Urgent warning over TikTok Shop food listings: Fears shoppers 'at risk' after items sold without vital information
Vendors on the social media site are flogging sweets and snacks without warning that they may contain any of the 14 primary allergens UK businesses are required to declare by law.
And experts say people with allergies could be putting themselves in 'grave danger' by buying the products.
MailOnline found dozens of items where the products' allergens were incorrectly labelled or even denied by vendors on TikTok shop.
Some products even described their allergen information as 'not applicable' - despite also being said to include ingredients such as flour, milk, eggs and nuts.
Chief executive of Anaphylaxis UK Simon Williams warned: 'If the ingredient and allergen information isn't there, don't buy it. You're putting your life in grave danger.'
He told the BBC: 'At the moment it's being used as a platform to sell things that may not be safe. They [TikTok] do need to do more.
One company, Alma Trade Ltd, used the platform to advertise Tigreat French chocolate crepes. They claimed that allergen information was 'not applicable' in their listing - despite the continental pancakes including wheat flour, whole milk and eggs
RM Wholesale is using TikTok shop to flog Fray Bentos pies, again saying that allergen information for the product is 'not applicable'. The pie makers, on their own website, warn that their products contain both wheat and barley
'There's a lot of people making a lot of money, great side hustle, but they're putting people at risk.'
One company, Alma Trade Ltd, used the platform to advertise Tigreat French chocolate crepes. They claimed that allergen information was 'not applicable' in their listing - despite the continental pancakes including wheat flour, whole milk and eggs.
In the UK, 14 allergens have to be listed on any product containing them.
They are: celery, cereals containing gluten (such as wheat, rye, barley, and oats), crustaceans (such as prawns, crabs and lobsters), eggs, fish, lupin, milk, molluscs (such as mussels and oysters), mustard, peanuts, sesame, soybeans, sulphur dioxide and sulphites (if the sulphur dioxide and sulphites are at a concentration of more than ten parts per million) and tree nuts (such as almonds, hazelnuts, walnuts, brazil nuts, cashews, pecans, pistachios and macadamia nuts).
The Food Standards Agency advises that food sold online or over the phone must provide allergen information at two stages in the order process. This generally means giving them in the online description and on the packaging.
RM Wholesale is using TikTok shop to flog Fray Bentos pies, again saying that allergen information for the product is 'not applicable'. The pie makers, on their own website, warn that their products contain both wheat and barley.
A listing by DaCakeGasm, meanwhile, lists their Nutella stuffed red velvet Oreo cookie and hazelnut stuffed M&Ms Cadbury cookie as just having eggs as an allergen. Eggs, flour and milk are listed in the ingredients - while both Nutella and hazelnuts contain nuts.
A huge three kilogram of Nutella, sold by Bibis Direct, says there are 'no allergens' and that it is a 'safe choice with no applicable allergens listed'. The product contains hazelnuts, milk and soya.
A listing by DaCakeGasm, meanwhile, lists their Nutella stuffed red velvet Oreo cookie and hazelnut stuffed M&Ms Cadbury cookie as just having eggs as an allergen. Eggs, flour and milk are listed in the ingredients - while both Nutella and hazelnuts contain nuts
A huge three kilogram of Nutella, sold by Bibis Direct, says there are 'no allergens' and that it is a 'safe choice with no applicable allergens listed'. The product contains hazelnuts, milk and soya
A fourth, JasatsLtd, advertised Lancashire butter pies, saying they contained milk and nuts. The ingredians also include wheat flour and soya flour
Bakedays Ahead said their 'creamy delicious cheese cake' only contained 'cream cheese' as an allergen. Cream cheese generally contains milk, while flour is also listed in the ingredients
A fourth, JasatsLtd, advertised Lancashire butter pies, saying they contained milk and nuts. The ingredients also include wheat flour and soya flour.
And Bakedays Ahead said their 'creamy delicious cheese cake' only contained 'cream cheese' as an allergen. Cream cheese generally contains milk, while flour is also listed in the ingredients.
After the BBC investigated adverts on the site, TikTok deleted adverts that were highlighted by the corporation. But all the companies complained about continue to sell products on the site without providing full allergen information.
A spokesperson told the broadcaster: 'We have policies and processes in place with our sellers to ensure the safety of food and beverages sold on our platform and we will remove products that breach these policies.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Lake District septic tank plan may boost local housing schemes
Residents in a national park could have their septic tanks replaced to help jumpstart local housing District National Park Authority (LDNPA) said the local planning authorities in Cumbria wanted to fund the replacement of the ageing tanks so that it would lead to less phosphorus pollution into local water levels of the nutrients can lead to a dramatic growth in algae and deplete oxygen said the move could help stimulate local housing projects which have stalled due to nutrient mitigation rules. In a document detailing the plans, LDNPA said modern package treatment plants discharge less phosphorus into water bodies than many of the existing septic tanks in the funding the replacement of these tanks with package treatment plants, LDNPA said the phosphorus savings could be used to generate "nutrient credits" that could be sold to housing developers in the said local housing schemes in Cumbria had stalled because developers could not mitigate the nutrient pollution the new homes would cause to four water catchments in the area as part of nutrient mitigation rules brought in credits generated by the replacement package treatment plants could be used for this mitigation, it said it had been given government funding to develop the mitigation schemes. As part of these plans, next week the authority will discuss proposals to remove the need for residents to seek planning permission before they replace a septic tank with a package treatment plant."We want to make the process of replacing tanks to be as seamless as possible given the environmental benefits of upgrading," it said. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
BreakingNews.ie
29 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Demonstrators detained by police in London during rival protests outside asylum hotel
Several demonstrators have been detained by police after rival groups gathered at a protest against the use of a hotel to accommodate asylum seekers. The Metropolitan Police has imposed conditions on a protest and counter-protest outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in Islington, north London. Advertisement People believed to be migrants earlier watched the protests from the hotel's windows, with some waving and blowing kisses as demonstrators chanted and banged drums in the street below. A group of counter protesters formed up outside the conditioned area and marched to Central Street. Officers prevented opposing groups coming together but those in the junction remain in breach of the conditions. Warnings are being given. Those who don't move will be arrested. — Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) August 2, 2025 A man wearing an England football shirt was detained by police after a confrontation with officers. A group of anti-fascist protesters blocked a junction outside the hotel. Officers then pushed into the crowd to detain several people, dragging them out by their arms and legs. Advertisement The group was then moved from the road and officers told them they were in breach of the conditions put on the demonstration, before forming a circle around the protesters. At about 3.30pm, police said there had been nine arrests, including seven on suspicion of breaching Public Order Act conditions. A protest and counter-protest is also taking place in Newcastle outside The New Bridge Hotel. Anti-immigration protesters outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel(PA) The Metropolitan Police said the protest against the use of the Islington hotel was organised by local residents under the banner 'Thistle Barbican needs to go – locals say no'. Advertisement A counter-protest, organised by Stand Up To Racism and supported by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, as well as other groups including Finsbury Park Mosque and Islington Labour Party, is also taking place. Police said the anti-asylum hotel protest had been 'endorsed by groups from outside the local community which is likely to increase the number of people attending'. Hotel residents watch from the windows (PA) Online groups that have voiced support for the protest include 'Patriots of Britain' and 'Together for the Children'. A counter-protester outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel said he wants migrants to 'feel safe' in the UK. Advertisement Student Pat Prendergast, 21, said: 'I want people to feel safe. I think the (rival protesters) over there are making people feel unsafe. 'I want to stand up in solidarity and say that, you know, we want people here. 'We want migrants. We want asylum seekers.' Police held masked protesters back in a line (PA) A noticeably smaller group of protesters waved union flags and held banners outside the hotel. Advertisement 'Get these scum off our streets', one man chanted in the direction of the hotel. A large group of masked protesters dressed in black chanting 'we are anti-fascist' appeared from a side street and marched towards the rival group outside the hotel. There were brief clashes before police rushed in to separate the two groups. The Metropolitan Police said plans were in place to 'respond to any protest activity in the vicinity of other hotels in London being used to accommodate asylum seekers'. Supporters of local protest group 'Thistle Barbican needs to go – locals say no' took part in the demo (PA) Conditions on the anti-asylum hotel protest include that anyone participating must remain within King Charles Square and that the assembly must not begin before 1pm and must conclude by 4pm. Police said conditions on the counter-protest include that participants must remain in Lever Street, near the junction with Central Street, and that the assembly must not begin before 12pm and must conclude by 4pm. Chief Superintendent Clair Haynes, in charge of the policing operation, said: 'We have been in discussions with the organisers of both protests in recent days, building on the ongoing engagement between local officers, community groups and partners. 'We understand that there are strongly held views on all sides. 'Our officers will police without fear or favour, ensuring those exercising their right to protest can do so safely, but intervening at the first sign of actions that cross the line into criminality. 'We have used our powers under the Public Order Act to put conditions in place to prevent serious disorder and to minimise serious disruption to the lives of people and businesses in the local community. Protesters waved flags (PA) 'Those conditions identify two distinct protest areas where the protests must take place, meaning the groups will be separated but still within sight and sound of each other.' There are also posts online advertising a 'for our children, for our future' protest in Newcastle on Saturday outside The New Bridge Hotel. A 'stop the far right and fascists in Newcastle' counter-protest has been organised by Stand Up To Racism at the nearby Laing Art Gallery. Pro-immigration protesters gather outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in central London (PA) In a statement, the organisers of the counter protest said: 'Yet again far-right and fascist thugs are intent on bringing their message of hate to Newcastle. They aim to build on years of Islamophobia, anti-migrant sentiment and scapegoating. 'In Epping and elsewhere recently we have already seen intimidation and violence aimed at refugees, migrants and asylum seekers. 'Newcastle, like the rest of the North East, has a well-earned reputation for unity in the face of those who seek to divide us. Whatever problems we face, racism and division are not the answer.' Northumbria Police have been approached for comment. About 100 people attended a protest outside the Stanwell Hotel in Spelthorne, Surrey, on Friday evening, during which a packet of lit firelighters was thrown at police, Surrey Police said. A man was arrested on suspicion of attempted arson and inquiries are ongoing to trace another suspect, the force said. Officers also arrested a man on suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder and aggravated trespass following a protest at the same location on Thursday evening.
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Who's most to blame for Newcastle's issues? The recruiter who didn't recruit
There is one morsel of good news for Newcastle United's incoming sporting director. Whoever it may be, he can't be as bad as the last bloke. Ross Wilson is the favourite for the role, ahead of Jason Ayto, formerly of Arsenal. Wilson has been the chief football officer at Nottingham Forest, so at least we know he's not scared of hard work. And he will need that restlessness. Newcastle's summer has been marked largely by frustration and tumbleweed. Not since cartoon skunk Pepé Le Pew has anyone in black and white had such trouble finding a match. If Newcastle identify a target, he goes elsewhere. Meanwhile, star turn Alexander Isak has fled to northern Spain to avoid the pre-season tour and agitate for a move to Liverpool, whose first bid of £110 million was rejected. Liverpool are briefing that they won't come back, but that hardly matters. Newcastle's preparations are already in ruins. Isak doesn't want to be there and the fans know this and are increasingly against him. It's a mess. What did former sporting director Paul Mitchell do in his year at the club? What did he bestow? What plans, what blueprints? Mitchell cannot be blamed for some recent disappointments, but he was a recruiter who didn't recruit and, by the looks of it, didn't leave much behind that was concrete as his legacy. Plenty of deals are set up in advance. We all knew that Trent Alexander-Arnold was on his way to Real Madrid many months out. Chelsea had Christian Pulisic agreed six months before he came, too. And José Mourinho would never take credit for the arrival of Petr Cech or Arjen Robben, saying those deals were in place before he was. Yet, having supposedly kept their powder dry for the great leap forward, what did Newcastle have arranged that hasn't fallen apart? Not Marc Guéhi — last summer's missed target — not João Pedro. They couldn't even keep goalkeeper James Trafford from joining Manchester City, the club that jettisoned him two years ago. Hopes of beating last season's 15th-placed team, Manchester United, to Benjamin Sesko sit in the balance. And before Liverpool came in for Isak they had already secured Hugo Ekitike, who Newcastle had fondly imagined would be his partner, or his replacement if the unthinkable happened. To see both in red would be little short of disastrous. And if all Mitchell had done was nothing — well, it wouldn't be impressive, but it wouldn't be actively harmful. Yet one of the few calls he did make is believed to have alienated Isak and may be the root of his present dissatisfaction. Having been promised an improved contract by the previous executive regime of Amanda Staveley and Mehrdad Ghodoussi, Isak was then informed that would not be happening. The logic was straightforward: Isak was a high earner with four years left on his deal and Newcastle are mindful of Profitability and Sustainability Rules. Yet the ramifications can now be seen. Isak clearly knows another club can make him happy. One whose recruitment agents are efficiency's gold standard. That's the problem with football's new executive model. Recruiters, sporting directors, call them what you will, appear to be no more reliable than the people they have replaced: the managers. Manchester United were said to have fallen behind because they were entirely reliant on the wit of Sir Alex Ferguson. Last season, Sir Jim Ratcliffe bemoaned the fact the club were still behind on data analytics and could only rely on the eyes of Jason Wilcox, the sporting director. Yet if Newcastle had a coach as ferociously proactive as Ferguson, would they have struggled to get deals done? No criticism of Eddie Howe is intended. He works in a modern club, which Ferguson's United were not. Yet it's not just about chains of command, philosophies and strategies. The best people, that is what Liverpool have. All clubs employ executives to direct football, or sport, or recruitment, whichever title is the fashion. Chelsea's probably have their own wing at the training ground. Yet some clubs buy consistently well, others do not. Newcastle recruited a man to recruit the men, but he failed. The ramifications are significant. Neither Wilson nor Ayto can be active in this transfer window. Another one is passing Newcastle by. Has Howe got too much power, it is asked? After all, Mitchell's time there may not have recovered from an early schism with Howe and with a void at the top sporting direction increasingly lands at the manager's door. Yet what option is there, in Newcastle's state? They had a man to do that job. Not only didn't he do it but some of the decisions appear to have benefited a rival. That's what you call a good recruitment strategy. Liverpool have even got the opposition working for them. And not so much as a thank you. We used to be such a polite nation too. Manners maketh man and all that. Yet no so much as a tip of the hat in the direction of the Netherlands for Sarina Wiegman. We've heard a lot about patriotism and 'proper' England since the European Championship was retained, but very little acknowledgement of the method behind it all. For that would mean conceding it really isn't all our work. It can't be, with a foreign coach. England's women were superb in this tournament. Resilient, brave, determined. The moment Spain did not get the game won in extra time, it was England all the way. Yet much of the credit for that strength of attitude goes to Wiegman and her largely Dutch backroom team, and the credit for them goes to the Koninklijke Nederlandse Voetbalbond (KNVB), the Royal Dutch Football Association. So this was an Anglo-Dutch victory, an Anglo-Dutch operation, like Unilever, Shell or The Legendary Pink Dots. Close, but England's women had never got over the line at a major international tournament until Wiegman arrived. And she didn't fluke it this time, as was churlishly implied until the moment of ultimate victory. Yes, England can play better. Yet there are very solid reasons why England defeated Spain, many of them down to the work of the central midfield, which was no accident. Wiegman has reached five straight tournament finals, winning three. That's no fluke, either. The system that produced this remarkable head coach deserves its due. Now there is concern because the proportion of English players in the WSL has halved to just 30 per cent. Baroness Campbell, instrumental in Wiegman's appointment, is worried. Ironic that champions of a national team with a foreign coach suddenly think nationality is important. We want it all ways. In victory, we wish to celebrate and promote this as the best of us, which is what successful international sport is supposed to represent. Yet the FA, and its chief executive Mark Bullingham, are too frightened of failure to take a chance on just our best. It wishes for England to comprise that, plus the best of yours too, if we're short. And it will blow the competition out of the water with its financial might to facilitate this. Just don't expect the tiniest acknowledgment if it pays off. That's why it was so amusing when Bullingham said Wiegman was 'not for sale at any price' in the build-up to the final. For a start, she is. That's why she left her position as Netherlands head coach to manage England: because she is very much the gun for hire. But that's her call. The real reason she's not for sale is because there is not another nation in Europe — and only one, the United States, across the rest of the world — that would pay what she receives for coaching England. When Wiegman won the European Championship with the Netherlands in 2017 she was made a Knight of the Order of Orange-Nassau and was awarded a statue in the garden of the KNVB; which is all well and good, but the FA gave her £400,000 a year and that rather ended discussions. Not to be outdone on the titles, there is now talk of making Wiegman a dame here too. It's another form of ownership. Look, she's ours, really. She's one of us. So we're Manchester City. And the majority don't care because all that matters is winning. Yet how a nation wins is important, too, particularly if that victory is going to be seized upon with great nationalistic fervour. Chloe Kelly's declaration that, 'I'm so proud to be English' was particularly well received. 'Uncomplicated patriotism,' one headline called it. But it is complicated, isn't it, if the manager is Dutch and the English didn't land a trophy until she arrived? The team have every right to wrap themselves in the flag because what they have achieved is exceptional; but the FA should at least have the decency to offer some small thank you to their counterparts in Zeist. Without them, we're nothing. When Richard Gould, the ECB chief executive, spoke to the media before the start of the fifth Test with India, he attempted to explain the thinking behind Test series being crushed into ever-shorter periods of time. He said the idea of keeping August free for the Hundred was here to stay and that part of the reasoning for making June and July the Test season was to avoid a clash with big football tournaments. When the Ashes are contested here in 2027, the schedule will replicate that for India this summer. The one that has culminated in a ruinous round of injuries. Yet that plan is already out of date. Now that tournaments involving England's women command almost as much attention as the men, there will not be a summer that cricket does not have to share with international football. Take the next four years: 2026, men's World Cup, 2027 women's World Cup, 2028 men's European Championships, 2029 women's European Championships. And that is before factoring in the 2029 Club World Cup, which may feature an expanded roster of Premier League clubs, including some of the bigger draws such as Liverpool or Arsenal. Test cricket has always competed with football in some way, and endures. Ben Stokes's famous match-winning innings at Headingley in 2019 took place across August 24 and 25, the same weekend as a full Premier League programme including Liverpool versus Arsenal and, on the day of the heroics, Tottenham Hotspur versus Newcastle United. Anyone much remember those matches? Nobody is forgetting Stokes's 135 not out and his partnership with Jack Leach, though. The Open, Wimbledon, the British Grand Prix, cricket is always challenged by our sporting summer. On Sunday, July 19, 2009, England were trying to win a Lord's Test against Australia for the first time since 1934. It was the day before Freddie Flintoff's iconic, kneeling, open-armed celebration. Yet on day four, many in the media centre were gathered around a television in a back suite because at Turnberry, the 59-year-old Tom Watson was within a hair's breadth of winning the Open. England's dramatic victory in the 2019 Cricket World Cup took place at the same time as arguably the greatest Wimbledon's men's singles final in history, Novak Djokovic defeating Roger Federer 7-6, 1-6, 7-6, 4-6, 13-12. So a little faith is needed, surely. For cricket to rearrange its calendar shows an absence of confidence in a sport that, at its best, still offers rewards like no other. How can we not believe in that? It was 46 degrees when Manchester United reached Chicago last week, with extreme weather warnings across the Midwest. Still, there was money to be made: £7.5million in United's case, the most of any Premier League team engaged in the Summer Series in the United States. So, a little bit more than Pachuca from Mexico got out of the Club World Cup, not quite as much as Los Angeles FC. No glory in the Summer Series, either. Chelsea can bask in the glow of being world champions for four years, with all the added commercial value this affords. Who won the Summer Series? Who cares? There are even suggestions that, far from being a money-spinner, it is failing commercially. The inaugural version two years ago lost £5.4 million — and that was before Fifa came in and delivered a genuine football competition for the locals, not a succession of glorified friendlies. We are yet to see the toll, if any, of the Club World Cup on Chelsea and Manchester City as the domestic season unfolds, but there is a risk-reward from taking part in a tournament with such obvious benefits. The Summer Series, by contrast, seems one big drain. Sunderland have already spent more than £100million on transfers. Coming into the Premier League via the play-offs it is no doubt necessary, while offering no guarantees. Ipswich Town were similarly ambitious last season and look where it got them. One prospective signing is interesting, though. Marc Guiu has started only seven games for Chelsea. On the face of it, his loan move to Sunderland would not make waves. The reason Chelsea are not prepared to make the deal permanent, however, is that inside the club Guiu is believed to have Cole Palmer potential. He's 19, four years Palmer's junior and with only slightly more first-team experience than Palmer had at the same stage of his career with Manchester City. So watch this space. Sunderland may be getting a special one, even if only for the season. The reason fans felt such love for Joey Jones was a shared devotion. Late in his career, at Huddersfield Town, snow had wiped out a weekend's fixture list. Mick Buxton, the manager, had an idea. He got the club to secure tickets at matches for all those players who had shown ambition to go into management. Watch the game, he said, and then write up a scout's report. It'll be good practice for you to get pointers from a manager's perspective. He assigned each player a match based on where he lived. Joey, a resident of north Wales but a Liverpool fanatic, was told there would be a ticket for him at Everton. 'I'm not going there,' he said. Buxton was bemused. 'I've never set foot inside Goodison Park unless I was playing,' Jones insisted. 'I'm not going to start now.' Despite Buxton's protests, he wouldn't budge. 'No way, not Everton. Anywhere but Everton.' Joey died last month. There is to be a statue of him at the home of his other great love, Wrexham. And if anyone goes near it with a blue scarf, he'll come back and haunt them. Numbers at the Women's European Championship told a story. Most goals, most assists and most chances created went to players from Spain, as did the first five berths for successful passes. Leading on most dribbles and most touches in the opposition box was Klara Buhl, of Germany. So how did England win? Most tackles, Keira Walsh. Most interceptions, Alex Greenwood. Most recoveries, Leah Williamson. Proof that even at the highest level, the dirty work brings reward. Standing besides the Uefa president, Aleksander Ceferin, on the podium in Basel was the general secretary Theodore Theodoridis, a native of Athens and formerly a board member of the Hellenic Football Federation. Uncanny, isn't it, the way that Olympiacos and Nottingham Forest, the clubs owned by Evangelos Marinakis, manage to nervelessly tiptoe their way through Uefa's minefield of multiclub ownership when Crystal Palace cannot.
