logo
Phillipson promises to ‘back the next generation' with training opportunities

Phillipson promises to ‘back the next generation' with training opportunities

Tens of thousands of apprenticeships and training opportunities have been promised as part of the Government's effort to increase workers' skills and cut net migration.
Ministers have promised a total of 120,000 new training opportunities for construction workers, engineers, healthcare staff and other trades in England before the next general election.
Up to 45,000 training places will be funded by hiking the charge paid by employers for bringing in foreign workers by a third.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'A skilled workforce is the key to steering the economy forward, and today we're backing the next generation by giving young people more opportunities to learn a trade, earn a wage and achieve and thrive.
'When we invest in skills for young people, we invest in a shared, stronger economic future – creating opportunities as part of our plan for change.
'But everyone has a role to play in a thriving economy, and we're taking our responsibility seriously providing more routes into employment, it's now the responsibility of young people to take them.'
The plans for 120,000 training places include an extra 30,000 apprenticeship starts across the current Parliament.
The apprenticeship budget for 2025-26 is more than £3 billion.
From January 2026, funding will be shifted away from masters-level apprenticeships to focus on training at lower levels, although support will be maintained for those aged 16-21 and existing apprentices.
The immigration White Paper published earlier this month set out plans to hike the immigration skills charge by 32% to 'upskill the domestic workforce and reduce reliance on migration'.
As many as one-in-eight 16-24 year-olds are not in education, employment or training.
Sarah Yong, director of policy and public affairs at the Youth Futures Foundation said: 'International evidence shows apprenticeships are a highly impactful way to support young people to prepare for and access jobs, yet participation among under-25s, especially the most marginalised, has declined in recent years.
'With stubbornly high youth unemployment and inactivity, rebalancing the apprenticeship system can encourage investment in youth apprenticeships and is a first step in enabling more young people to access good work.'
The Law Society urged the Government to continue to fund masters-level apprenticeships for those aged over 21.
The society's president Richard Atkinson said: 'Level 7 solicitor apprenticeships continue to be the only route outside of university to qualify as a solicitor due to specific qualifications set by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
'Apprenticeships play a vital role in promoting social mobility.'
Shadow education minister Neil O'Brien warned: 'The decision to scrap higher apprenticeships will do damage to the public services, particularly the NHS.
'It will make it impossible for many young people who don't go university to enter the professions.
'Numerous employers and professional bodies have warned about the damage scrapping higher apprenticeships will do, which is why this is being snuck out during recess.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The sacrifices parents make to afford children's school uniform
The sacrifices parents make to afford children's school uniform

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The sacrifices parents make to afford children's school uniform

A survey indicates that over a quarter of parents will go without food or heating to afford school uniform, with many relying on credit cards or 'buy now, pay later' schemes. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has called on schools to reduce branded uniform items, ahead of a new law capping compulsory branded items to three from September 2026. The Children 's Wellbeing and Schools Bill aims to alleviate financial strain on families, with 85 per cent of parents believing schools could cut costs by reducing branded items. While parents largely support the cap, some schoolwear retailers caution that it could lead to higher overall costs if unbranded items prove less durable. School leaders recognise the financial pressures on families, with some already relaxing uniform rules, though one headteacher suggested the cap might hinder behaviour management.

Quarter of parents sacrifice food or heating to afford school uniform
Quarter of parents sacrifice food or heating to afford school uniform

Powys County Times

timean hour ago

  • Powys County Times

Quarter of parents sacrifice food or heating to afford school uniform

More than one in four parents will go without food or heating to afford school uniform, a survey has suggested. A poll of 2,000 parents of school-age children in England found nearly half (45%) use credit cards to pay for uniform, while more than a third (34%) use 'buy now, pay later' schemes, such as Klarna, to cover costs. Nearly half (47%) of parents are worried about the cost of buying uniform for the start of the school year, according to the poll for charity Parentkind. The Education Secretary has called on schools to reduce the number of branded items of uniform they require ahead of an incoming change in the law. Speaking ahead of the new term, Bridget Phillipson said no family should have to choose between 'putting food on the table' and buying school uniform. Her comments come as a survey, carried out by Censuswide between July 31 and August 7, found 29% of parents said they will go 'without heating or eating' to pay for school uniform. Nearly a third (31%) of parents said they were likely to go into debt to buy school uniform. The poll – of parents of children aged four to 15 who attend state schools in England – found that 46% said they make personal sacrifices and 'go without' to pay for school uniform. The Government's Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill includes a proposal to cap the number of branded uniform items schools in England can require. The Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords, plans to require all schools in England to reduce the number of compulsory branded uniform items to three, plus a branded tie for secondary and middle schools. It is due to come into force from September 2026, the Department for Education (DfE) said. But schoolwear retailers have warned that the cap could increase costs for families as they say it could mean parents spend more on replacing lower-quality items which might not last as long as branded items. Meanwhile, Katharine Birbalsingh, headteacher of Michaela Community School in Brent in north-west London, has suggested that a cap on branded school uniform items could hamper teachers' efforts to improve behaviour. The poll found that 85% of parents believe schools could cut costs by reducing the number of branded school uniform items they require. Nearly three in four (73%) parents said they would be better off financially if schools reduced the number of branded items, while 61% said it would make their lives easier. Overall, 86% of parents who were surveyed said they believed the number of branded school uniform items makes 'no difference' to how well-behaved children are at school. Ms Phillipson said: 'School uniform matters, but it shouldn't break the bank. 'No family should have to choose between putting food on the table and buying a new blazer. 'Parents have told us they want fewer costly branded items and that's exactly what we're delivering. 'Schools can help ease the pressure on families right now by reducing the number of branded items they require. 'Our plan for change is keeping more money in the pockets of hardworking families, so the back-to-school shop doesn't push parents into debt and children can focus on their education, not their outfit.' Jason Elsom, chief executive of Parentkind, said: 'Parents have faced the crushing cost of sending their children to school for far too long. For many families the bills soar into the thousands every year, covering uniforms, books, stationery, trips, laptops and travel. 'These reforms are the first real step towards ending that injustice. 'Limiting branded school uniform items will make a difference straight away.' Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'It's important to remember that many schools already do a lot to ensure that their uniform is as affordable as possible for families – and recent feedback from NAHT members shows that further changes are already being made.' He said schools are increasingly relaxing or changing their rules – including limiting branded items or making them optional – to keep costs down. Mr Whiteman added: 'We have also heard from schools allowing trainers instead of shoes, as they can be cheaper and used for PE as well as every day, and uniform lists being made gender neutral so clothes can be passed down for siblings.' Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'Schools are acutely conscious of the financial pressures on families and the need to keep the cost of uniforms to a minimum. 'Most school leaders already take measures to ensure that is the case. 'We support the intention behind the Government's plans to limit the number of branded items, but have suggested that a cap on the cost of uniforms might be a better way of achieving this policy aim.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store