This common prescription drug could reduce deaths by sepsis, study finds
Researchers set out to explore whether the cholesterol-busting drugs may bring additional benefits for patients.
The new study examined information on sepsis patients who received statins during a stint in intensive care and compared it with patients in a similar situation who did not receive statins.
Some 14.3 per cent of 6,000 sepsis patients who were given statins died within 28 days.
This is compared with 23.4 per cent of 6,000 patients who did not receive statin therapy.
The research team from China said that this equates to a 39 per cent reduced risk of death within a month.
The research, based on data from thousands of patients at a hospital in Israel between 2008 and 2019, also found that 7.4 per cent of statin patients died while in the intensive care unit compared with 13.6 per cent of those who did not receive statins.
And during their overall hospital stay, some 11.5 per cent of sepsis patients who were given statins died, compared with 19.1 per cent of sepsis patients who did not take statins.
However, it appeared that those who were not prescribed statins had a slightly shorter hospital stay compared with those who did receive them – an average of eight days compared with almost 10 days.
'We found that statin users exhibited decreased 28-day all-cause mortality,' the authors wrote in the journal Frontiers in Immunology.
Sepsis is a life-threatening reaction to an infection that occurs when the immune system overreacts and starts to damage the body's tissues and organs.
In the UK, 245,000 people are affected by sepsis every year.
UK sepsis experts said that 'anything which might reduce the burden of a condition which claims one in five lives worldwide needs to be rigorously explored' as they called for larger trials to confirm the findings.
Statins are known as cholesterol-busting drugs because they can help lower the level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in the blood.
But experts said that they also have other benefits, including reducing inflammation and antibacterial effects.
The research team called for larger trials to confirm their findings.
'Our large, matched cohort study found that treatment with statins was associated with a 39 per cent lower death rate for critically ill patients with sepsis, when measured over 28 days after hospital admission,' said Dr Caifeng Li, the study's corresponding author and an associate professor at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital in China.
'These results strongly suggest that statins may provide a protective effect and improve clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis.'
Commenting on the study, Dr Ron Daniels, founder and chief executive of the UK Sepsis Trust, said: 'It has been known for some time that the anti-inflammatory properties of statins confer a survival benefit on those who take them if they develop sepsis.
'Whilst previous studies have failed to show a similar survival benefit in treating people with sepsis with statins, this new study supports calls for a large, multi-country, randomised control trial.
'Anything which might reduce the burden of a condition which claims one in five lives worldwide needs to be rigorously explored.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Scientists uncover new reason to avoid caffeine at night
New research suggests that consuming caffeine at night can lead to increased impulsivity, not just wakefulness. A study on fruit flies found that those given caffeine at night displayed "reckless" flying behaviour, being less able to suppress movement in challenging conditions. Female fruit flies exhibited a more pronounced impulsive response to nighttime caffeine compared to males, despite similar intake levels. The findings indicate potential negative implications for individuals, especially women and those who work night shifts. Researchers are continuing to investigate the specific mechanisms behind these effects and why daytime caffeine consumption did not yield similar results.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Researchers find milk type that increases risk of heart disease and death
A 33-year study conducted in Norway has investigated the long-term health impacts of consuming full-fat versus low-fat milk. Researchers analysed health data from 73,860 individuals, finding that the fat content of milk influenced the risk of death from heart disease. The study revealed that individuals who consumed full-fat milk had a higher mortality risk compared to those who drank low-fat milk. Specifically, consuming low-fat milk was linked to an 11 per cent lower overall mortality risk and a 7 per cent reduced risk of cardiovascular disease compared to whole milk. These findings support current NHS health advice, which cautions against high intake of saturated fat found in full-fat dairy due to its link to increased cholesterol and heart disease risk.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Clear signs of systematic starvation in the Gaza Strip
It is possible that Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq has chronic medical conditions, but the picture of him that the Guardian published leaves no doubt that he is also suffering from malnutrition (We published a photo of a malnourished child in Gaza. It made an impact globally – and created controversy, 6 August). David Collier implies that cerebral palsy might be the cause of this, but for many years paediatricians have rejected the belief that malnutrition is an inevitable consequence of this condition, or indeed of many other chronic diseases affecting children. Nutritional supplementation, delivered if necessary by feeding tube, has been shown to prevent or reverse malnutrition in children with cerebral palsy when appropriate nutritional needs are met. Of course, vulnerable children with chronic conditions are likely to be the first affected by the destruction of medical services, including unavailability of 'specialist medical supplements'. This is hardly surprising given the blocking by Israel of aid shipments, including food and medical supplies, and the deliberate targeting of health infrastructure and staff. Even for those determined to find alternative explanations such as an undiagnosed genetic disorder, this picture certainly illustrates severe malnutrition. I would suggest that the most likely cause for this is now obvious to most John PuntisRetired paediatric consultant gastroenterologist, Leeds Would Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq's bones be so visible if he was living anywhere other than Gaza? How about if he was living a few miles across the border in Israel? I think we all know the answer to that. But clearly there are some individuals (no doubt well-fed individuals) for whom even this needs spelling out. Yes, that's right, Gazan children with health conditions do lose weight when denied food, just as much as those born healthy. And let's not call it a man-made famine. Let's please call it as it is: an Israeli-made famine. Shirin FareedTwickenham, London Many of my wife's Jewish family and of mine were victims of the Holocaust. The world remained largely silent. We were among the few who were reluctantly given asylum in New Zealand. The Jewish cry 'Never again!' is more than justified. It has not been heeded. With the western world's complicity, the victims now are the people of Palestine, robbed of their ancestral land, massacred in the tens of thousands, tortured in Israel's prisons, threatened with expulsion, starved by design ('We are dying slowly, save us': starvation takes hold in Gaza after a week of appalling milestones, 2 August), treated as less than human – all this in defiance of international law. The belated recognition of a Palestinian state is no more than window-dressing for as long as the Palestine that was remains under cruel military occupation. The time for measured language is well past. It is time for action. Sanctions ended apartheid South Africa. Archbishop Tutu held Israel's crimes to be worse. Nato acted in Kosovo. Why not in Gaza? Is the last word to be left with the White House as children go on dying? I write as a former chair of Amnesty International UK, one of the many NGOs now naming the genocide for what it is. Peace Now is possible, with the necessary political Dr Paul Oestreicher and Prof Barbara EinhornWellington, New Zealand While I agree with much of what Hussein Agha and Robert Malley say (France and Britain's recognition of a Palestinian state won't stop Israel's onslaught, 30 July), the public intention to give symbolic recognition to Palestine by France and others, and possibly the UK, is nevertheless a positive step forward. It sends the clear message, from some of the more powerful states in international politics, that the Palestinian people do deserve the right to self-determination. The act of international recognition points to the lack of – and urgent need for – territory, government and sovereignty for Palestinians, whether in a one-state ('dignified coexistence'), federal-state or two-state model. Both Israel and Palestine deserve the right to self-determination, and that is an achievable goal, however repellent to the current Israeli Raia BrowningOxford I read your article with shock as well as horror (The mathematics of starvation: how Israel caused a famine in Gaza, 31 July). What a devastating exposure of the chillingly callous use of deliberately finely tuned starvation, behind which surely lies a cruelty that many will struggle to understand. Peter MillenHuddersfield, West Yorkshire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
