Trump hosts five West African leaders to discuss trade and development
On Wednesday, Trump hosted leaders from Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania, and Senegal at the White House for talks and a working lunch, with discussions expected to centre on business opportunities, according to a White House official.
During the lunch, Trump said they hail from 'very vibrant places with very valuable land, great minerals, great oil deposits and wonderful people'.
'There's a lot of anger on your continent. We've been able to solve a lot of it,' Trump said, pointing to a recent peace agreement leaders of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda recently signed at the White House.
The leaders are expected to discuss key areas of cooperation, including economic development, security, infrastructure and democracy, according to statements from the White House and Liberia. Trump said the five countries were unlikely to face US tariffs.
President Trump Participates in a Multilateral Lunch with African Leaders https://t.co/nkcx56xF74
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 9, 2025
Trump is expected to soon announce dates for a broader summit with African leaders, possibly in September around the time of the United Nations General Assembly.
This week's mini-summit marks the latest effort by successive administrations to counter perceptions that the US has neglected a continent where China has increasingly made economic inroads.
Trade, investment in focus
Wednesday's meeting is expected to focus on economics.
During the meeting, Gabon's President Brice Oligui Nguema told Trump his country was open to investment and wants to see its raw mineral resources processed locally, but needs large investments in energy to do so.
'We are not poor countries. We are rich countries when it comes to raw materials. But we need partners to support us and help us develop those resources with win-win partnerships,' Nguema said at the meeting.
Senegal's President Bassirou Diomaye Faye suggested his country also offered investment opportunities for tourism, including a golf course.
Faye said the course would only be a six-hour flight from New York and suggested Trump could visit to show off his skills.
The US International Development Finance Corporation said earlier in the day it would provide project development funding for the Banio Potash Mine in Mayumba, Gabon, helping Gabon reduce its dependence on imports.
'DFC's efforts not only benefit the countries and communities where they invest but also advance US economic interests by opening new markets, strengthening trade relationships, and promoting a more secure and prosperous global economy,' said DFC head of investments Conor Coleman.
The five nations whose leaders are meeting Trump represent a small fraction of US-Africa trade, but they possess untapped natural resources.
Senegal and Mauritania are important transit and origin countries when it comes to migration, and along with Guinea-Bissau, are struggling to contain drug trafficking, both issues of concern for the Trump administration.
However, African Union officials question how Africa could deepen trade ties with the US under what they called 'abusive' tariff proposals and visa restrictions largely targeting travellers from Africa.
The top US diplomat for Africa, Ambassador Troy Fitrell, has dismissed allegations of unfair US trade practices.
Earlier this month, US authorities dissolved the US Agency for International Development and said it was no longer following what they called 'a charity-based foreign aid model' and instead will focus on partnerships with nations that show 'both the ability and willingness to help themselves'.
Those cuts could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030, research published by The Lancet medical journal showed last week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
32 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
US court briefly pauses Trump's move to end protective status for Afghans
An appeals court has briefly extended temporary protected status (TPS) for nearly 12,000 Afghans in the United States, hours before it was to expire. Monday's order came 60 days after the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under President Donald Trump announced that it was ending the legal protections for thousands of Afghans legally living in the United States. The order by the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, granted an administrative stay on the termination until Monday after a request from the immigration advocacy organisation CASA. The appeals court gave no reason for its decision but indicated it would be deciding what to do swiftly. CASA had sought an emergency stay on Monday when the protection of Afghans was due to be terminated, court documents showed. Its case also includes Cameroonians whose TPS is to end on August 4. The immigrant advocacy group said the step to remove the status was arbitrary and discriminatory and would cause 'irreparable harm' to those affected. The court has asked both sides to submit briefs this week. The Trump administration has until 11:59pm US Eastern time on Wednesday (03:59 GMT on Thursday) to respond. A federal judge on Friday allowed the lawsuit to go forward but didn't grant CASA's request to keep the protections in place while the lawsuit plays out. The stay is not a final decision but gives time for the legal challenge, said Shawn VanDiver, founder of AfghanEvac, the main coalition of US military veterans and advocacy groups that coordinates resettlements of Afghan refugees with the government. 'AfghanEvac stands firmly behind the legal challenge and calls on DHS and the Trump administration to immediately reverse course and extend TPS protections,' VanDiver said in an email to the Reuters news agency. That status had allowed Afghans to live and work in the US and meant the government could not deport them. Millions of Afghans who fled their country over previous decades are now being forced back to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan from countries including Iran, Pakistan and the US. Deportations of Afghans are also anticipated in Germany as its government seeks talks with the Taliban. About 180,000 Afghans have come to the US since the Taliban retook control of the country in 2021. About 11,700 of them are currently covered by TPS. When Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem ended temporary protected status for Afghans, the department wrote in the decision that the situation in their home country was getting better. 'The Secretary determined that, overall, there are notable improvements in the security and economic situation such that requiring the return of Afghan nationals to Afghanistan does not pose a threat to their personal safety due to armed conflict or extraordinary and temporary conditions,' according to the May announcement. But rights advocates said many Afghans who helped the US during its war in Afghanistan would be targets of the Taliban if they return home. Particularly at risk would be women, whose rights the Taliban have rolled back since its return to power after the US withdrawal, rights groups said. The International Criminal Court last week issued arrest warrants for two top Taliban leaders in Afghanistan on charges related to abuses against women and girls. 'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said in a statement. The US homeland security secretary may grant TPS to people from specific countries. Countries that are currently designated for TPS include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Cameroon, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Haiti, Honduras, Lebanon, Nepal, Nicaragua, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela and Yemen. In addition to Afghanistan and Cameroon, the Trump administration has moved to end the designation for an estimated 260,000 Haitians and 350,000 Venezuelans. The Trump administration has also announced it will revoke the two-year 'humanitarian parole' of about 530,000 people in the US, including Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump slaps 17 percent tariff on tomatoes from Mexico
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has announced that it will impose a 17 percent tariff on fresh tomatoes from Mexico, scrapping a three-decade-old agreement to spare the produce from anti-dumping duties. Trump's withdrawal from the agreement to suspend anti-dumping measures on Monday came as the clock ticked down for Mexico to reach a comprehensive trade deal with the US by August 1 or face a general tariff of 30 percent on its goods. 'Mexico remains one of our greatest allies, but for far too long, our farmers have been crushed by unfair trade practices that undercut pricing on produce like tomatoes,' US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said in a statement. 'That ends today. This rule change is in line with President Trump's trade policies and approach with Mexico.' The Commerce Department had in April announced its intention to exit the agreement in 90 days, saying it had 'failed to protect U.S. tomato growers from unfairly priced Mexican imports'. Mexico supplies nearly 70 percent of tomatoes in the US, up from about 20 percent in 1994, according to the Florida Tomato Exchange. The Tomato Suspension Agreement, which was first signed in 1996, put a hold on duties stemming from a US trade court decision that found Mexican exporters were selling their produce at artificially low prices. Under the agreement, the US agreed to suspend the tariffs provided that Mexican producers did not sell their produce below agreed-upon 'reference prices.' The two sides renewed the deal on four occasions, most recently in 2019. In a joint statement, Mexico's economy and agriculture ministries condemned the move as 'unjust' and 'against the interests not only of Mexican producers but also of the US industry'. 'The gains made by Mexican fresh tomatoes in the U.S. market are due to the quality of the product and not to any unfair practices,' the ministries said, adding that the tariffs would 'only hurt American consumers' wallets, as it will be impossible to replace Mexican tomatoes.'
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US Supreme Court backs Trump push for mass firings at Education Department
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the administration of President Donald Trump can proceed with plans to slash funding and resources for the federal Department of Education. The conservative-majority court ruled on Monday that the government could move forward with plans to lay off nearly 1,400 employees as part of Trump's push to effectively dismantle the department. 'While today's ruling is a significant win for students and families, it is a shame that the highest court in the land had to step in to allow President Trump to advance the reforms Americans elected him to deliver using the authorities granted to him by the US Constitution,' Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement celebrating the decision. Monday's ruling cancels a previous order on the administration's efforts to fire about 1,400 workers at the Education Department, which US District Judge Myong Joun had ruled against in May, stating that it would 'likely cripple the department'. A US Court of Appeals agreed in a ruling on June 4 that the cuts would make it 'effectively impossible for the Department to carry out its statutory functions', which include overseeing student loans and enforcing civil rights law in US education, the site of previous political battles over issues such as federal efforts to combat racial segregation. Critics have accused the Trump administration of working to effectively abolish federal agencies, established and funded by Congress, through a maximalist interpretation of executive power. Trump and his Republican allies have depicted federal agencies as being at odds with their political agenda, and as hotbeds of leftist ideology and bureaucratic excess. The Trump administration has also sought to impose greater control over US universities, seeking a larger role in shaping curricula and threatening to withdraw federal funds if universities do not comply with government demands concerning issues such as cracking down on pro-Palestine student activism. In response to the court's decision on Monday, a liberal legal group that helped bring the challenge to Trump's efforts lamented that the ruling 'dealt a devastating blow to this nation's promise of public education for all children'.
