Doctors Found a New Blood Type and It Changes What We Thought We Knew
Scientists now recognize 48 distinct blood type groups, and the newest one, just officially classified, belongs to exactly one person on Earth.
Meet 'Gwada negative,' the rarest blood type known to science, Live Science reported.
The story begins 15 years ago, when doctors in France drew blood from a woman with Caribbean ancestry from Guadeloupe, known locally as 'Gwada.' At the time, she was undergoing routine testing ahead of a surgery. But what her blood revealed was anything but routine.
Back in 2011, researchers noticed an unusual antibody. It took nearly a decade of genetic analysis and DNA sequencing to uncover the source: a previously unknown mutation that altered the structure of her blood in a way never seen before.
This month, the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) confirmed the discovery, officially designating 'Gwada negative' as the 48th recognized blood group.
According to Thierry Peyrard, a medical biologist with the French Blood Establishment (EFS), she's the only person known to carry it and the only person in the world she's compatible with for transfusions.
'Discovering new blood groups means offering patients with rare blood a better level of care,' the EFS said in a statement.
That's because while ABO-Rh typing is safe for most transfusions, rare blood groups can lead to life-threatening complications if not properly matched.
With over 600 known antigens on blood cells, there are theoretically millions of possible combinations. But until now, only 47 had been officially cataloged. Thanks to advances in gene sequencing, that number is growing quickly, so don't be surprised if more discoveries like 'Gwada negative' follow.
For one woman in France, her blood told a story no one else could.Doctors Found a New Blood Type and It Changes What We Thought We Knew first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 26, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
How Scientists Are Using Drones to Study Sperm Whales
In the waters off Dominica in the Caribbean, a drone descends from the sky toward a sperm whale. Instead of dropping a tag from above, this drone will press against the whale's back to attach a specialized sensor. The tag's suction cups will stick to the whale's skin, allowing the device to record audio of these marine mammals communicating. The technique, which researchers call tap-and-go, is described in a new study published in the journal PLOS One on Wednesday. The findings demonstrate that the approach is a possible way to gather vital scientific data while minimizing the disturbance to whales. 'This is definitely the future,' said Jeremy Goldbogen, a marine biologist at Stanford University who was not involved with the research. 'It's really exciting to see these new innovations,' he said. Scientists have long used a traditional tagging method that involves standing on a boat's prow and using a 20-foot pole to attach the tag to the whale. But the boat's noisiness and proximity to the whales can cause them stress. The method also takes a lot of time and coordination, said Daniel Vogt, a research engineer at Harvard and the lead author of the study. 'We always wanted to improve this method,' he said of traditional tagging. Drones, in comparison, allow scientists to reach the whale from a distance, and more quickly. 'We want to reduce the disturbance to the animal while improving the quality of the data that we collect,' Mr. Vogt said. In recent years, drone technology has changed the way scientists study whales. Drones offer more than eyes in the sky: They can identify and measure individual whales, compare their behavior at the sea surface and even collect biological samples. By flying through the clouds of vapor, or 'blow,' that whales emit when they surface to breathe, drones can gather information about the whale's genetics, hormones and microbiomes. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
10 hours ago
- Fox News
Man 'wanted a cheeseburger' but French girlfriend made him eat healthy meals, he said
A French woman's homemade dinner sparked fury from her American boyfriend who wanted a burger instead, according to a viral post. The woman said she moved from France to the U.S. two years ago and has dealt with digestive issues since, according to her Reddit posting. "For some reason, the food here makes me sick," she wrote. "My body seems to struggle to digest it." "Whether it's takeout or fancy restaurant food … I can't go to the bathroom for days, or I'm violently vomiting," the woman added. The expat consulted medical professionals and, after multiple tests, was told that her body was probably "not used to the amount of salt and preservatives" in American food. After incorporating more whole foods into her diet, her health improved, she said. She wrote that she began meal-prepping and cooking meals from scratch. "My dad is actually a chef back home, so he was more than happy to send me some recipes to keep my diet interesting," she said. But one of her recipes – a "delicious" vegetarian lasagna made from scratch – caught the ire of her American partner. When he asked what was for dinner, the boyfriend "rolled his eyes" when he found out it was lasagna, the woman wrote. "[H]e was sick of 'that organic crap' and wanted a cheeseburger," she recounted. "The comment hurt." She said he told her that "it was unfair to 'make' him eat my diet." The woman also clarified that she intended no ill will toward Americans and said she enjoys living here – and those who shared comments mostly sided with her. "You are not responsible for feeding a grown man because he doesn't want to put in the effort," one of the top comments read. While most commenters supported her, some questioned whether the post was even real. "Because this totally happened, what in the world have you been eating since you've been in the U.S.?" one person questioned. "In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night." Carole Lieberman, M.D., a psychiatrist based in Beverly Hills, California, told Fox News Digital the Reddit poster appears to have "excellent taste in food, but bad taste in boyfriends." She added, "In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night – and certainly not a meal that the woman can't eat herself. Many couples share meal preparation duties and even enjoy it." Lieberman, who lived in France for years, also attested that the food is generally better than what most Americans eat. "The problem is that your boyfriend has come to expect home-cooked meals every night because you have spoiled him," she observed, speaking to the woman who shared her story. "He feels entitled to dictate the menu as well." "Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them." Lieberman encouraged the Redditor to reevaluate her relationship. "Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them, regardless of whether she's making vegetarian lasagna or veal escalope."
Medscape
11 hours ago
- Medscape
Novel Tool May Predict NSAID Hypersensitivity
TOPLINE: A new risk stratification tool known as CA4TCH — which relies solely on clinical history — could help predict which patients with a suspected hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) will have a hypersensitivity confirmed during a drug provocation test. METHODOLOGY: To develop and validate CA4TCH, researchers conducted a retrospective study of 1035 patients who presented with suspected NSAID hypersensitivity at the allergy unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier in Montpellier, France, between February 2001 and December 2020 and underwent drug provocation testing. Using elements of the clinical history — including sex; age at the last reaction; reaction onset ≤ 24 hours; whether the last reaction occurred in the past 5 years; history of anaphylaxis or respiratory symptoms; reactions to two or more drug classes; reaction to aspirin; and comorbid atopy, asthma, sinus disease, or chronic spontaneous urticaria — the team constructed a risk score to predict the presence of a drug hypersensitivity reaction. They then validated the risk score in an independent cohort of 69 participants from the University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 232 (22.4%) participants had at least one positive result during drug provocation testing, whereas 803 (77.6%) did not react to the suspected culprit NSAIDs. The CA4TCH tool had a sensitivity of 78.4%, specificity of 70.4%, and positive and negative predictive values of 43.3% and 91.9%, respectively. Among participants with a negative result, the model successfully delabeled 565 of 803 cases (70.4%). In these cases, past symptoms commonly included angioedema, urticaria, or pruritus. External validation showed comparable predictive performance. IN PRACTICE: 'Given existing variation in testing protocols across clinical centers, the fact that the CA4TCH score is based on clinical history elements alone means it can be used to generate a prediction for any individual upon presentation and could thus constitute a practical tool to be used alongside or as part of existing phenotype classifications,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu, MD, PhD, with the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania, was the corresponding author of the study, which was published online on July 16 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. LIMITATIONS: Fixed drug eruptions were underrepresented in the study, and the researchers did not consider food allergy phenotypes because they lacked information about food sensitization. DISCLOSURES: Some authors reported receiving financial support, including grants, consulting fees, honoraria, or support for attending meetings, from institutions and pharmaceutical companies. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
