spend 50 billion yuan ($7 billion) to acquire and shut down roughly a third of their production capacity and restructure part of the loss-making sector. One of the sources said the US and the abstaining countries viewed the project effectively as a new Chinese enterprise, supplied largely by Chinese state firms, and adding to excess capacity in the sector. The Trump administration, in both of its terms, has pressed the World Bank to stop lending to China. The US last year approved a $325 million federal grant to Michigan-based Hemlock Semiconductor for a major expansion to produce semiconductor-grade polysilicon to support reshoring of the chip supply chain.
Arab News
03-08-2025
- Arab News
Fair climate finance requires debt reform
When delegates from around the world convened in Bonn, Germany, for the 62nd session of the UN Climate Change Subsidiary Bodies, the specter of sovereign debt loomed large. For African countries, in particular, debt is no longer a problem unfolding in parallel with escalating climate shocks and widening development deficits, but rather the key obstacle to effective crisis responses. Debt reform and climate finance are two sides of the same coin. According to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, African countries owe $655 billion in external debt, while debt-service payments have more than doubled since 2010, driven by rising interest rates and currency depreciation. This year, the continent's collective debt-service bill will amount to a whopping $79 billion. In 2023, 34 African countries spent more on debt service than on health or education, let alone disaster relief or green infrastructure. Comprehensive debt cancelation is a prerequisite to progress on sustainable development. But it is only the beginning. Shaped by colonial power dynamics, the global financial architecture is practically designed to entrench inequality. When issuing loans to developing economies, institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank often impose conditions that constrain these countries' fiscal space and hardwire austerity into domestic policy. Short-term relief thus comes with long-term shackles. Many believe that mobilizing private investment is the key to closing the climate finance gap. 'Derisking' climate finance and attracting private capital through tools such as green bonds and blended finance are among the G20's flagship priorities. The decision on the New Collective Quantified Goal on Climate Finance, made at COP29 in Baku last year, likewise emphasizes the importance of private sector participation. South Africa, which assumed the G20 presidency in December 2024, has echoed this approach. For example, at the G20 finance ministers' meeting in February, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa called on the private sector, together with international financial institutions and development banks, to implement 'innovative financing and insurance mechanisms' aimed at scaling up funding for disaster prevention and post-disaster reconstruction. But the private sector has long struggled to engage effectively in climate negotiations or identify viable projects that serve climate, development and commercial objectives simultaneously. Since the infrastructure projects that are needed to strengthen climate resilience mature over a period of 20 to 30 years, countries need reliable access to long-term finance. But credit markets operate on three to five-year time horizons, meaning that borrowers often end up scrambling for more capital, which can be both unpredictable and expensive. According to the ONE Campaign, the average interest rate on bonds for African countries in 2021 was 5.78 percent, compared to 1.14 percent on loans from the World Bank. These countries will pay $56 billion in additional interest over the lifetime of loans contracted in 2017 to 2021, compared to what they would have paid if they had borrowed at World Bank rates. The much-touted 'blended finance' model does not solve this problem, because it often combines public and private funds in ways that leave countries exposed to credit market risk. Private finance is structurally biased against the Global South, owing partly to fundamental flaws in sovereign risk assessments. Mohamed Adow The real issue is that private finance is structurally biased against the Global South, owing partly to fundamental flaws in sovereign risk assessments. If the private sector is to help close the climate finance gap without trapping developing countries in cycles of repayment and dependency, we must first resolve the information asymmetries that enable credit rating agencies and institutional investors to define 'risk' in ways that penalize developing economies. Ramaphosa — who has voiced support for reforming global credit-rating systems — should help spearhead this process. At the same time, however, we must recognize the limits of private capital, particularly when it comes to financing for adaptation and loss and damage. There is no substitute for a major expansion of grants and public financing. The responsibility for tackling biases in the global financial system falls on the entire international community — not least the advanced economies that are now cutting their climate aid budgets. Nonetheless, African countries must take more responsibility for driving change. Africa has often failed to take a unified approach to global issues and maximize its collective bargaining power. Consider the Baku to Belem Roadmap — a joint initiative by the COP29 and COP30 presidencies to deliver at least $1.3 trillion in climate finance annually by 2035. Though the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat and the COP30 presidency began regional consultations on the roadmap in February, inviting stakeholders to share their input, Africa has not submitted an aligned position or set of recommendations. Meanwhile, many African countries pursue bilateral debt deals in isolation, while others are entangled in opaque and protracted restructuring processes like the G20's Common Framework for Debt Treatments. Zambia's debt restructuring, for example, dragged on for more than three years. What is needed now is for African countries to build a consensus around a common agenda that links COP30 to the G20. Priorities must include comprehensive debt cancelation for climate-vulnerable countries; the reform of credit rating systems and capital cost structures that unfairly penalize African economies; and the greater use of instruments such as grants to finance climate action. A global taxation regime, which could use revenues to fund resilience in developing economies, should also be on the table. Such efforts should build on existing initiatives and proposals, such as the proposed UN Framework Convention on Sovereign Debt, which would offer a credible, cooperative and rights-based approach to debt reform. The Africa Climate Summit, convening in Addis Ababa this September, will serve as an important moment to cement progress and speak with a unified voice in advance of COP30. Along with South Africa, the African Union — now a permanent member of the G20 — should play a leading role in this process, steering global debates toward the creation of a financial system that reflects today's multipolar realities, not the colonial dynamics of the past. This is a matter of justice, not charity. And, with developing economies on the front line of the climate crisis, it could not be more urgent.
