Stauber proposes 'Superior National Forest Restoration Act' that would reopen area to mining
The proposed legislation, titled the "Superior National Forest Restoration Act," would reopen a 225,504-acre area for sulfide-ore copper mining contracts.
If approved, it would rescind the 20-year mining moratorium implemented by President Joe Biden in 2023, following an attempt by President Donald Trump during his first term in the White House to open up the area to mining.
In his statement, Stauber says his bill would reinstate mineral leases in the area, describing that Biden's decision to protect it "a direct attack on our way of life in northern Minnesota" that "threatened our nation's strategic national security."
"Thankfully, with Donald Trump back in the White House and Republicans in control of both Chambers of Congress, we are well positioned to reverse the damage done by President Biden and turn Minnesota into a critical mineral powerhouse," he added.
Conservation group Save The Boundary Waters says that the bill would automatically force the issuance of federal mineral leases to Chilean mining giant Antofagasta, and introduced an expedited review timeline on any environmental review and project permits within the watershed of the Boundary Waters and Voyageurs National Park.
"Rep. Stauber's bill is a giveaway of America's most popular wilderness area – the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness – to a foreign mining company,' said Ingrid Lyons, Executive Director of Save the Boundary Waters.
"Rep. Stauber's bill undermines the robust record of science, public opinion, law, and economics that clearly demonstrates that this iconic American landscape is absolutely no place for our nation's most dangerous industry."
A previous version of the bill passed the U.S. House of Representatives in April 2024.The Boundary Waters has been the subject of a tug-of-war for the past decade, with the Obama Administration halted mineral exploration leases in 2016, only for them to be renewed by Trump during his first term as president.
Biden then reversed Trump's order, ordering 350 square miles of the forest and Rainy River Watershed near Ely to be closed to mineral and geothermal leasing for two decades – the longest amount of time it can issue the moratorium without congressional approval.
Much like many of the Trump Administration's recent actions in its first few weeks in power, it follows the advice of Project 2025 — a blueprint for Trump's second presidency put together by conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation — which advised the repeal of the protection on mining in the Boundary Waters watershed.
According to a Public Land Order (PLO) signed by then-U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland in 2023, resource scientists and professional land managers in the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management stated that a reversal of protections would cause environmental risks from sulfide-ore copper mining on land, water, and to wildlife.
The order also said it would cause harm to Native American communities, violate treaty rights and resources; and accelerate climate change impacts through the destruction of forest land and the vast consumption of energy by mining companies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
14 minutes ago
- New York Post
Texas Democrats say they're ending a two-week walkout over gerrymandered US House map plan
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Democrats say they are ending a two-week walkout that stalled Republican efforts to redraw congressional districts to satisfy President Donald Trump's demands for a greater GOP advantage. Democratic leaders say they will return for a second special legislative session after seeing California Democratic leaders proceed with plans to redraw their own U.S. House maps to neutralize Republican gains in Texas. 3 Texas Rep. Gene Wu speaks at a rally on August 16, 2025. AP 3 Protesters demonstrate outside the State Capitol in Austin, Texas, on August 16, 2025. AP The nation's two most populous states have been at the forefront of a national fight to reshape the congressional landscape ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Trump has sought to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms during his first presidency, when Democrats regained House control and used their majority to stymie his agenda and twice impeach him. 3 Greg Abbott is the governor of Texas. REUTERS Dozens of Texas House Democrats left the state more than two weeks ago to deny the GOP majority the attendance necessary to vote on redrawn maps intended to send five more Texas Republicans to Washington. They declared victory after Republicans adjourned that first session and Democrats around the country rallied in opposition to the Trump-led gerrymandering effort.


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Democrats urge Trump to walk back Nvidia, AMD deal
Several top Senate Democrats are urging President Trump to walk back a deal with Nvidia and AMD that would allow the companies to sell artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China after they agreed to share 15 percent of revenue from sales. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) argued in a letter sent Friday that the move runs counter to U.S. national security interests and could violate the law. Warner is the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, while Reed, Shaheen and Warren are the top Democrats on the Senate Armed Services, Foreign Relations and Banking panels, respectively. 'This 'negotiated deal,' allowing American semiconductor manufacturers to pay a 15 percent fee for the ability to sell critically sensitive technology to our adversary, blatantly violates the purpose of export control laws,' they wrote. Nvidia and AMD have each agreed to share 15 percent of revenue from the sales of their H20 and MI308 chips in order to secure export licenses from the Trump administration, which had imposed new licensing restrictions effectively blocking sales earlier this year. The deal has raised legal questions, as federal law prohibits fees on export licenses, while the Constitution bars export taxes. However, it's unclear whether the agreement would be considered a formal fee or tax and whether anyone would challenge the move. It has also provoked national security concerns, as the U.S. seeks to outpace China on AI and prevent Beijing from using the technology to boost its military capabilities. 'Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains,' the senators said. 'The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies.' 'The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm,' they added. The Democratic lawmakers pressed Trump for information about who participated in the negotiations, what legal standards were applied, how the 15 percent will be determined and collected, what the funds will be used for and what other companies are under consideration for such a deal. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested last week that the administration could pursue similar agreements in the future, even as the legality and mechanics of the Nvidia and AMD deal are 'still being ironed out' by the Commerce Department. 'Right now, it stands with these two companies. Perhaps it could expand in the future to other companies,' she said. 'I think it's a creative idea and solution.'


Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
The last time Zelensky met Trump in the Oval Office, things got heated. Here's what happened.
Tensions flared when Vance confronted Zelensky, saying, 'Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In response, Zelensky asked Vance, who has criticized efforts to send US aid to Ukraine, if he had ever visited his country. Advertisement 'Had you ever been to Ukraine? Did you see the problems we have?' Zelensky asked Vance. Vance replied that he had only seen 'the stories.' When Zelensky pointed out that the US had not fully grasped the war's repercussions, Trump bristled. 'You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel,' Trump told Zelensky, raising his voice. 'You're in no position to dictate that.' 'You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards,' Trump added. 'You're gambling with World War III, and what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country, that has backed you.' Advertisement After the Oval Office meeting, Trump 'He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace,' Trump wrote. Alyssa Vega can be reached at