
China charges ahead on climate while the West stalls and spins
China followed Europe earlier this month with a commitment to revamp its climate plan to meet the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. The goal, which entails reducing global greenhouse gas emissions to hold the earth's temperature increase to well below 2 C above pre-industrial levels, is a tall order for the world's second-most populous country.
China is far and away the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter, contributing nearly a third of the total. Despite gains from massive investments in renewable energy, China's emissions continued to climb last year. The Climate Action Tracker rates China's progress as ' highly insufficient,' a step worse than Canada, which is also deemed to be ' insufficient.'
The problem is the skyrocketing demand for power, which China can't yet meet with renewables. President Xi Jinping announced China would start to phase out coal-fired power plants, one of the highest emitters of greenhouse gases, in 2026. So far however, coal mining is still increasing and the construction of coal plants reached a 10-year high last year due to growing energy security concerns. Electricity demand spikes during heat waves when people crank up air conditioning. This is also the time when dam reservoir levels drop, decreasing the amount of available hydropower. That means burning more coal for power and greater carbon emissions. The vicious cycle continues.
Amid that avalanche of doom, however, are some very bright lights that could start to glow even brighter. There are indications that China's emissions have peaked and the country is about to turn the corner. There are a lot of Xi skeptics, and for good reason. A cynic might point to Xi's recent pivot back to coal and dismiss his climate leadership aspirations as an empty promise. But the country is a renewable energy juggernaut and in the first quarter of this year, the amount of power from solar and wind for the first time surpassed thermal energy mostly produced by coal.
Similarly, the number of electric vehicles sold in China is set to overtake gas-powered vehicle sales this year, 10 years ahead of its target. China's dominance in the EV marketplace won kudos from none other than Ford's CEO Jim Farley who recently returned from China gushing, 'their cost, their quality of their vehicles is far superior to what I see in the West.'
Part of China's interest in renewables is pure economics. China manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels at a time when renewables are in hot demand and its rich mineral reserves also allow the country to dominate battery production. But according to Carbon Brief, a UK-based climate publication, a good deal of the credit for China's climate ambition goes to Xi himself, who was concerned about global warming and interested in renewable energy long before he became president.
China claims it is ready to take on the role as a leader in the fight against climate change. It just might happen. @adriennetanner.bsky.social writes
As long ago as 2003, Xi wrote a series of articles, some of which touched on 'environmental protection, sustainable development, circular economy, conservation-oriented society and reducing resource consumption and pollution.' In 2005, when he was the party secretary of Zhejiang province, Xi gave a speech to villagers thrown out of work after a highly polluting quarry was shuttered, urging them to support a green transition. His statement, 'lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets themselves,' has since become his most famous environmental quote.
When Xi was elevated to the presidency, Beijing was choked in record-breaking smog from coal, iron, steel, cement and chemical plants. The country's development-at-all-costs mentality after the 2008 recession was sending 7,000 children a day to hospital for treatment for respiratory ailments. In response, a National Air Quality Action Plan was put in place that — among many other measures — capped the number of cars in Beijing and charted a course for investment in renewable energy. Since then, the Chinese public's perception and awareness of the need to combat climate change has shifted. 'It is top-down and driven by Chinese leadership,' Lu Zhi, a professor of conservation biology at Peking University, told Carbon Brief.
We should not underestimate the importance of leadership in the battle against climate change. South of our border, the US under former President Joe Biden, set ambitious climate targets to lower emissions by at least 50 per cent by 2030 and invested billions in climate-related infrastructure projects. One change in leadership later, and much of it is being undone. President Donald Trump has rolled back the nation's climate strategy, and is doing everything possible to arrest wind and solar energy, and to slow the transition to EVs. The most recent and dangerous blow delivered by the Trump administration this week, was an announcement from the Environmental Protection Agency stating that greenhouse gases will no longer be considered a public health threat, a finding that enabled the federal government to set emissions limits.
Here in Canada, environmental policy has taken a hit since the election of Prime Minister Mark Carney. His first move was to blast his predecessor's consumer carbon tax. And he is now musing about building more oil pipelines and contemplating doing away with a planned industrial emissions cap, and seems open to softening EV mandates.
China's leadership, for obvious reasons, would not tolerate the bevy of haters and naysayers who elected Donald Trump, and is less prone to capricious directional policy changes. Furthermore, the government sets the direction for industrial and economic development. While this has forced the country to tolerate horrific air pollution in its cities, it also means that when shifts are mandated, such as the transition to renewables or adoption of EVs, they happen a whole lot faster than here in the West.
And with less spin from industry defending outdated technology like internal combustion engines when better options are available, Chinese consumers are more willing to switch. If Xi is indeed serious about being a climate leader and wants to trade China's coal reliance for renewables, he's got as good a chance as anyone to make it happen.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Interview: Spanish economist says EU gains little from new tariff deal with U.S.
European leaders handled the trade deal with the United States "too weakly," said a Spanish economist, noting that the EU has tools to counter U.S. pressure. BARCELONA, Spain, Aug. 3 (Xinhua) -- The European Union (EU) has little to gain from its new trade deal with the United States, with Germany likely to be the bloc's biggest loser, Sergi Basco, associate professor of Economics at Barcelona University, told Xinhua recently. Basco said the "only positive outcome for Europe" in the deal, under which the United States will impose a baseline 15 percent tariff on EU goods while many U.S. exports to Europe face no tariffs, is that "instead of 30 percent, it is 15 percent." He noted that Germany will probably "lose the most," as it is the EU's largest exporter to the United States. The tariffs will "likely cause the sales of German cars to the United States to go down," and hurt Spain's automotive industry as well, "because many of the vehicles Germany sells use components made in Spain," Basco added. Basco criticized European leaders for handling the trade deal "too weakly," noting that the EU has tools to counter U.S. pressure. "I don't know if it's because the negotiations were hampered by there being different voices, but it seems to me that their reaction was weak," he said. Meanwhile, Basco cautioned that it is "important" to note that the trade deal is "a non-binding agreement," citing a European Commission statement stressing that the two sides "will further negotiate, in line with their relevant internal procedures, to fully implement the political agreement." He noted that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the trade deal as a "framework," adding that the agreement will need approval from all 27 EU member states, whose ambassadors are set to meet on Monday.


Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
India's garments sector faces tariff challenge, country needs bold reforms: GTRI's Ajay Srivastava
New Delhi [India], August 1 (ANI): With the US administration under President Donald Trump imposing 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified 'penalty', India's textile and garment sector is likely to face stiff competition from Bangladesh and Vietnam, who have been hit with comparatively lower tariffs, Ajay Srivastava, founder of trade think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), has said. 'Bangladesh and Vietnam are big players in garment exports and have a better tariff position than India. This puts our textile and garment industry at a disadvantage. The same concern extends to leather goods,' Srivastava told ANI in a product-wise analysis of the US tariff impact. While labour-intensive sectors like textiles and leather are expected to feel the heat, India's auto components, steel, and aluminium industries are likely to remain relatively unaffected, as the tariff levels on these items are broadly comparable across competing nations, he argued further. Critical sectors such as pharmaceuticals, electronics (including smartphones), and petroleum products have been kept exempt from the fresh tariff measures, he claimed. Overall, India has a 6-8 per cent disadvantage in comparison to other key Asian countries competing for market share in the US, according to Srivastava. To deal with this challenge, Srivastava argued that India must move beyond tariff negotiations and trade agreements, and instead focus on bold domestic reforms. 'If we manufacture good quality products at competitive prices, they will sell -- with or without a trade deal. Look at China, it exports massively without relying on trade agreements,' he said. He recommended a strong focus on reducing the cost of manufacturing and improving ease of doing business. 'Internal reforms are now essential. It's time for serious measures,' he added. Srivastava also cited the European Union's upcoming Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), effective from 2026, as an example of growing global protectionism. He suggested India diversify revenue sources by boosting tourism, which he said could offset tariff-related export losses. 'Tourism has the potential to generate double the revenue we may lose from US tariffs,' he said. Over the past few months, India and the US have been negotiating for an interim trade deal, but there were some reservations from the Indian side on the US demand for opening up the agricultural and dairy sectors. Agriculture and dairy are critical for India as these two sectors provide livelihood opportunities to a large section of people. On Wednesday, President Trump announced the imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. India and the US initiated talks for a just, balanced, and mutually beneficial Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March this year, aiming to complete the first stage of the Agreement by October-November 2025. On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order for reciprocal tariffs on various trade partners, imposing varied tariffs in the range of 10-50 per cent. He subsequently kept the tariffs in abeyance for 90 days, while imposing a 10 per cent baseline tariff. The deadline was to end on July 9, and the US administration later pushed it to August 1. US President Donald Trump had imposed reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries with which the US has a trade deficit. Since assuming office for his second term, President Trump has reiterated his stance on tariff reciprocity, emphasising that the United States will match tariffs imposed by other countries, including India, to 'ensure fair trade'. On Thursday evening, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in both houses of the Parliament, stating that the government is examining the impact of tariffs and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. (ANI)


Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Expect pause in next policy meeting, RBI already frontloaded rate cuts: CareEdge
New Delhi [India], August 3 (ANI): The RBI has already frontloaded the rate cuts, anticipating the moderation in inflation, and it is unlikely the central bank would go for further rate cuts unless economic growth concerns aggravate, CareEdge said in a pre-monetary policy review meeting. While the US reciprocal tariff rate (25 per cent for India) and proposed penalty are concerning, the RBI may opt to wait till 'we get further clarity on this front', the rating agency said. The next bi-monthly RBI monetary policy review meeting is scheduled for August 4-6, 2025. 'With a forward-looking outlook, the RBI would be focusing on inflation in the quarters ahead,' the report read. With CPI-based retail inflation expected to breach 4 per cent in Q4 2025-26 and average 4.5 per cent in 2026-27, the real policy rate would settle in the range of 1-1.5 per cent at the current repo rate, it asserted. 'Therefore, a rate cut in the upcoming policy meeting appears unlikely. Given the incomplete transmission of the previous rate cuts, the RBI is expected to hold off on further easing, allowing time for the full impact of earlier measures to materialise,' the report read. 'With the RBI having already frontloaded rate cuts and ensured ample liquidity, the MPC may prefer to pause for now and assess how the macroeconomic landscape evolves. Additionally, transmission of the previous rate cuts is still underway and could take some more time to show its effect on the economy.' The upcoming monetary policy meeting in August takes place against the backdrop of a notable moderation in headline inflation in recent months, largely driven by easing food prices. Inflation is projected to average below the 4 per cent target over the next two quarters, supported by a favourable base and muted food inflation. The global trade policy uncertainty will continue to cast a shadow on India's growth outlook; however, the overall impact is likely to be limited given India's limited merchandise trade exposure to the US economy, CareEdge noted. After a total of 100 basis point repo rate reduction since February 2025, the scope for more rate cuts was limited, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra had hinted after the latest monetary policy meeting. The recent frontloaded repo rate cut by the RBI was understandably aimed at boosting economy, which has relatively moderated. (ANI)