logo
What India's passionate support for an assassinated Congolese leader says about today's world order

What India's passionate support for an assassinated Congolese leader says about today's world order

Scroll.ina day ago
On February 19, 1961, thousands of people gathered in New Delhi to protest the murder of the young leader of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Patrice Lumumba.
The freedom fighter Aruna Asaf Ali, one of the organisers of the event, compared the martyrdom of 35-year-old Lumumba to the hanging of revolutionary Bhagat Singh by the British colonial administration.
Congress politician Indira Gandhi said that Lumumba's loss was that of 'somebody very near'. She added that there is more India could have done to protect Lumumba. Footage of the event shows that the large crowds were drawn across the political spectrum.
Artist Amrita Pritam wrote a poem for Lumumba in Punjabi, asking 'Can the white sheet hide this red spot in its folds?'
There were several tributes in Urdu including by Makhdoom and Sahir Ludhianvi. Sahir's poem translated into English by KA Abbas had the lines 'Every drop of a martyr's blood, Will Light an Immortal Flame'. Abbas himself wrote a story based on Lumumba.
What caused this passionate indignation and upsurge of support in India for Lumumba, whose birth centenary is being celebrated this year? It reflected a time when India was closely involved in the liberation struggles in Africa through the state, the activities of solidarity organisations and sympathetic individuals.
Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru described the murder as 'a turning point' in the history of Africa, predicting that 'a dead Lumumba is infinitely more powerful than a live Lumumba'.
Lumumba had been murdered just a year after being elected prime minister of the Democratic Republic of Congo on June 30, 1960, when the country gained independence from Belgium.
By January the next year, he was brutally tortured and assassinated. His body was dissolved in acid. As is now well documented, the US and the Belgians both worked to overthrow the young African leader.
The Congo had become embroiled in a political crisis after independence because the Katanga region – extremely rich in mineral resources – announced its secession with Belgian help.
The Belgians were antagonistic to Lumumba and the country's press routinely carried racist characterisations of him. With Katanga's secession, the Belgians found their opportunity to weaken him by sending a large number of armed personnel to the province.
Lumumba appealed to the United Nations for help. Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld obtained permission from the Security Council to send a mission to the Congo.
An Indian diplomat, Rajeshwar Dayal, was appointed Special Representative of the United Nations in the Congo and joined in September 1960. By the time Dayal arrived, it was too late. His predecessor, Andrew Cordier, had actively worked against Lumumba. Frustrated with the inability of the United Nations to assist him, Lumumba had asked for Soviet help – greatly alarming the West.
Lumumba's overthrow had reportedly been ordered by US President Dwight Eisenhower. With the backing of the US Central Intelligence Agency, Dayal wrote in his Mission for Hammarskjöld, Colonel Mobutu Sese Seko undertook a military coup.
'We had no doubt that Mobutu's own weak will had not provided the driving urge,' he observed. 'We had our suspicions which did not point to the CIA alone.'
Eventually, Dayal himself had to leave the Congo as Western powers lobbied for his removal and his life was threatened.
The failure of the United Nations to protect Lumumba brought to light its ineffectiveness. As Kwame Nkrumah, the first president of Ghana, wrote in his Challenge of the Congo, this was 'the first time in history that the legal ruler of a country' had 'been done to death with the open connivance of a world organisation in whom that ruler put his trust'.
The Soviets asked for the resignation of the secretary general, Hammarskjöld. In a letter to Nehru, Nikita Khrushchev expressed his shock at Lumumba's assasination, condemning the United Nations and asking for the resignation of Hammarskjöld.
Nehru expressed his sympathy with his views but did not believe that replacing Hammarskjöld would achieve much. Hammarskjöld soon died in a mysterious plane crash in September 1961. Eventually, Nehru decided to send several thousand Indian soldiers to the Congo under the United Nations mission to end the secession in Katanga.
To understand the rise and assasination of Lumumba, it is first important to understand the significance of Congo. It is a country rich in natural resources, including cobalt, copper and diamonds. It is almost three-fourths the size of India.
When the continent of Africa was partitioned among European powers in the late 19th century, Congo became the personal property of King Leopold of Belgium. During his 23-year rule, an estimated 10 million Africans were killed. In 1908, international alarm over the atrocities forced him to give up the territory. Congo became a Belgian colony.
At independence, Congo had some of the lowest living standards in Africa.
Lumumba, who was born in 1925 in a poor peasant family, grew up hearing stories of the Belgian atrocities. He was an autodidact, a voracious reader with a particular interest in philosophy, history and sociology.
In his years working as a postal clerk, Lumumba became involved with and led several societies and organisations. He took an active interest in discussing colonialism and race relations. He started writing for the newspapers and also wrote poetry. He had also learnt several Congolese languages including Lingala and Swahili. As he travelled around the country and met with a variety of people, his fame as an orator rose.
Lumumba's growing popularity worried the Belgian colonial administration who arrested him on charges of embezzlement in 1956. While in prison, Lumumba worked on a book titled Congo, My Country. The book was addressed to Belgian rulers and proposed a Belgo-Congolese union.
'My investigations,' he wrote, 'have not been limited to the évolué class; they have also been carried out among the working-class and the traditionalist leaders…with people of all types and all shades of opinion.' Lumumba started identifying with the majority of the Congolese population.
Play
This explains how his political views rapidly changed. In 1958, he became one of the founders of the Congolese National Movement. The idea of a national movement that built unity across ethnic divisions in Congo was a revolutionary idea. Soon afterwards, he was the Congolese delegate to the All African People's Conference organised in Ghana, which had declared its independence a year earlier under the leadership of Kwame Nkrumah.
Lumumba would become a committed Pan-Africanist. For Lumumba, unity was a principle of struggle, unity against tribal divisions in the Congo, unity among African nations and ultimately unity among all the oppressed fighting for their freedom.
Lumumba had studied the ideas of Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian freedom struggle. 'We have chosen just one weapon for our struggle, and that weapon is nonviolence, because we believe that whatever the goal, it can be reached by peaceful means,' he said in 1959. 'This is what our struggle represents…'
In an interview one year later, he said that the Congolese owe this principle of nonviolent action to Gandhi.
Lumumba did not have the time and the people to fully consolidate the state in the Democratic Republic of Congo. His ideas of African unity and true independence were seen as too dangerous by Western powers in the context of the Cold War.
The story of Lumumba reflects the heroism and the tragedy of African freedom struggles. In the century since his birth, understanding the history of these struggles continues to carry lessons for our unequal world order.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'India's freedom of speech regulated by Israel?': Congress questions after envoy Reuven Azar ‘targets' Priyanka Gandhi
'India's freedom of speech regulated by Israel?': Congress questions after envoy Reuven Azar ‘targets' Priyanka Gandhi

Mint

time12 minutes ago

  • Mint

'India's freedom of speech regulated by Israel?': Congress questions after envoy Reuven Azar ‘targets' Priyanka Gandhi

Congress leader Pawan Khera on Wednesday, launched a scathing attack on Israel Ambassador Reuven Azar after his criticism of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, who had accused Tel Aviv of 'genocide' and criticising the Indian government for its 'silence' on the matter. In a strongly worded post on social media platform X, Khera slammed Reuven Azar, stating that him 'targeting' a sitting Member of the Indian Parliament is 'both unprecedented and intolerable.' The Congress leader further tagged S Jaishankar, questioning if 'freedom of speech in India' had now 'begun to be regulated from Israel." Following Priyanka Gandhi's post on X, Israeli Ambassador to India Reuven Azar accused the Congress leader of spreading 'deceit' and presented Israel's version of the conflict's toll. 'What is shameful is your deceit. Israel killed 25,000 Hamas terrorists. The terrible cost in human lives derives from Hamas's heinous tactics of hiding behind civilians, their shooting of people trying to evacuate or receive assistance and their rocket fire,' Azar said in his post. The Israeli diplomat's post comes after Priyanka Gandhi alleged that Israel 'murdered over 60,000 people, 18,430 of whom were children', starved hundreds to death, and was threatening to starve millions more. 'Enabling these crimes by silence and inaction is a crime in itself. It is shameful that the Indian Government stands silent as Israel unleashes this devastation on the people of Palestine,' she wroteon X, on Tuesday. Apart from Pawan Khera, Congress's Gaurav Gogoi also hit out at the Israeli ambassador, stating that the 'Parliament cannot remain a passive spectator.' "The disparaging comments made by a foreign Ambassador against a Member of Parliament of India is a serious breach of privilege. Even if the Union Government is silent, the Parliament cannot remain a passive spectator..." he said on X. Veteran Congress leader and former Union Minister Anand Sharma also strongly condemned the remarks of the Israeli Ambassador to India, "denying" the humanitarian crisis of Gaza, saying that the language used by the Israeli representative and "undiplomatic, distasteful and unacceptable," while the brutality, destruction of schools, hospitals and mass starvation is taking place. As Israel continues its bombardment, the IDF said it has approved the "framework" for a new offensive in the Gaza Strip, days after the security cabinet called for the seizure of Gaza City, reported AFP. On Tuesday, Gaza's Health Ministry reported that five more Palestinians have died from hunger, bringing the total number of starvation-related deaths to 227, including 103 children.

Shashi Tharoor joins stray dog debate following SC order, flags 'unwillingness of municipalities to neutering' canines
Shashi Tharoor joins stray dog debate following SC order, flags 'unwillingness of municipalities to neutering' canines

Mint

time12 minutes ago

  • Mint

Shashi Tharoor joins stray dog debate following SC order, flags 'unwillingness of municipalities to neutering' canines

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor weighed in on the stray dog debate following the Supreme Court order, stating that that the 'flaw in our system is not lack of resources, but the unwillingness or inability of municipalities to perform the task of rounding up and neutering stray dogs, even when funds have been provided.' Shashi Tharoor's comments come after the Supreme Court on Monday, directed Delhi authorities to remove stray dogs from localities and house them in shelters due to increasing dog bite incidents. "This is a thoughtful response to the problem that is affecting ordinary citizens in every city. We need to protect humans while being humane to dogs. But one point no one mentions is that the flaw in our system is not lack of resources, but the unwillingness or inability of municipalities to perform the task of rounding up and neutering stray dogs, even when funds have been provided. These funds are never actually spent where needed — in making the arrangements that the SC, in understandable exasperation, has now decreed. Perhaps the funds should instead be allotted to Animal Welfare groups and sincere NGOs with a track record of sheltering animals? They are more likely to implement the ABC programme than the municipalities are," Tharoor posted on X. Calling the stray dog situation in the city "extremely grim," the Supreme Court on Monday ordered the Delhi government and municipal bodies to begin removing stray dogs from all local areas without delay and house them in designated dog shelters. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan directed Delhi authorities to set up shelters for about 5,000 dogs within six to eight weeks, to be expanded in phases. The court also warned that anyone obstructing the relocation drive — whether individuals or organisations — could face contempt proceedings. (This is a developing story. Keep checking for more updates)

Voter's list row: Congress' Sonia Gandhi's name added to voter list before she was citizen? BJP alleges so
Voter's list row: Congress' Sonia Gandhi's name added to voter list before she was citizen? BJP alleges so

India.com

time12 minutes ago

  • India.com

Voter's list row: Congress' Sonia Gandhi's name added to voter list before she was citizen? BJP alleges so

Voter's list row: Congress' Sonia Gandhi's name added to voter list before she was citizen? BJP alleges so The Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday launched a counterattack on Congress and claimed Sonia Gandhi had been illegally added to the voter list 45 years ago, before she was an Indian citizen. The Congress has accused the BJP of 'colluding' with the Election Commission to commit voter fraud. Ex-Union Minister Anurag Thakur claimed ex-Congress boss – born Sonia Maino in Italy in 1946 – was added on the list from 1980 to 1982, a year before she was an Indian citizen. In a long Twitter post, BJP leader Amit Malviya claimed that Sonia Gandhi's name first appeared on the rolls in 1980 — three years before she became an Indian citizen and while she still held Italian citizenship. The post read: Sonia Gandhi's tryst with India's voters' list is riddled with glaring violations of electoral law. This perhaps explains Rahul Gandhi's fondness for regularising ineligible and illegal voters, and his opposition to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). Her name first appeared on the rolls in 1980 — three years before she became an Indian citizen and while she still held Italian citizenship. At the time, the Gandhi family lived at 1, Safdarjung Road, the official residence of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Until then, the voters registered at that address were Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Sanjay Gandhi, and Maneka Gandhi. In 1980, the electoral rolls of the New Delhi parliamentary constituency were revised with January 1, 1980, as the qualifying date. During this revision, Sonia Gandhi's name was added, appearing at serial number 388 in polling station 145. This entry was a clear violation of the law, which requires a person to be an Indian citizen to be registered as a voter. Following an outcry in 1982, her name was deleted from the list — only to reappear in 1983. But even her reinstatement raised serious questions. In the fresh revision of the electoral rolls that year, Sonia Gandhi was listed at serial number 236 in polling station 140. The qualifying date for registration was January 1, 1983 — yet she was granted Indian citizenship only on April 30, 1983. In other words, Sonia Gandhi's name entered the electoral rolls twice without meeting the basic citizenship requirement — first as an Italian citizen in 1980, and then again in 1983, months before she legally became a citizen of India. We are not even asking why it took her 15 years after marrying Rajiv Gandhi to accept Indian citizenship. If this isn't blatant electoral malpractice, what is? What the Opposition is alleging? Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, also made explosive claims of a 'huge criminal fraud' in polls through collusion between the BJP and the Election Commission. Alleging that a 'vote chori model' was being used in many constituencies across the country, Gandhi said that the judiciary needs to get involved in this because 'the democracy that we love so much, does not exist anymore'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store