logo
Researcher behind Trump-ordered gender dysphoria report outs himself, doubles down that medical transitions for minors isn't ethical

Researcher behind Trump-ordered gender dysphoria report outs himself, doubles down that medical transitions for minors isn't ethical

New York Posta day ago

An anonymous researcher behind a bombshell Trump-ordered review of transgender treatments on minors has outed himself as a liberal MIT professor — as he doubled down on the report's findings that medical intervention on underage kids isn't 'empirically or ethically justified.'
Alex Byrne, a philosophy professor at the elite Massachusetts school, revealed in a Washington Post op-ed Thursday that he was among the nine co-authors of the sweeping Department of Health and Human Services report published last month that found gender dysphoria among young patients should be treated with therapy instead of transition treatments.
Byrne, who described himself as 'hardly a fan of the current administration' and noted he'd never voted Republican, insisted the HHS' Gender Dysphoria Report wasn't 'written by zealots busily grinding axes' — despite outraged critics on the left immediately ripping the review.
Alex Byrne, a philosophy professor at MIT, was among the nine co-authors of the sweeping report published last month that found gender dysphoria should be treated with therapy instead of transition treatments for children.
alexbyrne.org
Instead, he argued that the report — which was sparked by one of Trump's early executive orders but written by a liberal majority — offered up a 'sober examination of what by any standards are drastic medical interventions for physically healthy minors.'
'After surveying all the evidence, and applying widely accepted principles of medical ethics, we found that medical transition for minors is not empirically or ethically justified,' Byrne wrote, noting that the findings were in alignment with scores of other reports commissioned by health authorities in other countries — including the UK.
'The review describes how the medicalized 'gender affirming care' approach to treating pediatric gender distress, endorsed by the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, rests on very weak evidence,' he continued.
'Puberty blockers followed by cross-sex hormones compromise fertility and may cause lifelong sexual dysfunction (among other adverse effects); surgeries such as mastectomies remove healthy tissue and carry known risks of complications. Medical procedures always have downsides, but in this case no reliable research indicates that these treatments are beneficial to minors' mental health.'
Byrne, who described himself as 'hardly a fan of the current administration' and noted he'd never voted Republican, insisted the HHS' Gender Dysphoria Report wasn't 'written by zealots busily grinding axes'.
AP
Among the transgender interventions in children that were scrutinized in the HHS report included the use of puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgeries.
The report, which is still undergoing a peer-review, fueled immediate outrage among liberals and trans activists when it was published.
Byrne acknowledged much of the fury stemmed from the authors remaining anonymous — a move he said was made amid fears of 'personal attacks or professional penalties' given the divisive nature of the gender dysphoria treatments debate.
He was adamant though that the cohort could 'produce a rigorous, well-argued document' given the wide-ranging expertise of those involved — including experts in endocrinology, psychiatry, health policy and general medicine.
'The hostile response to the review by medical groups and practitioners underscores why it was necessary. Medicalized treatment for pediatric gender dysphoria needs to be dispassionately scrutinized like any other area of medicine, no matter which side of the aisle is cheering it on. But in the United States, it has not been,' he said.
'It deserves to be read by people of all political leanings. Whether its early critics bothered to do so is unclear.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Hampshire lawmakers give final approval to gender-affirming care ban
New Hampshire lawmakers give final approval to gender-affirming care ban

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

New Hampshire lawmakers give final approval to gender-affirming care ban

New Hampshire lawmakers on Thursday gave final approval to bills that would ban gender-affirming care for transgender minors in the state, sending the measures to Republican Gov. Kelly Ayotte, who has not yet said whether she will sign them. State lawmakers voted to pass House Bill 377, which would prohibit doctors from administering puberty blockers and hormones to transgender youth beginning next year. The measure includes a 'grandfather clause' that would allow minors already receiving care to continue doing so even after the law takes effect. The state House voted 202-161 in favor of the bill, with two Democrats, state Reps. Dale Girard and Jonah Wheeler, siding with Republicans. New Hampshire senators approved the bill Thursday in a 16-8 party-line vote. Lawmakers also voted to send House Bill 712 to Ayotte's desk. That measure, which builds on an existing law banning gender-affirming genital surgeries for minors, would bar children and teens under 18 from accessing additional surgical procedures when they are used to treat gender dysphoria, including facial feminization or masculinization surgery and what the bill calls 'transgender chest surgery.' It passed the House Thursday in a vote 191-163, with Wheeler again siding with Republicans to advance the measure. The state Senate passed the bill in another party-line vote. Passage of the bills, which, if signed, would make New Hampshire the first northeastern state to ban transition-related care for minors, comes roughly a week after the Supreme Court upheld a Tennessee law similarly preventing trans youth from being prescribed puberty blockers and hormones. Surgery for minors was not at issue before the court. New Hampshire state Rep. Lisa Mazur, a Republican and the prime sponsor of both bills, referenced the court's decision Thursday in her defense of the measures. 'It is now legal and constitutional for states to regulate and or ban the use of these harmful drugs in minors,' she said, the Boston Globe reported. Ayotte, a former U.S. senator who won New Hampshire's gubernatorial election in November, has not publicly said whether she plans to sign either bill, both of which were priorities for the state's Republican-led Legislature this session. Also headed to Ayotte's desk is House Bill 148, which would roll back some anti-discrimination protections for transgender people that the Legislature adopted in 2018. Her predecessor, Republican former Gov. Chris Sununu, vetoed a similar bill last year.

‘Obliteration' or not, House Republicans argue Iran strikes were a diplomatic win
‘Obliteration' or not, House Republicans argue Iran strikes were a diplomatic win

Politico

time12 minutes ago

  • Politico

‘Obliteration' or not, House Republicans argue Iran strikes were a diplomatic win

House Republicans have a new message about U.S. airstrikes on Iran: It matters less about how much damage was done, and more that it succeeded in bringing a badly weakened Tehran back to the negotiating table. Several GOP lawmakers hammered that message Friday morning as they left a classified briefing by some of President Donald Trump's top military and intelligence officials on last weekend's surprise U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. It marked a small but notable pivot for supporters of Trump's policy agenda who have struggled in recent days to back up his repeated claims that Iran's nuclear program has been 'obliterated.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers in the briefing that the objective of the strikes was to bring Iran to the negotiating table, according to two attendees. Iran and Israel reached a ceasefire Monday and Trump said Wednesday that new talks with Iran are planned for next week. While many GOP senators who received a similar briefing Thursday were left dancing around Trump's maximalist portrayal of the strikes' long-term impact, House leadership on Friday made a concerted effort to frame the success of the mission as hinging on more than just damage assessments. 'I think the greatest evidence that we have of the effectiveness of this mission was that Iran came immediately and was willing to engage in a ceasefire agreement that would have been unthinkable just a few weeks back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters after the briefing. Johnson, like other Republicans, also insisted the strike resulted in a 'substantial setback' for Iran's nuclear program. The readout for lawmakers came days after the leak of a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency assessment suggesting U.S. airstrikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by a few months. That set off a scramble by Trump, Rubio, Defense Secretary Hegseth and other senior Cabinet officials to push out new intelligence combating the DIA report, which the Pentagon intelligence agency said was a preliminary and low-confidence assessment. Hegseth has said the FBI and Pentagon are probing the leak. Several Republicans exiting the briefing — and at least one of the briefers inside the closed-door meeting — suggested that the exact description of the damage was immaterial. Iran had received a harsh message that any attempt to build a nuclear weapon would be met with force.'Regardless of whether you believe the leaked assessment — which was a 'low-confidence' assessment — the U.S. was able to go in there without any resistance and strike whatever it wanted to,' said House Armed Services Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) 'So even if you believe that worst case scenario and we need to go back in there, we can.' Rep. Darell Issa (R-Calif.), a House Foreign Affairs Committee member, added that the strikes instilled in Iran that there was a 'price to pay for continuing to enrich [uranium] beyond the 60 percent threshold.' But some Democrats emerged from the briefing with lingering questions about how effective the attack was at halting Iran's nuclear ambitions — and preventing a future conflict from reigniting. 'I'm walking out of this thinking we still don't know,' said Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee. 'The contradictions within the intelligence have still not been resolved.' 'We've got a cornucopia of adjectives ranging from 'obliterated' to 'destroyed' to 'set back',' said top Intelligence Committee Democrat Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.). 'The question is, did we significantly set back that program? And we still don't have a good answer to that question.' Himes also cast doubt on the idea that the strikes had paved the way for a diplomatic breakthrough acceptable to Israel, given that they had been 'browbeaten' by the U.S. into the ceasefire. 'If you're the Israelis and you suspect that we didn't get it all, or that there's not going to be a negotiation, you've got a tough conversation with the president of the United States,' Himes said. Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) suggested that Trump's declaration of the strikes' success early on may have been bravado — because Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine said at a news briefing just after the strikes that the full damage assessment would take time. 'You don't have to read classified material to know he overstated,' Quigley said. 'It's dangerous to overstate, because you need to know what the risks are, because you've got to face the risk — the risk that exists, not what you want the risk to be.' The two classified sessions featured the same cadre of briefers: Hegseth, Rubio, Caine and CIA director John Ratcliffe. For the second time in two days, that meant Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was noticeably missing from the conversation. Gabbard has been sidelined amid Israel's conflict with Iran and has reportedly clashed with Trump. Asked about the absence of the notional top spy in the U.S. intelligence community, Himes described it as 'very peculiar.' Still, some Republicans downplayed the significance. 'I'm not sure that's really meaningful. I think we got the information that we needed to get from the people most directly involved,' said Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), an Intelligence Committee member. Both Thursday and Friday's sessions also came after days of complaints from lawmakers that they weren't kept in the loop about the weekend's surprise attack on Iranian nuclear sites at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. The mission involved seven B-2 stealth aircraft and a guided missile submarine, and marked the first combat use ever of the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker busting bomb, with 14 dropped on the Fordo facility and other sites. But many Democrats argue the strikes, which Congress didn't vote to authorize, amounted to an unconstitutional overreach by Trump. House and Senate Democrats are now pushing war powers legislation that would prohibit Trump from taking further military action against Iran without congressional approval. The Senate plans to vote Friday evening on Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution to rein in Trump's war powers on Iran, but that measure is almost certain to fail unless Republicans break ranks with the administration. Libertarian Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) filed his own war powers resolution and criticized Trump's decision to strike Iran as unconstitutional — which made him a target for Trump — but stood down from forcing a vote after Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire. Progressives and top national security Democrats, though, are still pushing for a vote in the coming weeks.

Trump says he's "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately"
Trump says he's "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately"

CBS News

time14 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Trump says he's "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately"

Fed Chair testifies that tariffs could drive up inflation, which is why rates were held steady President Trump says he's "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately," after Canada announced a digital services tax on large foreign and domestic technology companies. Posting on Truth Social Friday afternoon, the president said the U.S. will let Canada know what their tariff rate will be in the next week. The trade talks blowup comes only a week after the president met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the Group of Seven economic summit in Alberta. "We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country," the president wrote. They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also. Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately." The post came shortly after Mr. Trump told reporters in a press conference at the White House that he will soon be sending letters to countries with whom trade talks aren't going well, and tell them what their tariff rate is. Canada is one of the United States' biggest trading partners. The U.S. has imposed tariffs on most imports from Canada, and Canada has hit back with tariffs on U.S. exports to Canada.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store