Government should combat 'smear campaigns' against OTB
Members of the cross-party Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee called for the move after publishing their pre-legislative report on the bill.
Among the document's 17 recommendations - which are based on meetings with relevant organisations and individuals over recent weeks - are that:
The bill should include a ban on both services and goods from the occupied territories.
"Potential legal challenges" should "not be used as grounds for diluting the legislation".
A "clear timeline" should be published for when the bill will become law.
The Government should encourage "like-minded" EU member states to draw up similar legislation.
The Government should "undertake efforts to establish and publish a range of likely scenarios" to help businesses to cope with any possible financial difficulties.
However, the report also states that politicians should work "closely with businesses in combating misinformation about the proposed bill".
"The committee recommends that the Government continues to engage in proactive diplomacy at EU, UN and US levels, with a public communications campaign to inform the public and international observers of the relevant facts of the legislation and to address any misinformation or misconceptions."
Committee chair John Lahart referred to recent "outdated tropes" made against Ireland due to the Occupied Territories Bill, including the US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee's claim that Ireland should "sober up" in relation to the legislation.
The Fianna Fáil TD said those comments were designed to "bully" and "press buttons", and that they need to be "faced down" by Ireland, saying that ambassadors, diplomats and other officials globally are watching what happens with the bill.
Social Democrats senator Patricia Stephenson said there has been "escalation" of "misinformation" in relation to the bill in recent weeks, a view shared by a number of other committee members.
Committee members confirmed that there was no disagreement over the final recommendations of the report, and that this was in part due to what they described as the changing atmosphere around the scenes in Gaza across all sides of the political spectrum.
Independent senator Alice Mary Higgins said the report's recommendations are "very clear" on the need to include services as well as goods in any bill, while Labour TD Duncan Smith said the report sends "a very strong message" to Government.
Committee members said at a press conference that any future Government version of the bill that does not include services would need to provide evidence that is stronger than what was provided to them in hearings.
Independent senator Frances Black - who published the original version of the bill in 2018 - said the report publication is "a hugely important step" and that "the services issue is crucial".
Senator Black said, "The committee is saying we want this, we want to do it right", and that any attempts at "scaremongering" should not take away from the fact Ireland would be "the first country to lead on this".
She added that Ireland has led on similar international issues in the past, including against the apartheid regime in South Africa in the 1980s, and needed to do so again now.
The committee's report has now been sent to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for further examination.
While Government has promised to fast-track the bill, the Dáil's summer recess means no decision will be made until the Oireachtas returns in September, at the earliest.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
The money candidates for President can claim back in expenses is going up by €50,000
THE VALUE OF election campaign expenses that candidates running to be President of Ireland can claim back is increasing by €50,000. The maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election is rising from the previous amount of €200,000 up to €250,000. Election expenses are reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election if the candidate is either elected or receives enough votes to reach more than one-quarter of the quota. Advertisement Minister for Local Government James Browne signed an order today bringing the change into effect. A statement released by his department this evening said that the change was made under ministerial powers to adjust the maximum value of expenses alongside inflation. 'Applying the Consumer Price Index increase since the amount was last revised resulted in a potential increase to €252,700, which has been rounded down to €250,000,' the statement said. Under the Electoral Act 1997, a candidate in a presidential election is not allowed to spend more than €750,000 in total on their campaign. As President Michael D. Higgins is reaching the end of his term, an election for his successor must be held by 11 November. Related Reads Labour Party throws support behind Catherine Connolly as Left unity candidate for president Fianna Fáil staying schtum on presidential candidate, but here's the names in the mix (so far) A date has not been formally set yet but there's plenty of talk in political circles about who the candidates will be. So far, two candidates with enough support to be on the ballot have formally declared themselves: Former EU Commissioner Mairéad McGuinness for Fine Gael and Independent TD Catherine Connolly, who is jointly backed by the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and Labour as a left-wing candidate. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Here's where Ireland is opening five new embassies and consulates around the world
THE DEPARTMENT OF Foreign Affairs is opening five new embassies and consulates across the world as part of diplomatic missions seeking to expand Ireland's footprint. Embassies will be opening in Belgrade, Serbia as well as Chisinau in Moldova and Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In a statement, Tánaiste Simon Harris said the new embassies show Ireland's 'commitment to EU enlargement', as it takes up the presidency of the European Union in the second half of 2026. 'Our expanded presence in the Western Balkans and Eastern Neighbourhood will reinforce links with countries who look to Ireland as an example of how a country can benefit from, and contribute to, the European Union' The missions will begin operations in the autumn. In addition to the embassies, two new consulates will open – one in Málaga, Spain and one in Melbourne, Australia. Advertisement Consulates are offices that support the embassy in that country. The Tánaiste said these will deliver services to the growing Irish diaspora and holiday makers in both regions. Both are due to become operational in 2026. 'Taken together, and with the mission already opened as part of the Global Ireland strategy, these five new missions will further strengthen Ireland's global presence and influence,' Harris said. Under Global Ireland 2025 – a whole government strategy with the aim of doubling Ireland's influence and footprint – there have been 22 missions opened to date. These include embassies in Kyiv, Rabat, Wellington, Bogotá, Amman, Monrovia, Santiago de Chile, Tehran, Manila, Dakar, and Islamabad. Consulates general have been opened in Vancouver, Mumbai, Frankfurt, Los Angeles, Cardiff, Manchester, Lyon, Miami, Toronto, Milan, and Munich. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump claims victory on trade - but EU had little choice
In many respects US President Donald Trump achieved his aims by introducing a swath of tariffs with America's main trading partners around the world. The European Union has a population of 448 million compared to the US which has 340 million. However, the US economy is larger. Many have been surprised at the way Donald Trump has appeared to be able to dictate terms to Europe. His announcement yesterday that he would commence the new tariff arrangements from 7 August appeared to be his decision with little input from the EU. President of the European Commission Ursula Von Der Leyen has defended the deal, which will see tariffs of 15% imposed on EU goods. There are two reasons why the EU did not want a full blown trade war with Mr Trump. Firstly, European businesses were opposed to a prolonged period of tit-for-tat tariffs with enormously damaging consequences. Secondly, if relations with Mr Trump soured, he could threaten to row back on defence commitments. The EU is highly reliant on the US for arm supplies, funding for NATO and military support for Ukraine. But looking at scale of tariffs imposed on other countries the EU's 15% does not seem too damaging compared to India's 25%, Canada's 35% and Switzerland's 39%. Most of the US' main trading partners have rates of 15% or 20%. The exception is the UK's 10% tariff. However, this is not an all-inclusive rate. In other words, other rates can be added to it. Nor does Britain have a written agreement capping pharmaceutical tariffs unlike the EU. It is worth bearing in mind that while tariffs on European goods go up, Mr Trump stated the EU would be "opening up their countries at zero tariffs" for US exports. Unanswered questions From the Irish point of view there are still many unanswered questions. There is no agreement on alcohol exports to the US. That sector was expected to be covered by a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement but that has not yet been confirmed. This is critical for Ireland's whiskey industry and the EU's wine exports. It seems clear that pharmaceuticals and computer chips will face tariffs of up to 15%, but the timing is still uncertain. Both are subject of so-called Section 232 investigations because Mr Trump believes the US' use of imports is a national security issue. Tánaiste Simon Harris said the tariffs for sectors under investigation will not become clear until those processes are concluded. For pharmaceuticals that is expected to happen in two weeks. But the fact that the EU-US agreement won't exceed 15% does provide some clarity for the industry. Bank of Ireland pointed out that drugs are relatively inelastic, which means if prices go up people still buy them because they are prescribed by doctors. The new swath of tariffs come at a time when the dollar has been weakening and making EU exports to the US more expensive at the worst possible time. Then there is the question of what this all means for the Irish economy. In March, the Department of Finance and the Economic Social Research Institute published research on the impact of tariffs on the Irish economy. It looks at a range of scenarios from tariffs of 10% to 25%. Based on that analysis, officials at the Department of Finance told business leaders yesterday that the economy would continue to expand, but at a slower pace than previously expected. Employment will grow but at a slower rate. The Government will now have to decide how all this will impact the Budget in October. But while Mr Trump may believe he has achieved his aims on tariffs, in the long run his actions carry the risk of higher inflation in the US and undermining the American economy.
