Lonely Planet co-founder reveals three more countries 'not to visit'
Lonely Planet has long been a reliable name when it comes to holiday guides and recommendations, ever since it was founded in 1973, by husband and wife team Tony and Maureen Wheeler.
The adventurous duo have been all over the world, and Tony is often asked by holidaymakers exactly which four corners of the globe people should visit.
Tony has shared his love for the Australian Outback, and Jaipur, in India, but he's also got some opinions on where definitely not to go.
The 78-year-old previously wrote a blog post, titled, 'I'm not going there anymore', where he listed four places he's sworn off.
Bali was written off due to it's 'ridiculous traffic', and the USA is a no-no for Tony while Trump and his 'associated scoundrels' are running the place.
His other two big vetoes for travel probably won't surprise many people: Russia and Saudi Arabia.
Fuel your wanderlust with our curated newsletter of travel deals, guides and inspiration. Sign up here.
And in a follow-up post, he's added three more to his list: Israel, Belarus, and Burma (Myanmar).
Firstly, in regards to Israel, Tony says he's 'amazed' he left it off his initial blog post. He adds that people complained about the country's omission, which Tony says was 'absolutely right.'
He's actually visited Israel more than once, and when he went in 2011, he said he felt a sense of 'hope that some sort of peace and agreement could come to that troubled region.'
But in light of the events of and since October 7 2023, Tony says he won't be returning.
He wrote: 'Despite the horrors of the Hamas attack I still cannot live with the Israeli attack on Gaza which has now been going on for more than one and a half years. It has to stop.'
Next, Tony references the Belarussian dictator, Alexander Lukashenko, as a reason not to visit Belarus, calling him a 'Soviet era thug.' More Trending
Tony actually visited the Eastern European country in 2018, saying he had a 'few interesting days in Minsk' but adds that 'my interest in Belarus has definitely gone downhill, I'm not planning on any return trips.'
Finally, Burma was the last place that Tony listed. He has been to the country several times over the years, most recently in 2017, making a stop in 'the country's absurd capital'.
Citing Burma's unstable political situation he said of his trip back then: 'It was very clear that a country which has gone up and then down for the whole time I've been visiting it, the first time was in 1974, was embarking on another stupid downhill plunge.'
Tony adds that recommending places not to visit is a gear change for him, adding: 'For a long time I've thought we should go anywhere, it's important for all sorts of reasons that we make contact with places, good or bad.'
While the places in this article might not be on your travel bucket list, there are several 'underrated' spots that are well worth a visit, according to Michael, a man who has visited 175 of 195.
Here are his top recommendations:
Tunisia
'Tunis has one of the best street food scenes I've ever encountered,' he says of the capital.
'I did a food tour with my buddy Mehdi, who runs the YouTube channel Tunisian Street Food, and I still dream about the stuff we tried. Fricassés, brik, grilled merguez – it was unforgettable.'
Bhutan
Metro's Gergana Krasteva recently wrote that of the 10 countries she visited in 2024, Bhutan trumped them all.
Michael agrees that the isolated Himalayan kingdom is unlike anywhere else on Earth.
From the ethereal mist draping the capital Thimphu to the sheer cliffs where Tiger's Nest Monastery clings, this mystic enclave feels like it exists outside of time.
'It's the kind of place that stays with you, haunting your thoughts long after you leave,' Michael explains.
Madagascar
'If you want nature, wildlife, adventure, and coastline all in one place, this island will leave you speechless,' Michael says.
'It feels prehistoric. Like stepping into a lost world.'
Pakistan
The path to Pakistan is one less travelled.
Michael says: 'The people, the food, the landscapes, and the sheer affordability make Pakistan a must-visit for adventurers like me.'
Metro recently named Pakistan as an unmissable destination to visit in 2025 thanks to its vast valleys and mountain ranges in the north, and we're not the only ones noticing all the country has to offer.
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: Israeli Mossad agents 'infiltrate heart of Iran with special-made weapons'
MORE: Iran vs Israel: who has the strongest military?
MORE: Ryanair shares warning over 'unfair' issue making holidaymakers miss their flights
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Netanyahu's race against the clock to go ‘full Hezbollah' on Iran
'I must govern the clock, not be governed by it.' So said Golda Meir, one of Israel's founders and its first and only female prime minister. Now, some 50 years later, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) may have realised her insight. Indeed, they have taken the clock and blown it to smithereens, neutralising its power to contain them once and for all. For the mullahs of Iran, this could spell curtains, or at least a long and painful 'Hezbollah-isation' stretching over weeks and months. The clock has always been central to Israeli military planning, with its strategists at the Kirya in central Tel Aviv long regarding it as important as guns and manpower. There are two big drivers. First, the IDF is reliant on reservists, so once a war starts there is an immediate social and economic imperative to move quickly. But much more influential – since the Yom Kippur war of 1973 and the global oil crisis it sparked – has been the 'diplomatic clock' and Israel's reliance on the US and its allies for military and diplomatic support. Once any new conflict started, the clock of international opinion would start ticking, with the US generally moving to bring things to a close as soon as possible. The prospect of the Middle East going up in flames and oil prices spiking ruinously has always trumped Israel's longer term security interests. Even after the Oct 7 massacre, Israel's military establishment feared it had only a limited window to deal with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in the north. Manuel Trajtenberg, then executive director of the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) in Tel Aviv, told The Telegraph at the time that the IDF was racing against 'several different clocks, all of them ticking down'. 'There's the military clock itself in terms of manpower and capacity but also the hostages, international pressure and even economic pressures,' he said. Looking back now, it's hard to determine what the worry was. While the 1967 Arab-Israeli War was famously wrapped up in six days, the latest conflict has been raging for nearly two years. Hamas has all but been blasted to extinction, ditto Hezbollah in Lebanon. The IDF is acting at will against anything it judges a threat in Syria and moves with impunity over Yemen. Now Iran – 'the head of the octopus' – is firmly in its sights. Part of what's changed things is the psychological shock of Oct 7 and the sense of existential crisis in Israel it has created. 'The diplomatic clock is a fraud, and Israel's leaders must see through it', urged Nave Dromi, director of the Israel Victory Project in the wake of the massacre. 'There can be no specific time limitations on responding to the murder, rape and butchery of 1,200 people, the wounding of thousands of others and the vicious kidnapping and humiliation of 240 Israelis and foreigners'. But as important in the destruction of the clock is Benjamin Netanyahu and his willingness to take on US presidents – a theme since he confronted Barack Obama over his 2015 nuclear deal with Iran from the floor of the US Congress. The Israeli prime minister then tied Joe Biden in knots over Gaza, and then Lebanon, for the final 15 months of his term. And he has now almost certainly cocked a snook at Donald Trump, who, by most accounts, wanted more time to renegotiate a nuclear deal with Tehran. 'Trump had sought additional time from Netanyahu for nuclear talks, and Netanyahu did not give it to him,' said Daniel Shapiro who served as US ambassador to Israel from 2011 to 2017, in an interview with Foreign Affairs magazine on Friday. For Iran, Netanyahu's great foe of more than 30 years, this could be very bad news indeed, with nothing obvious to stop Israel's bombing campaign against it grinding on for weeks and months. Sima Shine, a senior researcher at INSS, said there was 'no significant international pressure' to wrap things up – quite a thing for a former Mossad official and Iran specialist who spent decades battling the clock. 'There is little sympathy for the Iranian regime', she said. 'Everyone recognises its negative role in the war in Ukraine, its involvement in the Middle East conflicts, its brutal suppression of protesters – especially women – and the fact that no one wants to see it possess nuclear weapons.' At a briefing for journalists on Saturday, a senior IDF official turned things around 180 degrees, conjuring up a very different figurative clock. 'We are prepared for more … an aerial road to Tehran has effectively been opened', he said. 'Our goal in these operations is to remove an existential threat; to remove a ticking time bomb.'
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
With no sign of an end to fighting, what moves will Israel and Iran make next?
It is the war that has been feared for the best part of five decades. Now it is here, there's nothing in the language emanating for Tehran or Tel Aviv to suggest any hope of it ending quickly, despite the potentially parlous consequences for both sides, the region and beyond. World leaders, near and far, are calling for restraint but their words are being lost in the rush to rearm and attack once more. Israel warns 'Tehran will burn' while those in Tehran warn they will 'open the doors of hell' - both could be absolutely right and both share the same goal, victory and survival. After Gaza and Lebanon, Israel is emboldened. For the same reasons Iran is enfeebled, no longer able to rely on the strength, real or perceived, of Hamas or Hezbollah and aware the Israel has penetrated deep into its society and security. Israel also knows it has, should the going become excessively tough, the support, weaponry and military might of the United States to fall back on. Keir Starmer has also said RAF aircraft, including Typhoon fighter jets, have been sent to the Middle East region for 'contingency support', although the prime minister refused to say under what circumstances jets would be scrambled. Iran has less surety as to the support it might receive from Russia, China and others who have offered support or supply of weaponry. However it is still very much in the fight and could remain there. So where could this go now? The attacks by both on the other's territory can and will continue. Iran could block the Strait of Hormuz, where a quarter of global oil passes through. The impact of that would be felt globally quickly. It could also expand or shift its focus to American military assets in the region. Proxy support would help that effort, though going for the bases would likely bring the US directly into the war, it might be a gamble Iran is willing to take. There is also the question, at the heart of this whole war, as to how close to a nuclear weapon Iran is and whether even under attack they can speed one through and provide themselves with the very best defence. Israel too has its nuclear option - literally and metaphorically. Literally it is a nuclear power, metaphorically it could chose to take its fight right to the top Iran's power structure and attempt to take out the Ayatollah. That one move could lead to end of the Iranian regime. Those with everything to lose or nothing left to lose are dangerous adversaries. For sure brutal days lie ahead.
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
More UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Starmer calls for de-escalation
The Prime Minister said further military assets are being deployed to provide 'contingency support' across the region amid escalating hostilities between the two long-time foes. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast jets will be sent over, it is understood. The UK already has RAF jets in the Middle East as part of Operation Shader. Speaking to reporters travelling with him on a visit to Canada, Sir Keir declined to rule out intervening in the conflict entirely but made clear he would continue pressing for de-escalation and said the 'intense' developments over the weekend would be discussed in detail at the G7 summit. 'These are obviously operational decisions and the situation is ongoing and developing and therefore I'm not going to get into the precise details, but we are moving assets, we've already been moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support across the region. So that is happening,' he said. Sir Keir added: 'Our constant message is de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having are to do with de-escalation.' Asked whether he would rule out UK involvement, he said: 'I'm not going to get in to that.' Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Iran launched missile and drone attacks on Israel overnight after a series of Israeli strikes on the heart of Tehran's nuclear programme and armed forces. Tehran's UN ambassador said 78 people had been killed and more than 320 wounded in Israel's attacks, while its response was said to have killed at least three and wounded dozens. A Cobra meeting of high-level ministers was convened on Friday afternoon to discuss the situation. The same is not expected on Saturday but Whitehall officials were expected to be meeting. The conflict was ignited by early morning Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear bases on Friday. Israel said the barrage was necessary before Iran got any closer to building a nuclear weapon, although experts and the US government have assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon. Iran retaliated with waves of drones and ballistic missiles, with explosions lighting up the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Both the UK and the US have insisted they were not involved in the Israeli strikes and that the country acted unilaterally. Sir Keir would not be drawn on whether the UK was given notice of Israel's attack after reports that the country was not forewarned following the Government's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli ministers last week. 'In relation to Israel, I had a good and constructive discussion with Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday, and that included discussions about the safety and security of Israel, as you would expect, between two allies,' he said. Asked if Britain had been told in advance of Israeli's military plans, the Prime Minister said: 'I'm not going to go into what information we had at the time or since. 'But we discuss these things intensely with our allies. But I'm not going to get into precisely what we knew, because it's a constant flow of information between our allies, and between us and the US.'
