Trucking, copper, cocoa: volatility roils commodities
The ongoing geopolitical realignment and escalating trade tensions are sending shockwaves through global commodity markets, reshaping long-established trade routes and supply chains. From copper to cocoa, and even the U.S. trucking industry, these shifts are creating both challenges and opportunities for businesses and investors alike.
The most visible impact of the trade wars has been on major freight flows, particularly in the crucial eastbound trans-Pacific ocean container lane connecting Chinese exporters to U.S. importers. This vital artery of global commerce has seen weaker volumes and falling rates, with the Freightos Baltic Daily Index showing rates at $2,188 per forty-foot equivalent unit, the lowest since December 2023. This decline reflects the uncertainty and disruption caused by protectionist policies and retaliatory measures between the world's two largest economies.
However, the ripple effects of these trade tensions extend far beyond container shipping, touching various commodity markets in profound ways. Perhaps nowhere is this more evident than in the copper market, where the threat of U.S. import tariffs has created unprecedented arbitrage opportunities and is reshaping global supply dynamics.
Copper, often referred to as 'Dr. Copper' for its ability to predict economic trends, has seen its U.S. futures prices surge to record highs on the Comex exchange. This dramatic price action is driven by traders pricing in the possibility of hefty tariffs on the crucial industrial metal. The price gap between U.S. copper futures and the global benchmark on the London Metal Exchange has widened to record levels, creating a powerful incentive for traders to shift copper into the United States.Copper futures prices have reached a new record on tariff fears. (Chart: Bloomberg)
Kostas Bintas, head of metals trading at Mercuria Energy Group Ltd., estimates that 500,000 tons of copper is heading to the U.S. in March, compared to normal monthly imports of around 70,000 tons. This massive inflow is leaving the rest of the global market, particularly top consumer China, facing a potential shortage. Bintas predicts that this unprecedented situation could drive LME copper prices to over $12,000 or $13,000 per metric ton.
The copper market's dislocation highlights how trade policies can create unintended consequences and market inefficiencies. While U.S. manufacturers may face higher input costs, traders with the ability to navigate these complex dynamics stand to reap substantial profits. Meanwhile, the global copper supply chain is being reshaped, with potential long-term implications for producers, consumers and investors worldwide.
While the copper market grapples with potential shortages, the cocoa market faces a different set of challenges stemming from historically high prices. Cocoa futures nearly tripled last year due to supply concerns from West Africa and are currently trading near $10,000 a ton in New York. These sky-high prices are having a significant impact on chocolate manufacturers and consumers alike.Cocoa futures have experienced extreme volatility. (Chart: Bloomberg)
JPMorgan Chase & Co. analysts have trimmed their deficit estimates for the current 2024-25 cocoa season to 40,000 tons, down from their earlier forecast of 108,000 tons. This revision is primarily due to an expected 1.8% fall in demand as historically high cocoa prices deter consumption. Chocolate makers are feeling the squeeze, with recent earnings reports suggesting that previously resilient demand is weakening.
Cocoa price volatility is being driven by a mix of supply-side challenges and market dynamics. Extreme weather, particularly in West Africa, which produces about 70% of the world's cocoa, has hammered yields. Droughts, heat waves and erratic rainfall – linked to climate change and events like El Niño – have stressed cocoa trees, while diseases like the Cocoa Swollen Shoot Virus have wiped out significant farmland, especially in Ghana and Ivory Coast. Aging tree stocks and underinvestment in farms compound the problem, keeping supply tight.
On the demand side, global appetite for chocolate remains strong, but recent data shows grinding (processing) hasn't fully offset deficits, with three consecutive years of shortfall. The 2024/25 season might see a slight surplus, but inventories are still low, leaving little buffer. Market mechanics amplify this: Low liquidity in futures trading, driven by speculative funds and algorithmic trading, has led to wild swings – prices hit $12,000 per ton in April 2024 before crashing 27% in a single day due to margin hikes and position unwinding.
Structural issues, like concentrated supply from just a few countries and regulatory shifts (e.g., the EU Deforestation Regulation), add uncertainty, keeping volatility high. High prices might eventually spur more planting, but that takes years to pay off, so the roller coaster isn't stopping anytime soon.
Turning our attention to the United States, we find that the trucking industry, often considered a commodity itself, is also feeling the effects of these broader economic shifts. The U.S. trucking market has experienced significant volatility in recent years, with the pandemic creating unprecedented challenges in securing transportation capacity.
Current data indicates that the U.S. truckload market is nearing a state of equilibrium between supply and demand, a balance not seen since 2022. This shift is exemplified by the Outbound Tender Reject Index (OTRI), which tracks the percentage of truckloads that carriers reject. Since May 2023, this index has displayed a gradual but consistent upward trend, signifying a move away from the oversupply that previously characterized the market.
Rejections have outpaced spot rates, suggesting that spot rates will likely increase. (Chart: SONAR. To learn more about SONAR, click here.)The national outbound tender rejection rate (OTRI.USA), which measures the percentage of truckloads that are electronically tendered by shippers and rejected by carriers, has climbed to 6.88%, near the level that we consider to be inflationary for spot rates.
Meanwhile, the National Truckload Index (NTI.USA), SONAR's national average truckload spot rate inclusive of fuel, stands at $2.25 per mile, continuing its downward trend since its most recent peak at $2.53 per mile on Jan. 11.
In other words, tender rejections have diverged upward from the spot rate trend, opening up a gap. Typically, after tender rejections move (either up, when capacity is tightening, or down, when capacity is loosening), spot rates follow in the same direction. When capacity is tightening relative to demand, rates go up; when capacity is loosening relative to demand, rates go down.
For that reason, we believe that truckload spot rates are set to go up.
The Outbound Tender Reject Index shows the percentage of truckloads rejected by carriers. (Chart: SONAR. To learn more about SONAR, click here.)
In regions like Dallas and Atlanta, the OTRI figures have surpassed the national average, at 9.9% and 8.53%, respectively. This indicates tighter capacity, with carriers in these areas more frequently rejecting tenders. The underlying reasons for this increase can be traced back to a convergence of reduced capacity and shifting priorities among carriers who now favor loads offering better financial returns. The focus has been on maximizing operational efficiency amid fluctuating demand.
Furthermore, specific areas like the Pacific Northwest have seen a notable rise in the Flatbed Outbound Tender Reject Index (FOTRI), driven in large part by strategic cross-border timber and lumber shipments to Canada in anticipation of impending tariffs. This increase highlights the targeted manner in which capacity is being allocated according to market conditions and anticipated economic pressures.
The truckload market's incremental move toward equilibrium displays a restrained but deliberate tightening as capacity adapts to the current economic landscape. While this realignment presents challenges, particularly in securing optimal loads and building density in desirable lanes, it also underscores the market's ability to adjust and respond to prevailing economic conditions.
Notably, while tender volumes have declined significantly in recent months, rejection rates have remained relatively stable. This suggests that the truckload market has tightened more than many realize, with carriers becoming increasingly selective about which loads they accept. Large fleets have been parking and selling trucks over the past year, with enterprise carriers like Werner and Marten Transport reporting significant reductions in tractor counts.
The ongoing geopolitical realignment and trade tensions are reshaping global commodity markets in profound and often unexpected ways. From the copper market's unprecedented arbitrage opportunities to the cocoa industry's struggle with record-high prices, and the U.S. trucking market's delicate balance, these shifts are creating a new landscape for businesses, investors and policymakers to navigate.
Perhaps the only safe bet to make right now is on more volatility, for longer.
The post Trucking, copper, cocoa: volatility roils commodities appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
33 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
EGBN Investor News: If You Have Suffered Losses in Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: EGBN), You Are Encouraged to Contact The Rosen Law Firm About Your Rights
NEW YORK, June 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: EGBN) resulting from allegations that Eagle Bancorp may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased Eagle Bancorp securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On April 23, 2025, after market hours, Eagle Bancorp filed with the SEC a current report on Form 8-K, which included an announcement of Eagle Bancorp's Q1 2025 results. Commenting on these results, an article posted on the next day stated that Eagle Bancorp's Q1 2025 announcement revealed a ' notable miss on both earnings per share (EPS) and revenue compared to forecasts.' On this news, Eagle Bancorp's stock price fell 11.3% on April 24, 2025. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Peru's Growth Misses Expectations as Fishing, Farming Contracts
Peru's economic growth was weaker than expected in April, dragged down by slow growth in fishing and agriculture. Economic activity expanded 1.4% in April compared with a year ago, according to national statistics institute INEI. The median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg was for 2.1% growth.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
As Harvard's and Yale's private equity holdings go on sale, buyers can use this technique for 1,000% windfalls. ‘It makes your brain melt'
The secondary market for private equity stakes is booming as buyers are eager to snap up assets being shed by investors. There's reason to believe Harvard, Yale, and other elite institutions might be getting a good deal, even as they sell their holdings at a discount to current valuations. Some of the country's most elite institutions are offloading parts of their private equity portfolios. As funds take longer to return money to investors, Harvard and Yale are selling at a discount with endowments looking for more liquidity and flexibility amid economic turbulence. But both sides of such deals can make surprising gains. This portfolio maintenance doesn't appear linked to President Donald Trump's attack on university finances, including a possible tax hike on endowments. Industry skeptics think these sales, however, highlight growing concerns that returns in the opaque world of private equity aren't always all they're cracked up to be. 'With elite universities' private equity investments on the auction block, the big reveal is coming,' Nir Kaissar, founder of asset management firm Unison Advisors, wrote in a Bloomberg opinion column on Thursday. University endowments typically make for ideal investors in alternative assets—with virtually infinite investment horizons, they can ride out wild gyrations in the public markets by locking up billions of dollars over several years. On its face, that move has been a no-brainer. As Kaissar noted, Bloomberg's weighted index of U.S. PE funds returned 9.4% year over year from 2007 to 2024. The index's annualized standard deviation, a common measure of volatility, was just 7.2%. The S&P 500 gained 10.5% in that span with a standard deviation of 16.8%, a much worse return on a risk-adjusted basis. These numbers, however, may not reflect the underlying picture. Unlike stocks trading on public exchanges, the prices of private assets don't change based on the whims of investors day-to-day. Instead, valuations of most private companies, real estate properties, and other assets PE firms hold are typically based on subjective assumptions that don't fluctuate like public equity markets do, Tim McGlinn, an investment veteran and former adjunct finance professor at Seton Hall, told Fortune. 'There's nothing intrinsically wrong with that,' said McGlinn, who blogs about the alternatives industry at But when investors or prospective investors believe the holdings can actually be sold at those prices, 'that's when things become problematic.' Ultimately, private equity firms make money for investors by exiting their investments, when they attempt to turn notional valuations on paper into cash. Therefore, there must be some correlation between the performance of public and private assets, said Jason Reed, a finance professor at the University of Notre Dame. 'If the market's doing really well broadly, well then you're going to have lots of opportunities for businesses to buy your company, other private equity companies to buy your company, to take them public and IPO them,' he told Fortune. 'But if the economy is not doing great, businesses are struggling, then you're not going to have as many opportunities overall to sell.' Billionaire hedge fund owner Bill Ackman, a Harvard alumnus, has claimed his alma mater's $53 billion endowment, almost 40% of which is allocated to private equity, is significantly overstated. 'I believe that a substantial part of the reason why many private assets remain private despite the stock market near all-time highs is that the public market will value private assets at lower values than they are being carried at privately,' Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square Capital, wrote in a social media post last month. The Harvard Management Company, which oversees the university's endowment, declined to comment. It recently agreed to sell roughly $1 billion of its PE stakes, following a similar move in the summer of 2021. That came at a time of 'significant ebullience,' the university noted in its 2022 financial report, allowing the school to avoid discounts the funds would have faced just over a year later. Yale, meanwhile, is negotiating a nearly $3 billion sale of private equity holdings at a discount of less than 10%, a spokesperson for the Yale Investments Office told the school's newspaper. The university pioneered the institutional push into alternative assets, with 95% of its $41 billion endowment allocated to growth-oriented assets like PE, venture capital, real assets, and global equities. 'Following a months-long review, the University is in process to sell select private equity fund interests,' Yale said in a statement to Fortune. 'Private equity remains a core element of our investment strategy, and we continue to commit significant capital to our existing world-class partners, while pursuing new private equity opportunities to support the long-term growth of the Endowment.' This doesn't appear to be a distressed sale, McGlinn said, but the deal is otherwise hard to evaluate. More mature funds trade very differently than newer ones, and various positions are typically packaged together in these types of transactions. 'Yale being Yale, you can assume they're getting the best price they can,' McGlinn said. Still, investors in PE funds, known as 'limited partners,' sold their stakes at an average discount of 11% compared to the net asset value, or NAV, of these holdings on their balance sheets, according to Jeffries. It may seem odd that universities are looking to sell when valuations are likely down across the board this year as borrowing costs remain elevated. But demand in the secondary market is booming. Secondary sales increased 45% to $162 billion last year, per Jeffries. As a result, Yale, Harvard, and other universities could take much less of a haircut than they might have feared while also booking gains on their initial stakes. That's because there is reason to believe many buyers are willing to overpay, McGlinn said. Regardless of what secondary funds dish out to acquire these stakes, he explained, they are allowed to then mark these investments up to the old net asset value. McGlinn calls this process 'NAV squeezing.' As The Wall Street Journal reported last year, it can result in one-day windfalls of 1,000% or more, gains that McGlinn said secondary funds report as real returns. 'It makes your brain melt,' he said. Comparing NAV squeezing to a Ponzi scheme might go too far, said Jeffrey Hooke, a senior lecturer in finance at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School and a longtime critic of PE. But he agrees it looks quite shaky, even if the technique is permissible according to generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. 'It's almost like a full wash and rinse cycle,' said Hooke, formerly the principal investment officer of the World Bank's International Finance Corporation. Universities, of course, get to be on the other side of these deals. Even though they are selling their PE stakes at a discount to NAV, they could be getting more than the capital they had committed to those investments up until this point. In other words, endowments might still be escaping with a profit. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
