logo
Gen X is the least financially secure generation — and most Americans say they need six figures to live comfortably

Gen X is the least financially secure generation — and most Americans say they need six figures to live comfortably

Yahoo8 hours ago

More than a quarter of Americans say they would need to be making at least $150,000 to feel financially secure, and more than three-quarters of Americans say they currently don't feel financially secure — especially those who belong to Generation X.
More than three-quarters of U.S. adults say they aren't completely financially secure, which is up from 72 percent in 2023 and 75 percent in 2024, according to Bankrate's Financial Freedom Survey.
While just over a quarter of Americans told Bankrate they would feel secure if they could make $150,000, a large percentage of respondents — 45 percent — said they need to make at least six figures before they could begin to feel secure.
Feeling financially secure, as defined by Bankrate's survey, is the ability to 'cover your bills and everyday essentials but also have money left over for eating out and vacations.'
That growing sense of financial instability is fueled by several factors.
'One major issue is that wages have been stagnant for a large majority of the population over that time, and prices continue to rise,' Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida, told Bankrate.
'Add that to the backdrop of political instability everyone is feeling, and I think that is a perfect formula for people not feeling financially secure,' she said,
The cost of goods are not the only major expense on the rise. There's also child care, auto loans, home insurance, outstanding student loan balances, and of course, rent.
While all U.S. adults are subject to these forces, Generation X may be one of the hardest hit. Gen Xers — people who are currently between the ages of 45 and 60 — have now been working for decades. But the oldest of that cohort is still at least seven years away from the retirement age.
Bankrate's survey found that 84 percent of Gen Xers felt they weren't being paid enough to feel financially secure. The survey found that 80 percent of Generation Z respondents felt the same way, as did 79 percent of Millennials and 69 percent of Baby Boomers.
According to a 2024 Experian survey, Gen X has experienced the most 'financial trauma' — defined by Trauma of Money author Chanel Chapman as emotional distress directly linked to monetary concerns and its impact on their relationships, families, and perspectives on wealth.
In that survey, 74 percent of Gen X respondents said they were experiencing financial trauma, followed by 71 percent of Millennials, 64 percent of Gen Z, and 63 percent of Baby Boomers.
Gen Xers are in the unenviable position of nearing the end of their careers while also having to care for children and aging loved ones and navigating the challenging modern financial landscape.
Gen X was also in the prime earning years during the Great Recession, and were the first generation born after the broad elimination of pensions in the United States.
In the Bankrate survey, 35 percent of Gen Xers said they would need to rake in at least$150,000 annually to feel financially comfortable, while 24 percent of Baby Boomers, 26 percent of Millennials, and 20 percent of Gen Zers said the same.
While Gen X may be struggling the most, all the surveys show that more than half of all U.S. adults are feeling the pressure to make ends meet.
According to Bankrate, rapid inflation over the last three years has undermined households' purchasing power, which makes it harder for Americans to afford their lifestyles on their current salaries.
A salary of $100,000 in January 2020 has the same buying power as $124,353, according to Bankrate. That means that if the worker making $100,000 hasn't received a raise between 2020 and 2025, they've effectively lost $24,000 of their salary.
But for the nearly 900,000 Americans who make minimum wage, reaching that six-figure benchmark for financial security may seem impossible, especially when pushes to raise the federal minimum wage fail to materialize.
Today, 34 states and territories have minimum wages around the federal hourly minimum of $7.25 per hour. That rate has not increased since 2009. Five states — Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennessee — use the federal minimum wage, and three states have a lower minimum wage than the federal minimum.
While the push for a $15 minimum wage was championed primarily by progressive voices like Sen. Bernie Sanders, the idea has gained broader momentum in Congress, even among some Republicans like Sen. Josh Hawley.
Sanders attempted to add a provision raising the federal minimum wage to $15 in 2021 as part of Joe Biden's COVID-19 stimulus bill, but the effort was killed in the Senate.
That same year, the National Low Income Housing Coalition's annual 'Out of Reach' report found that minimum wage workers in 93 percent of U.S. counties would not be able to afford a modest one-bedroom apartment.
But even moderate raises aren't going to go far enough to reduce the financial pressures facing modern American adults.
The current typical national salary for a full-time, year-round worker was $81,515 in 2023, according to the latest figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Typically, the more direct path toward making more money is switching jobs, but even that avenue has become more difficult for many workers. Many companies have slowed or stopped hiring, making it that much harder for Americans to increase their salaries.
The financial realities of the modern world are a far cry from the idyllic American Dream — that an American who works a full-time job can afford a home, transportation, raise their children, and have enough left over to enjoy their lives — and that reality doesn't seem to be changing anytime soon.
'Though many Americans hold onto the idea of returning to a 1950s-era 'Golden' America age, the days when a single, non-college educated breadwinner could sustain an entire family seem like they may be confined forever to the past,' Bankrate economy reporter Sarah Foster said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

S&P 500 Is a Whisker Away From Record Ahead of Powell Remarks
S&P 500 Is a Whisker Away From Record Ahead of Powell Remarks

Bloomberg

time20 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

S&P 500 Is a Whisker Away From Record Ahead of Powell Remarks

US stocks edged higher on Wednesday following an all-time closing high for the Nasdaq 100 Index as Wall Street readied for a second day of testimony from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell before lawmakers. The S&P 500 Index was up 0.3% as of 9:43 a.m. in New York, while the technology-heavy Nasdaq 100 climbed 0.6%, extending its record run. The milestone was reached as a combination of robust fundamentals and easing geopolitical tensions boosted the appeal of the growth-focused gauge.

Customer Service Is A Human Sport—Even In The Age Of AI
Customer Service Is A Human Sport—Even In The Age Of AI

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Customer Service Is A Human Sport—Even In The Age Of AI

Jim Stevenson, CEO and Founder of Bletchley Group. Customer service has never been more scrutinized or more automated. Chatbots field our queries, apps track our orders, and self‑service portals promise instant resolutions. Yet, for all the technological wizardry, one timeless truth endures: at the heart of every customer service request or purchase journey is a human looking for an efficient and memorable experience. I was reminded of this on an otherwise ordinary Saturday evening at an Italian restaurant in Santa Monica. The pasta was sublime, the service attentive but not intrusive, and having debated and ultimately rejected the merits of tiramisu versus panna cotta, the bill arrived at an appropriately relaxed pace. So far, a great service. Then, ten minutes after arriving home, my friend realized her grandmother's heirloom ring, handed down through three generations, was missing. Calling the restaurant while realizing it was probably closed, we expected the standard answer, 'Pop back tomorrow, we'll have a look.' Instead, we were invited straight back, arriving to discover at least three members of staff had abandoned their cleaning and till-counting duties and were searching in the restrooms, around the table and in the bins. They were prepared with a box of disposable gloves so we could join the search. We left ring‑less but raving that this restaurant has earned two lifelong advocates thanks to the staff's genuine concern and willingness to dive into the search (and trash) to look for a customer's ring. Consider this experience while you digest a colder statistic: 78 per cent of UK customers now finish a service interaction frustrated—the highest level in a decade. Worldwide, more than half of consumers will defect after a single bad experience, and PwC reckons nearly a third will dump even a favorite brand after just one slip‑up. We have never had more technology promising to cosset customers, yet most of us now dread contacting 'support'. That contradiction is large enough to drive a chatbot through. Automation, when misapplied, simply scales indifference. Swedish fintech Klarna trumpeted in 2024 that its AI assistant had absorbed the workload of 700 human agents; by May 2025, the CEO was rehiring people because service quality had 'dropped' and customers still 'need to speak to a real person'. Yet technology is not the villain; misapplied technology is. Chewy, the online pet‑supply retailer, refunded a shopper after her dog died, advised her to donate the food, and then sent flowers signed by the agent who took the call. One compassionate gesture, amplified by social media, became brand equity that money cannot buy. Scaling the genuine compassion of sending flowers to a dog owner becomes cynical commercialism if not handled correctly, with authenticity and understanding. Whether searching dustbins or sending bouquets, the same five human values do the heavy lifting: • Empathy: Feel the customer's pain before you fix the process. • Ownership: The first person, or bot, who spots a problem shepherds it to resolution. • Speed: Responses must be quick and conclusive; velocity must lead to resolution. • Visibility: Show the graft; a real‑time progress bar or progress emails beats silent purgatory. • Culture: Celebrate staff who exceed the script; folklore outpaces policy binders. You cannot code kindness, but you can design for it. Map emotional journeys, not just click paths. Let AI clear the low‑stakes questions but provide a 'Human, please.' button inside two taps for the high‑stakes ones. Consult your customer service team, as they have daily interactions with your customers and are familiar with the frustrations and expectations. Replace unhelpful generic updates 'Your request is being processed.' with helpful and personable ones like 'Hang tight—we're on it and will update you within ten minutes.' Above all, broadcast hero stories internally; behavior follows narrative. Build a culture of excellence in customer service that permeates the DNA of your company. Employees will want to work for you, and customers will want to buy from you. Here is the paradox: 80% of companies believed they delivered a "superior experience" to their customers, but their customers do not agree. The tools we built to get closer to customers can push them further away unless they amplify, rather than anesthetize, our humanity. Before rubber‑stamping the next chatbot launch, ask a straightforward question: Would this experience make a customer believe we would dig through the bins for them at eleven o'clock on a Saturday night? If the answer is 'probably not', no algorithmic cleverness will keep them loyal. Design your online and offline experiences with the same core values and excellence in mind to build customer loyalty and brand equity. Excellent customer service is, and always will be, a human sport. Technology is just the kit. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?

Why Contextual AI Is Vital For The Future Of Supply Chains
Why Contextual AI Is Vital For The Future Of Supply Chains

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why Contextual AI Is Vital For The Future Of Supply Chains

Theodore Krantz, Chief Executive Officer at There are two new norms. The first is AI. By 2028 alone, 33% of enterprise software applications will include agentic AI, and 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be autonomously decided for us. And the second norm to come to terms with is global supply chain risk. Our current landscape is challenging and involves complexity, volatility, extreme weather events, cybersecurity risks and geopolitical tensions. For global enterprises, the question isn't simply whether to adopt AI. It's how to do so in a way that transforms fragmented systems into intelligent, adaptive ecosystems. That's where the distinction between applied and contextual AI becomes critical. Let's start with what most people are familiar with: applied AI. These are targeted tools built to automate specific processes, forecasting demand, managing inventory and flagging compliance risks. They're great at solving isolated problems with structured inputs and predictable outputs. But applied AI has its limits. It doesn't always understand nuance, interconnected risks or the fast-moving variables that define today's global supply networks. In contrast, contextual AI is much different. It does more than merely process data. It understands the environment in which that data lives. It can synthesize the real-time signals from a diverse array of sources, such as, but not limited to, cyber threats, regulatory updates, geopolitical developments and even financial stress indicators. In this way, contextual AI provides more meaningful and strategic recommendations, and this difference is centered on being proactive versus reactive. Why Most AI Projects Fall Short Despite the excitement surrounding generative AI and large language models, many companies remain stuck in what I call the AI adoption gap. A staggering statistic from shows that 90% of Fortune 1000 companies have little to no visibility into their second- and third-tier suppliers. They might use AI in pockets, but they lack the visibility and context to orchestrate decisions at scale to drive true retention and ROI. This is a massive gap, especially when most catastrophic risks tend to lie beyond your tier-one relationships. So, why does this matter for AI? Because no matter how advanced your model is, it's only as effective as the data you feed it and the perspective you bring to interpreting that data. Good AI without context is like a GPS that doesn't update in real time: helpful but prone to failure when conditions shift. The Case For Contextual AI In Supply Chains What separates contextual AI is its ability to integrate internal enterprise data with external intelligence. It's important to take into consideration multiple data sources—some public, some proprietary—to map global supply chains and assess risk across multiple dimensions: cyber, financial, geopolitical, regulatory and ESG. And the real magic happens when we marry that external lens with customers' own data to mitigate risk proactively. Take the recent outage involving CrowdStrike and Microsoft as an example. According to our data, about 675,000 direct customer relationships were impacted, and without a contextual view, understanding not just who was directly affected but how those ripple effects propagated across sub-tiers, organizations would be left guessing where their vulnerabilities truly lie. Building Enterprise Trust In AI Contextual AI is really about better outcomes. But to get there, enterprises need more than technology; they need trust. That trust starts with transparency, human-in-the-loop design and rigorous validation. Don't treat AI as a "set it and forget it" solution. Companies must continuously refine their models with domain experts and customer feedback, integrating reinforcement learning with human validation. And increasingly, using clean rooms to ensure customers can safely combine their sensitive data with your company's market data without compromising privacy or compliance is vital. AI in supply chains must meet a higher bar than many consumer-facing applications. Our business involves protecting livelihoods, handling geopolitical exposure and ensuring regulatory alignment across jurisdictions. That's why trust, explainability and governance are foundational, and this is true especially when AI is involved. From Trial Projects To ROI-Based Business Transformation The end goal isn't to bolt AI onto your existing workflows; it's to rethink the workflows themselves. Applied AI may help you do what you already do more efficiently. Contextual AI helps you redefine what's possible. It allows you to spot weak signals before they become front-page headlines. Then, in turn, it adjusts in real time rather than after the fact and aligns decision-making across all sorts of systems, even fragmented ones. This transformation will take time. And it will also require a shift in mindset as well as a retooling of infrastructure, but the results will be significant. It will mean more resilient, responsive and stronger supply chains that will benefit all over time. As enterprise leaders, we must challenge ourselves not just to implement AI but to elevate it. And the real power of AI isn't in the code. It's in the context. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store