Anthony Albanese set for one-day trip to New Zealand for talks with Christopher Luxon
The Prime Minister will depart on Saturday morning for a short international trip before returning on Sunday afternoon.
While Mr Albanese is not expected to use the trip to share any major announcements, conversations with Mr Luxon will focus on strengthening defence and security co-operation, and economic ties, like the Single Economic Market policy which reduces business and economic regulations between the two countries.
The leaders will also speak about issues in the Pacific and other international issues.
The Israel-Gaza war will likely be discussed following Israel's Security Council approving plans for a takeover of Gaza City, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong warning that the permanent forced displacement of Gazans would amount to a violation of international law.
Like Australia, New Zealand also doesn't recognise Palestinian statehood, however it also supports a two-state solution and has called for Israel to increase the amount of humanitarian aid allowed into Gaza.
Speaking more broadly about Australia's bond with New Zealand ahead of the trip, Mr Albanese said the relationship was 'unmatched'.
'I am delighted to visit New Zealand to meet with Prime Minister Luxon for our annual leaders' meeting,' he said.
'I look forward to discussing how we can work together to build on our Single Economic Market, modernise the rules-based trading system, deepen our alliance, and back our Pacific partners.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
No finding of guilt in blackmail case against former MP and husband, court reveals
A South Australian court did not find former MP Annabel Digance and her husband guilty of blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas, despite a previous claim by the premier's lawyer in court, a leaked email reveals. The email — which was obtained by ABC News — further states that Chief Judge Michael Evans has proposed an open court hearing be held early next week "to hear the parties prior to having the record of the court corrected". The email was sent by Mr Evans's acting judicial assistant on Friday afternoon to SA Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Martin Hinton, as well as his department and lawyers representing Mr Malinauskas and the Digances. "There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants," the acting judicial assistant wrote. "It has come to the attention of the Chief Judge that a part of the court record in this matter is incorrect and needs to be corrected. Annabel and Greg Digance were charged with one count each of blackmail after they allegedly threatened to make accusations of misconduct against Mr Malinauskas in 2020. Those charges were later dropped. Last month, the Digances filed a $2.3 million civil lawsuit against Mr Malinauskas and the State of South Australia — claiming that both led a malicious prosecution. Barrister Michael Abbott KC, for Mr Malinauskas, told the Supreme Court last Wednesday that the Digances had been found guilty of the blackmail charges, but they were subsequently dropped on the proviso they enter an order to leave his client alone. "It's clear … that the sentencing Judge, who was Judge Muscat, found [them] guilty of the charge of blackmail," he said. At the time, Supreme Court Associate Justice Graham Dart said he understood the court order could not have been imposed in the absence of a guilty finding. He questioned the viability of Mr and Mrs Digance's civil claim and said if they'd been found guilty then the prosecution could not be classified as malicious. According to the email sent by the acting judicial assistant on Friday, a nolle prosequi was entered by the prosecution on April 21, 2023, which brought the blackmail charge proceedings to an end. Nolle prosequi is a legal term used to abandon legal action. "The … orders made on that date were correctly made under the [Act]," the email states. "There were no orders made under [section] 28 of the Sentencing Act 2017. "The orders of the court made by the judge on 21 April 2023 are accurately reflected in the transcript of that hearing." In statement, a spokesperson for Mr Malinauskas said: "All Peter Malinauskas has ever wanted is to be left alone by the Digances, and is therefore grateful the court saw fit to impose an … order on the Digances". "The rest is a matter for the courts and the Digances," they said. ABC News contacted the Digances for comment.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Real estate agents say new seller disclosure laws are 'bottlenecking' Queensland's property market
New seller disclosure laws in Queensland are contributing to a housing market slowdown, with documentation delays causing a contract "bottleneck". Real estate agents say there's anxiety and frustration over the regime, which came into effect on August 1 and is designed to increase transparency in property transactions and protect buyers. Sellers must provide a mandatory comprehensive disclosure statement before a contract is signed, with information including land contamination, zoning, heritage listings, transport resumption plans and accurate rates and water charges. Brisbane agent Brett Andreassen said the legislation has had an immediate, widespread impact on the housing market. "Right now, it's frozen," Mr Andreassen said. "It's stopping the ability to do contracts … because the entire process is bottlenecked. "It's causing headaches across the board." Mr Andreassen said agents were already experiencing lengthy delays of up to 10 days in getting the full suite of documentation required from relevant agencies and departments. "Previously, I could get a phone call today from someone wanting to sell, we could book in to get the photos for tomorrow, and have the property on the market within days," he said. "[That's] because we'd have a 48-hour turnaround on the paperwork that was required for the contract. "Now, we're waiting seven to 10 days for all the paperwork. It's resulting in lost momentum." It's a sentiment echoed by Antonia Mercorella from the Real Estate Institute of Queensland, who said sales had slowed, particularly for units and apartments. "What we're seeing playing out now is what we feared, which is that it can take time to obtain the necessary information from the relevant suppliers," she said. Fellow Brisbane agent Gabrielle Trickey said the additional requirements were impractical and complex. "It's been a nightmare," Ms Trickey said. "I know one agent who sent out a disclosure statement that's close to 100 pages … not even including the contract. "If you're a first home buyer, you're just buggered — you're looking at so many pages before you even get to the contract." The reforms enable buyers to terminate a contract up until settlement if the required disclosure documents are not provided, or contain insufficient or incorrect details. "As agents, we're all freaked out [by that]," Ms Trickey said. Ms Mercorella said sellers and agents were "right to be nervous". "I've spoken with a number of lawyers who have expressed the view that the regime will be used by some to terminate contracts … we've seen the experience in other jurisdictions," she said. "It's well-known that some buyers will get cold feet and will look for opportunities and grounds for termination. "So, understandably, there is a degree of nervousness that is being experienced." Mr Andreassen said the uncertainty had created the "potential" for "gazumping", which occurs when a buyer and seller agree on a price, but the seller backs out before the paperwork is complete. "It essentially means that if there's a delay between offer and acceptance and the contract being prepared, another buyer could come in and place an offer and beat them to the punch," he said. "Queensland has always avoided it … but it's a real possibility because of these ridiculous delays that we've got." He said many prospective buyers would also likely be "bitterly disappointed" by what's contained in the disclosure statement. "People want to know flood [history], illegal improvements or renovations and termite/asbestos [history] … but there's no requirement for the disclosure of those three things." Ms Mercorella said the REIQ has raised agents' concerns with the state government. "Whenever new legislation starts, it causes a level of disruption … and frustration," she said. "We have been given assurances that they are monitoring and watching closely."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
How Queensland Premier David Crisafulli has gone from dazzling property flipper to secret business trouble
Australians love a tale of property renovation, but one story that's little known is that Queensland Premier David Crisafulli was once a successful house flipper. Between 2005 and 2009, his private family company, Crisafulli Financial Services, bought and sold seven north Queensland houses in rapid, profitable deals. Those successful deals make a disastrous loss on another property in 2022, when he was opposition leader, unusual. The family company lost more than $50,000 on a long-held property sold in a rush. That was just less than a year after he secretly finished paying out liquidators $200,000 to settle claims of botched business oversight. Politicians have private business, but that business is sometimes thrust into the public arena. And the premier's failure to declare private business affairs on a register of interests was found in June to breach parliament's rules. A bipartisan parliamentary ethics committee decided he had failed to declare a liability for the $200,000 liquidator settlement. He had been "careless", and there was evidence he "ought to have known that such payments were to be declared (as a liability) or at least sought the registrar's advice", the committee found. Another question he has since refused to answer is how he paid for the $200,000. Journalist: Did you pay yourself? Premier: I've met my obligations. Did anyone assist him in paying for it? "Well, have a look at the report," he replied, arguing how he paid was "part of the analysis". But the report does not mention how he paid. It goes to what private business of politicians should be public. Transparency International Australia chief executive Clancy Moore said public figures withholding information about financial dealings erodes public trust. He said that was particularly the case when it related to "insolvency and potential conflicts of interest". "Being forthcoming about how a significant financial settlement was funded, especially while serving in public office, would demonstrate a commitment to integrity, reduce speculation and enhance public confidence," Mr Moore said. But back to the profitable days flipping homes in the mid 2000s. Mr Crisafulli's family company was acquiring homes — often in Townsville's battler suburbs — capitalising on demand for housing with quick, hard real estate work. In general, these properties were nothing fancy but could be spruced up. One might have new tiles installed, for instance. It was successful. Property records show Crisafulli Financial Services bought one property for $256,000 in June 2007 and offloaded it by September for $312,000. Another, acquired in December 2006 for $218,000, was sold in March 2008 for $291,000. All told, before costs, the Crisafullis cleared almost $330,000 on those seven homes. By then, Mr Crisafulli had been in local government, later becoming a state minister in the short-lived LNP administration of Campbell Newman. In 2015, Mr Crisafulli lost office and ventured into the private sector. As revealed by the ABC, he landed a job via LNP donor and soccer-fanatic businessman Rabieh Krayem. The pair had known each other from Townsville and Mr Krayem had put forward the now-premier's name as sole director of a long-struggling training organisation SET Solutions. That was the same company in which Mr Krayem had just acquired a 50 per cent stake. Mr Crisafulli lasted mere months in the role — from his appointment in December 2015 until his resignation in April 2016. He was ultimately never paid a wage for his time, and one creditor told the ABC that Mr Crisafulli had been a straight shooter at the business and paid bills when promised. The business, which auditors found had received government funding for more hours of teaching than it had delivered, even when Mr Crisafulli headed the company, collapsed into liquidation in June 2016. Mr Crisafulli returned to parliament in 2017, but the ABC later revealed he had quietly paid liquidators $200,000 to settle claims the training business might have been trading while insolvent while he was at its helm. Such a payment can make business sense even when people do not believe they have done anything wrong. That's because settling liquidator claims privately may be cheaper and less scarring than risking a long battle which could potentially involve public court hearings. Mr Crisafulli secretly paid the settlement in three tranches: $80,000 in March 2020, $60,000 in July 2020 and $60,000 in July 2021. Insolvency industry sources said the multiple transfers can indicate financial strain or an inability to gather sufficient funds for a one-off payment. At the time, Mr Crisafulli's register of interests listed a multi-property portfolio and six Bank of Queensland mortgages. Land records also show an early-mid 2021 sale of one mortgaged property for $2.3 million and a mortgage-backed purchase of another for $745,000 by his wife, Tegan Crisafulli. In February 2022, about half a year after finishing paying the liquidators, his family company tried to offload a Townsville property bought for $287,500 12 years earlier. It was on a big but odd-shaped battleaxe piece of land. Even the sale advertisement was blatant about the property's bad condition: "No point in doing a building and pest." But buyers weren't keen. The asking price dropped. The advertisement suggested selling pressure: "The owner's instructions are clear, and this will be gone before the end of the financial year." By May 2022 it was sold for $230,000, marking a gross loss of $57,500. Mr Crisafulli won't answer why a sale needed to go through that financial year or if he was under strain then. Perhaps he might have wanted cash to make another purchase later, or to bring down borrowing levels. It could be unrelated to the liquidator settlement. But the premier, who had campaigned on his love for small business and transparency, will not clarify that, nor how he financed the $200,000 liquidator settlement. Perhaps he drew down on existing loans. Or family might have provided a payment as a gift — a carve out in the register of interests allows some family contributions to not be declared. In June of this year, when asked how he financed the $200,000 payment, Mr Crisafulli repeated phrasing he'd used before about having met his "obligations". He was asked: Did the $200,000 payment impose obligations on him to other people? "I want to be clear, this was subject to this analysis (the committee report) and I have met my obligations," he responded. Yet the report does not mention how he paid. He had also previously, when asked why he had not listed the liquidators' debt as a liability, maintained he had "met [his] obligations" — a statement the ethics committee later found was incorrect. Transparency International's Mr Moore said even if a payments disclosure "is not technically required under the letter of the law, the spirit of democratic accountability calls for more openness". "Transparency is not a technicality, it is a test of leadership." Deputy Opposition Leader Cameron Dick argued in June that questions remained.
