Does Canada supply electricity to US? What to know after lawmaker's threat of surcharge, shutoff
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Canadian, Mexican and American industries react as tariffs take effect
North Americans in the auto, agriculture and toy industries shared their reactions to new tariffs.
With President Donald Trump imposing 25% tariffs on goods imported from Canada and Mexico, leaders from both countries have responded in kind, with one even threatening to charge more for or shut off Michigan's, New York's and Minnesota's electricity.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford shared an X post on Tuesday stating that he spoke with leaders in New York, Michigan and Minnesota, "putting them on notice" that his province is prepared to add a 25% surcharge on the electricity it exports to their states if Trump's tariffs remain in place.
"If we have to, we won't hesitate to increase the charge or shut the electricity off completely," Ford wrote in the X post.
During Trump's formal address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, he said the "tariffs are about making America rich again and making America great again." The 78-year-old cautioned that "there will be a little disturbance" due to his tariffs, but he then said, "We're OK with that. It won't be much."
The Canadian government announced on Tuesday that it will move forward with 25% retaliatory tariffs on billions worth of goods imported from the U.S., beginning immediately with a list of goods worth $30 billion. The counter-tariffs will be increased to $155 billion if the current U.S. tariffs remain in place, and this number could rise even more if new tariffs are imposed, Canadian officials said.
Here is what to know about the statement made by Ford, and just how feasible it is for each of the three states.
What will happen to New York's electricity?
In a statement released late last February, the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) said, "The U.S. and Canada have one of the most integrated electric grids in the world, allowing system operators in both countries to pool resources for improved reliability and economic efficiency."
"We are in close and regular contact with Hydro Quebec and Ontario's Independent Electricity System Operator," the statement continued. "The NYISO anticipates having adequate supplies to meet expected demand on the system.'
The NYISO called the "reliable (and) uninterrupted" flow of electricity across the Canadian interties "critical to protect the health, safety and welfare of New York citizens, residents across the Northeast U.S., and the citizens of Canada."
"The NYISO and neighboring system operators have serious concerns that applying export tariffs to electricity may have serious adverse effects on reliability and wholesale electric markets," according to the not-for-profit corporation.
With the Canadian tariff order going into effect on Tuesday, the NYISO said in its statement that it was unclear whether imports of electrical energy from Canada would be impacted. When contacted by USA TODAY on Wednesday, a spokesperson for the corporation said it had "no further comment at this time," but would provide more updates as the process continues.
What will happen to Michigan's electricity?
Michigan will be affected if Ford's threat is carried out, but the state does not consume most of the considerable amount of electricity it receives from Ontario, Dan Scripps, chair of the Michigan Public Service Commission and a former state representative, told the Detroit Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network.
The electricity from Ontario goes through Michigan and into several other states that together make up the Eastern Interconnection, which is an electrical grid that stretches from central Canada to states east of the Rocky Mountains, according to Scripps.
Michigan Utilities, DTE Energy and Consumers Energy generate a lot of their own electricity or have long-term purchase agreements with wholesale markets, Scripps added.
Although Michigan may not get a ton of power from Canada, Scripps said it's difficult to determine the impact of Ford's threat, but he did acknowledge that customers in the state will likely see an increase in power prices.
"On the reliability side, I have bigger concerns,' he said. 'This flow, called the Lake Erie flow loop, is beneficial for grid reliability on both sides of the (U.S./Canada) border."
A disruption of the flow of power could increase the risk of power outages across the U.S. and Canada, according to Scripps.
What will happen to Minnesota's electricity?
Utility officials and regional grid operators in Minnesota told the Star Tribune that Ford's threat is unlikely to have serious consequences for the state.
The Minnesota officials' comments come after the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) reported that the state's electric grid is at high risk for power shortages. The NERC's 2024 Long-Term Reliability Assessment, which provides projections for 2025 to 2034, said the region Minnesota is a part of is the only one of 11 regions that have a ranking of a 'high' risk assessment.
"High-risk areas are likely to experience a shortfall in electricity supplies at the peak of an averagesummer or winter season," the NERC said.
In a statement released in January, Darrick Moe, the president and CEO of the Minnesota Rural Electric Association, said, "We must heed the warnings issued by our not-for-profit regulatory authorities about the future of power supply in our region. We can't continue to shut down plants and delay the permitting of generation resources that will help shore-up Minnesota's reliability.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Energy officials say termination of Solar for All program will hurt low-income Mainers
(Stock photo by Sirisak Boakaew/ Getty Images) Maine energy officials on Friday decried the Trump administration's announcement it will cancel nearly $7 billion in grants to fund solar energy projects for low-income households, saying it will raise costs for Maine people, particularly those with lower incomes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sent notices to states and other recipients of grants through the Solar for All program, which Democrats created in their massive 2022 taxes, energy and domestic policy law, that the agency was canceling all unspent funds from the initiative. The EPA said Republicans eliminated the federal fund that distributed the program's money in the 'one big, beautiful' law President Donald Trump signed on July 4. 'Thousands of Maine people stood to benefit from lower energy bills delivered by the Solar for All program,' said Dan Burgess, director of the Governor's Energy Office. 'Terminating this funding doesn't help Maine people, it only hurts them.' In April 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency awarded Maine $62 million through the federal Solar for All program that supports the state's clean energy workforce, in addition to expanding solar to low-income households. Just last month, the EPA approved the state's plan to implement the program so benefits could reach Mainers by 2026, according to a Friday news release from the Governor's Energy Office. However, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced on social media that the new law terminated the agency's legal ability to distribute the funds. 'The bottom line again is this: EPA no longer has the authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive,' Zeldin said in a video posted to X. 'With clear language and intent from Congress in the one big, beautiful bill, EPA is taking action to end this program for good. We are committed to the rule of law and being a good steward of taxpayer dollars.' Solar for All was projected to help over 20,000 low-income Maine households save between $380 and $1,400 annually on their energy bills through incentives for rooftop solar and a new community solar and storage program. Solar can lower costs and improve reliability by reducing demand on the electrical grid, lowering wholesale energy prices and circumventing the need for costly transmission and distribution investments, the state energy office noted. It also lessens the reliance on fossil fuels, which come with volatile price tags while exacerbating climate change. Part of the funding was also earmarked to support workforce training for over 700 Maine residents in essential building trades including electrical work, construction, maintenance and repair. 'Canceling the program deprives Maine of access to affordable solar, energy storage, and the skilled electricians, installers, and construction workers needed to meet our energy and economic needs now and in the future,' Burgess said. He added that the state remains committed to the program and will explore options to preserve it. His office is consulting with the Office of the Maine Attorney General on next steps. When Maine received its Solar for All grant in 2024, the state had 977 megawatts of solar energy installed, an increase from the 62 megawatts that were in place five years earlier. The majority of solar arrays in Maine are small-scale, less than 5 megawatts. Democrats created the Solar for All fund as part of the $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund in the law they passed without any GOP support in either chamber and President Joe Biden signed in August 2022. The Solar for All fund was meant to bring the benefits of solar power to 900,000 households in low-income communities, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Asked about the program's termination, U.S. Sen. Susan Collins told the Portland Press Herald it 'would be unfortunate news,' but that underscored the risk of including such a grant program in a 'completely partisan bill.' 'Not one Republican voted for the Inflation Reduction Act that included this grant program,' Collins reportedly said. 'While it is no surprise now that control of the White House has changed that the new administration would consider terminating this IRA program, my staff has asked the EPA for additional information.' According to a list on the EPA website, the awardees included the Executive Office of the State of New Hampshire; Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources; the Maine Governor's Energy Office; the Alaska Energy Authority; the Oregon Department of Energy; Washington State Department of Commerce; Bonneville Environmental Foundation in Idaho; Tanana Chiefs Conference in Alaska; New Jersey Board of Public Utilities; Maryland Clean Energy Center; Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority; Virginia Department of Energy; West Virginia Office of Energy; Department of Environment and Conservation Tennessee; Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet; North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality; South Carolina Office of Resilience; the Solar and Energy Loan Fund of St. Lucie County, Inc., in Florida; the Capital Good Fund in Georgia; Minnesota Department of Commerce; the State of Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy; the State of Ohio Office of Budget and Management State Accounting; Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation; Indiana Community Action Association Inc.; New Mexico Energy, Minerals, & Natural Resources Department; State of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources; Hope Enterprise Corporation in Arkansas; the Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority; the Center for Rural Affairs in Nebraska; Colorado Energy Office; Utah Office of Energy Development; Bonneville Environmental Foundation in Montana; Coalition for Green Capital in North Dakota; Coalition for Green Capital in South Dakota; Executive Office of the State of Arizona; Nevada Clean Energy Fund; Hopi Utilities Corporation in Arizona; and other programs that covered multiple states and tribes. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Campaigners rally together in bid to save 'vital' bus service
Campaigners in Chandler's Ford are pushing to save a vital bus service that is due to be cut by Hampshire County Council. Residents in Knightwood and Valley Park are fighting to prevent the loss of the 46 bus, the last remaining public transport link in their area, which is set to be withdrawn on Friday, August 29. The campaign follows a successful deputation by Hampshire resident Susan Dorsett to a full county council meeting in May, where she presented a petition with 1,676 signatures calling for the restoration of multiple cut routes. Ms Dorsett said: "Fellow campaigners and I say they will not rest until the councils and transport providers have included us in extensive consultations and put in place both emergency and long-term, regular, reliable, frequent public transport reconnecting our communities with the daily services, people, and destinations we would like to access. "Failure is not an option. "Public transport is a necessity for daily life and ought not to only be accessible to town and city dwellers on profit-making bus routes. "We need to reduce the number of cars on our roads; the congestion in our town and city centres, and the environmental damage. "We are aware of the Bus Service Improvement Plan monies and other funding which the government has allocated to HCC specifically to prevent the loss of routes such as ours. "We trust that HCC will now reprioritise some of these monies as the government intended, to help fund our vital bus services." READ MORE: Itchen Bridge lined with suicide prevention campaigners Councillor Lulu Bowerman, Hampshire County Council's head of passenger transport, agreed to meet with Ms Dorsett in Knightwood and Valley Park after the May deputation. Susan Dorsett (Image: Submitted) The meeting will take place on Wednesday, with campaigners set to present four key proposals and additional solutions developed over the summer. A spokesperson for Hampshire County Council said: 'The council continues to face significant and well documented financial pressures. "In autumn 2024, we reviewed savings proposals across 13 service areas, including passenger transport, to help balance our 2025/26 budget. "Following public consultation, the Authority agreed to withdraw discretionary funding for local bus services that are not commercially viable, including the no. 46 service from North Baddesley to Winchester. "We recognise the importance of local bus services to communities such as Knightwood and Valley Park which is why we continue to explore and promote alternative transport options that may be available.'


NBC News
33 minutes ago
- NBC News
DOJ investigating N.Y. AG's office and Sen. Adam Schiff
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has appointed a "special attorney" to probe mortgage fraud allegations against Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James, two administration officials told NBC News. The Justice Department is also in the initial stages of an investigation of James over her successful civil fraud case against President Donald Trump, according to three people familiar with the matter. Bondi tapped Ed Martin, a conservative activist and former interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., as special attorney to investigate Schiff and James, both prominent Democratic opponents of the president, the two administration officials said. A senior law enforcement official said a grand jury seated in the Eastern District of Virginia will investigate the James mortgage fraud allegations and a grand jury in Maryland will investigate the allegations against Schiff. Martin met Friday morning with Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte, who sent a criminal referral on the California senator to the Justice Department in May, the administration officials said. Pulte sent a referral on James in April, prompting the Justice Department to open an investigation on allegations that she made false statements on mortgage loan applications. Trump had previously called for both Democratic officials to be prosecuted because of the mortgage fraud allegations. Schiff and James have denied wrongdoing. Preet Bharara, who is representing Schiff, said in a statement Friday that the allegations against the senator 'are transparently false, stale, and long debunked.' Schiff previously blasted Trump's claims, in a video statement in July. "This is the kind of stuff you see tinpot dictators do. It is designed to intimidate his political opponents and somehow try to silence them," he said then. The U.S. attorney probe of James is focused on whether her office used its authority to violate Trump's legal rights through its civil lawsuits against the president and his businesses, according to three people familiar with the matter. That investigation is also looking at whether the National Rifle Association's rights were violated by her civil suits, the three sources said. It is being run out of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of New York, two of those sources said. In response to an NBC News inquiry, a spokesperson for the attorney general's office said: 'Any weaponization of the justice system should disturb every American. We stand strongly behind our successful litigation against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, and we will continue to stand up for New Yorkers' rights.' A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's Office did not return a request for comment. James, a Democrat, successfully sued Trump and his company over what her office said were fraudulent misrepresentations of his wealth and financial statements. A judge awarded James' office over $300 million in the case, an amount that's since swelled to over $500 million with interest. Trump is appealing the judgment. James' office also sued the NRA and its leadership with mixed results. The attorney general had sought the dissolution of the NRA in what is commonly referred to as the corporate 'death penalty,' but a judge struck down those claims. In 2024, James' office did win its civil fraud case against the longtime head of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre, with a jury convicting him of diverting millions of dollars from the gun group for his own personal lifestyle. The gun group said it was "gratified" to find out about the investigation. "She uses her powers as an elected official to try, in her words, to 'dissolve the organization in its entirety', thus silencing the voice of millions of our members,' NRA Executive Vice President and CEO Doug Hamlin said in a statement. "That she now expresses concerns over 'weaponization' is the height of hypocrisy--an utter lack of self-awareness at the very least.' It is not immediately clear how far along the DOJ investigation into James' office is and what evidence, if any, the Justice Department has gathered in the probe. An attorney for James, Abbe Lowell, said the probe of James' fraud case against Trump and his businesses 'has to be the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign." "Weaponizing the Department of Justice to try to punish an elected official for doing her job is an attack on the rule of law and a dangerous escalation by this administration," he added. The FBI and Justice Department began its probe of the mortgage fraud allegations against James in the spring. It's unclear why Martin is now in charge of the review. Martin served as Trump's interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., earlier this year, but his nomination was withdrawn after Republican senators expressed concerns over his association with Jan. 6 rioters. Trump then announced in May that Martin was moving to the Justice Department to serve as director of a 'weaponization working group." Martin did not comment on the Friday appointment. In his statement defending Schiff, Bharara criticized Martin, calling him 'the most brazenly partisan and politically compromised person possible for the task.' 'Any supposed investigation led by him would be the very definition of weaponization of the justice process,' said Bharara, who served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York before being fired by Trump during his first term in office. Lowell pushed back on the allegations against James in an April letter to Bondi, acknowledging there were some mistaken forms while noting contemporaneous letters and forms showing that James submitted the correct information. The letter called the "threadbare allegations" the "next salvo in President Trump's revenge tour against Attorney General James." In addition to her fraud case against Trump and his companies, James and her office have launched a number of successful legal challenges to his administration's agenda, dating back to his first term in office. Trump has maintained that James is biased against him. In 2021, he sued to stop her from proceeding with her fraud investigation, saying, 'Her mission is guided solely by political animus and a desire to harass, intimidate, and retaliate against a private citizen who she views as a political opponent." The lawsuit also alleged that Trump was the victim of "viewpoint discrimination." Trump later dropped the suit, but has continued to criticize James, including in an April Truth Social post that called her a "wacky" and "totally corrupt politician" who should immediately resign.