World Championship Of Legends Cancels India-Pakistan Match After Mass Player Withdrawals
The cancellation came as a direct result of several prominent Indian cricketers refusing to take part in the fixture, with sources indicating that their decision was influenced by the Pahalgam terror attack that occurred in April this year. The withdrawal of key players left organizers with no viable option but to abandon what would have been the first India-Pakistan cricket match since military tensions escalated following the April incident.
Among the notable players who opted out were former Indian spinner Harbhajan Singh, middle-order batsman Suresh Raina, and all-rounder Yusuf Pathan, according to reports. While official communications regarding their withdrawals were not confirmed, sources suggested that the Pahalgam attack and its subsequent impact on bilateral relations played a significant role in their decision-making process. Irfan Pathan also reportedly chose not to participate in the cross-border encounter.
Former Indian opener Shikhar Dhawan had already announced his withdrawal from the Pakistan match back in May, making his position clear through a social media post where he shared correspondence with tournament organizers. Dhawan cited prevailing geopolitical circumstances as the primary factor behind his decision, emphasizing that his country remained paramount above all other considerations.
In his public statement, Dhawan reinforced his commitment to his earlier decision, declaring his unwavering loyalty to India and stating that nothing supersedes national interests. His withdrawal had set an early precedent for other players who eventually followed suit as the tournament date approached.
The World Championship of Legends organizers initially believed that staging an India-Pakistan match could create positive memories for cricket fans worldwide, drawing inspiration from recent sporting exchanges between the two nations. They pointed to the Pakistan hockey team's planned visit to India and a recent volleyball match between the countries as examples of continued sporting cooperation despite political tensions.
In their official statement addressing the cancellation, WCL organizers expressed their love for cricket and emphasized that their sole intention had been to provide fans with enjoyable moments through the sport. They explained that the decision to schedule the India-Pakistan fixture had been made with the hope of fostering goodwill and creating memorable experiences for supporters across the globe.
However, the organizers acknowledged that their well-intentioned efforts had inadvertently hurt sentiments and created discomfort among respected Indian cricket legends who have brought significant glory to the country throughout their careers. They also recognized that the controversy had negatively impacted sponsor brands that had supported the tournament purely out of their passion for cricket.
The statement reflected genuine remorse from the organizers, who admitted that while their intentions were positive, the execution had resulted in unintended consequences that affected both players and stakeholders. They emphasized that causing distress to the Indian cricket legends was never their objective and that they deeply regretted any hurt caused by their decision.
This cancellation highlights the complex relationship between sports and politics in South Asian cricket, where bilateral matches often become casualty of broader diplomatic tensions. The incident demonstrates how geopolitical events can influence sporting decisions, even in exhibition tournaments featuring retired players rather than active international teams.
The World Championship of Legends had positioned itself as a platform for cricket fans to witness their favorite retired players in action once again, but the India-Pakistan fixture proved too sensitive given current circumstances. The tournament will now proceed without what would have been its marquee attraction, focusing instead on other matches that don't carry the same geopolitical implications.
The cancellation serves as a reminder of how deeply intertwined cricket and politics remain in the subcontinent, where sporting encounters between India and Pakistan continue to be viewed through the lens of bilateral relations and security concerns rather than purely as entertainment for cricket enthusiasts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘That was Ben Stokes behaving like a spoiled kid': Sanjay Manjrekar on last hour drama in Manchester Test
With the Shubman Gill-led Indian team eking out a draw against hosts England on the final day of the Manchester Test, as Gill, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar hit centuries, the fourth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar series saw plenty of drama. With one hour remaining, England skipper Ben Stokes approached Jadeja and Sundar, offering a handshake to signify a draw. However, the two Indian batsmen refused, forcing the match into the mandatory last 15 overs. This led to a verbal spat between Stokes and his teammates targeting Jadeja and Sundar, but both Indian batsmen would complete their centuries before agreeing to the draw five overs later. Former Indian cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar termed England captain Ben Stokes a 'spoiled kid' over the incident, believing the England captain could have 'handled things better.' 'Okay fine, he's unhappy that the players haven't walked off, he'll have to manage his overs carefully with the main bowlers already exhausted from bowling long spells the whole day. But throwing lollipops in the air and showing a bit of grumpiness out there, that was Ben Stokes behaving like a spoiled kid. I can understand him being surprised that India wanted to continue… but everything won't go as per your wishes, he should've handled that better. It was Ben, the hero, the champion that I admire, on that occasion behaving like a spoiled kid,' Manjrekar said during the post-match show on JioHotstar. Jadeja and Sundar stitched together an unbeaten 203-run partnership for the fifth wicket, keeping India's hopes alive in the series, with England leading 2-1 with one Test remaining. It was Jadeja's fifth Test hundred, while Sundar scored his maiden Test century with a knock of 101 runs on Sunday. Former England cricketer Jonathan Trott believes that if England were in the same situation as the Indian batsmen, they would have walked off after being offered the draw at the start of the last hour. 'Common practice in England, and Ben Stokes' mentality is that there are no personal milestones. If you're offered to end the game earlier, it's taken. In his (Stokes') mind, the game's done. I don't think England would have had personal milestones on their mind—that's just my view. Maybe if somebody was close to a maiden century, it would have been a bit different. You could tell by Ben Stokes' reaction that if they were in the same position, they probably would've shaken the Indian captain's hand if offered—if Shubman Gill had approached the English batsmen in the same scenario, they would've walked off. That's what Test cricket's about. It's played hard, it's played fair, but there's also a code and an ethos that the game is played with equal respect for each other,' Trott told JioHotstar. Stokes defended his offer, stating it was a decision made to protect his frontline bowlers. 'We were willing to take it as far as we possibly could and throw everything at them, but it got to that point where there was only one result left on the table. I wasn't going to risk any of my frontline bowlers in a situation like that, especially with a quick turnaround,' Stokes told the BBC.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Nasser Hussain not pleased with ENG skipper Ben Stokes' last hour antics
Former England captain Nasser Hussain termed Ben Stokes' decision to bring Harry Brook into the attack after India declined his offer to end the fourth Test early as silly, stating that Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar fully deserved their centuries. Jadeja and Washington were batting on 89 and 85 respectively before the start of the last hour of play when England skipper Ben Stokes, aware that a result was out of reach, offered to shake hands. However, with milestones around the corner, the Indian batters refused, which didn't amuse Stokes, who then introduced Brook into the attack to bowl some deliberate full-tosses, allowing both to complete their well-deserved tons. "I didn't have a problem with it. England seemed to have a problem with it. They were a bit tired, tired bowlers so they wanted to get off but two lads worked hard to get to 80s and 90s and they wanted to get Test match hundreds," Hussain said on 'Sky Sports'. "Stokes didn't have to bowl Brook and look silly at the end. We make far too much of these things. They played well and all credit to India," Hussain said. When Cheteshwar Pujara asked the same question to Washington Sundar, he sidestepped the issue. "I think everyone saw on TV what happened and they all must have enjoyed it," Washington said on JioHotstar. Former India batter Sanjay Manjrekar felt that Indian batters were well within their rights to continue unless there was an agreement prior that match will be called off before start of last hour of play. "I think Ben Stokes in the end behaved like a spoilt kid," Manjrekar said on 'JioHotstar'. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Gambhir: Generations will remember what Rishabh Pant did for this team
Head coach Gautam Gambhir on Sunday said the character and foundation of the current Indian team will be built on the remarkable act of courage from Rishabh Pant, who batted in the first innings of the fourth Test with a broken right foot. Pant added crucial first innings runs for the team despite batting with a fractured foot after missing a reverse sweep off Chris Woakes on day one. He managed to get a half-century, helping India post 358 on day two. Pant was not required to bat in the second innings as Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar guided India to a morale-boosting draw with a century each to keep the series alive. "Rishabh already, it's been declared that he's out of the series. And one thing I want to say is that the character and the foundation of this team will be built on what Rishabh did for the team and for the country as well," said Gambhir in the post-match media interaction. "Any amount of praise is not enough for him, especially batting with a broken foot. Not many people have done that in the past. And he had put his hand up, and that is why I say any amount of praise... "I can sit here and talk about this for hours and hours. I think the generations to come forward will talk about this. And generations coming forward should talk about it, that there is someone who has batted with a broken foot. And it's unfortunate because of the kind of form he was in. "But again, he's an important member of the Test side. And I hope he recovers quickly and comes back quickly and try and deliver a game for us," said the former India batter. All fast bowlers are fit for final Test, no call taken on Bumrah yet Gambhir also gave an important update on the fitness of the fast bowlers who have had to deal with heavy workload and injuries over the course of the five-match series. Having mentioned earlier that Jasprit Bumrah would be playing only three Tests due to workload management, Gambhir said no call is taken yet on his participation at The Oval. For the record, the Manchester Test was Bumrah's third of the tour but with the series still on the line, he might just play in London. "All the fast bowlers are there. There is no injury scare," Gambhir asserted. That means that Akash Deep has fully recovered from his groin injury and Arshdeep Singh from his hand injury.
