Russian anti-war protester found dead in London after asylum claim was rejected
Alexander Frolov was found dead in Acton, west London, on July 28, after waiting for more than a year for an appeal hearing.
His friends said they believe he took his own life due to the mental strain and feeling hopeless at the thought of being sent back to Russia.
Alexander originally came to the UK under a temporary visa as an agricultural worker in 2021.
But when Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, he could not return home because he 'refused to take part in killing people', his friend Galina Shakirova said.
Alexander submitted his asylum application in December 2022, but it was rejected in April 2024, according to the I.
He lodged an appeal and was waiting for his hearing to be rescheduled when he died.
The Russian Democratic Society described him as a 'dedicated opponent of Putin's regime, a volunteer who gave his time to help others, and a constant presence at anti-war protests'.
They said: 'Alexander believed in the possibility of a free and democratic Russia and hoped to one day return to it.'
Galina said she met Alexander as they worked as stewards at anti-war rally.
She said he was 'kind, generous, quietly dependable', but proving oppression to the UK Home Office was hard.
'Imagine being an opposition activist who knows that returning home almost certainly means prison. You've spoken out publicly. You've worked with organisations labelled in Russia as 'undesirable' or 'extremist',' she said.
'Then you ask for protection – hoping for safety, for a chance to survive. And instead, you're refused.'
The Home Office said: 'It is our long-standing policy not to comment on individual cases.'
Since 2022, 759 Russians have been granted refugee status in the UK.
Another 465 have been refused, and 154 are awaiting decisions.
Of these, 98 have been waiting longer than six months.
Meanwhile there are thought to be 1,500 political prisoners in Russia.
Many have been prosecuted for anti-war activities, with the Kremlin only recently allowing Russians to describe the invasion of Ukraine as a war – instead forcing them to say a 'tactical military operation'.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Moment 'murdered' ice cream man 'argues with customer' before stabbing
MORE: Mother of ice cream man fatally stabbed in London left devastated by son's death
MORE: It's official, Topshop is coming back to London
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Trump suggests it would be 'impossible' for Ukraine to win the war without attacking Russia and blames Biden for failing to let Kyiv 'fight back'
Donald Trump has suggested it would be 'very hard, if not impossible' for Ukraine to prevail without attacking Russia. The US President posted his thoughts on the continuing conflict on his Truth Social account on Thursday, adding he did not agree with his predecessor, Joe Biden, to refuse Kyiv the right to 'fight back' against Putin 's forces. Using a sports analogy, the forthright leader posted: 'It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invaders country. 'It's like a great team in sports that has a fantastic defense, but is not allowed to play offense. There is no chance of winning! 'It is like that with Ukraine and Russia. 'Crooked and grossly incompetent Joe Biden would not let Ukraine FIGHT BACK, only DEFEND. How did that work out?' He proceeded to share a picture of himself poking Vladimir Putin in the chest, in a playful echo of former president Richard Nixon doing the same to Nikita Khrushchev, former prime minister of the Soviet Union, during a tense debate in 1959. Trump shared his thoughts on the conflict as Ukraine launched drone attacks on oil refineries in Russia, including its latest assault in Rostov Oblast overnight. Ukraine has previously succeeded in entering Russian territory, including an incursion into the Kursk region in 2024. More recently, President Volodymyr Zelensky's forces launched Operation Spiderweb in June. The audacious assault saw more than 100 first-person view (FPV) kamikaze drones smuggled into Russia in wooden containers disguised as modular homes. They were loaded onto civilian trucks and driven behind enemy lines by Russian lorry drivers seemingly unaware of what they were carrying. The vehicles were parked within range of five airfields stretching from northern Russia down to Siberia, at which point the hidden roofs of the wooden cabins were opened remotely and the FPV drones took to the skies. Over the next few minutes, 41 nuclear bombers were systematically targeted and decimated in a crushing military blow to Russian President Vladimir Putin. However despite these military successes, Trump has questioned whether Ukraine has the ability to strike deeper into Russia. He reportedly asked Zelensky whether his forces could strike Moscow during a candid telephone call with the Ukrainian leader in July, according to The Telegraph. Trump's comments on the continuing conflict came as Russia staged its biggest hypersonic missile barrage on Ukraine since Putin met Trump last Friday Trump's comments on the continuing conflict came as Russia staged its biggest hypersonic missile barrage on Ukraine since Putin met Trump last Friday. Poland was forced to scramble warplanes today to protect its airspace as the heavy assault began. The Operational Command of the Polish Armed Forces said on X: 'In connection with the activity of long-range aviation of the Russian Federation, conducting strikes on Ukrainian territory... aircraft of the Polish Air Force and allied aviation are operating in Polish airspace.' Russian attacks on western Ukraine killed one person and wounded multiple others, officials in the country reported as diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war grind on. Moscow and Kyiv have kept up their aerial attacks on each other as world leaders including US President Donald Trump continue to push for a ceasefire.
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
‘Gay' Nigerian criminal can stay in UK despite using wife to claim asylum
A Nigerian jailed for violence has won a legal battle against deportation after claiming to be gay despite having been married to a woman and fathering a child by another. The man who arrived in Britain in 1983 made a series of initial asylum claims unrelated to his sexuality. Originally he claimed he would face persecution because of his political opinions. But when this was rejected, he sought leave to remain on the basis that he had married a woman living in the UK. After this argument was dismissed by the Home Office, he sought the right to remain after fathering a son. He claimed his removal from the UK would be a breach of his rights to a family life under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Jailed for violence Soon after he was jailed for four years for violent disorder, leading to the Government issuing an order for him to be deported. Once out of jail, he said he entered into a three-year relationship with a man, after which he submitted a claim to remain in Britain on the basis that he would be persecuted for being gay if returned to his home country. After a final appeal hearing, immigration judges ruled that they were 'satisfied to the lower standard' that he was gay, which would expose him to the 'real risk of persecution' if he was returned to his African homeland. 'Accordingly the appellant has a well-founded fear of persecution and he therefore qualifies for protection under the Refugee Convention,' they ruled. 'We are also satisfied that the appellant's removal would breach his rights under articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR.' Article 3 of the ECHR protects against persecution, torture and ill treatment. The case has been revealed in court documents, obtained by The Telegraph, and is the latest where migrants or foreign criminals have used human rights legislation to avoid deportation. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is proposing to restrict judges' powers to grant asylum under the ECHR articles 3 and 8 amid concerns a third of cases are now being approved for 'exceptional' reasons. The man, granted anonymity by immigration judges, claimed he had a gay relationship with a friend while at school in Africa. He came to Britain in 1983 but overstayed and left in 1992 before re-entering the UK in 1996, when he unsuccessfully claimed asylum on the basis of his political opinion. Marriage ends in divorce After unsuccessfully applying to stay on the basis of his marriage to a Portuguese woman in 2000, the couple divorced. According to the man he was 'in denial about his sexual orientation' when he started another relationship with a woman. They had a son in 2001. Two years later, he was convicted of violent disorder, after which he mounted a legal effort to avoid deportation, culminating in an appeal in 2015 based on the fact that he was gay. In evidence, he cited communications from his family in Nigeria over his relationship with a man from 2010 to 2013. He told the court they had told him to end it, saying he was 'bringing the family into ridicule and shame'. They said they would inform the security services of his sexuality. After his case was initially rejected, it was put before an upper tribunal where the judges accepted he had made 'numerous unsuccessful attempts to regularise his stay in the UK' and had 'a clear motivation for maintaining his claim to be gay and to fabricate having had a further relationship with a man'. 'However, we consider that the appellant's account should not be rejected solely because of his immigration history or because he did not rely on his sexual orientation to remain in the UK prior to 2015,' they said. They also found his evidence to be 'plausible and internally consistent,' ultimately ruling that his appeal should be upheld.
Daily Mirror
a minute ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump just admitted the real motivation for his latest dictator-esque obsession
The US President has previously - at least publicly - claimed he wants to scrap mail-in ballots because, he claims, they are prone to fraud. But he just said the quiet bit out loud Donald Trump just admitted why he really wants to get rid of postal voting in the US. The US President has previously - at least publicly - claimed he wants to scrap mail-in ballots because, he claims, they are prone to fraud. But in an interview with right-wing talk radio host Todd Starnes, he said the quiet bit out loud - and admitted doing so would help him rig the election. "It's the biggest thing we can do," he said. "Bigger than the reapportionment. It's the biggest thing we can do as a party." The "reapportionment" he referred to is Texas' unprecedented redrawing of its electoral map mid-term to create five more winnable seats for Republicans. That could be enough to let Trump keep control of congress, despite being the second most unpopular President in history (narrowly beaten by himself in his first term). Trump admitted on Friday that his recent interest in postal voting had been prompted by Vladimir Putin, who advised him to ban it. Russian elections are among the most corrupt in the world - with last year's re-election of Putin with a 90% landslide judged to be one of the most fraudulent in the nation's history by independent monitors. But Trump went on: "Our elections are extremely corrupt. The mail-in ballot system is seriously corrupt." This is untrue. While researchers accept postal voting is slightly more open to fraud than in-person voting, the evidence suggests it is exceptionally rare. He also claimed, as he has before, that America is the only country that allows postal voting. In fact, around 34 countries allowed some form of postal voting in 2024 - about half of the world's democracies. He then claimed he wouldn't bother campaigning in a state that had postal voting, which he did, repeatedly during the 2024 campaign. Then he confirmed again that his motivation for wanting to ban it was political. "The only way they're going to win is with mail-in ballots, that's the only way," he said. "I say we pick up 100 seats if we have real elections, meaning you go to the voters." Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. He added: "The biggest thing Republicans can do is get rid of mail-in ballots." He also claimed he "would have won California" if mail-in voting had not been available. This is, at best, implausible. Trump lost California by 3.2 million votes. To flip California he would have to either deter 3.2 million people from voting, or get them to flip - or most likely a good deal more than that, given about a quarter of Trump voters voted by mail.
