
How the wife of Hamas leader 'The Butcher' fled Gaza on a fake passport after his assassination - and then remarried in Turkey
Samar Muhammad Abu Zamar, widow of Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas military commander who was killed by IDF forces in October 2024, allegedly escaped the war-torn enclave using a fake passport and carrying 'significant sums of cash'.
Sources in Gaza told Israeli news site Ynet that Abu Zamar remarried in Turkey just months after Sinwar's death, in a wedding and relocation operation overseen by Hamas political bureau member Fathi Hammad, long linked to smuggling fighters and their families out of the Strip.
The claims come as footage from 2024 resurfaced showing Abu Zamar walking through a Hamas tunnel just hours before the October 7 massacre - carrying what appeared to be a designer handbag.
Although officially unconfirmed, the story has been widely reported in Israel.
An Israeli security official told Ynet that Abu Zamar, along with Najwa Sinwar, the wife of Mohmmed Sinwar - who succeeded his brother as Hamas chief after his death - both crossed into Egypt through the Rafah crossing using forged documents.
'She's no longer here - she crossed through the Rafah border using a fake passport,' a source said of Abu Zamar, saying the escape required 'high-level coordination, logistical support, and large sums of money that regular Gazans don't have'.
The revelations have sparked fresh outrage among ordinary Palestinians, many of whom remain trapped in Gaza after 19 months of relentless war, while the families of senior Hamas figures reportedly live in comfort abroad.
'They send their children to study in Turkey and Qatar – and send ours to the grave,' one Gazan civilian said. 'What makes them different from any corrupt ruler in the Arab world? They only look after themselves'.
Hamas, which styles itself as the vanguard of Palestinian resistance, has long been accused of exploiting the suffering of its own people while sheltering its leadership and their families overseas.
The Islamist group's military network has been shattered since the October 7 attacks, with only one senior commander, Izz al-Din al-Haddad, believed to still be alive.
Abu Zamar's former husband, Yahya Sinwar, was assassinated in October last year after being hunted by intelligence services and the Israeli Defence Forces for over a year.
Ultimately, his assassination was seemingly by chance, with the group of trainee soldiers responsible for the Hamas chief's death not knowing his true identity at the time, according to reports.
Israeli officials have said the 61-year-old - who has long been dubbed the Butcher of Khan Younis - was killed after he emerged from the underground tunnel network where he had been hiding.
A unit from the IDF's 828th Bislamach Brigade was patrolling Tal al-Sultan, an area of Rafah, when it came across a group of three Hamas fighters in the street and engaged them in a firefight.
The terrorists were 'on the run' moving from house to house, the IDF said, and became split up.
One of them, since identified as Sinwar, 'ran alone into one of the buildings'. He went up to the second floor, and troops responded by firing a tank shell in his direction.
The unit, made up of trainee infantry commanders and reservists, then began to sweep the area, according to Israeli reports from the time.
Two grenades were thrown at them, one of which exploded while the other failed to go off.
The troops decided it was too dangerous to proceed and pulled back, sending in a mini drone to trace the fleeing fighter instead.
Dramatic footage released by the IDF showed the bloodied Sinwar, his face concealed by a scarf, throwing a stick in a final attempt to defend himself against the drone just seconds before he was assassinated.
Two 120mm tank shells slammed into the building, as well as a surface-to-surface Matador missile, with shrapnel scything across the upper floors and killing Sinwar.
Unaware they had taken out Israel's prime target, the soldiers did not return to the site until the following morning, when soldiers from the 450th Infantry Battalion were sent in to get a closer look.
As they inspected the dead, they realised one bore a striking resemblance to the Hamas leader.
Graphic images emerged of his corpse lying on the rubble surrounded by Israeli soldiers, while close ups showed a catastrophic head wound and multiple injuries.
He was found with a weapon, a flak jacket and 40,000 shekels (£8,250).
'Yahya Sinouar had a lot of cash and fake passports on him, he was ready to flee,' Israeli army spokesman Colonel Olivier Rafowicz told French outlet CNEWS.
He claimed that the items Sinwar had on him, which allegedly also included a card from UNRWA, the UN aid for Palestinian refugees, 'may show that he was ready to flee and leave Gaza and his men behind.'
Booby traps around the area meant the corpse had to be left in place, but part of one of his fingers was removed and sent for testing.
Confirmation of his death took several hours, with multiple tests carried out, and his identity eventually confirmed with dental records and fingerprints.
Four hours after it confirmed it was investigating whether the Hamas leader had been killed, the military issued a simple message on social media: 'Eliminated: Yahya Sinwar.'
Pictures show Israeli troops carrying a body, believed to be Sinwar's, out of the destroyed building on a stretcher.
Recently, hostage talks have stalled, reportedly due to the difficulty of even reaching Hamas's scattered leadership in Gaza.
But despite occasional deadly ambushes on Israeli troops, Hamas is no longer capable of large-scale coordinated operations, analysts have said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man admits smuggling people to UK from France
A man has admitted smuggling people into the UK from France, a court has Hassan, 27, pleaded guilty that between 1 August 2024 and 18 September 2024 he conspired with others to organise a boat trip across the English Channel for a number of adults and children who were not UK Hassan was one of nine people stranded on a boat 10 miles off Berry Head, Devon, in September 2024 who were rescued by an RNLI crew, Plymouth Crown Court was remanded in custody and will be sentenced in August.


The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How do we lead moral lives in an age of bullies?
We are living in an age of bullies. Those with power are less constrained today than they have been in my lifetime, since the end of the second world war. The question is: how do we lead moral lives in this era? Vladimir Putin launches a horrendous war on Ukraine. After Hamas's atrocity, Benjamin Netanyahu bombs Gaza to smithereens and is now starving to death its remaining occupants. Trump abducts thousands of hardworking people within the US and puts them into detention camps – splitting their families, spreading fear. His immigration agents are accused of targeting people with brown skin. He usurps the powers of Congress, defies the courts, and prosecutes his enemies. He and his Republican lackeys cut Medicaid and food stamps – lifelines for poor people, including millions of children – so the wealthy can get a tax cut. Hate-mongers on rightwing television and social media fuel bigotry against transgender people, immigrants, Muslims, people of color, and LGBTQ+ people. Powerful men abuse women. Some of the abused are children. Powerful male politicians make it impossible for women to obtain safe abortions. CEOs rake in record profits and compensation while giving workers meager wages and firing them for unionizing. Billionaires make large campaign donations – legalized bribes – so lawmakers will cut their taxes and repeal regulations. Each such abuse of power encourages other abuses. Each undermines norms of civility. Every time the stronger bully the weaker, the social fabric is tested. If bullying is not contained, the fabric unwinds. Those who are bullied – who feel powerless, vulnerable, bitter, and desperate – become fodder for 'strongmen', demagogues who lead them into violence, war and tyranny. This is hardly new. Throughout history, the central struggle of civilization has been against brutality by the powerful. Civilization is the opposite of brutality. A civil society doesn't allow the strong to brutally treat the weak. Yet in my lifetime, I've witnessed a breakdown. I've seen a change occur – from support of decency and constraints on brutality, to tolerance of indecency and support for unconstrained cruelty. Trump is not the cause. He's the culmination. So how do we lead moral lives in this age of bullies? We do everything we can to stop the brutality, to hold the powerful accountable, and to protect the vulnerable. Putin and Netanyahu are war criminals whose criminality must be stopped. Trump is a dictator who must be deposed. Rightwing politicians who encourage white Christian nationalism must be condemned and voted out of office. Pundits who amplify racism and xenophobia must lose their megaphones. Powerful men who sexually harass or abuse women or children must be prosecuted. Women must have full control over their bodies, including access to safe abortions. Police who kill innocent people of color must be brought to justice. Immigration agents must be prohibited from abducting people off the street or from their homes or court houses or places of work. CEOs who treat their employees like manure must be exposed and penalized. Billionaires who bribe lawmakers to cut their taxes or exempt them from regulations must be sanctioned, as should lawmakers who accept such bribes. This isn't a matter of 'left' or 'right'. It's a matter of what's right. Living a moral life in an age of bullies requires collective action; it cannot be done alone. Each of us must organize and participate in a vast network of moral resistance. This is what civilization demands. It's what the struggle for social justice requires. It's why that struggle is so critical today, and why we all must be part of it. Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is a professor of public policy emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley. He is a Guardian US columnist. His newsletter is at His next book, Coming Up Short: A Memoir of My America, will be out on 5 August


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Starmer right to reject demands to recognise Palestinian state
When the Prime Minister meets Donald Trump in Scotland today they will have many more pressing matters to discuss than the American President's golf swing. Gaza faces the prospect of mass starvation. The decision of Israel 's government on Saturday night to let in limited humanitarian aid will provide some relief but the crisis certainly hasn't passed. Meanwhile, Sir Keir Starmer is besieged by Cabinet ministers led by Deputy PM Angela Rayner , plus scores of Labour MPs. They want him to recognise a Palestinian state. Last week President Macron announced that France will do so in September. How will Starmer respond to these challenges? I hesitate to say this, but it seems to me that our normally accident-prone Prime Minister has hitherto acted in a surprisingly sensible way as far as Gaza is concerned. He was right on Saturday to say that Britain will work with Jordan to drop aid into Gaza by air, ignoring the reservations of the United Nations and many aid agencies, which say that lorries can deliver much more food than air drops. Surely aid must be sent by whatever means possible, and for as long as too little aid is being distributed in Gaza it makes sense to drop some of it by air even if this involves some danger. Starmer was also right to offer to evacuate children from Gaza who need urgent medical attention, and could get it in Britain. Let's hope this happens. The PM is wise, too, to resist calls to recognise a Palestinian state now. There are several strong arguments against doing so. The strongest of them all is that the President of the United States is adamantly opposed. We may not like it, but the truth is that Britain has minimal direct influence over the Israeli government despite having ruled Palestine from 1917 to 1947, and paved the way for the creation of the state of Israel through the Balfour Declaration. The only government in the world that has appreciable influence over Israel is that of the United States. The only foreign leader to whom the belligerent, hard-hearted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will listen is President Donald Trump. President Macron may have got a kick out of recognising a Palestinian state, but it was classic virtue signalling that will change nothing on the ground and deprive France of any slight influence it might otherwise have enjoyed. Almost the only way Starmer can apply pressure on Israel is through the good offices of Trump. The American President alone is capable of encouraging Netanyahu to resume ceasefire talks with Hamas. Far more than any other leader, Trump may be able to persuade the Israelis to show mercy towards starving civilians in Gaza. You may say he doesn't care but I doubt that. He sees himself as a man of peace. He is often glued to television news, and has probably been as appalled as the rest of us by pictures of emaciated children. It's also increasingly clear that the Trump administration doesn't have a starry-eyed view of the Israeli government. For example, it has demanded an explanation for the recent killing of a Palestinian-American by Israeli settlers in the West Bank. The US ambassador to Jerusalem, Mike Huckabee, who is no liberal, called it a 'criminal and terrorist act'. There's a chance that Sir Keir can persuade Donald Trump that he should be a more critical friend of Israel than he has been. Events may already be pushing him in that direction. We should remember too – and here we must suppress all astonishment – that Trump seems genuinely to like the British Prime Minister. On arriving in Scotland on Friday, he actually said as much. Starmer knows that the one thing that would destroy such sway as he may hold over Trump's mercurial mind would be recognition by Britain of a Palestinian state. That remains a red line for the President, and rightly so. His grasp of Middle Eastern politics may not be enormous but it extends to a realisation that Israel can't be expected to recognise a state whose rulers might include Hamas. Until or unless Hamas is extirpated, the group remains in charge of what remains of Gaza, which would form part of any future Palestinian state. After the barbarities of October 7, 2023, when some 1,200 Israelis were butchered by terrorists, no Israeli government will countenance Hamas continuing in power. That would rightly be seen as a reward for its atrocities. Perhaps some time in the future – if Hamas no longer exists – there will be a Palestinian state living peaceably alongside Israel. I certainly hope so. It is a dream that several Israeli leaders have shared in the recent past. Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert reiterated his support for a Palestinian state on Radio 4 yesterday morning. He has recently accused Netanyahu's government of committing war crimes, and said yesterday that it should have acted sooner to alleviate famine in Gaza. Not all Israeli politicians are monsters. Believe it or not, Netanyahu himself, although historically opposed to a Palestinian state, made a speech in 2009 that conceived of such an entity so long as it was demilitarised and restricted in size, though admittedly he said this under pressure from President Obama's liberal administration. Even former prime minister Ariel Sharon, who was a pretty rough diamond to put it mildly, in 2003 accepted in principle the idea of a demilitarised Palestinian state. It was he, of course, who forced Israeli settlers to leave Gaza in 2005. Two years later, Hamas was firing rockets and mortar shells into southern Israel. It is by no means inconceivable that a future Israeli government will acknowledge a Palestinian state. It is just more difficult to imagine after what happened on October 7 – and impossible to envisage as long as Hamas remains part of the equation. So Sir Keir Starmer is absolutely right not to cave into Labour demands for instant recognition. He will be able to work on Donald Trump today, and when they meet again during the President's state visit in September, and try to persuade him to exert more pressure on the obdurate Netanyahu. Whether the Prime Minister will hold the line for long is much less certain. After all, he is a master of the U-turn, having changed his mind over the winter fuel allowance, welfare reform and a string of other policies.