Starlink to offer satellite internet at Rs 3,000 per month, says MoS telecom
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Now a report by news agency PTI suggests that Starlink may offer its services in the country at monthly subscription free of approximately Rs 3,000. The report also adds that initially the service will be provided to limited users.
Starlink to offer satellite internet at Rs 3,000 per month
As reported by PTI, Minister of state for telecom Pemmasani Chandra Sekhar has revealed that Starlink is set to offer high-speed connectivity across India at a monthly cost of around Rs 3,000.
The service which users earth's orbit satellites is said to offer its internet services in rural and remote areas where traditional broadband infrastructure is limited.
Shekar also said the service will be initially limited to only 20 lakh users. 'Starlink can have only 20 lakh customers in India and offer up to 200 Mbps speed. That won't affect telecom services," the minister said.
So the relatively high cost and limited reach of the service makes that for the time being it quite unlikely for Starlink to disrupt the existing telecom players like BSNL, Jio, and Airtel, which continue to dominate urban and semi-urban markets.
Starlink in India launch date (expected)
While Starlink has not officially announced a launch date for its satellite internet services in India, reports suggest the service could roll out within the next three months. It is also expected that pre-orders of the internet service may open soon, allowing customers in India to book the service by paying a small upfront amount.
Starlink in India hardware requirements
Starlink hardware will be distributed in India through telecom players – Bharti Airtel and Reliance Jio.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Both firms have signed agreements with SpaceX ahead of Starlink's planned entry into the Indian market.
The exact pricing of Starlink equipment in India has not been announced. In the United States, the standard Starlink kit is priced at $349 (approximately Rs 30,000), while the smaller Starlink Mini costs $599 (around Rs 43,000). In India, internet speeds are expected to vary between 25 Mbps and 220 Mbps, depending on the user's location and satellite coverage.
Starlink in India pricing (expected)
According to reports, Starlink plans to offer satellite internet kits with a price tag of Rs 33,000. Monthly subscription, on the other hand, may be priced around Rs 3,000-Rs 4,200.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's 25% tariff on India is a negative-sum game. There is no easy way out
Written by Arya Roy Bardhan Donald Trump has slapped a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports into the United States. He posted on social media that the US has never been able to do much business with India, given the latter's high tariff structure and other non-monetary trade barriers. Moreover, India's military and energy purchases from Russia have led the US administration to impose additional penalties (to be decided later). While the Indian government studies the implications of this move, not much analysis is needed to understand that this is a negative-sum game. Are tariffs harmful? Tariffs are not just a tax on imports – they are effectively a consumption tax. Just as it narrows the profit margins for Indian exporters, it also drives up the prices of Indian imports in the US. In 2024, the US imported goods worth $87.4 billion from India, resulting in a trade deficit of $45.7 billion, accounting for nearly 2 per cent of its entire deficit. While the US imports a little over 3 per cent of all its goods and services from India, nearly a fifth of Indian exports are shipped to the US market. Although both nations will suffer from the fallout, India finds itself in a far more precarious situation given the trade structure. Before the tariff wars, India's effective tariff rate on US imports was around 12 per cent, while India faced 2.2 per cent tariffs. The over ten-fold jump in tariffs will not only hurt Indian exporters but also risk trade diversion. The US might simply import more from other countries: American importers of textiles or seafood can turn to suppliers in Vietnam, Indonesia, Ecuador or others that face less harsh tariffs, crowding out Indian exporters. The shocks are not limited to trade: Currency markets have already reacted to the tariff announcement. The Rupee has weakened as a response to Trump's announcement. While a depreciated rupee will make Indian goods slightly cheaper globally, the exchange rate adjustment cannot compensate for a 25 per cent price hike in the US. On the flipside, a weaker rupee will raise India's import costs, pushing up domestic inflation. Is 25 per cent a lot? The 25 per cent tariff can wipe out India's comparative advantage in labour-intensive goods overnight. If exports to the US remain at similar levels as last year, Indian importers will be looking at an indirect $22 billion tariff bill – over 0.5 per cent of India's GDP. Whether it be textiles, pharmaceuticals or gems and jewellery, the tariff is high enough to eat away the entire margin of producers. These sectors can be severely hit, leading to output and employment losses. The shocks will not be limited to the exporting sectors but will be transmitted to the entire economy through value chain linkages. Recently, India became the largest exporter of smartphones to the US, overtaking China. This was driven primarily by Apple's efforts to gear up smartphone production in India during the US-China rift. Smartphone production and exports have become large in India, with its share in total electronics rising from 9.9 per cent to 44.4 per cent over the last decade. The Performance Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme attracted foreign firms, which led to greater production, exports and employment. In a way, the PLI subsidised Apple's production in India, with the intention of buttressing an infant industry to a globally competitive stage. Now, Apple is being threatened to cut back production in India and come back to the US, which could potentially negate all benefits and leave India's state expenditure worthless. However, it might be difficult for the US to turn away from Indian assembly plants due to its market share and the similar tariff rates faced by competitors. It would also shoot up American iPhone costs, which can turn into a serious political misstep. Not just smartphones but all the leading export sectors can lose the edge they gained via the PLI – the tariff bill is equivalent to the Rs 1.97 lakh crore PLI budget. As a result of the tariff and penalty package, if half of US orders disappear, Indian goods exports will fall by $ 40 billion, shaving 1 per cent off India's GDP in 2025-26. To minimise the damage, India must respond with measured negotiation, market diversification, enhanced competitiveness, and safeguarding of affected sectors. If the tariffs linger, the shocks could accelerate reforms and a pivot to new markets, ultimately making India more self-reliant and broad-based. However, the damage during the transition is too large to be left to the markets. No easy way out India can soften the blow of Trump's 25 per cent tariff by acting on two fronts at once. First, it can offer quick, temporary tax refunds or cheaper loans to the exporters that sell most to America, while using its 'Make in India' plans to push those same industries into higher-value goods and advanced technology. Second, it should quickly seal new trade pacts with the EU, Gulf and other markets so that exporters are not tied to a single buyer. Legal recourse should be considered by filing a case at the WTO. For its part, the US could gain by striking a fair trade deal, much like the UK-India agreement, that lowers duties, protects jobs, and keeps supply chains steady on both sides. Only an appropriate agreement can turn this into a positive-sum game. Bardhan is a Junior Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation
The Print
23 minutes ago
- The Print
Trump's tariff move undermines mutually beneficial India-US relationship, says Suresh Prabhu
I recall, during Trump's first term, when I served as India's Minister of Commerce and Industry, I negotiated with former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and former US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer about trade-related issues. We also engaged with US agriculture and dairy industry representatives to explain that loosening of regulations could severely impact our social sector and sensitive religious practices. These examples highlight the depth of India-US collaboration and its far-reaching benefits. While we often celebrate these ties, we were recently hit with a severe jolt—President Donald Trump's unilateral announcement of tariffs on Indian goods. This comes despite months of trade negotiations and a shared goal to deepen economic ties. India's relationship with the United States is multi-faceted. Several top Fortune 500 companies in the US—which make it an enviable economy—are led by people of Indian origin. Ivy League universities, which contribute to America's reputation as the knowledge power of the world, have professors, deans, and even presidents of Indian origin. Indian-origin scientists have won Nobel Prizes, and the US medical system—one of the world's best—benefits from Indian-origin doctors, pharmaceutical researchers, and innovators in drug development. Even NASA, which recently partnered with ISRO, has Indian-origin scientists playing key roles. Even then, many US industry leaders across sectors strongly supported closer trade ties with India. That's why this sudden tariff decision is disappointing. But the world needs diplomacy, statesmanship, and mechanisms for cooperation—especially between two countries that consider themselves natural allies. India and the US share democratic values, respect for freedom, and a robust people-to-people connection. Indian professionals aren't stealing jobs in the US—they're creating them. In fact, a study by a reputed US organisation shows how Indian investments have created thousands of jobs in America. India isn't a threat India is not the top contributor to the US trade deficit. Trade deficits fluctuate like blood pressure—they go up and down. As the world's third-largest aviation market, India will need to buy a vast number of aircraft and related infrastructure. The US is an obvious supplier. With its transformation into an energy exporter, the US also has opportunities to supply LNG to India—provided we address transportation challenges, since no pipeline exists between the two. India also contributes to US innovation. Many American corporates grow by acquiring smaller startups—often born in garages. India, with the third-largest startup ecosystem, can be a fertile source of innovation and tech ideas that fuel US corporate growth. Our first Green Revolution was also a product of India-US collaboration. In the 1960s, an agreement between US Agriculture Secretary Orville Freeman and India's Chidambaram Subramaniam, along with M.S. Swaminathan, helped India shift from being a food importer to an exporter. We owe much of that success to our partnership with the US. Geopolitically, Asia is emerging as the key theatre of global politics. India is projected to become the second-largest economy in Asia by 2030 and has a growing presence in Africa. We've always respected the territorial integrity of other nations and pose no strategic threat. US investments in India won't just strengthen our economy—they'll boost America's too. As global norms shift, India can play a key role in shaping a fairer order—alongside the US. Also read: India must not retaliate to Trump's tariff tactic. Secure interim deal, fix internal issues Benefits of cooperation over trade friction Trade should not be the sole lens through which we assess this precious bilateral relationship. For many Indians, the US represents aspiration, freedom, and opportunity. People-to-people ties remain the foundation of this bond. It's time to return to the negotiating table and think calmly and clearly about the benefits of cooperation. Every bilateral relationship must weigh the cost of confrontation against the benefits of partnership—and in this case, the latter clearly outweighs the former. The current trade friction stems from India's trade surplus, but this imbalance is likely to ease. India's economy is growing rapidly, with soaring demands in sectors like aviation, where US-India complementarities are obvious. President Trump and Prime Minister Modi share a strong personal rapport. Their respective campaigns—Make America Great Again and Make in India—are complementary. Working together is the best way for both countries to uphold democratic values worldwide. However, ground realities must not be ignored. Most Indian farmers are marginal, with landholdings of less than a hectare. India's largest dairy brand, Amul, sources milk from women farmers with just two or three cattle. These farmers depend on this income for survival. This is not corporate dairy or agriculture—it's subsistence-level farming. They cannot be expected to compete with giant agribusinesses abroad. In my discussions with US counterparts, both in government and industry, I found an understanding of these concerns. I hope this awareness continues to shape the future of our bilateral relationship. India and the US have a unique opportunity to grow together, support a rules-based global order, and build a partnership that benefits not just our two nations, but the world. Suresh Prabhu is India's former Minister of Commerce and Industry (2017-2019). Views are personal. He tweets @sureshpprabhu. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
23 minutes ago
- First Post
After Indus Treaty pause, India fast-tracks Sawalkote Hydro Project in J&K. Will it hurt Pakistan?
The Indian government has begun inviting tenders for the Sawalkote Hydro Project on the Chenab River in Jammu and Kashmir. The 1,856 Megawatt project will come up near Ramban district's Sidhu village, around 120 kilometres from Jammu and 130 kilometres from Srinagar. The development comes in the aftermath of India suspending the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan. Here's why this project matters read more A child stands near Chenab River with the Baglihar hydroelectric project in the background, about 155 km northwest of Jammu. File photo/Reuters India is moving ahead with its plans to build the Sawalkote Hydro Project in Jammu and Kashmir. The government has begun inviting tenders for the 1,856 Megawatt project on the Chenab River. The development comes in the aftermath of India suspending the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan. But what happened? And what do we know about this project? Will it hurt Pakistan? Let's take a closer look What do we know about the project? The Sawalkote Hydro Project is one of India's most ambitious schemes. The project will come up bear Ramban district's Sidhu village. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is around 120 kilometers from Jammu and 130 kilometers from Srinagar. The project was conceived in the 1960s by the Central Water Commission (CWC). Detailed investigations for the Detailed Project Report (DPR) were conducted at the time. Officers of the Geological Survey of India conducted surveys for the project between 1962-1963 and 1970-1971. The Sawalkote Consortium submitted the Detailed Project Report in February 2018. The project has been delayed for decades over environmental concerns, political issues, administrative challenges, red tape and legal issues. Over a dozen villages in the area will be affected by the projected. Its residents will need to be shifted to new homes and compensated for the same. An army transit camp in Ramaban will also have to be relocated. Pakistan had also objected to the project under the terms of the Indus Waters Treaty. India earlier this week began laying the ground for the project. The National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) was given the project in 1985. In 1997 it handed back the project to the Jammu and Kashmir State Power Development Corporation, which spent 400 crores on the project. The project landed in the NHPC's hands again in 2021. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The NHPC on July 29 floated a tender valued at Rs 200 crore. This covers the planning, design and engineering works for the scheme. The agency has fixed September 10 as the final date for submitting bids. The bid is open to international firms This is merely the first tender. Additional tenders for construction and development will be floated in the coming months. The project was originally designed on a much smaller scale. However, over the years, plans for the scheme have got bigger. The project is designed as a run-of-the-river scheme. The project will comprise nine turbines and an underground power station. It will feature a Roller Compacted Concrete Gravity Dam at a height of 192.5 metres. The water will flow through three horseshoe-shaped tunnels measuring 965 metres, 1,130 metres, and 1,280 metres in length. It will have non-monsoon and monsoon period flood diversions at 2,977 cumec and 9,292 cumec respectively. It will produce around 8000 million units of electricity every year. The reservoir that will come up with the project will have a capacity of over 500 million cubic meters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That's around a fifth of the capacity of Delhi's Bhakra dam. It will be the largest hydroelectric project in the Union Territory. The delays have caused the estimated cost of the project to escalate from around Rs 8,000 crore. The current price of the project is begged at 22,000 crores. However, others warn that the final price tag could be over 30,000 crores by the time the project is done. India in June declared the project one of 'national importance'. This gives the NHPC greater freedom to execute the project and will likely cut down on red tape. It does one of a half dozen projects that India set to revive in the region. These include the Pakal Dul On Marusudar river in Kishtwar, Kiru and Ratle projects , which are also on the Chenab River, Kirthai I & II, Parnai project on Jhelum's Suran tributary. These projects, when finished, will bring in more than 5,000 megawatts of clean power to Jammu and Kashmir. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This will make the region more energy independent and boost the national grid. Will it hurt Pakistan? The move must be seen in a larger context. India's move comes after it suspended the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack in April. India and Pakistan had signed the treaty in 1960 under the aegis of the World Bank. The treaty governs the use of the Indus River system that flows through both countries and is vital to its economies. It left India in control of the eastern Beas, Ravi and Sutlej rivers, and gave Pakistan rights over the Indus, Chenab and Jhelum. However, India was still allowed to draw from the western rivers for, among other things, domestic and agricultural use and hydroelectricity. Many in India have been calling for New Delhi to renegotiate the treaty or withdraw from it entirely. About a possible diversion of the Indus, Delhi should closely monitor the issue. Representational image. File image/PTI Home Minister Ahmed Shah, speaking in Parliament recently, decried the treaty as 'one-sided'. 'The Indus Water Treaty was one-sided. Farmers of India also have the right over the water, and soon, drinking water will reach Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, and Delhi from the Indus,' Shah said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The Indus Water Treaty will be held in abeyance until Pakistan irrevocably gives up its support of terrorism. We have warned that Blood and water will not flow together', Foreign Minister S Jaishankar added. Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Parliament speech on Tuesday had taken Jawaharlal Nehru to task over the treaty. Nehru, India's first prime minister, had played a crucial role in the signing of the treaty. Many now think he was too generous by far with Pakistan. India is now is trying to make the most of its share of the western rivers – particularly the Chenab River. The Chenab, which is one of the region's three major rivers, starts in Himachal Pradesh and runs through the Western Himalayas. Over 10,000 square km of its catchment falls permanently above the snowline. This means it can be used around the year to generate hydroelectricity. Experts say India sees the Chenab River both as an asset and as a symbol of energy independence. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD They say this will further increase Pakistan's concerns about its water woes and its energy issues. With inputs from agencies
